Marsupials are underrated Australian survivors. It's time to get to know them better
Over millions of years, it's lost its eyes, but it is still a fierce hunter.
Even though it has no external ears, it can sense the smallest of movements.
The Anangu people call it "itjaritjari".
When Western scientists first stumbled across the cryptic animal in the 19th century, they dubbed it the "marsupial mole" because it bore a striking resemblance to the "true moles" they knew.
Some even debated whether it was a missing link between mammals and marsupials. Then they discovered it had a pouch.
At the time Notorctes typhlops was described, scientists such as John Gould regarded marsupials as primitive animals.
Just a few years earlier, in 1863, he wrote:
"This is a very low form of animal life, indeed the lowest among the Mammalia."
The subject of his disdain? The majestic kangaroo — and, by extension, all Australasian marsupials.
Marsupials had been respected and understood by Indigenous Australians for tens of thousands of years when Gould penned those words.
Today, many marsupials have become Aussie icons — think kangaroos, koalas and wombats — and have arguably gained more attention than other Australian mammals such as rodents and bats.
Yet our knowledge of this amazing group as a whole — even the popular animals — is still "inadequate", Tim Flannery argues.
Professor Flannery is famous for his work as a climate advocate and director of the Australian Museum, but marsupials have been his passion since the 1980s.
"If you want to know what it really means to be Australian, it pays to give the marsupials a little bit of time," he says.
Today, two-thirds of the world's 300-plus marsupial species are found in Australia.
Their story on this continent starts at least 55 million years ago.
The earliest marsupials were probably like today's bandicoots, small omnivorous creatures that can breed at a rate of knots when conditions are correct, Professor Flannery suggests.
Fossils from the Murgon fossil site in Queensland back him up, revealing ancient bandicoots and tiny climbing creatures that might have looked like today's phascogales.
Their ancestors travelled here across the supercontinent of Gondwana, from what is currently South America through ancient Antarctica until they reached a land bridge that is now Tasmania.
"Australia was still very much a polar environment. Everywhere south of northern New South Wales was all within the Antarctic circle," Professor Flannery explains.
These early marsupials shared their damp polar world with the world's first songbirds and the egg-laying monotremes, which would evolve into today's platypus and echidna.
The "scarce" fossil record also shows bats as well as hints that a few non-marsupial mammals were present on the continent at the same time.
But marsupials may have had an evolutionary advantage over mammals.
Marsupials have it easy in the birthing department compared to placental mammals like us.
They have a super pared-back placenta — so don't nourish their young in their uterus for long. They birth underdeveloped joeys (sometimes the size of a grain of rice) and grow them up externally, usually in a pouch.
When colonial scientists like Gould encountered marsupial reproduction, it was cast as an "intermediate" step between egg-laying monotremes and "high" placental mammals.
In other words, it was thought that mammals evolved from marsupial-like creatures.
And only monotremes — platypus and echidna — were considered lowlier.
This idea was flipped upside-down like a ring-tailed possum on a wire by Heather White in 2023.
Dr White, who is a researcher at London's Natural History Museum, studied ancient skulls, and showed that marsupials evolved from early placental mammals.
This means marsupials are hyper-specialised placental mammals after all. Sorry Gould.
And their pouch may have been the secret to their evolutionary success, Professor Flannery suggests.
Dunnart females are ready to breed at three months old, and have 14-day pregnancies of up to 10 young at once — often from multiple fathers.
When times are hard, they can hit "pause" on their pregnancies.
This "eruptive and rapid" breeding may have given marsupials the edge they needed to cross the ancient polar land bridge from South America to Australia when placental mammals did not.
And sure, there are no marsupials that have flippers like whales or that can fly like bats.
But we should celebrate them for what they can do, says kangaroo fan Vera Weisbecker, who runs the bones and biodiversity lab at Flinders University.
"Kangaroos are the biggest animal to ever hop, ever. This is biomechanically next to impossible at such large sizes," Dr Weisbeker says.
As the continent changed over time, many species adapted to new challenges and habitats.
The ancestors of today's itjaritjari, and its northern cousin the kakarratul (Notoryctes caurinus) as it is known by Ngaanyatjarra communities, appear in the fossil record about 20 million years ago.
These early marsupial moles transformed adaptations used for foraging in soft rainforest to survive in the desert as the continent dried out.
They weren't the only animals to adapt to arid conditions.
Tiny carnivorous desert-dwelling mulgara (Dasycercus sp) produce super-concentrated urine and seemingly get all their moisture from their prey's flesh.
The mainly herbivorous mala (Lagorchestes hirsutus) takes this feat one step further. It can survive in the desert without water or juicy insects, getting all its moisture from plants.
Australia's climate is tough, but Professor Flannery says the real challenge of this continent is the soils.
"The surface layer of the rocks has been leached of all of its nutrients a long time ago, with a few exceptions," he says.
As a result, Professor Flannery believes the capacity of marsupials to survive on "miserable and meagre food" is underrated.
"The good old euro can eat spinifex and survive which is bloody miraculous from a metabolic point of view," he says.
Not all marsupials live in the arid zone.
The cuscus (Spilocuscus maulatus), which is Professor Flannery's favourite underrated marsupial, along with the striped possum (Dactylopsila trivirgata) and tree kangaroos can still be found in pockets of dense rainforests in northern Australia.
Yet despite their tenacity over the past 55 million years, many marsupials are now threatened with extinction.
There are now around 159 marsupial species in Australia — and an estimated 40 per cent of them are threatened.
Since colonisation, 17 Australian marsupial species have disappeared.
This is an extinction rate of nearly 10 per cent — well above the global mammal extinction rate of 1.4 per cent over the same period.
Marsupial moles — the itjaritjari and kakarratul — are rarely seen. Little is known about their range and distribution.
The karkarratul is considered stable, but the itjaritjari is listed as endangered.
Both species face predation by introduced species such as foxes and cats, and changes to their habitat.
Despite being evolutionary wonders, the idea that marsupials are "inferior" to placental mammals still remains today, Professor Flannery says.
Helping turn that notion on its head is Greg Irons, manager of the Bonorong Wildlife Sanctuary in Tasmania.
As a wildlife rescuer, he hears concern about the charismatic cuties such as Tasmanian devils in his home state or bilbies, koalas and numbats on the mainland.
But Mr Irons worries that less famous marsupials blur into "just another hopping thing", when they each have a unique (and underrated) role in the ecosystem.
On mainland Australia, little diggers like bandicoots and bilbies and boodies eat seeds, travel and then disperse those seeds when they come out their back end.
They pockmark arid environments with holes, increasing water penetration after rain and improving conditions for the young plants they help transport.
In Tasmania, bettongs use their pointed snout to root out fungus from the forest floor, scattering spores and spreading fungi that keep forests healthy.
"We've got kids at school that can all tell you what a lion, a tiger, and probably 40 different species of dinosaur are, but they cannot tell you what a bettong is," Mr Irons says.
"Yet this animal could be responsible for the entire communication and health of the forest that allow us to breathe."
Thanks also to Dr Jack Ashby, assistant director of the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge for his input.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
20 hours ago
- ABC News
Researchers study impacts of coral bleaching on Lord Howe Island
Researchers hope studies into the world's most southern coral reef at Lord Howe Island will help experts better understand how marine systems are adapting to changing oceans, and how to protect them. The island's reefs, 600 kilometres from the Australian mainland, are on a boundary line between warm and cool environments. They support a range of marine species found nowhere else in the world. Their remote and southern location, away from stressors which impact other reef systems, means they are an important benchmark site when assessing the wider impact of warmer ocean temperatures. Last February, Lord Howe experienced its most severe coral bleaching event, the fourth and worst recorded there since 1998. Since then, a team of researchers from Sydney's University of NSW (UNSW) and University of Newcastle has been monitoring the recovery of the island's reefs. "We are looking at understudied reef systems … what happens after a bleaching event, how do corals recover?" UNSW PhD candidate Paige Sawyers said. "And are there different tolerances for recovery for different species?" Ms Sawyers has observed the Lord Howe Island reef systems on four visits to the island since the start 2024. She said a low tide anomaly at the island last May left coral exposed and further damaged and stressed the reef system. Ms Sawyers said the reef was showing observational signs of recovery earlier this year, but was experiencing ongoing strain after an "incredibly challenging year". "A lot of the reef was looking OK, unfortunately, the temperatures were higher than normal," she said. "While we didn't reach bleaching thresholds or witness visible bleaching this year, the reef was still under thermal stress. "Sea temperatures remained above the summer average of 24.06 degrees Celsius, sitting between 24 and 25 degrees for around four to five months. She said the prolonged exposure occurred at a critical time when the reef needed to recover. "Instead, what we're seeing is recovery being stalled just when it's most vital," she said. Ms Sawyers said compared with tropical reefs, subtropical reefs such as Lord Howe typically recovered more slowly after bleaching. She has been analysing her findings and said she hoped to visit Lord Howe in the coming months. Lord Howe reef tour operator Dean Hiscox regularly monitors the island's ocean temperatures and coral health. He said he was concerned about the impacts of residents living on the island, particularly on the marine park's water quality. "We really need to get our head around sustainability, and we need some baseline information," he said. Work is underway to gather that information. Lord Howe Island Marine Park managers have been working with researchers from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), Southern Cross University, and the University of NSW to investigate water quality and nutrient levels in the marine park, which can directly impact marine system health. AIMS senior research scientist Shaun Wilson was part of a research trip to the island late last year to try and determine the level and movement of nutrients in the coral lagoon, and whether they were coming from human or natural sources. Dr Wilson said there was evidence modern waste and sewage management had led to a reduction in nutrient levels in parts of the reef. His team hoped to return in the next 12 months to collect more data. "Lord Howe is one of our most temperate reefs," he said. As part her research, Ms Sawyers has also been investigating bleaching and recovery in an understudied tropical reef system in Samoa, where a mass bleaching event also occurred in 2024. "When we went back five months later, they'd [the corals] recovered," she said. Ms Sawyers said she was comparing the Samoan reef's resilience with Lord Howe. "This helps us identify patterns in resilience and recovery. "The findings can then be used to inform predictions and management strategies for other Australian reef systems."

ABC News
21 hours ago
- ABC News
Creatine supplements can be effective but experts warn against gummies and dodgy marketing
"If you have a body you can benefit from it." "If you're not taking it, you're missing out." These are just some of the claims about creatine that social media is awash with. As Brisbane based sports dietitian Taryn Richardson says, "creatine is having a real moment". Hype around taking creatine supplements is at an all-time high and there's never been more product options on the market; from cola gummies to "icy blue razz" powders that are mixed with a drink. Creatine is a compound naturally produced by the body and also found in animal-based products like fish and meat. It's found in most muscles in the body, as well as the brain, and used as a source of energy to allow muscles to flex. Our bodies make around half the creatine we need each day (about 2 to 4 grams) but the rest has to come from the food we eat or supplementation. Creatine is one of the most studied supplements and there is extensive evidence it can support muscle growth and improve athletic performance. Emerging research shows it might even help our brains. But some experts are urging consumers to do some research before they buy. "There's this messaging at the moment that everyone should take creatine supplements no matter who they are and what they're doing, and I really disagree with that," Ms Richardson said. Some brands are selling "premium" types of creatine that don't have adequate scientific backing but customers are paying more for them, according to experts. "Just remember these supplement companies have really good marketing teams," said Professor Matthew Cooke, a nutritionist at La Trobe University, who has done extensive research on creatine. There's also "femvertising" of some products with pretty, pink packaging, collagen add-ins and female-centric marketing, with one US brand even calling themselves "Sheatine". Then there's the gummies. Creatine gummies are advertised as a delicious and easy-to-take option but independent testing has repeatedly shown some contain almost zero creatine. One popular brand sold in Australia called PUSH was forced to halt all sales after testing showed their gummies were significantly underdosed with creatine. Sydney-based personal trainer James Smith was skeptical about the gummy products and whether they met their label claims so he sent nine brands for testing at independent lab Eurofins. All of the testing was made public and only one brand, Wellboost's strawberry banana gummies, contained the advertised 5 grams of creatine. PUSH's strawberry flavour gummies returned a creatine reading of 0.102 grams per serving when it should have been 5 grams. Their apple flavour came in at 0.112 grams. PUSH was charging $59.95 for a 30-day supply. Anaesthetic technician Tina Hill had been taking PUSH gummies for four months before learning they were just "expensive lollies". "I was just throwing money down the drain," she said. Ms Hill said she heard about creatine online and wanted to support her strength training but was also interested in any potential cognitive benefits it could give her. "I saw all of those well-known fitness influencers who had come from a competitive background were promoting PUSH gummies on social media and it seemed reliable," she said. In a statement, PUSH told the ABC it accepted full responsibility for the underdosing and was now suing its former manufacturer. PUSH has accused the manufacturer, which is based in China, of altering the product formula without their knowledge. "Production is now underway with a new Australian based manufacturer to strengthen quality control and prevent issues like this from happening again," PUSH said. "Moving forward every batch of PUSH gummies will be independently tested by Eurofins US." But experts say consumers should avoid all creatine gummies brands for now. "I think these companies have good intentions but it comes down to the production — with the process of making gummies such as heating likely decreasing the levels of creatine," Professor Cooke said. Ms Richardson agreed. "For now I'm telling my clients to stick with powders — they are a lot cheaper anyway," she said. Ms Hill switched to a powder supplement and said she is finally feeling the effects of creatine. "A few weeks in I do feel like I've seen a huge improvement in my fitness levels and just my general wellbeing." Women generally have lower levels of creatine as they tend to get a lower intake through their diet and have lower muscle mass than men, which means they have lower creatine storage. Studies have also shown vegetarians and vegans have lower baseline levels. "A lot of us probably aren't getting enough creatine from our diet as we're heading towards more plant-based diets or at least reducing the amount of meat we eat," Professor Cooke said. Evidence shows creatine supplementation can boost the total creatine in your muscles by around 20 to 40 per cent. Some people do this quickly by starting with a "loading" phase of 20 grams per day for a week and then lowering to 5 grams per day. Loading isn't necessary though, Professor Cooke said, because you get the same results by starting at 5 grams per day, it will just take a bit longer. For most people it will result in more power and strength for explosive bursts of exercise and it improves recovery after exercise-related muscle damage as well as sarcopenia (loss of muscle as we age) if taken in conjunction with resistance training. Recently, researchers started delving deeper into the potential benefits of creatine among women and how it might assist during hormonal fluctuations. During menopause, estrogen and progesterone levels decline significantly which may negatively impact creatine metabolism so supplementation could be beneficial at this time, Professor Cooke said. Research has shown creatine supplementation can help post-menopausal women with physical function when combined with resistance training and now experts want to explore how it might support bone health during perimenopause when bone density starts to decrease. It's early days but research is also suggesting supplementation may benefit pre-menopausal women during their menstrual cycles when there's varying levels of creatine metabolism and fatigue. Some brands are now shamelessly trying to capture the female market by using taglines like "craft your perfect peach" or advertising "creatine for women" when it's exactly the same as the "genderless" creatine on the market. Professor Cooke said some brands may be capitalising on the recent research that's been more focused on women. "I know some marketing will take advantage of this but in the research space it's really great to see this research in the female population." Creatine is mostly stored in muscles but a small amount is also found in the brain and there's evidence it may benefit mood and cognitive function, particularly for those who are sleep deprived. It could even help with recovery from traumatic brain injuries. More high-quality research is needed but some studies show it could potentially help people with Alzheimer's disease. Jose Antonio is a professor of health and human performance at Nova Southeastern University in Florida and said he was particularly excited by the neuroscience research into creatine. "Even if you don't care about the muscular strength side of things I tell my students they should take it for their brain because in the last five years there's been more data showing it can help with cognitive processes," Professor Antonio said. It's worth nothing though that approximately 20 to 30 per cent of people are non-responders to creatine supplementation, meaning that they see little to no benefit from it. Creatine can be bought in a few different forms and the vast majority of research is on creatine monohydrate (creatine molecule + water molecule). But some brands are selling new formulations in which they bond the creatine molecule to other compounds to make: Many brands selling these claim they are up to five times more effective or better absorbed than creatine monohydrate. "That's baloney," Professor Jose Antonio said, "not only are they more expensive, they don't work better. "Some of them claim, 'this is better absorbed than creatine monohydrate' but monohydrate is 99.9 per cent absorbed so you're not going to get any better absorption." Professor Cooke said some of these may actually be less effective and he wouldn't recommend buying anything other than creatine monohydrate. Creatine supplements are safe and have limited side effects — some people may experience some bloating but that can generally be minimised by taking a lower dose or taking it with meals. But Ms Richardson doesn't recommend heading straight to the supplement aisle saying a "food first" approach is best. "There's no point adding sprinkles to the cake if you don't have your cake baked first — you need to build a foundation of good day-to-day nutrition through your diet and only then would I look to add supplements to that." Professor Cooke said taking a creatine supplement was personal preference but he is glad it's no longer seen as something just for "gym heads". "I think the key thing here is it's safe and there's benefits across the life span."

Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Nvidia supercomputer marks ‘new era' for Australian AI
Nvidia, the world's most valuable company, is teaming with Monash University and Dell to build an Australia-first supercomputer that promises to elevate the country into the AI big leagues. The supercomputer, dubbed MAVERIC and built in collaboration with CDC Data Centres, will be purpose-built for large-scale AI and data-intensive workloads and feature technology never before deployed in the country. MAVERIC will be housed at CDC's facility in the Melbourne suburb of Brooklyn, with construction to begin later this year. The system is expected to go live in early 2026, and was the subject of a meeting between Australia's ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd, Assistant Minister for Science Andrew Charlton and Nvidia executives on Wednesday morning. 'Without this kind of AI super-computer power, Australian researchers are trying to compete on the world stage with one arm tied behind their back,' Monash University vice-chancellor Sharon Pickering said in an interview. 'We are making a $60 million investment here so that Australia can be world leaders, and not just be willing to take second place. We have to be willing to be the best in the world and for our world-leading researchers; my job is to get them the best infrastructure in the world to support them.' MAVERIC will initially focus on advancing medical research, Pickering said, including developing new pharmaceutical products and personalising treatments for patients suffering from acute medical conditions. It will also focus on environmental issues including a study of the Antarctic and research into the impact of heat on populations. It will be available to university researchers and academics, students and research partners. The supercomputer will be built using Dell racks and servers and feature Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 platform. Amid debate about Australia's role in the global AI arms race, Dell Australia managing director Angela Fox said that MAVERIC represented a 'leapfrogging' opportunity for the nation in its AI capabilities. 'It allows researchers to use increasingly sophisticated AI models to tackle some of Australia and the world's most pressing issues and will deliver lasting value for the nation,' she said. 'It's a massive win for the research community and for Australia as a whole.'