logo
"Dangerous": Congress Slams Poll Body's Intensive Revision Of Electoral Rolls In Bihar

"Dangerous": Congress Slams Poll Body's Intensive Revision Of Electoral Rolls In Bihar

NDTV21 hours ago

Patna:
The Congress party has strongly opposed the Election Commission of India's decision to undertake a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the upcoming 2025 Assembly elections, calling the move an "explicit admission" that the country's electoral rolls are flawed.
In a statement, the party said: "This notification is a clear, explicit admission by the Election Commission that all is not well with India's electoral rolls, precisely what the Congress party and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi have been flagging repeatedly, especially in Maharashtra."
The Congress termed the SIR a "devious and dubious idea disguised as a solution."
It alleged that the process, which involves government officials visiting every household to verify identity and residential documents before re-enrolling voters, poses a serious threat of disenfranchisement.
"Lakhs of Union and State government officials will now control and dictate who has correct documents and who doesn't. This carries a huge risk of wilful exclusion of voters using the power of the state machinery," the statement warned.
The party further criticised the complex documentation requirements, especially the birth certificates of voters and their parents, calling them "arbitrary, whimsical and onerous" on Bihar's estimated 8.1 crore eligible voters.
The Congress also questioned the EC's abrupt shift in strategy. The party noted that on March 8, 2025, the EC had floated a proposal for electoral roll clean-up using Aadhaar, which, while not perfect, was deemed more viable.
"Why was the Aadhaar-based approach dropped? What changed in just three months for the EC to abandon that and suddenly announce a full-scale SIR in Bihar?" the Congress asked.
With the Assembly elections just months away, the Congress expressed deep suspicion over the timing of the EC's move, especially in light of the Commission's refusal to address the party's concerns about voter roll discrepancies in Maharashtra.
"Given the EC's dogged resistance to our long-pending demands and its dubious actions in the past, there is enough reason to suspect the motives behind the SIR plan in Bihar," the statement added.
The party concluded by stating its firm opposition to the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar, calling it a ploy to discard the current electoral roll and create an entirely new one just before the election.
"We strongly oppose this move not only in Bihar but also in its potential rollout in other states. The integrity of the electoral process must not be compromised under the guise of verification," the statement said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress cut off? White House limits intel sharing after Iran strikes report leak
Congress cut off? White House limits intel sharing after Iran strikes report leak

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Congress cut off? White House limits intel sharing after Iran strikes report leak

The White House is restricting congressional access to classified information after a leak revealed details of US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. This leak, exposing a Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, has sparked outrage and prompted immediate action. The Trump administration will limit intelligence shared on CAPNET, raising concerns about transparency. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Congressional Access to Classified Info Curtailed Classified Channels to Congress Now More Restricted Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Speaker Johnson Blames Congress Without Proof The Leak's Origin Still Unclear FBI Launches Investigation FAQs The White House is tightening its grip on classified information shared with Congress after a leaked report revealed the early damage assessments of recent US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, as per NBC News leak, which exposed a Defense Intelligence Agency finding that Iran's nuclear capabilities may have only been set back by three to six months, has drawn sharp rebuke from both the administration and lawmakers, and now prompted swift action to restrict access to such kind of information, according to the READ: Supreme Court rules in favor of Donald Trump's birthright citizenship proposal The Trump administration will now limit what intelligence appears on CAPNET, the classified communications network used to share sensitive materials with Congress, as reported by NBC News. It's a move that immediately raised concerns about transparency and oversight, especially from Democratic members of Congress, according to the Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that, 'The administration should immediately undo this decision," adding, 'They seem not to want to see the facts to get out. Just Trump's version of the facts, which we know is often false," as quoted by NBC News READ: Pete Hegseth sparks buzz by renaming USNS Harvey Milk after World War II hero Oscar V. Peterson Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson, expressed anger over the leaked reporting of the Defense Intelligence Agency's early assessment of the US strikes on Iran, saying, 'There was a leak, and we're trying to get down to the bottom of that. It's dangerous and ridiculous that happened. We're going to solve that problem, and we'll keep the coordination,' as quoted in the NBC News report. When he was asked if he thought the leak came from Congress, the speaker responded, saying, 'That's my suspicion,' as quoted in the though the Trump administration's crackdown and Johnson's suspicions are on Congress, it's not actually known if the leak came from a member of Congress, as reported by NBC to the report, lawmakers had access to the early assessment about the strikes from the Defense Intelligence Agency and were able to view it in a secure location in the Capitol, known as a SCIF, and then the assessment was sent to leadership through these official the White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News, 'I am told by the FBI the leak already is being investigated, and it absolutely should be because this was a top secret intelligence analysis that very few people in the United States government had access to see,' as quoted by The Hill a secure network the executive branch uses to send classified information to no proof yet. Speaker Johnson suspects it, but investigations are still underway.

Karnataka HC quashes hate speech cases against Bommai
Karnataka HC quashes hate speech cases against Bommai

United News of India

time37 minutes ago

  • United News of India

Karnataka HC quashes hate speech cases against Bommai

Bengaluru, June 27 (UNI) The Karnataka High Court today quashed two criminal cases filed against former Chief Minister and BJP leader Basavaraj Bommai, who was facing charges of promoting enmity between religious groups over remarks made during a political rally against the Waqf Board. The allegations stemmed from a protest rally held by the BJP in November 2024, where Bommai had sharply criticised the Congress-led State government and the Waqf Board. He was reported to have said, "If a stone is thrown in Savanur, wherever it falls, it is Waqf land." The comment was perceived as inflammatory and led to charges under Section 196(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Challenging the FIRs, Bommai moved the High Court seeking quashing of the cases, terming them "politically motivated and legally untenable." Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar, who presided over the matter, ruled in Bommai's favour. 'In light of the vague, bald, omnibus, laconic allegations made in the impugned complaint, coupled with the principles stated by the apex court and this court, the continuation of the proceedings would amount to an abuse of process of law,' the judge said in a strongly-worded order. The Court made it clear that the relief granted would apply solely to Bommai and not to other co-accused in the case, if any. Bommai was represented by Senior Advocate Prabhuling K. Navadgi, with Advocate Shivaparasad Shantanagoudar filing the petitions on his behalf. The verdict is expected to bring significant political relief to the former CM, who has been a vocal critic of what the BJP has called 'discriminatory land policies' allegedly favouring minority institutions under the current government. UNI BDN RN

Big political war over RSS's call to review ‘socialist', ‘secular' in Preamble
Big political war over RSS's call to review ‘socialist', ‘secular' in Preamble

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Big political war over RSS's call to review ‘socialist', ‘secular' in Preamble

The big focus of this episode of 5ive Live is RSS's call to remove 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Constitution's preamble, which has sparked a political controversy. A day after RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale pitched for the removal of the terms 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble of the Constitution, BJP leader and Union Minister Jitendra Singh backed the move. Jitendra Singh said, "I don't think there's any doubt about it. Dattatreya Hosabale has stated that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' were added to our preamble after the 45th amendment... Dr. Ambedkar has crafted one of the world's finest constitutions. If this was not his thinking, then how did someone add these words? "Any right-thinking citizen will endorse it because everyone knows they are not part of the original constitution document, which Dr. Ambedkar and the rest of the committee wrote... It's a matter of preserving democratic and constitutional values, and those violating the constitution are actually the biggest violators." Meanwhile, the Congress and the RJD have slammed the RSS and BJP, stating that RSS never accepted the Constitution.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store