Half of butterfly species in long-term decline
The monitoring scheme by the charity Butterfly Conservation, the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) has been running since 1976. Volunteers count butterflies across more than 3,000 sites.The monitoring revealed 51 of the UK's 59 butterfly species declined last year compared with 2023, while just six increased.It was the second worst year on record for common butterflies that live in gardens, parks and the wider countryside.Experts said that butterfly numbers do vary from year to year. Last year's low numbers are partly because of the wet spring and relatively cool summer, which did not provide good conditions for winged insects to feed and breed.But the monitoring data also shows that for the first time, more than half of the UK's butterfly species are in long-term decline.
The number of Small Tortoiseshell, for example, has gone down 86% since 1976, and the Green-veined White has seen a 28% decline.Habitat destruction, use of pesticides and climate change are some of the reasons blamed for the decline. Several species are listed on the red list, which means they are in danger of extinction. These include the Grizzled Skipper, Small Pearl-bordered Fritillary and Chalk Hill Blue.Conservationists said those species required specific habitat to survive, which had been destroyed over the past century.A 'butterfly emergency' was declared after the low results of the citizen science Big Butterfly Count last year.Richard Fox from Butterfly Conservation said many people since then have been asking what they can do to help.The organisation is calling on people to not cut their grass between April and September, saying this simple act can make a lot of difference to moths, butterflies and other wildlife."By far the best thing we can do to help butterflies is to create more habitat," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm naming my baby after an animal but people say it sounds irritating'
A mum has been urged to reconsider the name she's chosen for her son, as not only is she naming him after an animal, but people also say it sounds 'irritating' Everyone has different tastes when it comes to baby names, and no matter what name you choose for your little one, you're bound to find some people who don't think you've made the right decision. Not only is there a divide in preference when it comes to classic names versus unique ones, but there are also differences in opinion over what syllables sound nice together and whether a given name "fits" with the baby's surname. One mum is finding out the hard way that it's sometimes best to keep your chosen baby name to yourself, as she's been told to reconsider naming her child after an animal. The mum believes the moniker is perfect for her baby boy due in January, but said one person in her family has even "begged" her to change her mind. In a post on Reddit, the mum claimed she and her husband were planning on naming their child "Badger". She said her husband's initials are "BAJ", and she initially wanted to give her son the same name, making him "BAJ Jr". The couple would then call him "Badger" for short, but the dad isn't keen on naming his son after him, so wants to just call him "Badger" as his legal first name. The mum wrote: "Why are boy names so hard? I had my girl names picked out already, and they're old-fashioned and very pretty. But the only boy's name my husband and I can agree on is Badger. Hear me out. "My husband's initials are BAJ (he's also named after his great-grandfather). I just wanted to name the baby BAJ Jr. and call him Badger as a nickname, but my husband thinks it's weird to name a baby after himself. He just wants the baby's name to be Badger." Since telling some of her friends and family about it, the mum has received some "mixed reactions". Some don't mind the name at all, but one person in particular has said they hate it so much that they have "begged" her to change it. She added: "I have gotten mixed reactions to this. Some people love it, but one person in particular hated it and begged us not to name our child Badger. I don't think it's as crazy as naming a kid Fox or Bear (which I have seen happen!) "Tell me! Is Badger too weird? Let me know now before it's too late!" Commenters on the post were quick to tell the mum that they weren't keen on Badger as a name. Many pointed out that not only is a badger a mammal, but it's also a verb meaning "to pester" someone. One person stated: "I wouldn't do it. The verb 'to badger' means to pester or harass someone persistently. It implies a relentless and annoying effort to persuade or convince someone, often to the point of irritation." Another added: "Badger is a very, very weird choice. I suppose it will be easy to pronounce and spell but in addition to the animal, it means 'to pester'. Cannot recommend." While a third posted: "I am SHOCKED that you've received mixed reactions and not 100% negative." One commenter also noted that the "old English" for badger is "Brock", which several people suggested would be a better name than Badger. Someone replied: "Brock Andrew for a legal name and Badger as a nickname for now. He can decide what he wants when he's older."
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
Country diary: A flash of tomato-red among the green
This has been a better year for insects in Dorset. Last year there were hardly any in the garden; this summer the long grass on the lawn is zizzing with grasshoppers. Butterflies and moths are more evident too. In a bright flutter of tomato-red wings, the first of this year's Jersey tiger moths appears. It settles momentarily in the lower leaves of a sycamore tree, folding away its brilliant hindwings under cream and black tiger-striped forewings. Only the furry orange tip of its abdomen hints at the vibrant colour concealed beneath, reserved as a warning to flash at predators. Once restricted to the Channel Islands and continental Europe, hence the name, this beautiful species (Euplagia quadripunctaria) has spread gradually along the south coast from Devon and Dorset. It's now found all through the south of England and Wales, becoming relatively common in London and up into Bedfordshire. Butterfly Conservation cites its spread as an indicator of the impact of global heating, a harbinger of how the range of moth and butterfly species in the UK is changing. The spiky-haired caterpillars rely on a variety of plants classified as weeds, including nettle, dandelion, plantain, bramble and ground ivy. Larvae hatch in September and feed until the spring, their bristles gradually changing colour with each moult from brown to ginger. Their generalist diet means they are not reliant on one specific plant species, which is an advantage during winter when food is scarcer. The trend for warmer winters has increased the amount of greenery to be found, and this could be a significant factor in their movement north. Jersey tigers fly by day as well as at night, which makes them more noticeable. Gardens offer an ideal habitat, with a varied mix of foliage in a relatively small area, especially when overgrown, giving the tigers a chance to lurk in the undergrowth. A little untidiness helps them thrive at all life stages, with larvae pupating on the ground in silk cocoons among leaf litter. The two moths I have seen so far were in gardens that were nicely unkempt, their hedges twined through with honeysuckle and the magenta flowers of perennial pea. Under the Changing Skies: The Best of the Guardian's Country Diary, 2018-2024 is published by Guardian Faber; order at and get a 15% discount
Edinburgh Reporter
6 days ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Council advised of significant RAAC costs in low-rise block in Leith
The council has been warned that it faces potentially serious costs for new repairs to a low-rise block in Leith. There are questions over the reason for delays in the council acting on reports of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in a Leith low-rise block. The City of Edinburgh Council carried out a survey of RAAC in buildings where it owns homes in 2024 – but officers say a report of the compound in the roof of a block with council flats was missed. According to a report set to be considered by Edinburgh councillors next Tuesday, the city failed to follow up with a homeowner who raised the issue – meaning the block's roof was never investigated. The report details how a homeowner made the report last year, and followed up in May 2025 after the city offered to buy 17 flats in buildings with council tenants to make costly repairs. The council is now reinvestigating the presence of RAAC across the entirety of the council's housing stock, including all flat blocks with flat roofs. RAAC is believed to be present in at least two blocks in Leith, and council officers think it could be present in six other blocks. According to the report, the council may face a 'significant financial impact' alongside owners of flats in RAAC-affected buildings, and that costs of fixing it are unbudgeted. Additionally, it says that the council will be unable to cost any repairs until the two investigation efforts are completed. Officers will investigate blocks built by the same architect as the two affected blocks in Leith to check if they have the compound. In addition to those checks, officers will also look at data for all low-rise council blocks in the city in order to exclude buildings from checks where the presence of RAAC is impossible. This includes buildings constructed before RAAC was used in the UK construction industry. Officers say the timeline for this analysis will be subject to 'the scope and investigation and extent of the findings.' Green councillor Alys Mumford said she is concerned about the lack of follow-up, and said Green councillors will be asking questions of officers at the meeting. Cllr Mumford said: 'We're pleased that Council officers are taking this seriously, and would like to thank the homeowner for continuing to raise the issue so that we can make sure all council tenants are protected from any potential RAAC issues. 'This is not the first time we have heard of residents' significant concerns not being acted upon, and so of course at the Committee meeting we will be asking questions about the delay in responding when this was first raised, and if any changes need to be implemented in Council processes to ensure that this doesn't happen again. 'While we're hopeful that the re-investigation won't turn up any further instances of RACC, we think it is absolutely right to be doing a second, thorough, process to protect our residents.' The report also said repair costs in each of the two affected flat blocks in Leith will be subject to discussions between homeowners in each of them. RAAC was a building material often used in the construction of publicly-owned buildings in the UK up to the 1990s. It was popular for its low cost, low weight and fire resistance, but it can fail if it comes into contact with water for extended periods of time. Several council primary and secondary schools are affected by RAAC, as well as the Blackhall Library, which closed temporarily until fixes could be implemented last year. After last year's survey, council officers found that 72 current and former council flats in the city used a certain type of RAAC roof panels, with the council still owning 44. Of the five affected buildings discovered, three were terraced rows of six houses, and two were low-rise apartment blocks. During the works, both council and private residents of the buildings will need to be temporarily moved out. Councillors will consider the report at the next meeting of the Housing, Homelessness and Fair Work Committee on Tuesday, August 12, which you can view here. by Joe Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Edinburgh City Chambers. © 2025 Martin McAdam Like this: Like Related
