&w=3840&q=100)
Maritime fundamentals remain strong despite US tariffs: Synergy Marine CEO
US reciprocal tariffs may cause friction in the short term for the maritime sector but over the long term, India's fundamentals remain strong, says Synergy Marine Group CEO.
US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed reciprocal tariffs on around 60 countries, including India, disrupting global trade. The US later suspended reciprocal tariffs until July 9 but has imposed base import tariffs of 10 per cent on all countries.
On the likely impact of US reciprocal tariffs and trade uncertainty on the Indian shipping industry, Synergy Marine Group CEO Jesper Kristensen said, In the short term, they (tariff actions) may cause friction.
Over the long term, India's fundamentals remain strong. The country's expanding port capacity, growing export base, and skilled workforce make it a resilient and adaptive player in global shipping, Kristensen added.
Synergy Marine Group is a global ship management company.
When asked about the impact of trade uncertainty on jobs in the shipping sector, Kristensen said that demand for multi-disciplinary maritime professionals is rising, not falling.
"Driven by digitalisation, decarbonisation, and regulation, shipping is transitioning toward skills-based hiring. Demand for multi-disciplinary maritime professionals is rising, not falling.
Our hiring outlook remains strong and forward-leaning. Synergy currently employs over 28,000 seafarers worldwide 70 per cent of whom are Indians. In the current fiscal year, we expect this proportion to increase further, in line with fleet expansion and the growing demand from shipowners for highly skilled Indian officers and crew, he said.
Synergy also has a significant shore-based presence, employing around 3,000 professionals across offices in seven cities in India.
We anticipate an 8 per cent increase in shore-based hiring this year, particularly in technical management, data analytics, crewing, and digital innovation rolesreflecting both our continued growth and the evolving expectations of shipowners globally, Kristensen said.
On future outlook, Kristensen said that the group is focusing on expanding its global footprint through selective new partnerships west of Suez, while further deepening long-standing relationships in Japanits largest and most strategically significant market over the next three years.
We are also progressing into the offshore segment through our joint venture with EDT Offshore, marking a deliberate move into technically demanding and safety-critical operations that are central to the energy transition, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Market Wrap: D-Street ends higher on US trade talk optimism; Sensex adds 123 pts, Nifty above 25,100
Indian benchmark equity indices Sensex and Nifty ended in the green on Wednesday, lifted by gains in IT and oil & gas stocks, as positive cues from Asian markets and progress in trade talks between the U.S. and key partners like India and China boosted investor sentiment. The BSE Sensex advanced 123.42 points, or 0.15%, to settle at 82,515.14, while the NSE Nifty eked out a gain of 37.15 points, or 0.15% to close at 25,141.40. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo
Economic Times
14 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rupee sticks to muted price action, implied volatility retreats
The Indian rupee ended slightly higher on Wednesday, sticking to rangebound price action for a third consecutive session on two-sided client flows and the absence of cues to firm a directional bias on the currency. ADVERTISEMENT The dollar-rupee pair's implied volatility, a gauge of future expectations, has receded on the back of muted moves in the currency. The 1-month gauge eased to about 4.4%, the lowest in over one month. On the day, the rupee closed at 85.51 against the U.S. dollar, up slightly from its close of 85.6025 in the previous session. Asian currencies were largely steady as well while the dollar index was hovering sideways around the 99-handle. Mild dollar sales from foreign banks helped the rupee tick higher in early trading but routine corporate dollar demand stood in the way of the local currency extending its rise, a trader at a state-run bank said. India's benchmark equity indexes, the BSE Sensex and Nifty 50, ended slightly in the green, tracking a rise in regional equities as markets gave a guarded welcome to the latest signs of progress in trade talks between the United States and China. ADVERTISEMENT "The dollar remains one of the best gauges of trade sentiment. While it has held up generally well early this week, it hasn't built on the late-week momentum following the US-China meeting announcement," ING Bank said in a note. Worries about the impact of wide-ranging U.S. tariffs have weighed on the dollar this year and left it nursing losses of more than 8.5% against major peers. ADVERTISEMENT The focus now turns to U.S. consumer price inflation data, due later on Wednesday, which is expected to show month-on-month core consumer prices rose 0.3% in May, according to a Reuters poll, slightly higher than the 0.2% rise in the previous month. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
U.S. states would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill
A Republican tax bill proposal could shift $22 billion in SNAP costs to states, potentially forcing them to cut eligibility or leave the program. State officials express concerns about absorbing these costs, which could impact millions of recipients. The bill also expands work requirements, potentially removing millions more from SNAP. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads States would struggle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads U.S. states will not be able to fully administer food stamp benefits for millions of the nation's poor if a proposal in the Republican tax bill forcing them to shoulder billions of dollars in new costs is signed into law, according to state officials, local government associations and policy than 41 million people receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest food aid program, which cost about $100 billion in 2024. The tax bill passed on May 22 by the U.S. House of Representatives and backed by President Donald Trump would shift some $22 billion in administrative and benefit costs to state and local governments, according to a Reuters of the move say it will promote accountability and reduce waste in the program. But states fear it will backfire."No state is going to be able to simply absorb that," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, told from North Carolina, Oregon and Michigan also said their states did not have the resources to easily take on the spending requirements in the proposal, which is now before the states could be forced to shrink SNAP eligibility or to leave the program altogether, according to letters sent in May to Congressional and agriculture committee leadership from state and county legislatures and health officials."Shifting the financial burden of SNAP onto states is fiscally unsustainable and risks harming the very individuals and families the program is designed to support," said one letter from the National Conference of State letters were sent by the National Association of Counties, National Association of County Human Services Administrators and the American Public Human Services Association. USDA spokesperson said that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins supports Trump's agenda and that the agency will continue to provide technical assistance to have long supported reduced spending on SNAP, arguing that the program creates a dependence on federal support and should be more narrowly targeted to the most could not reach a representative from the Republican Governors Association or from Texas, Florida or Georgia, the Republican-led states facing the highest SNAP costs The House bill would require states for the first time to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with their payment share from 5% to 25% tied to the state's error rate, a USDA measure of how accurately states determine eligibility and benefit that would amount to more than $20 billion in spending, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The bill would also require states to immediately pay 75% of the cost of administering the SNAP program, up from their existing 50% obligation, adding another $2 billion to the sum, according to USDA states facing the most new spending would be California ($3.7 billion), New York ($2.1 billion), Florida ($1.7 billion) and Texas ($1.2 billion).The state spending requirements would push 1.3 million people off of SNAP in an average month, because some states would modify eligibility requirements or stop administering SNAP, according to a May 22 letter from the Congressional Budget Office to House and Senate agriculture committee does not have the ability to support $850 million in new SNAP spending and may need to restrict eligibility or reduce benefits if the House bill passes, said Elizabeth Hertel, director of the state Department of Health and Human would struggle to absorb more than $477 million and the state is planning for what they would do if forced to take on the spending, said Claire Seguin, director of the division of the Oregon Department of Human Services that administers Carolina is already budget constrained and "there isn't really a way to backfill" more than $650 million in new SNAP spending, said Department of Health and Human Services secretary Dev Sangvai, who did not provide details on what steps the state would take if the provision York also cannot absorb its projected costs, Barbara Guinn, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, told Senators during a June 4 forum on the SNAP most states must balance their budgets and cannot accrue debt to offset new spending like the federal government can, shifting SNAP spending to states risks drawing down resources from other public programs like Medicaid, said Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger. The bill would also expand work requirements for some SNAP recipients and restrict states' ability to waive those requirements when unemployment ticks up, which together would push another 3.2 million people off of SNAP in an average month, according to the CBO.
