Fed's hand may be forced as disinflation builds, Macquarie says
Investing.com -- At its meeting last month, the Federal Reserve delivered a hawkish pause as it flagged growing risks of higher inflation and slower growth, but the trend of disinflation is likely to force the Fed's hand into a more dovish stance at the June meeting, paving the way for a rate cut this year.
'We think that the Fed will lean toward a more 'dovish' message on June 17 than it did on May 7, and the prospect for a rate cut in 2025 has strengthened a bit,' Macquarie strategists wrote, pointing to the recent decline in US inflation and signs of a weakening labor market.
While the April JOLTS report showed a modest pick-up in job openings, Macquarie cautions that other indicators—including today's weak ADP report and a drop in private-sector quit rates—signal the US labor market is losing momentum. 'The improvement in April openings seemed to contradict the poorer hiring signals from the Fed's recent regional surveys, the decline in job security measures in consumer surveys, and even third-party surveys of job openings,' the strategists said, adding that the ADP report showed a mere 37,000 in net hiring.
Macquarie warns not to put too much weight on the JOLTS report, noting, 'we shouldn't take the JOLTS report from yesterday too seriously, lest we be surprised by weakness in this Friday's May employment report.' For the Fed, the unemployment rate remains the 'paramount single driver' for its disposition toward rates, and any break above the recent 4.1%-4.2% range could be pivotal.
On the inflation front, Macquarie sees underlying price trends in the US as 'again disinflationary,' especially after the latest PCE inflation report. 'We think that with the June 18 FOMC meeting, some of the Fed's caution about cutting the Fed Funds rate target will start to fade, as the Fed considers that—if we abstract from the tariffs—underlying price trends in the US are again disinflationary,' they wrote.
Tighter credit conditions are also weighing on the outlook, as banks continue to tighten lending terms amid policy uncertainty and mark-to-market losses on Treasury holdings. 'Much of this, we think, is being driven by a suppression of consumer credit, as banks tighten lending terms,' Macquarie said.
Related articles
Fed's hand may be forced as disinflation builds, Macquarie says
Bond yields fall as rate cut bets rise
'Illegal' metal tariffs won't receive retaliation yet, says Carney
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Carney and Trump are holding private talks to drop tariffs
Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump are having discussions out of the spotlight to reach a trade deal and lift tariffs. Sources with knowledge of the conversations first confirmed the calls with CBC/Radio-Canada and Industry Minister Mélanie Joly later told reporters that Carney and Trump are talking to each other. A source, who spoke on the condition they not be named, said the two leaders have had a few phone calls in the evenings and exchanged text messages about trade since Carney's visit to the White House last month. There have been no public readouts of the talks between Carney and Trump. Sources said the conversations are aimed at reaching an agreement on the trade war launched by the U.S. against Canada. Carney and Trump have talked openly about a desire to chart a new economic and security deal, but the Canada-U.S. relationship appeared to hit a snag earlier this week when Trump doubled tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports. The tariffs, now at 50 per cent, are a further blow to the Canadian industries that are the U.S.'s biggest supplier of the Wednesday, Carney only said "intensive discussions" were ongoing and that his government was readying reprisals if negotiations with the United States failed. Sources told CBC/Radio-Canada they are hoping for some sort of Canada-U.S. trade deal by the time Trump and Carney meet at the G7 summit — just 10 days from now in Alberta. Asked Thursday how close the two sides are to a deal, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said he's not talking about it publicly. Speaking in French, Joly confirmed there have been talks and said it's normal during a trade war to have diplomatic discussions. "We won't negotiate in public," she added in English. "We'll let the prime minister do his work." A White House spokesperson told CBC News that Trump was "directly" involved in talks with Canada, but didn't mention Carney specifically. "Talks with Canada continue about trade, border security and defence matters. Any deal announcements, however, will come from President Trump himself," spokesperson Kush Desai said in a official with the U.S. embassy said "both the president and prime minister, or members of their teams, have publicly acknowledged that there are ongoing conversations. But this is not something that will be negotiated in public." Earlier this week, Trump's envoy to Canada, Ambassador Pete Hoekstra, told a crowd in Toronto the deal "is being settled at the highest levels of the U.S. government with the involvement of the highest elected officials." The direct conversations between Carney and Trump were first reported by the Globe and Mail. Carney, who campaigned on the promise he'd take on Trump, has been under pressure to respond to the president's latest tariff salvo. The Canadian Steel Producers Association called the doubled tariffs a "crushing blow" to the industry and said the move effectively blocks Canadian steel from entering the U.S. market. The association wants to see immediate counter-tariffs on U.S. metals. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who said he's in daily talks with the prime minister, called for retaliation if an agreement can't be reached "in the next few days." "Let's hope they get a deal. But if they don't, let's come out guns ablazing," he told reporters Thursday at Queen's Park.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Why Trump can't have it both ways on rates
Presented by Editor's note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day's biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. Quick Fix President Donald Trump wants a strong labor market and low interest rates. Right now, those goals aren't compatible. Economists expect the Labor Department to report this morning that employers added 125,000 jobs last month. If the number exceeds expectations, it will be yet another sign of economic resilience despite the effects that Trump's trade agenda, market convulsions and touch-and-go recession fears have had on sentiment. It would be great news for a White House that has reveled in recent positive economic data and has sparred with Wall Street heavyweights or reporters who spotlight the risks posed by the president's agenda. But it would also give Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell a case to hold rates higher for longer. Higher borrowing costs might help keep a lid on inflation — and further weaken rate-sensitive sectors like housing — until there's greater clarity on how tariffs ultimately affect consumer prices. The Fed is scheduled to announce its interest rate decision on June 18. Obviously, that's not what Trump wants. The president used this week's tepid private sector hiring report from the payroll processing firm ADP to lash out at the Fed chair — whom he's nicknamed 'TOO LATE' — and make a case for why he 'must now LOWER THE RATE.' And there are signs that the labor market is flagging. U.S. employers announced layoffs affecting nearly 94,000 positions last month — a 47 percent increase over April of last year, according to a report from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Jobless claims for the week following the Memorial Day holiday jumped more than many economists had predicted, the government reported on Thursday. And the Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing and service sector employment indices were both in contraction territory in May. But if today's jobs report disappoints — EY's Gregory Daco sees job growth falling below 100,000 — it will be taken as a sign that Trump's trade agenda is starting to wear on employers. While a softening labor market increases the likelihood that Powell accelerates the timeline for rate cuts, it would also suggest the economy is in much worse shape than anyone in the White House would like. Trump would then face more political pressure — from both Wall Street and industry — to dial back his protectionist trade policies. Julien Lafargue, the chief market strategist at Barclays Private Bank, put it this way: 'Anything below the 100,000 mark could reignite recession fears while a stronger-than-expected print could perversely be negative for risk assets as it would likely put upward pressure on yields.' In other words, for Trump, the odds that he'll get a Goldilocks economy and low rates — soon — look slim. We'll see at 8:30 a.m. when the Labor Department puts out its report. IT'S FRIDAY — What are you looking for in the jobs report? Let me know. And as always, send your tips, suggestions and personnel moves to Sam at ssutton@ POLITICO PRO SPACE: Need an insider's guide to the politics behind the new space race? From battles over sending astronauts to Mars to the ways space companies are vying to influence regulators, this weekly newsletter decodes the personalities, policy and power shaping the final frontier. Find out more. Driving The Day Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman will speak at a Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy event on financial regulation at 10 a.m. Food Fight — Elon Musk, the godfather of the Department of Government Efficiency and one of Trump's most powerful boosters during the 2024 campaign, was already on the warpath against GOP leaders over the president's 'big beautiful bill.' On Thursday, he went after Trump. Suffice it to say, it got personal. — As Irie Sentner reports: 'In a Washington full of big money and bigger personalities, it's shaping up to be the breakup of the decade. And it's happening for all the world to see … Musk suggested the president should be impeached, Trump threatened Musk's companies, and Musk even threw out allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein.' — The consequences have the potential to simultaneously 'derail the president's agenda and Musk's personal fortune,' Irie writes. As the feud spilled across X and Truth Social, shares of Tesla notched their worst day ever, erasing more than $150 billion of market value, according to the WSJ. Trust us. — The White House is also dialing up its attacks against both the Congressional Budget Office and outside experts over projections that the megabill could cause debt levels to spike in exchange for mediocre economic returns, The NYT's Tony Romm reports. Revival — Binance has survived its legal battles with U.S. regulators. Now, the global crypto exchange is emerging as a major beneficiary of Trump's pro-crypto pivot. Declan Harty has more in a Q&A with the exchange's CEO, Richard Teng. TRADE CORNER Too much news — Before the Musk spat overtook the news cycle, Trump had a 'very good phone call' with Chinese leader Xi Jinping amid tense negotiations over tariffs and other trade barriers, per Megan Messerly, Phelim Kine, Ari Hawkins and Daniel Desrochers. — Treasury did not identify the country as a currency manipulator in its semi-annual report on the foreign exchange practices of major trading partners, Doug Palmer reports. Trade deficit falls — Doug also reports that the trade deficit fell sharply in April after hitting a record high in March. Talking Points First in MM: From Wall Street regulator to crypto lobbyist — In one of her first interviews as Blockchain Association CEO, Summer Mersinger, a former CFTC commissioner, spoke with Declan Harty about the critical but chaotic moment facing crypto in Washington today. The following is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. With the regulatory landscape shifting, how are you thinking about this moment for crypto in Washington? Just a year ago, there was this discussion around all the risks involved with blockchain and crypto, and now, we're at a point where Congress is on the cusp of passing a stablecoin bill. So it's a critical time for the industry. It's a critical time for the policymakers, and it's the opportunity that I think the industry needs to come together, be a unified voice and really push this forward so that the U.S. can become a global leader in this space. How do you hope to use your experience at the CFTC as you lead the Blockchain Association? My time at the CFTC taught me a lot about these markets and the ways that a well-regulated market functions. But if you go back further in my history, I came from Capitol Hill — that's where I spent most of my career. And I'm hoping that I can use those skills to really help BA and the members get that critical legislation accomplished. Do market structure and stablecoin legislation need to be packaged together? They both stand on their own. I trust Congress to do what's best to get legislation to the president's desk, and however they decide to move forward, we're going to be supportive. … If stablecoin [legislation] gets to the president's desk before the other, I see that as a win — and it just adds momentum to the market structure bill. On The Hill Trouble in Senate Banking — Senate Banking Republicans are skeptical that some of the measures being sought by Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) for the megabill can comply with the strict rules governing the filibuster-skirting budget reconciliation process, Jasper Goodman reports. Markup incoming — Katherine Hapgood reports that House Financial Services Chair French Hill (R-Ark.) plans to move ahead with a landmark crypto market structure bill on Tuesday over objections from Democrats, who want more time to negotiate. Adios — The House passed a bill Thursday that would remove Small Business Administration offices from 'sanctuary cities' that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, Katherine reports. First in MM — Democrats led by Rep. Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) on Friday introduced a new bill to counter the administration's rollback of rules that required businesses to disclose their true owners. Under the bill, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and the SBA would have to coordinate on multilingual guidance, education and scam prevention to make compliance easier, Katherine reports. GOP senators look to codify DOGE operations of Treasury payment systems — Congressional DOGE Caucus Chairs Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and Rep. Aaron Bean (R-Fla.) will introduce legislation next week to codify changes that the cost-cutting operation once led by Elon Musk made to the Treasury Department's payments system. The bill would require Treasury to have a description of the payment, link it to a budget account and crosscheck the payment against government databases to ensure accuracy and eligibility, Katherine reports. Ernst said the measure would save billions over the next 10 years. 'Enacting safeguards to spending has been one of the Trump administration's and DOGE's greatest triumphs, and I am determined to codify it and make it permanent.' Jobs report David Maurstad, the former senior director of the National Flood Insurance Program, recently launched Maurstad Advisors, LLC to advise on issues like insurance brokerage, resilience planning and crisis communication.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A Fed rate cut would be a 'happy pill' for markets: Strategist
Wall Street will be watching for the latest labor data in Friday's jobs report for the month of May as investors speculate on what could be the next economic catalyst to encourage the Federal Reserve to begin cutting interest rates in 2025. LPL Financial Chief Economist Jeffrey Roach and Siebert Financial CIO Mark Malek sit down with Madison Mills to discuss what a rate cut would mean for markets (^DJI, ^IXIC, ^GSPC, ^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX) and the inflation pressures the Fed is navigating while waiting for fresh data. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. How big of a catalyst might a Fed cut coming sooner rather than later be for this market? Well, it would certainly be a happy pill for the market. Uh, a lot of the challenges that we're all looking at for the markets right now, unfortunately lower Fed funds rates are not going to necessarily help any of those challenges. However, markets ultimately always like lower rates and clearly if the Fed did do something, it would certainly send a positive signal to the market and maybe improve sentiment in the market. Jeffrey, I want to bring you back in on exactly what Mark was just saying, what would it take for the Fed to cut sooner rather than later? How bad would the economic data have to look? Well, you know, I think the Fed is really focusing on these nagging inflation pressures. You know, I referenced just a little bit ago the ISM surveys report as it relates to employment. You know, from the most recent ISM report on business that we just got two days ago, input costs are still rising pretty significantly. So that's a real concern. So the Fed is in the wait and see mode. Interestingly enough, it's it's possible that firms are in the wait and see mode too as well. Going back to labor market numbers, it seems as if firms are not interested in necessarily adding strongly to payrolls, but they're also conversely not really interested in shedding payrolls. You don't really see uh, the firings increase as well, right? The hirings and the firings, they're they're kind of static at this point. Wait and see. I think back to the original question here on when and if the Fed will act, they're certainly not going to act uh, in this upcoming meeting. Uh, it's there's a chance that they actually hold in July as well if the inflation numbers are still elevated and payrolls continue to show some stability. Mark, do you agree with that path forward for the Fed? Yeah, I I think so. I think, you know, our base case is still about two cuts for later on this year, although there was a little bit of a bump the other day in Fed funds futures. We saw that as a result of the numbers that we got, the ADP numbers. Uh, but I think at this point, they can afford to wait and I think that's the mode that they're in. Um, it's interesting though, if we look at some of the behind the scenes commentary from the Fed, such as the Beige Book, and also we saw the meeting minutes earlier in the month, there are concerns amongst the Fed. Although, whether they act on them now or later, it's more likely going to be later. And we're still focusing on two even though the market's starting to inch into possibly three when we look at futures at least. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
