Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed
Ferriday High is 90% Black. Vidalia High is 62% white.
For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests 'we're not supposed to have the finer things,' said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. 'It's almost like our kids don't deserve it,' he said.
The schools are part of Concordia Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district — and dozens of others — from decades-old orders that some call obsolete.
In a remarkable reversal, the Justice Department said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will 'bite the dust.'
It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools.
The orders were always meant to be temporary — school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts.
Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation — including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favoring white students in admissions.
'Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there,' said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 'That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently.'
Debates over integration are far from settled
Last year, before President Donald Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Black elementary and middle schools.
At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders.
Accepting the plan would have been a 'death sentence' for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed.
'It's time to move on,' said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. 'Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.'
At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities.
'It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need,' he said.
Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. 'Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to ... it would be a culture shock to some people," said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who like Derrick Davis is Black.
The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment.
Federal orders offer leverage for racial discrimination cases
Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana.
Calling the orders historical relics is 'unequivocally false,' said Shaheena Simons, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases.
'Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders,' she said.
With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said.
In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered Delta Charter School to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15% Black.
After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40% of its students are Black.
Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant.
The Justice Department could easily end some desegregation orders
The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs are no longer involved — the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals.
Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened.
As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95% white.
At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area 'feels like a Mayberry, which is great,' referring to the fictional Southern town from 'The Andy Griffith Show.' The federal government, he said, has 'probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped.'
Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline.
After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left.
Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement.
'A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B," he said. 'You'll find schools like Ferriday — the term is, to me, slipping into darkness."
___
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what you need to know about Louisiana's new cell phone law
Louisiana drivers have to put down their cell phones while in motion under a new law that took effect last week. Gov. Jeff Landry believes the new law will help lower the state's auto insurance rates, which are the most expensive in the country. Republican Slidell Rep. Brian Glorioso's Act 288 makes handheld cell phone use illegal while driving, including talking, texting and engaging in social media or apps. Drivers can still operate their phone using hands-free technology. They can also hold their phones while parked or stopped at red lights. "This is one of the great pieces of legislation that has evaded us at this Capitol," the Republican governor said while signing Glorioso's bill into law. "Finally this year we were able to pass a distracted driving (law). "If you quit texting and driving it's less accidents and if there's less accidents there's less lawsuites. It's a great bill." More than 30 states have enacted bans on hand-held cell phone use while driving. Though the law took effect Aug. 1, police officers can only give drivers a warning until Jan. 1, 2026. And the law prevents officers from conducting a traffic stop based only for violating the cell phone ban. Drivers can only be ticketed for violating the ban as a secondary offense, which means they were pulled over for another primary violation. But current law does allow officers to pull drivers over for violating the ban in school and construction zones. The penalty for violating the new law will be a $100 citation, while the fine is $250 in school zones. More: Frog gigging law changes in Louisiana, home to Frog Capital of the World Greg Hilburn covers state politics for the USA TODAY Network of Louisiana. Follow him on Twitter @GregHilburn1. This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Will Louisiana's new cell phone law lower auto insurance rates? Solve the daily Crossword


New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: West Virginia Governor Sending Guard Troops to Assist in D.C.
The Trump administration backed off one of its most explicit efforts to take control of the Washington police department on Friday, agreeing before a judge to leave the city's police chief in charge for now. Under pressure from Judge Ana C. Reyes of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, who pledged to intervene unless the administration retracted its move to insert an ally as the head of the police department, the Justice Department agreed to rescind part of an order on Thursday that had looked to do just that. In place of the old order, which had given absolute control over the city's police department to Terry Cole, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, lawyers hastily drafted a revised version. The judicial threat and lightning negotiation session that followed presented the first major setback for the Trump administration in its rapid campaign to seize control of law enforcement in the nation's capital. But they left in place most of the structure of the federal takeover, maintaining less intrusive federal oversight of the police department and leaving federal agents and National Guard members free to continue patrolling Washington streets. The document agreed to on Friday preserved many elements of the order released on Thursday by Attorney General Pam Bondi, including authorizing Mr. Cole to 'direct the mayor to immediately provide' law enforcement in pursuit of many of the president's stated goals, including immigration enforcement and removing homeless people from public spaces. But it cut out a provision naming Mr. Cole the city's 'emergency police commissioner,' a role that appeared to usurp the authority of Pamela A. Smith, the city's police chief, to command the force and set its priorities. Mayor Muriel Bowser and the city's attorney general, Brian L. Schwalb, hailed the outcome even as lawyers were still racing inside to make the final revisions to Ms. Bondi's order. 'The local policing of our city sits with the mayor and the chief of police, notwithstanding the government, the president and the attorney general's efforts to suggest that they had taken control of our police force and put somebody in to run our police,' Mr. Schwalb said. 'I'm very gratified that the judge today recognized that that is flagrantly illegal, that it violates the clear language of the Home Rule Act and that, for all intents and purposes, the chief of police remains the chief of police.' 'My sincere hope is that we don't have to be back fighting over this issue again,' he added. On social media, Ms. Bondi attacked Mr. Schwalb, who had sued over the Trump administration's actions, while taking a softer tone toward Ms. Bowser. 'Unfortunately, the DC Attorney General continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety in Washington, DC,' she said, adding, 'We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser, who is dedicated to ensuring the safety of residents, workers, and visitors in Washington, DC.' The compromise came shortly after Judge Reyes forcefully encouraged lawyers from both sides to reach a short-term truce that would have the federal government temporarily step back from asserting control over policing the city until the court dives more fully into the details of the case next week. Judge Reyes, a Biden appointee, made clear that her initial reaction was that the Trump administration had gone far beyond the authorities Congress intended in the 1973 Home Rule law granting the city limited self-governance. She told Yaakov Roth, a lawyer from the Justice Department, that she would block the order Ms. Bondi released on Thursday if the provision elevating Mr. Cole were not removed in negotiations. Washington's government sued the Trump administration on Friday, arguing that an executive order issued by President Trump on Monday federalizing the city's Police Department and the follow-up order by Ms. Bondi 'far exceed' the president's authority under the Home Rule law. In the emergency hearing on Friday, Judge Reyes said she was focused solely on reaching a truce that could last the weekend. While she said the Trump administration's broader actions using the Home Rule Act appeared unlawful, she effectively punted any discussion on that point to next week. Judge Reyes emphasized on Friday that she would need to eventually weigh in on Mr. Trump's claims that crime in the city had reached a breaking point, after each side could research and present evidence, including crime data and the steps the city has already taken this year to work with federal law enforcement in service of the president's goals. Statistics show that Washington's crime rate has been falling recently. She also noted that courts have not, so far, had occasion to scrutinize the bounds of the law, as no president had tested them until now. 'By the way, do we all agree that I'm fortunate enough to be the first person to rule on this section of the Home Rule Act?' she said. 'Uh, huzzah.' Mitchell Reich, a lawyer representing the District of Columbia, told the judge that the case raised 'a nest of novel questions' about federal power that needed to be resolved in a more holistic way. 'Oh, I agree with that,' she said. While the discussion on Friday was mostly confined to Mr. Cole's authority, Judge Reyes also clashed with Mr. Roth over what he believed the federal government could actually do with the city's police once it had federalized the force. She pushed back on a number of claims Mr. Roth made, including that he could effectively supplant the city's police chief in setting priorities across the department and steering large numbers of officers into certain neighborhoods or away from their standard work. Above all, she made clear that she did not believe the law gave the president the power to take control of the city's police and use the force to pursue objectives that may even violate the city's own laws and ordinances, like Washington's law restricting local police cooperation with immigration enforcement. 'It's antithetical to the notion of home rule,' Mr. Reich said. 'Local residents have local control.' 'I agree with you that they're not allowed to take over the police force, and Mr. Roth, if I gave him truth serum, he'd probably agree,' Judge Reyes said. After giving lawyers from both sides an hour to make their cases, Judge Reyes stepped away for an hour and a half to let them confer on a resolution to the standoff. When Mr. Roth returned to confirm that Mr. Cole would assume a more collaborative role for now, and work through the mayor's office to change the city's policing policy, she thanked both sides for 'very good work on very short notice.' 'I think these are the kind of issues that should be decided between the District and the government, so I'm thankful for you all,' she said. 'But again, if I have to step in, I will, OK?'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge tosses lawsuit filed by Ryan Walters against Freedom From Religion Foundation
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters against the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a group with which he's had multiple public disagreements. U.S. District Judge John F. Heil III in Muskogee issued his ruling on Wednesday, Aug. 13, saying Walters and the taxpayer-funded agency he leads, the Oklahoma State Department of Education, had failed to demonstrate standing to file the lawsuit. Heil also found the court lacked jurisdiction. The case was dismissed without prejudice, meaning it could be refiled. In the lawsuit, filed March 31, Walters complained about the foundation sending letters to two Oklahoma school districts concerning public prayer being held in one, Achille Public Schools, and the hiring of an athletic team chaplain in another, Putnam City Schools. The foundation believed those situations to be unconstitutional. Walters, who has pushed to include the teaching of the Bible in Oklahoma classrooms, disagreed. Heil said the lawsuit 'does not allege that (the agency) has stopped executing its duties or ceased administration of Oklahoma's public schools because of defendant's letters. Nor does the complaint allege that the schools have ceased any policies or practices because of defendant's letters. For these reasons, the court finds that plaintiffs have failed to show an injury in fact,' Heil wrote. He added: 'Plaintiffs' generalized statement of injury is nothing more than conjecture.' The Madison, Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation called Heil's ruling 'a win for freedom of speech.' Annie Laurie Gaylor, the co-president of the foundation, said it would 'continue to work to protect the constitutional rights of students and families in Oklahoma.' Megan Lambert, the legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, which helped represent the foundation in the lawsuit, said the decision underscores the right to speak out for change. 'The right to dissent is now more important than ever, and we remain committed to ensuring that people can continue to advocate for better governance and equity in Oklahoma public schools," Lambert said. "The Oklahoma State Department of Education is without the power to silence dissent.' Walters responded to a request to comment on Heil's ruling Thursday, Aug. 14, by issuing a statement reiterating his support for Christian values. 'For years and, at the behest of Democrats, Christianity is under attack in America,' Walters said. 'And during this all out assault on Christian values, all we hear from the Left is applause. There will NEVER be a day where I allow these values to be trampled on in Oklahoma.' In a letter to Achille Superintendent Rick Beene dated Dec. 17, the foundation said it had learned from a complainant that their child's history teacher 'now begins class by picking a Bible verse for the day and asking a student to read the verse to the class' and that the district 'has a custom and practice of beginning each school day with 'mandatory student-led prayer' over the schools' intercom system.' Achille, located in Bryan County in southeastern Oklahoma, has about 300 students in its district. An attachment to the lawsuit included a February 2018 letter sent from the foundation to the Putnam City district concerning the football team chaplain, but the lawsuit did not ask for any relief regarding that letter. Walters' suit claimed the foundation's letters had interfered with 'Superintendent Walters's and OSDE's statutory duty to oversee Oklahoma's public schools and their duty to implement curricular standards, investigate any complaints levied against an Oklahoma school and advocate for its students and parents.' Walters and the Freedom from Religion Foundation have clashed before, over issues including prayer over the school intercom at a Prague school and a Bible-verse-themed poster inside a Putnam City middle school. The foundation has cited the long-standing court precedent establishing a separation between church and state. This article has been updated because a previous version had an inaccuracy. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Judge tosses suit filed by Ryan Walters over letters sent to schools Solve the daily Crossword