US News Live Updates: Donald Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect today
09 Jun 2025 | 07:38:20 AM IST
U.S. President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 am ET (0401 GMT) on Monday, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from "foreign terrorists." The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa.The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date. Show more Demonstrators torched cars and scuffled with security forces in Los Angeles on Sunday as police kept protestors away from the National Guard troops President Donald Trump sent to the streets of the second biggest US city.Unrest broke out for a third day, with protestors angry at action by immigration officials that have resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. Polish and allied aircraft were activated early on Monday to ensure the safety of Polish airspace after Russia launched air strikes targeting western Ukraine, near the border with Poland, the Operational Command of the Polish armed forces said."The steps taken are aimed at ensuring security in the regions bordering the areas at risk," the Command said on X.All of Ukraine was under air raid alerts as of 0200 GMT on Monday after the Ukrainian Air Force warned of Russian missile and drone attacks. Israel's Foreign Ministry says a Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists has been diverted to Israel.In a post on X, it said the boat "is safely making its way to the shores of Israel."The passengers "are expected to return to their home countries," it added, without providing further details. Israel said a Gaza-bound boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists was redirected to Israeli shores on Monday, with the passengers set to return to their homes."The 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. The passengers are expected to return to their home countries," Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs posted on social media. Two people died in a fire incident caused by two e-rickshaws kept for charging in the Kodi colony, Dilshad Garden. Fire Officer Anup Singh says, "We received a call at 11.32 pm. The fire was in Kodi colony, Dilshad Garden. We reached the spot and carried out the firefighting operations. After dousing the fire, it was found that two e-rickshaws and motorcycles were gutted in the fire. Two people also lost their lives in the fire incident... Among the dead, one was 24 years old and the other was 60 years old... The charging of the e-rickshaws seems to have caused the fire. Further investigation is underway..." Dust-laden winds are expected to continue in the national capital on Monday with generally clear sky, the India Meteorological Department (IMD) said on Sunday. According to the IMD, strong surface winds are likely in the city on Monday with the maximum temperature expected to hover around 43 degrees Celsius and the minimum around 28 degrees Celsius. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition said early on Monday that the Israeli military had "boarded" the Gaza-bound charity ship the Madleen.Connections have been lost on the ship, the coalition added in a post on Telegram. President Donald Trump has banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States and restricted access for those from seven others, citing national security concerns in resurrecting and expanding a hallmark policy from his first term that will mostly affect people from Africa and the Middle East.The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa.The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry
Sydney, When US President Donald Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports the goal was to bring manufacturing back to American soil and protect local jobs. However, this process of re-shoring is complex and requires years of investment and planning – far too slow for the world of ultra-fast fashion, where brands are used to reacting in weeks, not years. Many clothing companies started to move production out of China during Trump's first term. They relocated to countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia when the initial China-specific tariffs hit. This trend accelerated with the newer 'reciprocal' tariffs. Instead of re-shoring production, many fashion brands are simply sourcing from whichever country offers the lowest total cost after tariffs. The result? The ultra-fast fashion machine adapted quickly and became even more exploitative. From Guangzhou to your wardrobe in days Platforms such as Shein and Temu built their success by offering trend-driven clothing at shockingly low prices. A USD 5 dress or USD 3 top might seem like a bargain, but those prices hide a lot. Much of Shein's production takes place in the so-called 'Shein village' in Guangzhou, China, where workers often sew for 12–14 hours a day under poor conditions to keep pace with the demand for new items. When the US cracked down on Chinese imports, the intention was to make American-made goods more competitive. This included raising the tariff on Chinese goods as high as 145 per cent , and closing the 'de minimis' loophole, which had allowed imports under USD 800 to enter tariff-free. But these tariffs did not halt ultra-fast fashion. They just rerouted production to countries with lower tariffs and even lower labour costs. The Philippines, with a comparatively low tariff rate of 17 per cent, emerged as a surprising alternative. However, the country can't provide the industrial scale and infrastructure to match what China can offer. So why does Australia matter? Much of the cheap fashion previously bound for the US is now flooding other markets, including Australia. Australia still allows most low-value imports to enter tax-free, and platforms such as Shein and Temu have taken full advantage. Australian consumers are among the most frequent Shein and Temu buyers per capita globally. Just 3 per cent of clothing is made in Australia and most labels rely on offshore manufacturing. This makes Australia an ideal target market for ultra-fast fashion imports. We have high purchasing power, lenient import rules and strong demand for low-cost style, especially due to the cost-of-living crisis. The hidden costs of cheap clothes The environmental impact of fast fashion is well known. However, amid the chaos of Trump's tariff announcements, far less attention has been paid to how these policies – together with the retreat from climate commitments – worsen environmental harms, including those linked to fast fashion. The irony is that the tariffs meant to protect American workers have, in some cases, worsened conditions for workers elsewhere. Meanwhile, consumers in Australia now benefit from faster delivery of even cheaper goods as Temu, Shein and others have improved their shipping capabilities to Australia. Australian consumers send more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing to landfill each year. But the deeper problem is structural. The entire business model is built on exploitation and environmental damage. Factory workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting. In the race to stay competitive, many manufacturers reduce wages and overlook hazardous working conditions. Will ethical fashion ever compete? Fixing these problems will require a global rethink of how fashion operates. Governments have a role in regulating disclosures about supply chains and enforcing labour standards. Brands need to take responsibility for the conditions in their factories, whether directly owned or outsourced. Transparency is essential. Alternatives to fast fashion are gaining traction. Clothing rentals are emerging as a promising business model that help build a more circular fashion economy. Charity-run op shops have long been a sustainable source of second-hand clothing. Australia's new Seamless scheme seeks to make fashion brands responsible for the full life of the clothes they sell. The aim is to help people buy, wear and recycle clothes in a more sustainable way. Consumers also matter. If we continue to expect clothes to cost less than a cup of coffee, change will be slow. Recognising that a USD 5 t-shirt has hidden costs, borne by people on the factory floor and the environment, is a first step. Some ethical brands are already showing a better way and offer clothes made under fairer conditions and with sustainable materials. These clothes are not as cheap or fast, but they represent a more conscious alternative especially for consumers concerned about synthetic fibres, toxic chemicals and environmental harm. Trump reshuffled the deck, but did not change the game Trump's trade rules aim to re-balance global trade in favour of American industry, yet have cost companies more than USD 34 billion in lost sales and higher costs. This cost will eventually fall on US consumers. In ultra-fast fashion, it mostly exposed how fragile and exploitative the system already was. Today, brands such as Shein and Temu are thriving in Australia. But unless we address the systemic inequalities in fashion production and rethink the incentives that drive this market, the true cost of cheap clothing will continue to be paid by those least able to afford it. PY PY This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin Men ‘Invade' Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk For The First Time; Russia Confirms Operation
/ Jun 09, 2025, 11:27AM IST Russian forces have entered Ukraine's Dnepropetrovsk region for the first time, marking a symbolic and strategic escalation in the war. The Times reports that the assault coincides with renewed Russian offensives in the Sumy and Donetsk regions, as peace talks remain stalled. A tank division from Russia's Battlegroup Center is reportedly spearheading the advance. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council, warned Ukraine of 'new realities' on the ground, stating that failure to engage in negotiations would lead to further battlefield consequences. Tensions continue to rise across multiple fronts.
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
US National Guard Deployed In Los Angeles: What Threats Do They Counter
What started as simmering outrage over federal immigration raids turned into a full-blown standoff in Los Angeles on Sunday. On its third day, the protests spiralled into chaos, self-driving cars were set on fire, a major freeway was shut down, and over 120 people were arrested. Police responded with tear gas and rubber bullets as tensions ran high. Then came the flashpoint: US President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the city despite the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom. What Is The US National Guard? The US National Guard is a part-time military force that serves both state and federal governments. Each state has its own Guard units, which can be activated by the governor for local emergencies, like wildfires, floods, or protests, or by the President for national missions, including overseas deployments or domestic unrest. The Guard is made up of two branches: the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard, totalling over 430,000 personnel. It operates under two legal frameworks, Title 32, where the governor is in charge (often for disaster response), and Title 10, where the President takes command (for federal missions). Why Are National Guard Troops In Los Angeles? Trump deployed the National Guards in direct response to widespread protests following a series of controversial ICE raids across Los Angeles. Immigration enforcement officers targeted workplaces such as Home Depots, a doughnut shop, and a warehouse. Trump justified the troop deployment as necessary to "address the lawlessness" in California. By federalising the National Guard under Title 10, he placed them under his command, bypassing Governor Newsom, who normally controls the state's Guard. "We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden," Trump said Sunday. What Threats Are They Responding To? The National Guard is not directly engaging in law enforcement. Their said role is to protect ICE officers and guard federal facilities, including a downtown detention centre where some detained immigrants were taken. Protesters reportedly hurled rocks and concrete at federal agents, damaged property, including setting self-driving cars on fire, and clashed with police, prompting officers to use tear gas, rubber bullets, and flash bangs to control the crowds. Authorities have warned of growing public safety threats, describing the protests as being driven by "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and even suggesting possible cartel involvement. To prevent further unrest, Guard troops are now stationed outside key federal buildings, especially ICE facilities, to protect them from damage and block protesters from breaching federal grounds. "There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves," wrote Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck. What Is The Legal Basis? The Insurrection Act, an 18th-century law, allows US presidents to use military force during rebellion or unrest, but Trump hasn't invoked it. Instead, he relied on another statute that allows the president to federalise National Guard troops in emergencies. This places them under federal command, though the law says such orders should go through the state's governor, a step Trump skipped. "Purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," Gavin Newsom said of the deployment. Past Precedents In 1957, US President Dwight Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas. In 1992, President George W Bush invoked the Insurrection Act during the Los Angeles riots following the Rodney King verdict. More recently, in 2020, Trump, in his first term, requested National Guard units from various states to respond to protests in Washington, DC, after the killing of George Floyd. What sets the current situation in Los Angeles apart is the deployment of troops over the objection of the state's governor, a legally murky and highly unusual move.
