Bust-ups and burnout: Let our experts help you deal with workplace conflict
Are you concerned about your job's security amid Trump tariffs and an uncertain economic outlook? Have you felt let down by your employer's internal processes?
Perhaps you are burnt out due to an increasing workload? Or maybe you are considering leaving your company altogether due to a drive to return to the office.
We want to hear from you about any work-related issues you want to put to our panel of experts.
We have received many queries on working from home, detailing unique challenges in having to spend more and more time in the office, or dealing with the isolation felt by some while working from home. We want to hear more.
READ MORE
Has your employer called for a greater presence in the office? What effect has this had on you? You might have found that
hybrid working arrangements
have led to a collapse of workplace relationships and friendships.
Other queries have spanned private and public pensions, feeling overqualified for specific roles, inappropriate behaviour in the office, or
being the subject of allegations of misconduct, resulting in suspension
.
Work-related stress and burnout queries are coming in at an increasing rate, which experts say are on the rise. Have you experienced these?
Perhaps you are unhappy in your current role and want to see what else is on offer, particularly in this employees' market in a country at near full employment.
Conflict arising from hybrid working arrangements
, which can often result in allegations of workplace bullying, is also on the rise, according to our panel of experts. Have you experienced such conflict and want to know more on how to handle it?
Maternity-leave related queries
and parental leave worries,
flawed internal grievance processes
, and recruitment and promotion-related queries have also been dealt with by our panel of experts.
Alongside employees, managers and employers grappling with a sometimes unhappy workforce have sought advice on navigating hybrid working arrangements, challenges in retaining talent and
even handling social gatherings outside of the office
.
Finding new ways of coping with conflict is an ever-present challenge, as even very experienced people in charge of their career trajectory will often find themselves coming home each night with a tale of woe to offload on their partner.
The intensity of such experience is clearly often worsened as people take on more responsibility through promotion and years spent in a particular working environment. But people at the start of their careers can easily find themselves in even more testing environments.
This column has sought to specialise in finding new ways to effectively bypass or solve such issues, and readers have proven hugely interested in how peers approach such scenarios, how they would themselves react in these situations, and deal with perceptions of blame.
A remarkable example of workplace conflict involved
a HR executive suffering from burnout
- a phenomenon such staff are typically supposed to solve, not get caught up in.
Please use our attached form to send in any workplace queries that you may have. We do everything to ensure your details are anonymised where necessary in published responses. We seek expert responses from the most relevant people to ensure clear-sighted, accessible advice.
[
Your work questions answered: If offered another job during maternity leave, what are my rights for taking the rest of it?
Opens in new window
]
Please limit your submissions to 400 words or less, and please include a phone number.
Your name and contact details are kept confidential and will only be used for verification purposes. Any details about your employer will also be anonymised.
Please note we may not publish a response to every submission we receive.
This column is not intended to replace professional advice and only questions selected for publication can be answered.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Tesla suffers suffers biggest one-day drop in market value after Trump-Musk spat
Tesla 's market value suffered its biggest one-day drop on record on Thursday as an escalating feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk triggered a sharp sell-off in the carmaker's shares. The electric vehicle group's shares closed down more than 14 per cent, erasing $153 billion (€134 billion) from its market capitalisation, after the US president signalled he could terminate US government contracts with Mr Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social. Thursday's drop left Tesla's share price down 25 per cent since the start of the year. READ MORE The spat between two of the world's most powerful men included repeated barbs from Mr Musk on his platform X and Mr Trump's comment that the billionaire, who has been a close ally since the election, was 'wearing thin'. The Tesla sell-off reverberated through US stock markets, with the S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite ending the session down 0.5 per cent and 0.8 per cent respectively. Both indices began to decline at around midday, when Mr Trump and Mr Musk began exchanging insults. The pair's 'petulant drama shook up the stock market', said Mike Zigmont, co-head of trading and research at Visdom Investment Group. 'The bond market didn't care, nor should it.' Tesla investors have had a rollercoaster few months. The stock rallied hard in the final quarter of last year after Mr Trump won his second term as president, but fell between mid-December and early March amid a broader market sell-off fuelled by Mr Trump's trade wars. Shares in rivals to Mr Musk's space exploration group SpaceX and its satellite broadband network subsidiary Starlink rose on Thursday as Tesla fell. AST SpaceMobile gained 7.5 per cent while communications group EchoStar jumped 17.4 per cent. The breakdown of Mr Musk's relationship with Mr Trump comes as his public interventions in European politics, including support for far right parties, have contributed to falling car sales across Europe. In March, JPMorgan strategists wrote in a note to clients that they 'struggle[d] to think of anything analogous in the history of the automotive industry, in which a brand has lost so much value so quickly'. The cuts Mr Musk made to federal government spending as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency also sparked a backlash. The Tesla boss stepped back from his government role at the end of May, having blamed 'blowback' against his businesses. Some investors said the market should have anticipated Mr Musk's feud with Mr Trump, despite their earlier bonhomie. Renowned short seller Jim Chanos said on X that it was the 'Most. Predictable. Break-up. Ever.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
You might think it's Your Friends & Neighbors, but And Just Like That... is the only true aspirational show on TV
Sometime in April a new fantasy dropped: a walk-in wardrobe swish enough for Jon Hamm to want to break into it. Hamm's role as Andrew 'Coop' Cooper, a sacked hedge-fund manager turned neighbourhood burglar, in Your Friends & Neighbors has been a rare source of unalloyed television pleasure this year, with each Friday episode notification from Apple TV+ becoming the starting pistol for the weekend. Still, forget what I said about wardrobes. This dark comedy with a dash of Dynasty might be set in a fictional 'exclusive hamlet' in New York state, but no one in their right mind would actually want to be one of the neighbours in Your Friends & Neighbors. They are, as Coop's conspiratorial voiceover tells us, 'assholes'. It makes for a fun blend of soap, satire and farce, but it's not aspirational, not unless you genuinely fancy being in the market for torn jeans that cost more than monthly rent. READ MORE The now completed, already renewed nine-parter, created by Jonathan Tropper, instead fits into the recent vogue for depicting the ultrawealthy as venal, ludicrous and unhappy, prompting chicken-and-egg questions about which came first, the money or the grasping personality. [ Your Friends & Neighbors: Jon Hamm is hilarious in this riotous, satirical romp Opens in new window ] To be clear, I loved it. Rich people have very funny problems sometimes. Perhaps their greatest flaw is their desire to hang around only with other rich people, which in Your Friends & Neighbors means going to parties organised by your ex-wife's new boyfriend. Westmont Village has those eye-popping American proportions going on but is as oppressive as elite enclaves come. Even the 'keeping up with the Joneses' theme-tune refrain is all pressure, no joy. Yes, how nice to have the time to laze about sharing local arrest gossip in a sauna with four other women wearing matching towels, but how claustrophobic, too. And who really wants to be a member of the sort of stultifying country club that won't stick by you when you're charged with murder? But at least Westmont Village isn't a five-star hotel so suffocating it would put you off the entire concept of holidays. In The White Lotus the lifestyles of the rich and tedious have their own hypnotic quality. I certainly felt as if I was being hypnotised into watching the third season's slow depiction of wellness hell. Never mind the gunfire. It was the forced phone-detoxing and poolside man-pests that were the true horror. That third run reaffirmed my long-held belief that there's never been a massage that hasn't been enlivened by some kind of security emergency. By the finale I felt sorry for the Thailand tourism authorities, who got such a raw deal compared to Taormina, in Sicily, the HBO show's second-season star. And that's the essence of this recent fashion for wealth porn. It's not aspirational lives we're watching, it's aspirational scenery. Maybe the more the real world falls apart, the more audiences – and producers – gravitate towards glimpses of picture-postcard unreality. In Netflix's Sirens , for instance, we're presented with an unnervingly pristine shoreline as the camera follows a perky personal assistant skipping up endless flights of beach steps to the Cliff House. This island mansion has a perfectly positioned swimming pool and grounds so enormous you need a buggy to drive around them. I don't recommend Sirens – it's not so much escapist as a series to escape – though it should be noted that it also possesses some enviably spacious walk-in wardrobe action. To access it, however, you must put up with Julianne Moore being creepy for the best part of five episodes. Never work for someone who might suddenly demand you procure a harp. [ Sirens review: An anaemic White Lotus cover that hits the right notes but has no tune of its own Opens in new window ] Speaking of work, it remains gloriously incidental to the only true aspirational show on television: the Sex and the City spin-off And Just Like That... Carrie Bradshaw, the never-knowingly-underwardrobed Manhattanite played by Sarah Jessica Parker , has rats in her back garden, but her back garden is in a Gramercy Park townhouse, where her new apartment is otherwise shaping up delightfully. Because real estate is no bother to Carrie, she has once again moved on from the rent-controlled studio apartment that Elle Decor has dubbed her 'emotional support brownstone'. [ And Just Like That... Season 3 review: Nostalgia served up like a gift box of premium cupcakes Opens in new window ] The women of And Just Like That... occasionally have to contend with woes such as malfunctioning alarms and demanding podcast producers, but they are radically content, in the main, with being rich. They know their money allows them to enjoy everything from eccentric headwear to ballet. They're free. This seems a good time to revisit remarks made in 2022 by Candace Bushnell , the columnist who inspired the original series, about how much she used to be paid. [ Candace Bushnell at the Ambassador: A fun, girly night out for Sex and the City fans Opens in new window ] In the 1990s she received $5,000 a month for writing the People Are Talking About column for Vogue. The New York Observer, home of Sex and the City, 'paid less', but she could afford that because of Vogue. Before these columns she would 'get an assignment for 3,000 words, $2 per word', which she described as 'failing'. Ah. Failure has never sounded so aspirational.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Can belated economic sanity save the US from a Liz Truss-style fiasco?
The US approach to trade restrictions is a roller coaster. The tactic so far has been to announce a big increase in tariffs on its trading partners, then some degree of rowing back pending negotiations, then some new threats if negotiations aren't going fully the US's way. Now the US courts have intervened to at least delay proposed tariffs. It's not clear where all this will land. China confronted US tariffs that escalated to more than 100 per cent with its own countermeasures. Then negotiations opened and there has, for now, been significant rowing back . Alongside higher tariffs on steel and cars, the opening salvo against the EU was for 20 per cent tariffs, scaled back to 10 per cent while negotiations opened. The latest threat from the Trump administration is for 50 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU , unless agreement on a trade deal is reached by midsummer. Trade deals are complex and the window for reaching a deal is very short. The short-term effects of these threats are destabilising, both for exporters to the US and for US producers relying on imported inputs. READ MORE The objective of the US administration is, presumably, to see US production replace imported goods. However, unless US firms have spare capacity to replace imports, they need to build such capability. [ EU-US tariff talks: What happens next? Opens in new window ] No sane US firm will invest in new factories until it is clear what the final outcome will be from the negotiations with different big trading partners. In many cases, it could take years to bring such investments on stream – possibly only after the next US presidential election. If Trump's successor were to pursue a different trade policy, import-replacing investment might struggle to make money. The Republic of Ireland exported more than €50 billion of pharmaceuticals to the US last year. New US pharma capacity would be needed to replace imports from Ireland. Firms are unlikely to decide to invest in new factories in the US until they know what the final trade landscape will be. Then, if new plants are built, they will need regulatory approval to produce the relevant drugs in the United States, likely also taking years. Thus, it could take considerable time before pharmaceutical production could switch from Ireland to the US. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 Recent studies by the EU Commission and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have looked at the possible effect of the US-initiated trade war on the EU and the US economies. The studies suggest that the trade war is likely to be particularly damaging for the US, with a much more muted impact on the EU. That is because the tariffs will raise the cost of US imports for US consumers and producers. In turn, this will lead to higher inflation, which could require the US central bank, the Fed, to raise interest rates, slowing the economy further. The EU research suggests that the unilateral imposition of tariffs by the US, just through their effects on trade, would reduce US national income by 1 per cent next year, while the impact on the EU would only be 0.2 per cent. Retaliatory action by the EU and others would raise the United States' loss to 1.5 per cent. The EU analysis also indicates that the US costs would be magnified by any increase in interest rates needed to choke off inflation. If the Fed were to raise rates to counter rising inflation, this could provoke a Trump response, overturning the Fed's vital independent role in setting interest rates. If this were to happen, the loss of faith in US economic policy would be likely to have even more serious consequences. However, the United States faces a further problem. US government debt is 120 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), back to where it was in 1945 after the second World War. In the OECD, only the Greek, Italian and Japanese governments are more indebted. Nevertheless, the Trump administration plans to implement big tax cuts for the coming years. While serious cuts in expenditure, affecting social and health services, are also promised, the net effect will still mean borrowing of 6 per cent to 7 per cent of GDP each year, adding rapidly to the already high debt burden. The lesson we learned from the fiscal crisis in the 1980s, and again 15 years ago in the financial crash, is that if your national debt goes above 100 per cent of national income, you face big challenges borrowing at reasonable rates. Current US policy raises the possibility of a Liz Truss type event , where government interest rates rise significantly due to the prospect of an ever-increasing government debt burden. Hopefully, before this happens, sanity will prevail in US economic policy.
