Sunk and abandoned boats recovered from river
An operation to recover five boats that had been abandoned by their owners and left to rot and sink in the river as it passes through Bath began in March, but on May 9, was finally completed.
The operation near Pulteney Weir in the town centre was carried out by Bath & North East Somerset Council due to the boats posing a hazard to other users of river and a pollution risk to the water.
The works were part of the Better Moorings Project which seeks to address a range of mooring-related matters in Bath and North East Somerset.
The works were carried out by specialist contractors Strate Marine Services and began on March 15, with the final boat having been removed last week.
Recommended reading:
New tattoo shop opens its doors in Wiltshire town
Major UFO Conference coming to Wiltshire town this year
Historic building to be turned into new Wetherspoons as permission granted
The council announced the removal of the boats in early March, when councillors said the boats had become a hazard in the waterway and threatened the ecology of the area.
The council added that it would be seeking recovery of £72,600 total costs for the removals of the boats once the job had finished.
The council says it is seeking to recover the removal costs from the boat owners, who are encouraged to engage with the council at their earliest convenience to minimise additional storage costs.
One of the wrecks now recovered from the River Avon. (Image: BANES Council.) Mooring in the Pulteney stretch of the River Avon remains closed due to health and safety concerns. All boat owners moored in the area have been advised of the risks and were encouraged to vacate the area prior to the winter.
Councillor Tim Ball, cabinet member for Neighbourhood Services, said: 'These five boats have been an issue for some time and it's fantastic that the removal operation has been completed. Thank you to residents and businesses in the area for your patience while the works were carried out and to Strate Marine Services and our Better Moorings team, who all worked tirelessly to achieve this positive outcome.
'The removals will ensure the safety of all river users and enhance everyone's enjoyment of this iconic waterway, whilst reducing the levels of artificial waste in the river.
'We advise boat owners to safely moor at recognised and officially open mooring sites, monitor their moorings regularly throughout the winter season, ensure their boats are fit for the water and are fully insured inclusive of salvage.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Historian finds 17th century will which sparked Shakespeare family row
A 17th century will which sparked a family row over William Shakespeare's grand Stratford-upon-Avon home has been found. The document, drawn up by Thomas Nash on August 25 1642, was discovered Dr Dan Gosling, a historian at The National Archives, who was looking through unlisted boxes containing hundreds of deeds. Dr Gosling said he is 'confident' that no one had seen the will in 150 years as it was filed away in the late 19th century. He added that it shows how the execution of Shakespeare's will 'wasn't entirely smooth sailing'. Nash was married to Shakespeare's granddaughter Elizabeth Hall and living in New Place – then The Bard's family residence and the second-largest house in the Warwickshire town. But Nash left the property to his cousin Edward – despite having no right to do so. The house had already been left by Shakespeare to his eldest daughter, Susanna, who was alive and living there with Nash and Elizabeth, who was her daughter. When Nash died in 1647, Susanna and Elizabeth obtained a legal document confirming that they still held Shakespeare's estates. Edward Nash hauled Elizabeth into court the following year, arguing she respect Nash's wishes. The case landed in the Court of Chancery – where Elizabeth argued that her late husband had no power to grant Shakespeare's home and mentioned her grandfather's bequest to her mother. Elizabeth, who later became Lady Barnard, is believed to have settled the matter out of court and lived in the residence until her death in 1670, Dr Gosling said. Dr Gosling told the PA news agency: 'My initial immediate reaction when I found it was, 'oh, this is interesting', but I got really excited when I started to read about it and how it tied into the Chancery case, how it tied into the Shakespeare family and the last of Shakespeare's direct descendants.'
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Government's GCSE English and maths resits policy ‘not fit for purpose'
The Government's policy of making students resit maths and English GCSEs is 'not fit for purpose' and it can undermine young people's 'confidence and motivation', education leaders have warned. Politicians have been urged to 'rethink' how young people are encouraged to gain English and maths skills after the number of post-16 students taking GCSE resits in the two subjects increased this year. The rise in young people resitting their exams is partly down to a growing number of teenagers in the population, as well as the return to pre-pandemic grading standards in England in 2023, the Ofqual chief has suggested. In England, many students who do not secure at least a grade 4 – which is considered a 'standard pass' – in English and/or maths GCSE are required to retake the subjects during post-16 education. The proportion of 16-year-old entries in England securing at least a grade 4 in English language has dropped from 71.2% last year to 70.6% this year – although it is above the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when the figure was 70.5%. In maths, the proportion of 16-year-old entries in England securing at least a grade 4 has fallen from 72.0% in 2024 to 71.9% this year, though this is higher than 71.5% in 2019. Students in England are funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve a GCSE grade 9 to 4. For students with a grade 2 or below, they can either study towards a pass in functional skills level 2 or towards a GCSE grade 9 to 4. PA news agency analysis of figures by Ofqual suggests that 183,450 16-year-olds in England did not achieve a grade 4 or above in English language this year, 1,770 more than in 2024. In maths, it is likely that 174,930 16-year-olds did not achieve a grade 4 or above, 970 fewer than last year. The Government launched a curriculum and assessment review last summer. Ahead of the review's final report, which is due in the autumn, education leaders have called on policymakers to look again at the GCSE resits policy. The Education Secretary has said the review will look at how to support young people who do not achieve the 'right level' in maths and English at GCSE. Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'Once again we see that the majority of students who retake GCSE English and maths in post-16 education under a Government policy of mandatory resits continue to fall short of a grade 4 standard pass. 'It is utterly demoralising for these young people and there has to be a better way of supporting literacy and numeracy. 'We urge the curriculum and assessment review to grasp this nettle.' Catherine Sezen, director of education policy at the Association of Colleges (AoC), said: 'Across the country, educators are working hard to improve outcomes, yet many are left asking what more can be done. 'After a decade of the condition of funding policy, it is time to rethink how we support young people to build essential English and maths skills.' She added that the AoC is calling for 'a more flexible, evidence-based approach' which empowers colleges to meet learners' needs 'without relying on repeated resits that can undermine confidence and motivation'. Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the NAHT school leaders' union, said the current GCSE resit policy was 'not fit for purpose'. He said: 'NAHT has long called for reform of the current policy that forces students into repeated resits, which is demotivating and ineffective. 'What is needed are more appropriate and engaging alternatives to GCSEs in English and maths at KS4. 'Post-16 students who need to continue the subjects must be allowed to study for qualifications that suit their needs and ambitions, rather than defaulting to GCSE resits.' Jill Duffy, chief executive of the OCR exam board, added that Thursday's figures showed a 'resit crisis. She said: 'Tinkering at the edges of policy won't fix this. We need fundamental reform to maths and English secondary education – especially at Key Stage 3 – to support those who fall behind in these crucial subjects.' UK GCSE entries for students aged 17 and over has risen by 12.1% compared with last year. On the rise in the number of post-16 students taking resits, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at England's exams regulator Ofqual, said it was linked with the 'rising demographic trend'. He told PA: 'If you've got a larger cohort – and proportions getting a grade four are broadly stable – you're going to see more people coming through to resit. 'But the reset of normal grading standards in 2023 probably also plays into it as well.' Sir Ian said: 'My view is that the Government's policy that students continue to study English and maths post-16 if they haven't reached that critical grade four threshold is the right thing to do. 'The policy is not that students do multiple resets. The policy is that they continue to study English and maths and sit, when appropriate, either for GCSE or for a functional skills qualification.' Speaking to PA earlier this month, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The curriculum and assessment review is looking at how best we can support 16 to 19-year-olds who don't achieve the right level in maths and English. 'Of course I do want more students – particularly from less well-off backgrounds – to get a good pass at GCSE in English and maths because that's the gateway to so much more. 'But the curriculum and assessment review is going to look at the approach we will take in the years to come.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
GCSE gender gap at narrowest point this century
The gap in GCSE results between boys and girls is now at its narrowest point this century. While girls are still outperforming their male classmates in terms of both top grades and reaching at least a 4/C, their results dropped slightly this year. The narrowing of the gender gap could be down to a combination of reasons, including societal pressures on girls and the continuing impact of the pandemic, education experts suggested. Overall, nearly a quarter (24.5%) of girls' GCSE entries were awarded at least a grade 7/A compared to almost a fifth of boys' entries (19.4%): a 5.1 percentage point gap, according to figures published by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ). Last year, 24.7% of girls' entries scored one of the top grades, compared to 19.0% of those from boys: a 5.7 percentage point gap. This is the narrowest lead enjoyed by girls since at least 2000, which is the earliest archive data available. Meanwhile, 70.5% of girls' GCSE entries were awarded at least a grade 4/C compared to 64.3% of boys' entries – a 6.2 percentage point gap – again the smallest gap in 25 years. In 2024, 71.0% of girls' entries scored at least a grade 4/C, against 64.2% of boys' – a gap of 6.8 percentage points. Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'While we're pleased that boys' GCSE outcomes have improved this year, it is obviously not such good news that girls' outcomes have slightly fallen. 'It is hard to say why this might be the case, and we would welcome further research to identify the factors involved. 'We do know that there are significant pressures on adolescent girls because of wider societal issues around idealised and misogynistic online content and its real-world consequences. 'It would not be surprising if the resulting stress and anxiety impacted on academic performance. 'However, girls continue to outperform boys at GCSE and we also need to deal with the issue of how we improve the aspirations of some groups of boys who currently struggle in the education system.' Jon Andrews, head of analysis and director for school system and performance at the Education Policy Institute (EPI) said: 'As expected, the overall grade distribution for this year is similar to what we have seen in each of the last two years. 'But what is notable is that, while girls continue to outperform boys, the gap continues to close. Our previous analysis showed that girls' outcomes were particularly affected by the pandemic, and there are worrying trends around girls' wellbeing.' A report published by the EPI last year found a narrowing of the gap in reading attainment among primary school boys and girls. While girls remained ahead, their outcomes were the same as before the pandemic, while there was an improvement in boys' reading. Among secondary school pupils, the research found a similar picture – with outcomes for girls falling, while those for their male peers remained largely the same. Ofqual chief Sir Ian Bauckham told PA: 'It has been observed that the gender gap is now at a lower level than it has been for the last 20 years or so, which I think broadly speaking should be taken as good news because a gap in the performance of girls and boys is clearly not something that should be seen as desirable at all. 'As to the reasons why we see these long-term changes, I think it's much harder to be certain. I think there are probably lots of reasons contributing to it. 'It may be different trends that have arisen as a result of the return to normal after the pandemic, but it may be wider social factors as well.'
