YouGov poll has Labor ahead of Liberals in Tasmania but well short of majority
Early election campaign opinion polling suggests Tasmania is on track for another minority government which could be even further in minority than the previous government.
A YouGov poll of 1,287 Tasmanian voters from June 12 to 24 put Labor on 34 per cent of the statewide first preference vote, the Liberals on 31 per cent, independents on 18 per cent and the Greens at 13 per cent.
It's one of the first surveys of voting intention to be released during the state election campaign.
The result has Labor up 5 per cent from last year's state election, the Liberals down 5.7 per cent, and the Greens relatively steady.
The independent vote is 8.4 per cent higher than at the last election, but the poll does not measure support for individual candidates as it was conducted before nominations closed, with respondents indicating support for a generic independent.
YouGov's Paul Smith said if the result was replicated at the election, Labor could end up with one or two seats more than the Liberals.
"It's early days in this election, but I would see Labor as getting around 14 seats, and the Liberals 12 to 13, and the rest spread across the Greens and independents," he said.
Statewide, the difference between the two major parties was less than the poll's 3.4 per cent margin of error.
Parties need 18 seats to reach majority in the 35-seat lower house, with seven MPs elected in each of the five electorates under the Hare-Clark voting system.
The Liberals have governed with 14 seats since the last election, with confidence and supply agreements in place with crossbenchers, some of whom are progressive.
The poll shows the Liberals ahead in Bass and marginally leading in Braddon, the parties polled evenly in Lyons, while Labor has significantly more support in Franklin and Clark.
The gap between the parties was similar to an EMRS poll from mid-May, before the election was called, which had Labor on 31 per cent, the Liberals on 29, independents on 17 and the Greens on 14.
That poll included the Jacqui Lambie Network (JLN) on 6 per cent, but the party is not running candidates in this election.
YouGov also asked voters to rank their top three issues at the election, with 22 per cent listing 'investing more in health' as their number one issue, followed by 14 per cent wanting more public housing.
The 'pro' and 'anti' Macquarie Point stadium answers were listed separately, but when combined as a single issue, they reached 21 per cent.
This showed 12 per cent of respondents listing opposition to the stadium as their main issue, and 9 per cent listing their support for the stadium.
Mr Smith said the poll showed the majority of Tasmanians wanted the parties to focus on other issues.
"[They] provide opportunities for parties and candidates to campaign on those issues and win more votes."
Polling analyst Kevin Bonham said the figures showed Labor would get one more seat than the Liberals, and possibly two.
But he said it was still a wide-open race.
"At the time of this poll, it doesn't show a big clamour towards either side," Dr Bonham said.
"It doesn't show anyone looking like having an easy path to forming government.
"Labor could be five seats short on those numbers, although it might come up a bit when you account for independents being overestimated."
The shape of the crossbench will be a critical factor for the next government.
The last parliament included three progressive independents, and three JLN MPs, two of whom later sat as independents.
All six are running again — two of the former JLN MPs running for the Nationals, and one as an independent.
Anti-salmon farm campaigner Peter George is also running as an independent in Franklin. He received 21.7 per cent of the first preference vote in the federal election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
33 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Aust has important role as US ally, trading partner: PM
POINTS OF CONTENTION IN US-AUSTRALIA RELATIONSHIP Australia is attempting to negotiate an exemption from US tariffs, which include a 50 per cent levy on Australian steel and aluminium and a 10 per cent tariff on most other goods. But certain sticking points could threaten Australia's success. DEFENCE SPENDING * The US has urged Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, which would cost the government tens of billions of dollars * American officials also placed more pressure on Australia after North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) allies agreed to increase their military budgets to five per cent of gross domestic product * But Australia previously agreed to grow its defence spend from two per cent of GDP to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34 and the prime minister has stood firm and supported current spending levels AUKUS * The Pentagon in June launched a 30-day review into the nuclear submarine partnership between Australia, the US and the UK to examine whether it aligned with US President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda * Australian politicians have played down the review and noted the UK conducted a similar investigation before backing the agreement BEEF IMPORTS AND BIOSECURITY * Though Australia accepts imports of beef raised and slaughtered in the US, Mr Trump's administration is demanding the government also take in beef that has been raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US * Australia has barred the latter from import due to biosecurity concerns * Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where disease outbreaks are a concern MEDIA BARGAINING CODE * Australia's media bargaining code ensures tech companies pay news outlets for their content * However, the US has already pointed to the code as an issue in its foreign trade barriers report * Canada capitulated to US demands by scrapping a digital services tax that would have targeted US tech firms, highlighting Mr Trump's desire to protect the industry * Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said he will not undermine the code in negotiations with the US PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS SCHEME * Australia's subsidised prescription medication scheme could be in America's sights as the US pharmaceutical lobby claimed it undervalued innovation because it keeps prices low for Australians * The president announced he would put up a "tariff wall" on countries that export pharmaceuticals to the US, though some Australian pharmaceutical companies have managed to find a way around US levies * Mr Albanese has vowed to protect the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and his government has ruled out the "Americanisation" of Australia's health system
Perth Now
44 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Albo hits back at ‘absurd' defence claim
Anthony Albanese has rejected a report detail revealing his deputy, Defence Minister Richard Marles, did not get warship readiness briefings for years. An audit published on Friday found the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) has failed to properly maintain Australia's biggest battleships – the HMAS Canberra and HMAS Adelaide. It also revealed Mr Marles did not get 'preparedness reports' from Australian Defence Force (ADF) officials 'in 2023 and 2024 due to development of the 2023 Defence Strategic Review'. Instead, Mr Marles was briefed 'through 'other means', including during conversations'. The Prime Minister flatly rejected the finding when asked about it on Tuesday. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (right) has rejected revelations his deputy and Defence Minister Richard Marles (left) did not get key readiness briefings for years. Credit: News Corp Australia, Martin Ollman / NewsWire 'Well, that's just absurd, that's just absurd,' Mr Albanese told Nine's Today. Pressed further, he said Mr Marles was 'of course' briefed. 'That's just ridiculous, frankly,' Mr Albanese said. 'I haven't seen that report, but we sit in the National Security Committee with the Chief of the Defence Force. 'We meet regularly. I certainly have met with heads of all of the armed forces regularly, and that is just completely incorrect.' He said the extra $57bn Labor had pumped into expanding capability 'has come directly after discussions and engagement, obviously with Defence'. 'And in the last budget in March, indeed, we brought forward a billion dollars of additional spending, bringing to over $10bn our additional commitments over the forward estimates as well,' Mr Albanese said. Preparedness reports detail what can be deployed in the event of a war or natural disaster – key information against a backdrop of looming conflict in the Indo-Pacific and increasingly common extreme weather events. Labor's handling of defence has come under a microscope since the US last month demanded Australia hike the ADF's budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Albanese has resisted, saying Australia's national security was a matter for Canberra, not Washington. He has also said his government would first determine need and then allocate funds rather than set a flat GDP target. But the government's position has put Australia at odds with its allies across the world, with all NATO members bar Spain agreeing to lift defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP last week. Closer to home, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea have all recently committed to spending more amid warnings from the Trump administration the region faces graver threats than Europe. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took a thinly veiled shot at Australia last week, saying if European countries can agree to hike defence spending, then US allies in the Indo Pacific 'can do it as well'. 'I mean, look, if our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do it, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well,' she said, responding to an Australian journalist. 'But as for our specific relations and discussions, I will let the President speak on those.' Though whether the Trump administration would actually seek to mirror a NATO target for allies in the Indo Pacific remains unclear.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Snap election tipped to return another hung parliament
One state is on track for another minority government, according to opinion polling which suggests Labor will win more seats than the incumbent Liberals. Tasmania heads to the polls on July 19 after parliament passed a no-confidence motion in minority Premier Jeremy Rockliff in early June. It is the island state's second election in as many years, and the fourth in seven . Opinion polling by YouGov, the first of the campaign, has Labor getting 34 per cent of the first preference vote, ahead of the Liberals (31), independents (18) and Greens (13). That would likely translate to around 14 seats for Labor, short of the 18 required to govern in majority. The party, which has been in opposition since 2014, currently holds 10 of 35 lower-house seats, while the Liberals hold 14. "Labor is on course to become the largest party in what will still be a hung parliament," Paul Smith, YouGov director of public data, said. The polling, taken in mid-June, has Labor boosting its support from the March 2024 election by five per cent with a roughly five per cent drop for the Liberals. Anti-salmon campaigner Peter George, who gave Labor's Julie Collins a run at the federal election, has also thrown his hat in the ring. The Liberals suffered a 12 per cent swing against them at the most-recent election, with voters jumping to minor parties and independents. The polling has Mr Rockliff as preferred premier with 43 per cent support, with Labor leader Dean Winter (36) trailing with more than one-fifth of voters undecided. Mr Winter has ruled out "doing a deal" with the Greens to form government. The crossbench as it stands includes five Greens, five independents and one member of the Jacqui Lambie Network, who is now running with the Nationals. Several notable independent candidates are attempting to capitalise on major party dissatisfaction, including former Liberal attorney-general Elise Archer. Federal Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie has backed Mr George and incumbent independent Kristie Johnston, who voted for the no-confidence motion. Ms Johnston, who wouldn't be drawn on whether she would rather back a Liberal or Labor government, said the major parties needed to change their attitude. "What we saw in the last parliament was a disrespect from both the premier and the leader of opposition to the crossbench," she said. "There were 11 members of the crossbench in the last parliament, more than what was on the opposition (Labor) bench." Ballooning net debt on Mr Rockliff's watch was a major reason for the no-confidence motion, but Ms Johnston said she was yet to see any solutions from the Liberals or Labor.
