logo
Government agrees to ensure paid bereavement leave covers miscarriages

Government agrees to ensure paid bereavement leave covers miscarriages

Independent11-03-2025

The Government has agreed to ensure paid bereavement leave covers miscarriage, as it also headed off a potential Labour rebellion over calls to increase paternity leave.
Business minister Justin Madders said the Government 'fully accepts' the principle of bereavement leave for pregnancy loss and will work with MPs and peers to amend the Employment Rights Bill.
His commitment came in response to amendments tabled by Labour MP Sarah Owen, who chairs the Women and Equalities Committee which recommended changes to the law.
Since April 2020, employees can be eligible for statutory parental bereavement leave and pay if there is a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy, but there is no specific leave for a pre-24 week loss in the form of miscarriage.
In January, the committee said the two-week leave period should be also made available to those bereaved as a result of pre-24 week pregnancy loss.
The committee said an estimated more than one in five pregnancies end before 24 weeks, with between 10% and 20% of pregnancies ending in the first 12 weeks, known as early miscarriage.
Mr Madders, speaking during the Bill's report stage, said there is a 'clear gap in support' for those who experience pregnancy loss and 'need time to recover and grieve'.
He said: 'We fully accept the principle of bereavement leave for pregnancy loss, as raised in the amendments, and we look forward to further discussions with (Ms Owen) and (peers) as the Bill moves on to its next stages in the Lords.
'Bereavement is not an illness, it's not a holiday and it does need its own special category.'
Ms Owen appeared to become emotional as she spoke during the debate, saying: 'It doesn't just provide rights, but goes a long way into furthering how we talk about pregnancy loss in society as a whole. That miscarriage is no longer ignored, that it is no longer stigmatised as a sickness.
'People have been moved to tears of joy, relief and raw emotion that their loss is now acknowledged and things will change. Later tonight, in the privacy of my home, I'll probably be one of those too.'
She added: 'It is a giant leap forward in the recognition that miscarrying is a bereavement, not an illness, and workers will legally have the right to grieve.'
Elsewhere in the debate, Labour MP Stella Creasy (Walthamstow) led calls for paternity leave to be increased.
Her new clause seven was supported by more than 50 Labour backbenchers, which posed a problem for the whips, although it was not pushed to a vote after Mr Madders sought to offer assurances on the Government's approach.
Ms Creasy's amendment would have required the Government to consult on the period of protected paternity or parental partner leave, amid calls for it to go beyond the two-week entitlement.
She said: 'We need to end the battle of the sexes when it comes to childcare.'
The Bill, as it stands, would establish the right to paternity and parental leave for a worker from day one.
Mr Madders also noted an amendment tabled by Labour former minister Louise Haigh and Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran (Oxford West and Abingdon) which sought to prevent non-disclosure agreements from stopping workers making a disclosure about harassment.
He said: 'This is an important issue that warrants further consideration.'
The Bill as a whole aims to deliver the biggest overhaul of workers' rights in a generation, although it is feared some of the changes could cost businesses almost £5 billion annually.
Policies such as day-one protections from unfair dismissals and ensuring guaranteed hours on zero-hours contracts are 'likely to have a disproportionate cost to small and micro businesses', according to an economic analysis of the Bill published by the Department for Business and Trade.
Shadow business minister Greg Smith said the Government should have taken more time to develop its proposals given it was still bringing forward several pages of amendments.
He said: 'Fundamentally, this is a bad Bill. Whilst it contains many good measures, many well intentioned measures, they have failed to get the balance right between employees and employers.
'And whilst I welcome some of the comments the minister made in his opening remarks, not least on the point he knows we have agreement from our debate in the Bill committee on bereavement leave for pregnancy loss, I'm afraid for the vast majority of this Bill, the balance has, in fact, been got wrong.'
Mr Smith also said a proposal that would give employers a responsibility to protect employees from harassment from clients and customers could produce a chilling effect on free speech at universities and usher in 'banter police' for pubs and restaurants.
A Liberal Democrat amendment to make carer's leave a paid entitlement was rejected by 323 votes to 95, majority 228.
A proposal from Conservative MP Sir Ashley Fox (Bridgwater) to give special constables the right to time off to carry out their police duties was also defeated by 324 votes to 189, majority 135.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed
Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed

South Wales Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed

The secretary general of the military bloc is expected to use a speech at London's Chatham House to say a '400% increase in air and missile' capability is required just to maintain deterrence and defence. He will say 'wishful thinking will not keep us safe' as he warns Nato must become a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance' to protect itself, in the remarks on Monday, when he will also separately meet the Prime Minister and Defence Secretary John Healey. Mr Rutte is expected to say: 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. 'The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends'. He will add: 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation and medical support'. On threats against the alliance, Mr Rutte will say: 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. 'Hope is not a strategy. So Nato has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' The Prime Minister has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. But Mr Rutte's visit to the UK comes after he proposed members of the bloc spend 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence as part of a strengthened investment plan for the alliance. The target would require nations to raise core defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, while the remaining 1.5% is to be made up of 'defence-related expenditure'. Nato leaders will meet in The Hague later this month, when the total 5% spending target by 2035 will be discussed. The UK's Strategic Defence Review, which was published on Monday, recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets. The boost to the defence budget will be confirmed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday, when she will set out the Government's priorities for the next three years.

Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed
Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed

South Wales Argus

time41 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed

The secretary general of the military bloc is expected to use a speech at London's Chatham House to say a '400% increase in air and missile' capability is required just to maintain deterrence and defence. He will say 'wishful thinking will not keep us safe' as he warns Nato must become a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance' to protect itself, in the remarks on Monday, when he will also separately meet the Prime Minister and Defence Secretary John Healey. Mr Rutte is expected to say: 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. 'The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends'. He will add: 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation and medical support'. On threats against the alliance, Mr Rutte will say: 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. 'Hope is not a strategy. So Nato has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' The Prime Minister has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. But Mr Rutte's visit to the UK comes after he proposed members of the bloc spend 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence as part of a strengthened investment plan for the alliance. The target would require nations to raise core defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, while the remaining 1.5% is to be made up of 'defence-related expenditure'. Nato leaders will meet in The Hague later this month, when the total 5% spending target by 2035 will be discussed. The UK's Strategic Defence Review, which was published on Monday, recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets. The boost to the defence budget will be confirmed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday, when she will set out the Government's priorities for the next three years.

Tesla Loses Billions in Value as Musk-Trump Feud Heats Up Over EV Subsidies
Tesla Loses Billions in Value as Musk-Trump Feud Heats Up Over EV Subsidies

Auto Blog

time42 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

Tesla Loses Billions in Value as Musk-Trump Feud Heats Up Over EV Subsidies

Musk turns on Trump, triggering steep Tesla declines President Trump has threatened to end government subsidies and contracts to Elon Musk's companies, with Tesla facing billions of dollars in annual losses without various state and federal programs. Musk escalated the feud with a series of posts on X, formerly Twitter, attacking the president, erasing $150 billion in Tesla's market value on Thursday before a Friday rebound. After the market's close on Friday, Tesla's market cap stood at about $950 billion, down from roughly $1.1 trillion at the week's start. 0:02 / 0:09 2025 Audi S3: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More Elon Musk/President Trump — Source: Getty Musk's specific criticisms of Trump's bill include the entrepreneur saying: 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' according to The Hill. The Tesla CEO also said on X: 'Abruptly discontinuing the energy tax incentives would jeopardize America's energy autonomy and the dependability of our power grid.' On Thursday, President Trump said on his Truth Social platform that the 'easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts,' Reuters reports. The president also posted on Truth Social: 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' How Trump's and Congress's initiatives impact Tesla The House of Representatives version of Trump's bill, passed in late May, proposes to largely end the federal $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicle (EV) purchases by the end of 2025. If passed by the Senate, eliminating the federal EV subsidy could erase $1.2 billion in Tesla's annual profits, according to Reuters. Separate Senate legislation that removes California's EV sales mandates could lower Tesla's yearly sales by another $2 billion. Tesla earned almost $2.8 billion last year by selling regulatory credits to other automakers, helping competitors meet government-established car emissions rules, many of which are in California. Since Tesla only makes all-electric vehicles, it earns a surplus of regulatory credits that it can sell to other automakers. Competitors who don't manufacture enough zero-emission vehicles face steep fines if they don't purchase regulatory credits from Tesla. Republicans in Congress are working to lower some of the federal waivers California needs for stricter emissions standards than the federal government, and if rolled back, Tesla's regulatory credit profits would take a significant hit. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Elon Musk and Donald Trump with a Tesla Model S — Source: Getty Tesla plans to launch its driverless robotaxi rideshare service in Austin, Texas, this month, subject to government oversight. Still, analysts don't believe Musk's feud with Trump will impact the autonomous Tesla fleet's debut. Gene Munster, Tesla investor and managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, said: 'In my view, the White House has little to gain in standing in front of autonomy, given autonomy is central to physical AI, and for the US to be a leader globally in AI, it also needs to be a leader in physical AI,' according to Business Insider. Autoblog contacted Tesla for comment but didn't receive a response. Final thoughts Elon Musk spent over $250 million to help re-elect Donald Trump, with Tesla's stock increasing after the President's victory. However, Musk's controversial time as a special government employee, most notably with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), triggered severe stock declines at Tesla, ultimately causing the entrepreneur to step away from politics and focus more on his company. Musk's decision to go on the offensive against Trump could further erase any benefits he and Tesla initially gained through their partnership, as reflected in this past week's stock market. Gene Munster estimated in a Friday report that eliminating EV tax credits could reduce Tesla's 2025 deliveries by 15%. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store