
Health experts raise alarm over RFK Jr's ‘war on science' amid mass firings and budget cuts
The decision comes as Kennedy abruptly canceled a scheduled meeting of a key health care advisory panel, the US Preventive Services Task Force, earlier this month. That, combined with his recent removal of a panel of more than a dozen vaccine advisers, signals that his dismantling of the science-based policymaking at HHS is likely far from over.
'The current administration is waging a war on science,' warned Celine Gounder, a professor of medicine and an infectious disease expert at New York University in a keynote talk in May to graduates of Harvard's School of Public Health.
'Today we see rising threats to the public health institutions that have kept our world safe for generations,' she said, citing 'cuts to research that benefits the lives of millions, looming public health emergencies that are not being addressed with the urgency they demand, and a continued coordinated attack on the very idea of the scientific process.'
Gounder added: 'Over the past few months, we have seen the Trump administration engage not only in medical misinformation, but in active censorship of scientific discourse.'
Since he took the helm at HHS, Kennedy's unscientific views on vaccines and some other medical matters coupled with the agency's widespread research and staff cuts, have prompted protests from scientists inside and outside HHS plus lawsuits.
Medical experts say Kennedy's policies are helping 'sow distrust in vaccines' as measles cases soar to a more than three decade high, hurt vital healthcare research with draconian cuts, and helped foment a Trump administration 'war on science' mentality.
Kennedy sparked a firestorm in June by ousting 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which recommends vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and votes to provide updates to its vaccine schedule. He then named a new eight person vaccine panel – half of whom share Kennedy's distrust of vaccines – who quickly retracted recommendations for flu vaccines containing an ingredient which many anti-vaxxers have falsely connected to autism.
That move sparked sharp criticism from veteran doctors with a national pediatric group, which opted to boycott its first meeting.
'Among the reasons we decided not to participate was because it clearly appeared to be an orchestrated effort to sow distrust in vaccines,' Sean O'Leary who chairs a committee on infectious diseases with the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the Guardian.
Dissent has also spread at the National Institutes of Health, where dozens of science researchers and other staff in June released a detailed document, dubbed the Bethesda Declaration, warning that key missions of the premiere research agency at HHS were being damaged by the Trump administration's budget cutting.
Even before these moves, prominent healthcare scholars were sounding loud alarms about some HHS policies and the administration's anti-science mentality – including its draconian budget cuts for research and staff cuts totaling over 10,000.
Gounder said there has been a 'flood of Orwellian doublespeak from public health agencies', contributing to declining vaccination rates and making Americans more susceptible to diseases like measles, which recently hit a level not seen since 2000 when measles was declared eliminated in the US.
Her critique has been amplified by public protests from healthcare experts troubled by its vaccine policies and large cuts to research and staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the NIH and other parts of HHS.
On a separate legal front, a Rhode Island federal court in July ruled against HHS and Kennedy and put a temporary stop to the drastic revamping of HHS and some of its staff cuts.
The ruling provided a court victory to a group of 19 Democratic state attorneys general, plus the District of Columbia, which in May sued Kennedy – plus other HHS leaders such as the FDA commissioner and the CDC's acting director – attacking the restructuring as an 'unconstitutional and illegal dismantling' of the agency. Kennedy, they alleged, has 'systematically deprived HHS of the resources necessary to do its job'.
The Rhode Island judge wrote that as members of the executive branch, Kennedy and the HHS do 'not have the authority to order, organize, or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress'.
For his part, Kennedy in March issued a statement defending the early HHS move to cut 10,000 full-time jobs: 'We aren't just reducing bureaucratic sprawl. We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic.'
Those jobs have since been cut, as of Monday 14 July, after an 8 July order from the supreme court that allowed the restructuring plans to proceed. Many employees who were supposed to be laid off during the agency's first round of 10,000 layoffs in April have been in limbo as the order made its way through the court system and later paused by federal judges. The reorganization, in addition to cutting staff, was supposed to consolidate the department's 28 divisions into 15 and cut regional offices from 10 to five.
Democrats in Congress too have voiced strong alarms about the thousands of HHS job cuts and their adverse impacts on healthcare and science.
Ten congressional Democrats led by congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland, whose district is home to thousands of NIH and FDA workers, wrote to Kennedy in March demanding the rehiring of thousands of illegally fired workers, warning of the 'harmful consequences' for patient healthcare and science research.
Raskin told the Guardian that Kennedy and the Trump administration's actions reveal a 'complete disregard for the law making powers of Congress. Trump wants to be both the implementer of the laws and the legislative branch, but that is not his job. It's totally unconstitutional. They're trying to cut off funds that have been lawfully appropriated by Congress'.
O'Leary and many other medical experts warn that the dangerous ideologically driven cuts at HHS will have long-term consequences.
'What we're seeing across HHS is deeply concerning,' said O'Leary 'NIH funding has never been politically or ideologically driven, but clearly that's what we're seeing now. Those cuts are going to have serious consequences for our country and healthcare.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ham salad brands recalled over listeria contamination fears
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service issued a public health warning for Reser's Fine Foods Ham Salad and Molly's Kitchen Ham Salad over listeria contamination fears. According to a press release from the agency, the possible contamination was discovered when a Reser's, based in Topeka, Kansas, was found to have used a breadcrumb product that was already subject to a Listeria monocytogenes recall. There have been no reports of illness among consumers due to contamination. The agency advises anybody who has consumed the products to seek medical help immediately. The specific warning is for 12-ounce plastic tubs of 'Reser's Fine Foods Ham Salad' with expiration dates of 09/01/2025 and 5-pound plastic tubs of 'Molly's Kitchen Ham Salad' with expiration dates of 08/31/2025. The FSIS warning raises concerns that retailers and consumers may have the product in their refrigerators and freezers. Customers are asked to be mindful and refrain from eating the named products. In May, a listeria outbreak linked to ready-to-eat sandwiches and snacks has sickened at least 10 people in the U.S. A producer is voluntarily recalling dozens of products sold to retail stores, hospitals, hotels, airports, and airlines, federal officials said. Listeria poisoning is caused by a particularly resilient type of bacteria that can survive and grow even during refrigeration. About 1,600 people are infected with it — and 260 die each year in the U.S., according to the CDC. Listeria bacteria thrive in moist environments, including soil, water, and decaying vegetation, and are carried by some animals. The hardy germs are typically spread when food is harvested, processed, transported or stored in places that are contaminated with the bacteria. When bacteria enter a food processing plant, they can be difficult to eradicate. Foods contaminated with the bacteria can cause people to become ill. Symptoms can be mild and include fever, muscle aches, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. More serious illnesses can include headache, stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance, and convulsions. Listeria poisoning is challenging because symptoms can develop quickly, within a few hours or days after consuming contaminated food. However, they can also take weeks or up to three months to appear. Those most vulnerable to getting sick include the very young, people older than 65, and those with weakened immune systems or who are pregnant. Listeria can survive and grow in refrigerated food. It can be killed by heating foods to 'steaming hot,' or 165 degrees Fahrenheit (74 degrees Celsius), the CDC says. But that's not always possible — or palatable—for foods that are made to be eaten cold. Because Listeria can survive under refrigeration, it's essential to clean and sanitize any surfaces, including refrigerator drawers and shelves, that may have come into contact with the products.


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
JD Vance hits the road to sell Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'
Vice President JD Vance will visit his home state of Ohio on Monday to continue promoting the GOP's sweeping tax-and-border bill. His office confirmed he will be in Canton, Ohio, to discuss the bill's 'benefits for hardworking American families and businesses'. While his aides offered little detail in advance about the visit, NBC News reported that his remarks will take place at a steel plant in Canton, located about 60 miles south of Cleveland. The visit marks Vance's second trip this month to sell the legislative package, filled with a hodgepodge of conservative priorities that Republicans have dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' as the vice president becomes its chief promoter on the road. In West Pittston, Pennsylvania, Vance told attendees at an industrial machine shop that they should be able to keep more of their pay in their pockets, highlighting the law's new tax deductions on overtime. Vance also discussed a new children's savings program called Trump Accounts and how the new law promotes energy extraction, while decrying Democrats for opposing the bill that keeps the current tax rates, which would have otherwise expired later this year. The legislation cleared the GOP-controlled Congress by the narrowest of margins, with Vance breaking a tie vote in the Senate for the package that also sets aside hundreds of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration agenda while slashing Medicaid and food stamps. The vice president is also stepping up his public relations blitz on the bill as the White House tries to deflect attention away from the growing controversy over Jeffrey Epstein. The disgraced financier killed himself, authorities say, in a New York jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump and his top allies stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein's death before Trump returned to the White House and are now reckoning with the consequences of a Justice Department announcement earlier this month that Epstein did indeed die by suicide and that no further documents about the case would be released. Questions about the case continued to dog Trump in Scotland, where he on Sunday announced a framework trade deal with the European Union. Asked about the timing of the trade announcement and the Epstein case and whether it was correlated, Trump responded: 'You've got to be kidding with that.' 'No, had nothing to do with it,' Trump told the reporter. 'Only you would think that.' The White House sees the new law as a clear political boon, sending Vance to promote it in swing congressional districts that will determine whether Republicans retain their House majority next year. The northeastern Pennsylvania stop is in the district represented by Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a first-term lawmaker who knocked off a six-time Democratic incumbent last fall. On Monday, Vance will be in the district of Democratic Rep. Emilia Sykes, who is a top target for the National Republican Congressional Committee this cycle. Polls before the bill's passage showed that it largely remained unpopular, although the public approves of some individual provisions, such as increasing the child tax credit and allowing workers to deduct more of their tips on taxes.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
White House made 'misstep' on Epstein files, MAGA ally confesses
The Trump Administration's refusal to release any more files about Jeffery Epstein has dominated the news cycle in recent weeks, and both the President's political allies and adversaries are growing weary. Progressive Democrat Ro Khanna (pictured) appeared on Meet The Press Sunday, when he told host Kristen Welker that he considered the issue of the Epstein filed a winning one for his party. 'This is about trust in government. When John F. Kennedy was president, trust in government was 60%. Today it's in the teens. Speaker Johnson and I came to Congress together. He was on the reform side too. He wanted to make government work,' Khanna noted. 'This is a perfect opportunity for him to say, "Look, the past is the past." Okay, I didn't love that he shut down government. Maybe on your show today he'll commit that when we come back, let's have a vote. Remind him of what were like, the conversations we had in our freshman class. This is about being a reform agent of transparency,' Khanna continued, doing his best to put additional pressure on the Republican Speaker. Voters as well are not happy with Trump's handing of the files, with only 16% of respondents to a recent Emerson College poll saying that they approve 'of the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.' Emerson College Polling director Spencer Kimball noted Thursday that the Epstein files issue was the one Trump fared the worst on. Khanna and libertarian-minded Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky teamed up earlier this month to introduce the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which would compel Attorney General Pam Bondi to publicly release all unclassified materials relating to Jeffery Epstein. The duo's resolution is receiving the the backing of a diverse set of members, including New York socialist darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Michigan 'Squad' member Rashida Tlaib , as well as Boebert of Colorado, Nancy Mace of South Carolina, and Greene of Georgia. Khanna noted during a media appearance last week that his resolution had the backing of all 212 of his Democratic colleagues in the House. Even if only the 10 GOP co-sponsors of the resolution were to support it, it would easily pass the House as just a simple majority is need, which is 218 votes out of 435. Speaker Mike Johnson had choice words for the uncanny duo's push to release the files during his own Meet The Press appearance Sunday. 'The Massie and the Khanna discharge petition does not have adequate protections. For example, in the way that it was drafted, they cite that they don't want child abuse, sexual abuse information uncovered, but they cite the wrong provision of the Federal Code, and so it makes it unworkable,' Johnson told Welker. 'It requires the DOJ to release grand jury testimony. They are prohibited by law from doing so. So it is not the right approach. There is another approach out there. The House Republicans on the Rules Committee have a resolution that is well drafted, that is thoughtfully drafted by lawyers, that would make this workable. That's the approach, we have to protect the innocent. We'll do it at all cost,' Johnson added. Yet, even members of the President's own political party are calling the Administration's handling of the files a 'political mistake' and 'misstep.' Eric Burlison (pictured left), a Missouri Republican, told CNN's Manu Raju Sunday that part of the issue is 'that there were false expectations that are created, and that's a political mistake.' 'I think that saying that you're going to be able to deliver when you haven't even looked at all of the files, what's available, was probably a misstep,' Burlison told Raju.