logo
Covid-19 shots for kids remain on CDC vaccine schedule with slightly different designation

Covid-19 shots for kids remain on CDC vaccine schedule with slightly different designation

CNNa day ago

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has updated its immunization schedule for children, days after US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that Covid-19 vaccines would be struck from the list of recommended shots for healthy children and pregnant women.
Children will be able to get the vaccines after consulting with a health care provider — what's known as 'shared decision-making.' For pregnant women, there's less guidance; spaces advising that group on the Adult and Child Immunization Schedules are now shaded gray for Covid-19 vaccines 'to reflect no guidance/recommendation,' according to an email sent by the CDC on Friday.
But the changes — posted two days after Kennedy's surprise 58-second social media announcement that the vaccines would be dropped from the CDC's recommended immunization schedules — have created more confusion as doctors, parents and vaccine experts try to parse the new language.
The updates also underscore the fine line Kennedy is walking as he tries to appease vaccine-averse supporters while listening to guidance from the doctors and career scientists who report to him — as well as the majority of Americans who want access to vaccines.
HHS insisted Friday that the vaccines had been removed from the CDC's recommended vaccine schedule, as Kennedy had pledged.
Two people who are familiar with the nuances of the schedule's designations and language said the Covid-19 vaccines for children remain on the schedule, just as other vaccines available for 'shared decision-making' are still considered to be on the schedule. Covid-19 vaccines remain on the schedule for adults too, but with no specific recommendation for pregnancy.
'All this demonstrates that DHHS doesn't understand how the vaccine schedule works,' one person said.
What the vaccine schedule says
On the updated Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule posted Friday, Covid-19 vaccines are no longer listed as 'recommended' by the CDC, but they are listed as 'recommended vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making,' meaning children can get the shots after consulting with a health care provider.
Other vaccines listed as recommended after shared clinical decision-making, such as human papillomavirus for adults 27 through 45 and meningococcal B vaccines for some adolescents 16 through 23, are also considered to be on the CDC's immunization schedule, the source said.
'Yes, absolutely they are still on the schedule,' said a person familiar with the agency's vaccine recommendations who asked not to be named as they were not authorized to share details of the government's deliberations.
In meetings with HHS officials over the past two days, CDC officials had gone out of their way to be deferential and professional, and there was no confrontation about the recommendations, the source said.
In announcing the update Friday, HHS aligned with Kennedy's language from earlier in the week, when he said, 'As of today, the Covid vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.'
'The old COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children under 18 and for pregnant women have been removed from the CDC vaccine schedule,' HHS press officer Emily Hilliard said in a statement Friday when the changes were posted.
'The CDC and HHS encourage individuals to talk with their healthcare provider about any personal medical decision. Under the leadership of Secretary Kennedy, HHS is restoring the doctor-patient relationship. If a parent desires their healthy child to be vaccinated, their decision should be based on informed consent through the clinical [judgment] of their healthcare provider,' the statement said.
HHS doubled down in a social media post later in the day, when it fired back at several media outlets over headlines suggesting that the CDC was keeping the Covid-19 on its vaccination schedule for kids in defiance of Kennedy.
'WRONG AGAIN' the post said. 'The vaccine is not recommended for pregnant women. The vaccine is not recommended for healthy children. Any decision by a parent to vaccinate their child outside the CDC recommended schedule should be made in consultation with their healthcare provider.'
Andrew Nixon, director of communications for HHS, emphasized to CNN that the recommendation would come from a health care provider.
'All CDC is recommending is, 'go talk to health care provider.' If the health care provider recommends that the child get a Covid-19 vaccine, that's fine. That's the physician's recommendation. That's not CDC recommendation,' he said.
What the changes mean for children
Under shared clinical decision-making, patients must first consult with a health care provider about the benefits and risks of the vaccine. Kennedy has said he wants patients to give 'informed consent' before getting vaccines, and the new recommendation puts that into practice.
According to the CDC, such a provider would be anyone who routinely administers vaccines, including doctors, nurse practitioners, nurses and pharmacists.
A vaccine listed on the schedule in this category is required to be covered by insurance with no cost-sharing, meaning no co-pays for patients, according to the CDC.
An email sent by the CDC on Friday said the change from 'recommended' to 'shared clinical decision-making' on shots for kids applies to all children ages 6 months through 17 years, 'including those who are moderately or severely immunocompromised.'
The email also says children eligible for free vaccines through the Vaccines for Children program will be able to get Covid-19 shots after a conversation with their health care provider.
Kids can become severely ill with Covid-19, especially if they're younger than 5. Data presented at the last meeting of the CDC's independent vaccine advisers showed that children 4 and under were hospitalized with Covid at roughly the same rate over the past two respiratory seasons as they were with the flu, even during a severe influenza season. Fewer than 5% of children hospitalized with Covid-19 last season were up to date on their Covid-19 vaccinations.
Immunization experts said that they were relieved that kids could still get the shots but that shared clinical decision-making can present hurdles to vaccination because it requires doctors to consult with patients first.
'With shared clinical decision-making, historically, it has been harder to get people vaccinated,' said Dr. Michelle Fiscus, a pediatrician who is chief medical officer for the Association of Immunization Managers.
Dr. Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said the updated recommendation – which preserves insurance coverage for the vaccines – was a relief.
'After confusing, mixed messages from leaders at Health and Human Services (HHS) earlier this week, we are relieved to see today that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its schedules for child and adolescent immunizations to allow families to maintain the choice to immunize their children against Covid in consultation with their doctor,' Kressly said in a statement.
'However, the deeply flawed process to reach the recommendation raises serious concerns about the stability of the nation's immunization infrastructure and commitment by federal leaders to make sure families can access critical immunizations, whether for Covid or other infectious diseases,' she added.
Fatima Khan, co-founder of the nonprofit grassroots group Protect Their Future, which advocated for kids' access to Covid-19 vaccines throughout the pandemic, said Kennedy's initial announcement was disheartening.
'A lot of parents right now have been doing everything they can. They've been calling their representatives, their health departments, anyone who will listen, anyone who is accountable to the public. And it just felt like today we were heard even if it was in a small way,' Khan told CNN.
Uncertain access for pregnant women
However, the future of Covid-19 vaccine access for people who are pregnant is less clear. Many of the agency's information pages continue to recommend the Covid-19 vaccine for pregnant women, but the adult immunization schedule has been changed to specify that the recommendation applies only to adults who aren't pregnant.
'That's very concerning,' Fiscus said.
The lack of guidance for pregnant women seems to conflict with what US Food and Drug Administration officials wrote in a recent New England Journal of Medicine editorial, in which they said the agency expected that vaccines would continue to be approved for adults with underlying conditions. Pregnancy continues to be listed as a condition that places at person at higher risk for a severe Covid-19 infection.
'If pregnancy is removed as a high-risk condition, what is that decision based upon?' Fiscus asked, saying the agency hasn't given any evidence to support recent changes.
Pregnancy is a risk factor for severe Covid-19 infections. Early in the pandemic, CDC studies found that pregnant women with Covid were three times more likely to need ICU care and nearly twice as likely to die compared with those who weren't pregnant. Covid infections during pregnancy have also been linked to fetal complications such as stillbirth and preterm delivery.
The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine said it would continue to recommend that people who are pregnant be vaccinated against Covid-19.
'Maternal immunization remains the best way to reduce maternal, fetal, and infant complications from COVID-19 infection, and is safe to be given at any point during pregnancy. Maternal immunization is also associated with improved infant outcomes and decreased complications, including maternal and infant hospitalizations,' the group said in a statement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Knicks' all-in moves didn't get them all the way there. But they are getting close
The Knicks' all-in moves didn't get them all the way there. But they are getting close

Associated Press

time31 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

The Knicks' all-in moves didn't get them all the way there. But they are getting close

NEW YORK (AP) — The New York Knicks went further than they'd gone in 25 years, just not as far as they hoped. They signaled they were serious about making a run at the NBA title when they traded for Mikal Bridges in the summer and then Karl-Anthony Towns in a preseason blockbuster, adding a top perimeter defender and an All-Star center to a lineup headlined by Jalen Brunson. Their all-in moves just couldn't get them all the way there. The Knicks were eliminated by the Indiana Pacers on Saturday, leaving them without a championship since 1973. But after advancing to the Eastern Conference finals for the first time since 2000 following consecutive second-round exits, they could at least feel that they are getting closer. 'So it's improvement from last year, but it's ultimately not what our ultimate goal is,' coach Tom Thibodeau said. After Boston rolled to the 2024 title and brought back all its key players, the Celtics were viewed as strong favorites in the East. Yet after building gradually since Leon Rose's arrival as team president in 2020, the Knicks weren't conceding anything to the champions. They re-signed OG Anunoby to the largest contract in team history, then traded five first-round picks in the deal to acquire Bridges from Brooklyn. Just as they were set to begin training camp, the Knicks dealt two starters in All-Star Julius Randle and Donte DiVincenzo, who had just set their single-season 3-point record, to get Towns from Minnesota. The moves made the Knicks good enough to get past the Celtics in the second round. But it turned out to not be the right roster against the deep and speedy Pacers, who knocked them out for the second straight season. 'You make the moves to win, so it hurts to not be able to bring an opportunity to the city for a championship,' Towns said. 'We've got a bunch of great guys in that locker room and the plan now is just to put ourselves in this position again and succeed next time.' First, Rose and the front office will have to evaluate just how close the Knicks really are. Their 51-31 record left them a distant third in the East behind Cleveland and Boston, and they went a combined 0-8 against those teams in the regular season before they finished off the Celtics in the second round after Jayson Tatum ruptured his Achilles tendon in Game 4. With two All-NBA selections in Brunson and Towns, the starting lineup is one of the NBA's strongest. The bench could use a boost, as the Knicks lack the solid depth of the Cavaliers and Celtics — and certainly of the Pacers. Still, after being mostly miles away for two decades, the Knicks have turned themselves into a contender. They have won 50 games in back-to-back seasons and made the playoffs in four of five under Thibodeau. Even after Saturday's defeat, there was belief that the Knicks will get another shot soon. 'The most confidence. Overconfident,' Brunson said when asked if he was confident the Knicks had a group that could win. 'Seriously. There's not an ounce of any type of doubt that I'm not confident with this group.' The extension their captain agreed to last summer that was far below maximum value could help add to it. And perhaps the Knicks are finally at the point that there isn't much to do. The Knicks surely will regret letting this chance get away, unable to recover from their Game 1 collapse at home when they blew a 14-point lead in the final 2:45 of the fourth quarter. So naturally, there was disappointment. That's all there had been in New York in the 2000s. Now there's also hope. 'And so I think the challenge for us is to look at it for what it is,' Thibodeau said. 'And it's, we finished in the top three, but we're falling short of the ultimate goal, and so for us it's to use that for motivation and determination to work all summer to prepare ourselves to make the final step and keep improving so we can achieve our goal.' ___ AP NBA:

What's Good for Politicians Is Good for General Motors
What's Good for Politicians Is Good for General Motors

Wall Street Journal

time37 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

What's Good for Politicians Is Good for General Motors

General Motors CEO Mary Barra earned $29.5 million last year, and it's hard to argue that she isn't earning her keep. The automaker sold more cars in the U.S. than any other company last year, and its profits have doubled in her 11 years as CEO. Credit her ability to please her most important customers—politicians. Their command is her wish. While doubling down on manufacturing profitable gas guzzlers, Ms. Barra promoted electric vehicles to ingratiate herself to Democrats who want to eliminate the products that churn out profits for her company. She again proved her flexible principles last week by praising President Trump's auto tariffs, which the company estimates will dent its profits by $5 billion this year. 'I think tariffs is one tool that the administration can use to level the playing field,' she said. What she omitted is that the playing field has been tilted in GM's favor for decades by a 25% tariff on pickup trucks, which gives domestic automakers an effective monopoly. Also: Mr. Trump's new 25% tariffs on all cars and parts not made in the U.S. will hurt GM, but they will wallop its foreign competitors even more. In 2018 Ms. Barra got a crash course in politicking when she announced a corporate restructuring that involved closing four U.S. plants that produced low-selling sedans. Her goal was to make GM leaner and more profitable. In this she succeeded, but she blundered by not throwing a bone to Mr. Trump, who thinks CEOs answer to him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store