Court dismisses ex-AG officer's appeal in lawsuit against Rewcastle-Brown
The case involved three articles, including one titled 'How AG's Office Connived to Prevent a Second Post-mortem on Kevin Morais – Exclusive Expose.'
A three-judge panel, led by Justice Datuk Azizah Nawawi, unanimously ruled that Mabel failed to comply with legal requirements by not providing a Malay translation of the allegedly defamatory article.
Justice Azizah stated, 'In this case, there was no Bahasa Melayu translation of the impugned defamatory article, and that was clearly a non-compliance with Order 92. We find there is no appealable error by the High Court. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs of RM10,000.'
The High Court had earlier rejected Mabel's suit on May 2, 2024, citing the same reason and ordering her to pay RM15,000 in costs.
Judge Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah emphasized the legal necessity of Malay-language pleadings under Article 152 of the Federal Constitution and the National Language Act 1963/67.
Mabel had sued Rewcastle-Brown in 2019 over articles connecting her to alleged text messages sent to the family of Kevin Morais, a murder victim in 2015.
She sought damages and the removal of the articles from Sarawak Report's website. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Defamation case: Caprice ordered to ‘archive' 31 posts
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has ordered rapper Caprice to archive 31 allegedly defamatory Instagram posts targeting entrepreneur Muhammad Asyraf Khalid. Judge Datuk Anand Ponnudurai granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction following a suit filed by Muhammad Asyraf, stepson of Datuk Seri Siti Nurhaliza Tarudin. Lawyer Abdul Hakeem Aiman confirmed the posts must be archived immediately until the inter-parte injunction hearing on September 2. Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli, has yet to file a defence statement in response to the lawsuit. Muhammad Asyraf initiated the suit on August 4, citing defamatory posts published between July 30 and August 2. The posts allegedly portrayed Muhammad Asyraf negatively for hosting Murad Zaidi, his personal trainer, on a podcast. 'I invited Murad to discuss gym management challenges and clarify his Instagram statements denying allegations,' said Muhammad Asyraf. The posts also insinuated that Muhammad Asyraf misused family influence as the son of Datuk Seri Khalid Mohammad Jiwa. Despite not airing the full podcast episode, Caprice continued attacking Muhammad Asyraf publicly. The lawsuit claims Caprice's actions led to public backlash and tarnished Muhammad Asyraf's reputation. Muhammad Asyraf seeks an injunction to prevent further defamatory posts and demands their removal within 24 hours. He also requests a public video apology from Caprice across all social media platforms. The plaintiff is seeking general damages, aggravated damages, and legal costs. The case will proceed with an inter-parte hearing on September 2. - Bernama
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
13 of 29 MA63 demands resolved, says Fadillah
KUALA LUMPUR: Some 13 out of the 29 demands under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) have been resolved, says Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. He said nine of the 13 were finalised during the Madani administration, while four were carried out through previous administrations. 'Efforts towards achieving the remaining 16 demands are ongoing. 'This includes education, health, petroleum and oil royalties,' sais the Energy Transition and Water Transformation Ministry when winding up debates for his ministry in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (Aug 18). Stressing the government's commitment to resolving all matter under MA63, he said the time frame also depends on the legal proceedings involved. 'We respect the special position of Sabah and Sarawak as indicated in the Federal Constitution,' he added. He also said the federal government is always ready to resolve the demands in efforts to recognise the spirit of MA63.
The Star
9 hours ago
- The Star
Process to separate powers of AG and public prosecutor at final stage, says Azalina
KUALA LUMPUR: The process to separate the powers of the Attorney General and the Public Prosecutor is in its final stages, says Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said that a complete study and proposed model on the separation of powers would be brought to Cabinet soon. "The initiative to separate the roles of the AG and the Public Prosecutor is now in its final phase. "The findings, along with a proposed separation model, will be brought to the Cabinet for consideration in the near future," said Azalina during her winding-up speech on the 13th Malaysian Plan (13MP) in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (August 18). Azalina also said that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had said during Question Time that the Cabinet is expected to make a policy decision on the matter by the end of August, Azalina said the Parliamentary Services Act and the commitment to separate the powers of the AG and the Public Prosecutor represent the government's most significant reform to date. She said this would involve amendments to the Federal Constitution, requiring a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Meanwhile, to ensure all Malaysians have access to justice, the government is set to introduce mobile court services in rural areas under the "Justice on Wheels" initiative. She said the initiative had been implemented in Sabah and Sarawak but not in the peninsula. "This is an inclusive step to ensure that justice is not just in urban areas but also in rural areas and the interior," said Azalina. She said newly appointed Chief Justice Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh had also expressed support for the initiative. "We hope to have one mobile unit for each state. Mobile legal access will not just solve small cases but also assist in registering documents," she said.
