logo
Yvette Cooper refuses to say if she agrees with Macron's Brexit criticism

Yvette Cooper refuses to say if she agrees with Macron's Brexit criticism

Independent11-07-2025
Yvette Cooper has refused to say whether she agreed with Emmanuel Macron 's claim that Brexit had made tackling illegal immigration harder.
It comes after the French president said voters were 'sold a lie' on Brexit when they were told it would 'make it possible to fight more effectively against illegal immigration '.
Unveiling a new one-in-one-out returns agreement with the UK, the French president said that because Brexit left the UK without a returns agreement with the EU: 'it creates an incentive to make the crossing, the precise opposite of what Brexit had promised'.
Asked whether Mr Macron had a point about Brexit, the home secretary told Sky News: 'I think what I've seen happen is that the way that the criminal smuggler gangs operate is that they will weaponise anything that is happening.
'And so what we saw in the run-up to Brexit being implemented was we saw criminal gangs promising people that they had to cross quickly, and they had to pay money to the smuggler gangs quickly in order to be able to cross in time before Brexit happened.
'As soon as Brexit happened, they then said 'Oh, well, now you've got to pay us money, because this means you can't be returned because the Dublin Agreement isn't in place'.
'So the thing about the criminal smuggler gangs is whatever arrangements are in place, they will use them in order to make money, but that's why we have to be fundamentally undermining their model.'
Ms Cooper also declined to say how many migrants would be returned under new arrangements with France, telling Times Radio the figures had not been 'fixed'.
'The numbers are not fixed, even for this pilot phase that we are starting now.
'So this will be a programme that we roll out step-by-step, and we will provide updates as we go. But we are going to do this in a steady way.'
Giving a press conference alongside Mr Macron at the Northwood military base in West London, Sir Keir Starmer said the deal to send small boats migrants back to France for the first time was a 'breakthrough moment' which would 'turn the tables' on people smugglers.
The pair hope the deal will have a deterrent effect beyond the limited numbers involved in the pilot scheme.
Under the one in, one out deal, for each small boat migrant sent back across the English Channel an asylum seeker will be allowed to enter the UK from France under a legal route.
No details have been given about how many people will be covered by the scheme, but reports from France have indicated it could initially be limited to around 50 a week – a small fraction of the weekly average this year of 782.
It is understood numbers will grow over the pilot period and depend on operational factors.
Some 21,117 migrants have made the crossing in 2025 according to the latest Home Office figures, a record for this point in a year, with more attempting the journey on Thursday as the UK and French leaders met.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sunday's News in Pictures: Donald Trump announces US-EU trade deal at Turnberry after day of golf
Sunday's News in Pictures: Donald Trump announces US-EU trade deal at Turnberry after day of golf

Scotsman

time11 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Sunday's News in Pictures: Donald Trump announces US-EU trade deal at Turnberry after day of golf

It was a busy day at Turnberry in South Ayrshire yesterday, with US President Donald Trump enjoying a day of golf before announcing a trade deal with the EU. Ahead of sitting down for a discussion with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, Mr Trump played a few rounds of golf with his family, where he was seen blowing kisses to supporters. It was later that day that he spoke with Ms von der Leyen to announce a trade deal between the EU and the US. Today, Mr Trump is set to meet one-on-one with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at Turnberry, before they are expected to travel to a private engagement at Trump International in Menie. Here are some pictures from the historic day at Turnberry. 1 . US President Donald Trump shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen US President Donald Trump with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after agreeing on a trade deal between the two economies following their meeting at Turnberry | AFP via Getty Images Photo Sales 2 . US President Donald Trump shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after agreeing on a trade deal between the two economies AFP via Getty Images Photo Sales 3 . US President Donald Trump (R) and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at Turnberry Trump told reporters after: "We have reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody." The EU chief also hailed it as a "good deal". | AFP via Getty Images Photo Sales 4 . Staff and family, Bettina Anderson, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump U.S. look on as President Donald Trump and President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen announce a US-EU trade deal The US-EU trade deal was announced after a meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. | Getty Images Photo Sales

Pershore missing mother and daughter found
Pershore missing mother and daughter found

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Pershore missing mother and daughter found

A mother and daughter who were missing from their home for nine days have been Mercia Police had appealed for help in finding Hannah Sheehan, 45, and Lydia Sheehan, 14, who were last seen in Pershore, Worcestershire, before disappearing on 18 search spread further afield as the pair had links to Redditch, Stratford, Leamington Spa and Wellesbourne in Warwickshire, with people urged to call they were "found safe and well" on Monday, the force confirmed. Officers thanked everyone who shared information about the police appeal. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Chinese hackers have seized control. How did we let this happen?
Chinese hackers have seized control. How did we let this happen?

Telegraph

time12 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Chinese hackers have seized control. How did we let this happen?

A civilisation that cannot defend itself really should not expect to survive, and after the latest cybersecurity news, I wonder how it can. An official advisory was recently sent out to the US military, warning that all forces must now assume their networks have been breached. The enemy is inside the house. What it means is that no system connected to the internet can be defended. Our own national cybersecurity agency asked UK businesses to make this presumption in 2020. The reason this hasn't been bigger news is that we've become fatalistic and weary, as one cybersecurity attack follows another. So when we discovered in early July that Chinese hackers had gained control of Microsoft servers at hundreds of US government agencies – including the US nuclear weapons agency – it was just another hacking story. What made this one noteworthy was that there wasn't immediately a fix or a patch, Microsoft admitted last Tuesday. Incredibly, confirmation of the US military's 'assume breach' alert had to be dragged out of the Department of Defense via Freedom of Information Act requests by a campaigning non-profit called Property of the People. These developments are the latest stage in an ongoing state-sponsored Chinese campaign, in which hacking has evolved from widespread commercial espionage a decade ago into something far more threatening. The latest phases, Salt Typhoon and now Volt Typhoon, are meticulous and sophisticated. They target not just government agencies like the National Guard, and China-critical MPs like Sir Iain Duncan Smith, but also private sector companies in the energy, telecoms, transport and water sectors. Ciaran Martin, former head of NCSC, the cybersecurity centre based at GCHQ, says that China's capabilities have been transformed. 'Now think of dozens or even hundreds of [individual] hacks at the same time – 'everything, everywhere, all at once' in the words of Jen Easterly, recently departed head of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.' Software attacks on our computer systems can create unique damage in ways that conventional warfare cannot. Let's consider two. While aerial bombing can produce spectacular instant results, targets can be disassembled prior to attack, and can be quickly rebuilt after the attack. Both happened with the recent attack on Iraq's nuclear facilities. But recovering from cyber attacks is much harder. Ask the British Library, which has still not restored all of its services. 'Printed catalogues and handlists are available in our Reading Rooms', it still advises visitors to its website. The attack took place in October 2023. A second way in which cyber attacks now present a unique challenge is the ability of Chinese hackers to 'live off the land' after they break through. Rather like special forces embedded behind enemy lines, hackers conceal themselves undetected for months or years. To the guardians of the network, they are just another innocent user. 'Both Salt and Volt Typhoon were in play for years before being detected,' writes Martin. 'And they are strategic compromises of the West on a scale hitherto unseen by any other cyber power.' Not only do we not know when the attack is over, we don't even know when it has begun. How did this happen? If I haven't depressed you enough, this is where it gets particularly troubling. Cybersecurity is a gnarly failure of accountability and regulation that spans decades of indifference, and implicates business complacency and government apathy. The internet protocols (IP) we use today are completely rotten. The great and the good of the IT and telecommunications industries spent the entire 1980s in international committees devising complex secure networking protocols, only to be met with mistrust and specifications no one really wanted. Fed up with waiting, we adopted today's protocols, which were cheap and simple to implement, but not secure. Now, the international standards bodies that might devise a successor to IP are dominated by China. When they fail, suppliers can hide behind licensing agreements and expensive lawyers. No one goes to prison for bad security design. Their customers – us – are guilty of negligence too. Salt Typhoon took advantage of a bug in Cisco routers that users had not bothered to fix for seven years. As a society, we rush to implement technologies without thinking too hard about externalities. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) opens up lots of new holes, and also lowers the bar so that even the technically unskilled can plant hacks. All in all, then, this may not seem a good time to force Britons to use a new government identity service. Especially when you know that 'red team' penetration testing proved in March that this could be penetrated by hostile foreign agents without them being detected. This is what Baroness Neville Jones calls 'a piece of critical infrastructure'. Chinese agents may already be 'living off the land' inside the One Login system, on which your government wallet has been built, and soon perhaps, your digital ID. But don't expect Peter Kyle, the Science and Technology Minister, to put the brakes on the One Login project when he's its biggest fan. To survive and prosper, we need serious and technically aware people in his position, who listen to the security professionals. Kyle appeared on Newsnight last week wearing jeans and a T-shirt and trainers, all of which were intended to signal to viewers his youthful love of digital technology. He is 54.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store