Walz targets Bacon in Omaha stop of national town hall tour
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz listens to State Sen. Ashlei Spivey of Omaha speak during his town hall event at Metropolitan Community College in North Omaha. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)
OMAHA — Should the Omaha area replace Republican U.S. Rep. Don Bacon with a Democrat and help curb the worst impulses of the Trump administration?
You betcha, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said during the second stop of his national tour criticizing House Republicans for avoiding in-person town halls.
Walz, a Nebraska native, made Bacon a focus of his mid-morning Saturday speech at Metropolitan Community College's Fort Omaha campus to more than 400 people.
He said he was 'not here to personally attack the representative' or call him names. But he said Bacon needs to face his voters and their questions.
'Do the damn job and answer the questions,' Walz said.
The former running mate of Vice President Kamala Harris slammed Bacon for following national GOP advice and skipping an in-person town hall this year.
Bacon, who has hosted in-person and telephone town halls in the Omaha-based 2nd Congressional District, is hosting a tele-town hall on March 25.
Bacon told the Examiner recently that he did not like the tone and tenor of recent town halls he had seen and that some people are afraid to attend.
'I've been at some of the in-person town halls,' Bacon said. 'When you got moms and dads saying we can't bring our kids to a town hall, there's a problem.'
He also spent at least two nights this week responding to critics on Elon Musk's X by saying he would be able to reach more voters on his tele-town hall.
Gov. Tim Walz says at Iowa town hall he is 'soul-searching' after 2024
Jane Kleeb, chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, said Bacon is 'terrified,' one of the 'gutless Republicans who are afraid to see their voters.'
She told the standing-room crowd that Nebraska Democrats would create a book of comments from Saturday attendees and deliver it to Bacon.
'All they care about is that government is cut down to the bone,' Kleeb said of Republicans. 'Democrats believe government is here to serve the people.
Walz's tour is aimed at reviving Democratic voter engagement in competitive House districts served by Republicans not hosting in-person town halls.
He spoke to more than 1,000 people in Des Moines on Friday, where he acknowledged how many Democrats and nonpartisans feel lost under President Donald Trump.
Walz said he understood the feeling of wanting Democratic and independent and non-Trump Republican leaders to 'do something.'
He asked the standing room-only crowd to take the time to tell their elected leaders what they need to see them doing. He said Democrats would respond.
Several questioners asked Walz about how to fight feeling unsafe or threatened, from immigrants with legal status to workers worried about the ability to organize and to people with friends and relatives who are LGBTQ. Others expressed concerns about federal programs and grants becoming unpredictable.
'There's a tendency … to check out,' Walz said. 'You didn't do that … because you love the country, and you know you need to do something about it.'
Maurice Jones, a Democratic candidate for Omaha City Council in North Omaha's District 2, said Americans are learning with Trump's 'mass firings' that the federal government isn't going to protect them.
Both Democrats running for mayor, Jasmine Harris and John Ewing, also addressed the crowd, saying cities would need to lead the way back.
State Sen. Ashlei Spivey of Omaha said during the Walz appearance that state leaders need help from people to tell state and federal leaders things are not OK.
She said leaders need to know people are not happy with how things are going, including in Nebraska, where she said the governor does Trump's bidding.
'Our executive branch mirrors and does everything that the Trump administration says,' she said.
Walz credited western Nebraskans for showing up to Gov. Jim Pillen's town hall in Scottsbluff for pushing back on his effort to end the 'blue dot.'
Video of the appearance circulating online show that many in the crowd booed and said they don't want to switch to winner-take-all.
'Maybe don't ask a question if you don't know the answer,' Walz said.
Nebraska Democrats go on offense with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz's townhall
Walz said he was proud of Harris winning the 2nd District's 'blue dot.' Nebraska awards some of its Electoral College votes by congressional district.
He said he pushes back on people who say he and Harris failed to win any swing states, because they won a stray electoral vote from Nebraska's 2nd District.
'We did not,' he said. 'We won Omaha. Not by luck. Not by chance. By organizing.'
Walz said people are paying attention to the chaos in Washington.
Veterans services workers being cut matter, he said. Federal grants for cancer research matter, he said. And access to reproductive care matters, too.
He said he believes Bacon, a retired Air Force brigadier general, cares about veterans. But his voting record and fealty to Trump show something else.
'I believe Representative Bacon,' Walz said. 'I'm not questioning his character. I'm questioning his judgment and decisions on the job.'
Bacon, in a statement during the Walz rally, called Walz the 'most liberal governor in America' and said he didn't watch or monitor his town hall.
He said recent House GOP town halls where representatives faced vocal opposition reflected political manufactured anger, not real.
And he criticized Walz for inaccurately describing his own service in the Nebraska and Minnesota National Guard. Bacon invited him to call the tele-town hall.
Said Bacon: 'Whether it's high taxes, broken borders, abortion … or biological men playing in female sports, Governor Walz is wrong on every major issue.'
Walz, during his speech, said GOP attacks on the handful of trans athletes participating nationally is an attack on every person's rights, and Democrats need to call out the people peddling it.
Then, he said, they need to get away from social issues and pivot back to the assaults Republicans are making on core governing.
Minnesota First Lady Gwen Walz, wrapping up the event, said the work did not stop because Harris and her husband lost. It got harder and needs more help, she said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Senator Calls LA Unrest 'Anarchy and Chaos' As Trump Deploys Guard: Live Updates
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., has sharply condemned the escalating unrest in Los Angeles, warning that Democrats risk losing the moral high ground if they fail to denounce the violence. His remarks, posted on X, have drawn reactions across the political spectrum, including responses from Elon Musk and other officials. What to Know: Fetterman called the Los Angeles protests "anarchy and true chaos" and urged his party to speak out. "I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that," he wrote. Elon Musk responded to Fetterman's remarks with an American flag emoji. Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy praised Fetterman, saying it takes courage to speak hard truths. Deputy White House chief of staff Taylor Budowich claimed Fetterman's stance stresses divisions within the Democratic Party. Sen. Bernie Sanders also spoke against violent protests, calling for disciplined, nonviolent resistance. The unrest has led to the deployment of National Guard troops, with President Trump defending the decision. Stay with Newsweek for the latest.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH: Dem, media outlets insist LA anti-ICE riots are 'peaceful' despite violence, injured cops
Media outlets and elected Democrats have made the rounds in recent days, often using the word "peaceful" to describe the anti-ICE unrest in Los Angeles over the weekend despite rioting and violence that has resulted in destruction and injured police officers, a video review by Fox News Digital finds. "The vast majority of protesters and demonstrators are peaceful," Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., said recently on MSNBC. "They're passionate." "A lot of these peaceful protests are being generated because the president of the United States is sowing chaos," Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., said on Sunday's "Meet the Press" on NBC. On CNN, a California Democrat House member said she doesn't know what the "so-called" violence is "all about." "Well, first of all, it's not even all of downtown," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said while downplaying the extent of the violence. "This is isolated to a few streets, five or 10 streets. This is not city-wide civil unrest like has happened in our city before. But if you watch the pictures, especially on national TV, you would think that the entire city has blown up into unrest, and this is just not true." ABC7 Los Angeles anchor Jory Rand cautioned law enforcement from escalating tensions by interfering and said on Sunday that they risked turning "what is just a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn into a massive confrontation and altercation between officers and demonstrators." Rep. Nanette Barragán, a Democrat who represents California's 44th Congressional District, said on CNN's "State of the Union" program Sunday, "We are having an administration that's targeting peaceful protests." Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is widely believed to be eyeing a run for California governor, sparked controversy online when she referred to the unrest as "overwhelmingly peaceful." Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton posted on X, "California Governor Newsom didn't request the National Guard be deployed to his state following peaceful demonstrations. Trump sent them anyway. It's the first time in 60 years a president has made that choice. "Trump's goal isn't to keep Californians safe. His goal is to cause chaos, because chaos is good for Trump." While there were examples of some peaceful protests at the outset, by the end of the day Friday property destruction and violence broke out in a situation that became increasingly violent over the next few days and led to injured officers. "Last night, over 1,000 rioters surrounded a federal law enforcement building and assaulted ICE law enforcement officers, slashed tires, defaced buildings, and taxpayer funded property," the Department of Homeland Security said in a press release Saturday referring to the previous night. Several officers have been injured in the rioting, which included rocks and other projectiles being thrown at them, and dozens of people have been arrested related to the protests and rioting. Conservatives on social media have blasted the various media outlets and Democrats who have used peaceful phrasing to describe the protests despite the various examples of violence, property destruction and burning cars. President Donald Trump sent in the National Guard over the weekend, sparking outrage from local Democrats, and announced on Monday the mobilization of Marines to help quell the rioting.
CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
How the $1,000-per-baby ‘Trump accounts' would work and who would benefit most
On the face of it, the so-called 'Trump accounts' — which would provide parents of newborns with $1,000 to invest on behalf of their child's future — would be a plus for many families. 'It's a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation, and they'll really be getting a big jump on life,' President Donald Trump said Monday at a White House event. The five-year pilot program, which is included in the House-passed budget bill — also known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' now under consideration in the Senate — could give a financial leg up to a new generation to build savings for their education and beyond. While the proposal has its merits, it may not do as much as it could to help the tens of millions of families who will struggle to save for their children. 'This proposal meets some, but not all, of the best practices recommended by decades of research on early wealth-building programs,' said Madeline Brown, a senior policy associate at the Urban Institute, a Washington, DC-based think tank. Here is a look at how the program would work and who is likely to benefit most. Under the proposed 'Trump accounts' — initially called 'Money Account for Growth and Advancement' (MAGA) accounts — the federal government would put $1,000 into individual accounts for babies born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028. To be eligible, the baby must be a US-born citizen, and both the parents and the baby must have Social Security numbers. The family and others may make annual contributions to the account so long as combined they don't exceed $5,000 a year, although nonprofits may be able to donate more. The money must be invested in a low-cost, diversified US stock index fund or equivalent, and no withdrawals may be made until the child turns 18. Taxes are deferred on growth until the money is withdrawn. The account is intended for expenses tied to higher education or 'post-secondary education credentialing,' buying a home or starting a small business. Distributions for qualified expenses will be treated as capital gains, which are taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income. But they will be taxed as ordinary income and subject to an additional 10% tax if an under-30 beneficiary uses them for other expenses. The pilot program gets good marks on two fronts: It will be universal and automatic: Parents won't have to do much to set up the account. 'It will maximize inclusion,' Brown said. '(Research shows) if you have an opt-in program, you're likely to see higher income families enrolling at higher rates.' That may be due to their having both greater awareness of the program and greater liquid assets that can be put toward savings, she said. It establishes federal assistance from Day 1 of a child's life: There has been bipartisan support for programs like 'baby bonds,' which are publicly funded trust accounts to give newborns a financial headstart. Although some states and cities have created similar programs, no federal initiative has been set up to date. But as proposed, the pilot program diverges from the best practices cited in early wealth building research in that: It is regressive: Every family — rich or poor, regardless of need — would get the same $1,000 per newborn. And because families with greater means will have a much easier time making their own contributions to the accounts on top of the initial $1,000, those families are likely to end up with far greater savings accumulation at the end of the day. In a report in March, the Milken Institute estimated that $1,000 invested in a broad equity index fund would grow to an average of $8,300 over 20 years. Any other savings contributed along the way by the family or the employer of the parents could greatly increase that account balance. If a family can't put in more on top of the initial $1,000 by the federal government, having $8,300 by age 20 is certainly better than nothing. Still, it may not go far in financing a college education or a down payment on a home. 'The structure favors families who already have the means to save. It's regressive by design,' said Michelle Dallafior, senior vice president of tax and budget at First Focus for Children, which noted on May 29 that the House reconciliation bill includes many provisions that would not help poorer Americans. The withdrawal rules are complex: Early wealth building programs work best when they provide ease of access and use, Brown said. But the current proposal's withdrawals are confusing and limiting. For instance, only half of the cash value of the account may be withdrawn between the beneficiary's 18th and 25th birthdays. Brown also notes there is no allowance for emergency use of the funds. That means families and beneficiaries would pay a penalty for early withdrawal.
