‘Turning into America': Sydney restaurant's menu act outrages
A Sydney restaurant has responded after a customer aired their frustration over a tip being added to their bill without their consent – a move that has reignited the debate over whether Australia's tipping culture is becoming more like that of the United States.
The discussion was sparked by a Reddit post detailing a visit to Lana, an upscale Italian restaurant in Sydney's Circular Quay, owned by hospitality giant House Made Hospitality.
The post included a photo of the bill, which came to $221 before a seven per cent service charge of $15.47 was added, bringing the total to $236.45.
The original poster wrote: 'This is the second occasion I have seen this at a fine dining Sydney restaurant. Is this slowly becoming the norm? Is the gratuity actually shared with the staff who go above and beyond?'
They also noted the service charge was detailed on the menu in 'tiny print'.
Commenters weighed in
The thread quickly filled with angry comments from locals who felt the practice was out of touch with Australian values.
'Places like this should be made famous for scummy tactics of gratuity,' said one.
Another wrote: 'This isn't America,' while others vowed to avoid restaurants with auto-tips.
'Thanks for the heads up,' said a third, 'I am not okay with paying an auto-gratuity. This is Australia. Once tipping culture takes hold, it will never go away.'
Another user called it 'absolutely disgraceful behaviour' and said it 'needed to be called out'.
Restaurant responds
Lana responded to the backlash, telling news.com.au, 'The optional seven per cent gratuity at Lana is communicated at multiple stages during the booking process (on our website, in the booking widget, in the confirmation email), written on the menus, and verbalised again when the bill is presented, and is designed to reward our team for their dedication and hard work.
'It also serves to incentivise exceptional service and support increased tenure within our industry, at a time when experience is hard to find, and living costs are increasing.
'This surcharge is not mandatory and can be removed at any point, no questions asked nor judgment given, should a guest request it.'
The restaurant explained that gratuities are managed through a third-party software program (which it believes is the fairest approach and ensures transparency), and every dollar goes directly to the team working during that shift, including the kitchen.
'Our goal is to deliver a memorable dining experience for our guests while rewarding our team for their efforts,' the spokesman continued. 'However, we fully respect that not all guests may wish to pay the gratuity, which is why it remains entirely optional.'
The 'awkwardness' of opting out
Despite this, commenters were sceptical that guests would feel comfortable opting out of the charge.
'They're counting on the fact that a good number of diners will feel too awkward to ask for it to be removed,' claimed one.
'You have to look the person in the eye who won't be getting the extra money,' pointed out another.
Is this legal?
In Australia, restaurants are permitted to add an automatic service charge or tip to bills, but there are strict legal requirements regarding transparency and the option to opt out.
The charge must be clearly indicated as optional and displayed in the total price before the payment is made.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) states that businesses must be transparent about these optional charges and ensure customers are not misled.
Diners must also be able to request the removal of any automatic gratuity before paying the bill.
Do hospitality workers expect tips?
Much of the controversy around tipping is due to the fact that Aussie workers are already paid a fair wage.
Australia's minimum wage is $24.95 per hour, as of July 1 – among the highest in the world – while in the U.S., employees often rely on tips as they earn a base wage as little as US$7.25 ($11.32) per hour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Ratepayers slugged with new healthcare levy as ACT budget deficit balloons to $1.1 billion
Canberra ratepayers will be slugged with a new health levy as the ACT government works to rein in its ballooning budget deficit. In handing down his first ACT budget, Treasurer Chris Steel said rising healthcare costs would push the territory further into the red to the tune of $1.1 billion for 2024-2025. Mr Steel expects to claw back some $600 million in the coming year to bring down the budget deficit to $425 million for 2025-2026, with forward estimates predicting the budget to have a small surplus in four years. With healthcare costs expected to increase to $2.9 billion in the next financial year, ratepayers will have to pay a new $250 health levy to help cover costs. "We have had to confront, in this budget, the need to invest in our healthcare system," Mr Steel said. Businesses which earn $1.75 million will be required to pay payroll tax. Previously, only businesses which earned more than $2 million were required to pay it. Mr Steel said the Commonwealth needed to fund their "fair share" of health care, which he estimated would be about 45 per cent of the cost of the service in the ACT by the year 2035. The Commonwealth funded around 37 per cent of the ACT's healthcare bill in 2024-25. "We do need to see the Commonwealth contributing more and we'll be very strongly advocating for that," he said. There will be a general rates increase of 3.75 per cent in addition to the emergency services levy increasing by $30, and the safer families levy increasing by $10. You can see how much average rates are going up in your suburb here: Michael Johns is one Canberran whose hip pocket will take a hit. Mr Johns labels himself the "sandwich generation" — living with his wife and two kids while also caring for his two elderly parents. "We're sailing pretty close to the wind at the moment, but rates do provide services." Mr Johns is currently living in an apartment in Braddon because the build on his family house dragged on with delays, meaning he currently pays two lots of rates. "My earning capability because of home obligations are really limited. That's what's making it hard," he said. "I'm not against paying rates but at the moment it's really tough." More to come.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Wondering what the 2025 ACT budget includes? Here are five key takeaways
Treasurer Chris Steel has used his first ACT budget to deal Canberrans a tough set of cards. Barely two months on from a federal election dominated by the cost of living, only a very small pool of Canberrans will see any sort of relief in this latest outlook. In fact, hip pockets will be hit even harder — especially for homeowners. The ACT government is using a backdrop of lower interest rates and reduced inflation to justify its efforts to boost much needed revenue, as its budget deficit spills over to $1.1 billion. Let's take a look at the five key takeaways from the 2025-26 ACT budget. The biggest takeaway from this budget is a $250 health levy. It'll apply to all ratepayers and will be attached to rates notices every year until 2028-29, when the ACT government says it'll review it to see if it is still necessary. The levy is expected to bring the territory's coffers an extra $205.7 million over the next four years, starting with $50 million in 2025-26. The ACT government says the extra cash will fund health care, which is the biggest cost to the ACT budget, accounting for roughly a third of all spending. And according to the government, health is the main reason it has such a big budget blowout, with a deficit of $1.1 billion. It says it's had to shoulder the cost of increased demand on services driven by more expensive GP visits, aged care, and private healthcare costs, as well as people catching up on the care they deferred during COVID. At the same time, there's also spending on the design and construction of the new northside hospital in Belconnen, the new Canberra Hospital masterplan in Woden, and health centres in southern Tuggeranong, the inner south, and Gungahlin. But the ACT government has also given the federal government a nudge for not chipping in enough — saying the Commonwealth funded around 37 per cent of the ACT's healthcare bill in 2024-25, but that that amount will fall to around 33 per cent in the next year. That's despite an agreed target to get that Commonwealth contribution to 45 per cent in the next 10 years, so the ACT government is miffed it is missing out on a shortfall of about $190 million. If you're a property owner, rates will only be going in one direction — up. But by how much depends on where you live. For houses, average rate rises range from $47 a year in Chapman to $2,332 in Forrest — that's an increase of 18 per cent! For units, average rate rises start at $25 a year in Coombs to $334 in Yarralumla. The reason why parts of Canberra's inner south are on the upper end of the scale is because of a new threshold the government has introduced. It'll apply to what the government says are 'high value' residences — those with an unimproved land value worth $1 million or more. It means those in that new land value bracket will be hit with a higher rate of 0.5743 per cent, up from 0.4832 per cent, bringing in an extra $17.8 million over the next four years. High value commercial properties with a land value of $5 million or more will also have their own higher threshold, raking in another $5.29 million over the next four years. We'll begin to see little increases in some everyday costs like parking, car rego, and driver licence renewals. Some more niche changes include a jump in storage fees for impounded vehicles, up by 730 per cent to $25 a day. And it'll now cost $11 to get a volunteer working with vulnerable people card — they've been free since the scheme was rolled out in 2011. It seems the ACT has also been undercharging for tobacco licence fees compared to New South Wales, so they will increase by 72 per cent from $638 to $1,100. And if you thought vomiting in a taxi couldn't get much more humiliating, you were wrong. The government will be letting taxi drivers increase what they can charge if they need to clean up after you from $85 to $135. Canberrans love an electric vehicle (EV, leading the country in EV adoption rates with around one in five new vehicles sold being plug-ins. Part of the reason is the ACT's generous incentives to invest in zero-emissions vehicles, including a stamp duty exemption — but no more! From September 1, 2025, there'll be a minimum 2.5 per cent duty on new cars, which will increase in line with emissions and value. The higher the emissions, the higher the duty. On top of that, there'll be an additional 8 per cent tax on vehicles worth $80,000 or more. The government is saying that EVs have now established themselves in the market, and it can't keep giving away these incentives for free. It's the same case for battery storage, ceiling insulation and energy efficient electric appliances which, until now, have been available with zero-interest loans through the Sustainable Household Scheme. From July 1, those loans will now come with a 3 per cent interest rates. But there has been more money allocated to the scheme, which means there should be more people eligible for the low-interest loans. Solar panels won't be included in that scheme at all anymore and will only be available through Home Energy Support Program loans. A $1.1 billion deficit has forced the ACT government to find ways to bring in all the revenue it can muster. The government says with inflation and interests now coming down, now is the time to claw back. High and middle income earners — especially home owners — will feel the brunt of it. On top of the new health levy, the Safer Families Levy will jump from $10 to $60 in 2025-26, and the Police, Fire and Emergency Services Levy will increase by $30 to $426. That's a total levy increase on rates of $290, on top of the general rates increase of 3.75 per cent. Small and medium businesses will also be forced to contribute more, with businesses that earn $1.75 million now required to pay payroll tax. It's intended to capture more businesses. Previously, only businesses which earned more than $2 million were required to pay payroll tax. Low-income earners and Canberra's vulnerable will be largely spared. Electricity, gas and water rebates will be permanently increased by $50 to $800 to help those disproportionately affected by cost-of-living pressures. The number of properties that can be rented out through the government's affordable community housing scheme will also increase from 250 to 1,000. And a $1.5 million Food Bank Fund will also be established for groups offering food relief.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Virgin Australia shares take off, rallying 11 per cent as airline returns to trade on ASX
Virgin Australia shares have rallied as the airline has officially returned to the stock market, marking one of the most anticipated listings of the year and the latest chapter in its turbulent journey. Virgin's initial public offering (IPO) was priced at $2.90 per share, raising $685 million for the company. After the company resumed trade on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) on Tuesday afternoon, Virgin shares ended 11.4 per cent higher, at $3.23. After collapsing into administration at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Virgin was rescued by US private equity giant Bain Capital and delisted from the stock exchange. Now the airline has taken off on the ASX once more, with a leaner business model, a new shareholder mix and the financial muscle of Qatar Airways behind it. At the completion of the IPO, Bain's stake in Virgin was reduced to about 40 per cent, while Qatar Airways retained about 23 per cent, according to the prospectus. At the bell-ringing ceremony at the ASX, Virgin chief executive Dave Emerson was loath to make any predictions around the share price on the first day of trade. "We're focused on delivering long-term value for our shareholders, continuing to improve our performance, and so over time, I expect that to be reflected in stock price," he told reporters at Exchange Square in Sydney's CBD. The airline was not seeking to raise funds through the IPO, but rather to deliver a return to its existing owners, who would have their stake reduced. "It's a great sign that we did not need to raise any money in this float, it means that we have a very strong balance sheet," Mr Emerson said. "We didn't need any additional capital, in fact, we're generating strong returns and we're able to fund our fleet growth without needing new equity … so we feel very well set-up for the future." Overnight, two Virgin services operated by Qatar Airways were diverted on their way to Doha due to the temporary closure of Qatar's airspace, as Iran launched missiles towards US air bases. One flight from Sydney and one from Brisbane were affected, with both landing safely. The Virgin CEO said he received a call at 3:30am from his operations team, informing him of the diversion: "I thought, it was going to be a long day". "Things are trending in a very good direction much more quickly than I might have thought when I woke up this morning and so I'm optimistic about where we're headed. "Our flights today are scheduled to operate, they'll probably be delayed but we're expecting to operate our regular schedule today and then hopefully it's business as usual from there." Mr Emerson said the airline would continue operating flights as it was up to customers whether they wanted to travel in the current environment. "We've got free change over the next week, if anybody doesn't want to travel, they're welcome to change their plans or they can cancel and get a complete refund," he said. "We want to support our customers here and let people make their own decisions about what they're comfortable with." More than five years ago now, Virgin's fall was swift and dramatic. However, it was also entirely predictable if one considered the fate of Ansett Australia. A fierce price war with Qantas had left Virgin financially vulnerable. Then came the global pandemic, grounding fleets and evaporating revenue almost overnight. "Qantas was worried that Virgin Australia was going to attack its corporate travel market and go after the business market, so we had this brutal price war which left Virgin Australia a little bit weak," aviation analyst Peter Harbison told ABC News. "And then when it was just starting to recover, COVID came along and it went into administration." In April 2020, Virgin entered voluntary administration, with its boss blaming its failure to secure a federal government bailout. Within months, the airline was sold to Bain Capital for $3.5 billion. Bain Capital grounded budget offering Tiger Airways for good and set about repositioning Virgin as a mid-market offering. Virgin returned to profitability in 2023. Mr Harbison said Virgin Australia offered fewer inclusions than Qantas but broader appeal than budget airline Jetstar. "The lounges are more limited. Its product is really very much tailored to the mid-market, which does suggest quite a lot." Mr Emerson described the airline as "different in almost every way as far as the business model goes" to the Virgin that collapsed during the pandemic. "We're serving the small business, serving the value corporate, serving the premium leisure segment, those people who really value the product that we put out there … we've changed the whole business model, but what hasn't changed is our focus on delivering great service." As of February this year, Virgin has an additional backer in government-owned Qatar Airways, which bought a 25 per cent stake in the airline and delivers more access to international routes. "Now with Qatar, they have a very tidy deal which will very much help them in the future," Mr Harbison said. Despite that, he did not line up to buy shares in the relisted Virgin. "It is a highly risky business. The profitability margin over the last 70-odd years since the Second World War is pitiful." The answer, according to analyst Mr Harbison, could be no. He argued meaningful airfare reductions are unlikely without government intervention to free up airport slots and increase competition. That is despite regional carrier Rex set to become government-owned if alternative buyers can't be found. Mr Harbison said, with Rex firmly positioned as a regional airline, the Qantas–Virgin duopoly will remain. "The only thing that is going to produce lower airfares is if demand slackens," Mr Harbison said. "And it's not really showing a lot of signs of that at the moment — consumer confidence is reasonably high." Mr Harbison said while Virgin IPO may result in some money spent on fleet renewal and other improvements, another price war with Qantas was unlikely. "Qantas doesn't really want to rock the boat, it likes having Virgin there with a third of the market as long as it doesn't get too aggressive. However, in recent weeks, Qantas has shown signs of ramping up competition in the trans-Tasman market, adding around 60,000 additional seats for December and January, taking on Air New Zealand. Aviation expert Neil Hansford told ABC News the additional capacity could keep a lid on prices, in good news for travellers. "You're not going to see anything like the price increases that could possibly have existed had Qantas not put all this extra capacity into the market," he said.
