Racial disparities in criminal justice system ‘shameful'
The Met Police Commissioner said there was a history between policing and black communities 'where policing has got a lot wrong, and we get a lot more right today'.
'But we do still make mistakes. That's not in doubt,' Sir Mark added.
'I'm being as relentless in that as it can be.'
He continued: 'The vast majority of our people are good people.
'But that legacy, combined with the tragedy that some of this crime falls most heavily in black communities, that creates a real problem because the legacy creates concern.'
'It's not right that black boys growing up in London are more likely to be dead by the time they're 18, far more likely than white boys,' the commissioner said.
'That's, I think, shameful for the city.
'The challenge for us is, as we reach in to tackle those issues, that confrontation that comes from that reaching in, whether it's stop and search on the streets or the sort of operations you seek.
'The danger is that's landing in an environment with less trust.
'And that makes it even harder. But the people who win out of that, all of the criminals.'
He added: 'I'm so determined to find a way to get past this because if policing in black communities can find a way to confront these issues, together we can give black boys growing up in London equal life chances to white boys, which is not what we're seeing at the moment.'
'And it's not simply about policing, is it?' he added.
'I think black boys are several times more likely to be excluded from school, for example, than white boys.
'And there are multiple issues layered on top of each other that feed into disproportionality.'
The police chief said the Met is a 'stretched service', but that people who call 999 can expect an officer to attend.
'If you are in the middle of the crisis and something awful is happening and you dial 999, officers will get there really quickly,' Sir Mark said.
'I don't pretend we're not a stretched service.
'We are smaller than I think we ought to be, but I don't want to give a sort of message of a lack of hope or a lack of determination.'
'I've seen the mayor and the Home Secretary fighting hard for police resourcing,' he added.
'It's not what I'd want it to be, but it's better than it might be without their efforts.'
Sir Mark went on to say that the criminal justice system was 'close-to-broken' and can be 'frustrating' for officers.
He said: 'The thing that is frustrating is that the system – and no system can be perfect – but when the system hasn't managed to turn that person's life around and get them on the straight and narrow, and it just becomes a revolving door.
'When that happens, of course that's frustrating for officers.
'So the more successful prisons and probation can be in terms of getting people onto a law-abiding life from the path they're on, the better.
'But that is a real challenge. I mean, we're talking just after Sir Brian Leveson put his report out about the close-to-broken criminal justice system.
'And it's absolutely vital that those repairs and reforms that he's talking about happen really quickly, because the system is now so stressed.'
Sir Mark gave the example of Snaresbrook Crown Court in London, which he said had more than 100 cases listed for 2029.
'If it's someone on bail, then who might have stolen your phone or whatever and going in for a criminal court trial, that could be four years away.
'And that's pretty unacceptable, isn't it?' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Retired Met officer wins damages over Sky misconduct claim
A retired Metropolitan Police officer is to receive "substantial damages" from Sky to settle a High Court claim, after it falsely said he used taxpayer money to facilitate sexual encounters with female for former Ch Supt Simon Crick told a hearing on Wednesday he felt forced to retire earlier than planned in November last year because of the claims, which were published in April article claimed Mr Crick had committed professional misconduct and had been removed from active duty while misconduct proceedings were McKenzie, for Sky, said the organisation "should never have made these allegations" and "apologises for the harm caused". 'Reputational damage' Reading an agreed statement, Nikila Kaushik, for Mr Crick, said the two entities, Sky Limited and Sky UK Limited, are within the Sky Group and publish Sky News and its said they were responsible for an online article published on 3 April last year, headlined: "Police chief accused of using taxpayer money to book hotels for sex with female colleagues".Ms Kaushik said Sky had accepted "the allegations were false" and had agreed to pay Mr Crick damages and his legal McKenzie said: "The defendants through me acknowledge that the allegations were false and apologise to the claimant for the damage to his reputation, and his distress."Sky is happy to set the record straight and undertakes to this court never to repeat them."At the end of the short hearing in London, Mr Justice Linden said he was "pleased to see this matter has been resolved".An apology was also published on the Sky News website on Wednesday.
Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile
The Reform UK leader is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet', the Transport Secretary said, as she defended Peter Kyle's comments. The Technology Secretary had accused Mr Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over Reform's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. Asked if she agrees with Mr Kyle's statement, Ms Alexander told Sky News: 'Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act. 'I think that the position of Reform in saying that they want to repeal the entirety of the Online Safety Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation when it comes to the protecting of our children and the safety of young people online, I think that, in effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he's totally happy for there to be a free for all on the internet. Heidi Alexander said Nigel Farage is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet' (James Manning/PA) 'That's not the position of the Labour Government. It's not the position of me. It's not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday.' Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing the remarks as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'. Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, the minister had said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Following this, Clacton MP Mr Farage urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Kyle said proposals to overturn the Act 'makes my blood boil', as he argued repealing it would benefit 'disgusting predators who contact children and groom them online'. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said repealing the Act would benefit predators (Stefan Rousseau/PA) He added: 'I make no apologies for putting the interests of vulnerable children ahead of the interests of predators and child abusers – and the Reform leader's ego.' Also writing for the newspaper, Mr Farage said 'all of this is of course a deflection from the real problem with the Online Safety Act', as he raised concerns over ID checks. He added: 'In the name of safety, the Act poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes. 'In the name of protecting children, the law aims to regulate what adults are allowed to say or see – while doing nothing to make our children safer.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said making statements about overturning the Bill is 'very lazy' and 'not responsible'. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
'I never knew humanity could be so cruel': Five men jailed over 'sadistic' torture of woman
Five men have been jailed for their roles in the 'sadistic' and 'cruel' torture and false imprisonment of a woman in a Dublin flat over a false accusation about missing drugs. During a three-hour period in September last year, Natalie Ennis (then 37) was beaten to the head and body with metal pole, burned with a makeshift blow torch and a heated hammer head, cut with a knife, kicked and punched, had her hair cut off and was threatened with rape, Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard. Advertisement The men took running jumps at her during the assault in a one-bedroom flat at Henrietta House, Dublin 7, threatened to make her drink ammonia and also threatened to rape her teenage daughter. She was terrified throughout and thought she was going to die, Caroline Cummings BL, prosecuting told an earlier sentence hearing. The assault only ended when gardaí entered the flat with a search warrant, the court heard. All of the men, who have between one and 124 previous convictions respectively, were on bail at the time of the offence. Five of the eight men present that day entered guilty pleas, while another man and a juvenile are still before the courts. The eighth person is not before the courts. Advertisement Mark Keogh (33), Mark McMahon (55) and Braxton Rice (21), all of Henrietta House, Henrietta Place, Dublin 7, along with Sean Conroy (21) of Sillogue Road, Ballymun and Kian Walshe (22) of Constitution Hill, Dublin 7, all pleaded guilty to false imprisonment and assault causing harm to the woman at Henrietta House on September 26th 2024. A number of other counts against each man relating to the production of articles in the course of an offence, were taken into consideration. Sentencing Imposing the sentence on Wednesday, Judge Pauline Codd said the context of this offending 'highlights the degree to which normal humanity and decency are absent' in the drugs trade. She noted the aggravating features of the case included the violation of the woman's rights to liberty and bodily integrity, the serious injuries sustained, the premediated nature of the offending and the 'deliberate targeting' of Ms Ennis, who the judge said was 'vulnerable'. Advertisement The judge said the violence included ''disturbing, cruel and sadistic methods of torturing a woman by a group of men', adding later that a group of men against one woman is, in itself, 'terrifying'. Judge Codd noted that this offending took place in the context of other criminal activity, namely 'enforcement' in relation to the alleged loss of drugs and that all the men were on bail at the time. She said this offending 'demonstrates the evils associated with the drugs trade' and its wider criminal associations. The judge noted Ms Ennis was humiliated by having her hair cut, describing this as an 'almost ritualistic medieval punishment, especially when directed at a female'. Advertisement The judge said it was a 'concerning feature' of the case that two men – Conroy and Rice - by the age of 20 were 'capable of inflicting such cruelty and depravity', but said it was 'not insignificant' that they had difficult backgrounds. The judge commended the gardai for their intervention, the thoroughness of their investigation and the empathy shown to the victim. Judge Codd noted that but for the intervention of the gardaí, the men could be facing more serious charges, and said the harm caused to Ms Ennis was the 'most serious type' within the range of the charge of assault causing harm. She said the victim impact statement conveyed the 'unimaginable traumatic effect' of the offending on Ms Ennis. The judge said the victim had shown 'remarkable courage and dignity' and wished her well in her recovery and in the future. Advertisement She noted the victim's evidence that all of the men were involved in assaulting her. The judge also noted that some of the men indicated they had been using drugs that day, which she said may explain their conduct, but did not excuse it. The judge said the accused men 'must have left aside all humanity' that day. Judge Codd noted that the court heard evidence that the men told the injured party a 'black man' was coming to rape her and described this as a 'threat of the most misogynistic and racist kind'. The judge said she had taken into account the men's guilty pleas, their circumstances and the other mitigation before the court. Judge Codd said Rice was the 'main ringleader' who acted as 'inquisitor' in relation to the missing drugs, made 'vicious threats' and heated implements which were used to burn the victim. She said Rice's level of culpability was within the 'exceptional level' for the offence of false imprisonment, and that he used 'sadistic torture and threats' against the 'defenceless woman'. The judge noted Rice denied physically assaulting the injured party in a psychological report, which she said is 'at odds' with the offence and was not put to gardai during cross-examination. She handed Rice a sentence of 15 years, with the final 12 months suspended on strict conditions. The judge said Conroy was 'one of the main movers' in this offending, 'eclipsed only by the actions of Rice'. She said he was 'centrally involved' and imposed a sentence of 13 years, with the final 12 months suspended on strict conditions. Handing McMahon a sentence of 12 years, Judge Codd noted he allowed his flat to be used, 'facilitated and actively took part' in the offending, but was not the 'main mover'. She noted he expressed shame that he was involved in an offence involving violence against women. McMahon's son, Keogh was jailed for nine years for his involvement. The judge noted Keogh's previous convictions and that he was part of the group which falsely imprisoned and assaulted the injured party. Judge Codd noted that Walshe's car was used to transport the victim to the flat and that he shared a recording of the attack, which demonstrated a 'lack of empathy and moral compass'. Previous convictions The judge said Walshe has no 'significant history of offending', and at the time, was 'effectively a first-time offender'. She handed Walshe a sentence of 11 years with the final two-and-a-half years suspended on strict conditions . The court heard McMahon has 27 previous convictions, including drug dealing and possession, burglary, robbery and malicious damage. Keogh has 124 previous convictions, including drug dealing and possession, possession of knives, assault causing harm and escaping custody. Conroy has 89 previous convictions including drug dealing and possession, burglary and possession of knives. Rice has 12 previous convictions including drug dealing and possession while Walshe has one previous conviction. The maximum sentences for false imprisonment and assault causing harm are life and 10 years respectively. The judge backdated the sentences to when each of the men individually went into custody. Defence counsel asked the court to take into account their clients' guilty pleas, their personal circumstances, expressions of remorse and the contents of letters and documents submitted on their behalf. The court heard that four of the men grew up in circumstances of neglect and poverty, while Walshe grew up with a supportive family, and his offending was described as 'out of character'. Fionnuala O'Sullivan SC, defending Rice, said she was not instructed to challenge the prosecution's case and asked the court to note her client's position that he accepts his role, but denies assaulting the injured party. She said Rice was born addicted to methadone and his parents both had significant addiction issues. Counsel said her client had a 'chaotic' early life, and at 16, 'began to lose his way'. She asked the court to take into account Rice's youth at the time. Patrick Gageby SC defending McMahon said his client regrets opening the front door and is ashamed to be involved with any violence against women. He said his client had a long period without offending, but has a longstanding drug addiction. Counsel said McMahon fell back into trouble following the death of his wife eight years ago. Mr Gageby asked the court to consider the condition of McMahon's home at the time of the offence, that he has no signs of wealth and will be homeless upon his release from custody. Dean Kelly SC, defending Keogh, said his client experienced the 'most profound neglect and dysfunction' as a child. His client's parents were in active addiction at that time and Keogh also experienced homelessness as a child. Mr Kelly said Keogh's early childhood experiences gave him a 'horror' of intoxicants, but this changed following the death of his grandfather when he was in his late teens and developed further while he was in custody in his mid-20s. A psychological report places Keogh at high risk of re-offending and counsel noted it referred to his client's use of violence to maintain his social standing and avoid violence. Mr Kelly asked the court to consider his client's admissions, that there is no evidence that he was involved in planning this offence and that Keogh, like his father, will be homeless post-release. Dominic McGinn SC, for Conroy, outlined that his client was born with a heroin addiction and was later placed into foster care. He said Conroy fell into addiction as an older teenager, and as a result of his choices, has lost the last three years to drugs and incarceration. Mr McGinn asked the court to take into account his client's youth, that his previous offending does not include violence and that Conroy was the first to plead guilty. James Dwyer SC, for Walshe, said his client started an apprenticeship after finishing school, has a good work history and was involved with youth services. Mr Dwyer noted references handed to the court on behalf of Walshe describe this offending as 'out of character' and a letter from his family expresses their remorse for what was suffered by Ms Ennis. He said his client has a number of protective factors, including a supportive family and noted Walshe's youth at the time. Injuries Ms Ennis was left with a broken eye socket, broken cheekbone, broken nasal bone, broken elbow, burns, dislocated teeth, bruising and lacerations across her head and scalp among other injuries. She required skin grafts, staples to her scalp and later had surgery to remove a disc in her back, the court heard. She spent three weeks in hospital in the immediate aftermath of the assault. In her victim impact statement, which was read out by the investigating officer, Ms Ennis said she was 'petrified' in the flat. 'If police didn't come in through that door that day, I was sure I was dead,' she said, describing the men as 'animals'. 'I was beaten, stabbed and burnt – tortured to confess to something I knew nothing about,' she said. '...The smell of my skin burning, I will never get that smell out of my mind again,' she said, adding that she was 'completely helpless' and outnumbered by the eight men. 'I never knew humanity could be so cruel,' she said. Detective Garda Peter Guyett told the court that at the time of the incident, Ms Ennis and her then partner were staying with one of the men whose case is still before the court. While there, the woman became aware this man was holding drugs in his house. On the day in question, this man and another person approached the woman in the house and told her: 'Come on, we've to go', before she was put into an Audi containing two other men and driven to Henrietta House. Missing drugs There were eight men in the flat and a 'baby-faced' man, who later emerged to be Rice, started interrogating her about a €90,000 batch of cocaine that had gone missing from the home she was staying in. Rice accessed Ms Ennis's Facebook account and demanded her mother's address, threatening to rape her teenage daughter who was staying there. He started hitting her across the head with a metal pole before he 'lost control' and started hitting her all over her body, the court heard. An older man, later identified as McMahon, whose flat it was, held a hatchet up to her face while his son Keogh, referred to in court as 'Sparky' hit her across the head with a pole. Conroy kicked her face. 'Every person there hit her,' Ms Cummings said. 'Not one of them didn't get involved'. She said the men would walk into the next room so they had more space in order to run at the victim with speed while assaulting her. While she was being hit and kicked, Rice heated the head of a hammer up and pressed it 'over and over' against her bare legs, the court heard. They cut her hair which the woman later described as 'the ultimate humiliation'. At one point, she heard the men on the phone to their 'boss' who said: 'Strip her off and get her into bed and bugger her.' They didn't do this but they told her a 'black man' was coming to rape her, the court heard. The man whose house she was staying in was told by the others to get involved and he cut her legs with some sort of blade. They used an aerosol can and a lighter as a makeshift blow torch to burn her. Ms Ennis thought the incident lasted for an hour and a half, but CCTV footage showed she was in the flat for three hours before gardaí entered, the court heard. Ms Ennis was visibly bloodied and bruised, extremely distressed and there was blood on the chair under her as well as clumps of hair scattered around the flat. The men tried to pretend that she had been injured outside by a third party and they were helping to clean her up, but Ms Ennis was taken to another room where she disclosed that they had been torturing her. 'I was being beaten to a pulp by all these men for absolutely no reason,' she later told gardaí. 'They used steel poles, hammers, makeshift blowtorches and lighters to torture me.' In her victim impact statement, Ms Ennis said that the men had tortured her family information out of her and the threat of rape against her daughter had destroyed her. She said she now isolates herself from her family so they will never be in danger again. She said the torture she endured was the longest three hours of her life and she continues to suffer from flashbacks, constant headaches, pain all over her body 'from all the hits I took that day'. She is still waiting on a psychological appointment, she said. Ireland Woman was tortured over false missing drugs accusa... Read More 'What happened to me is something I will never forget,' she said. 'I will never forgive those sick human beings for what they have done to me.' Concluding her statement, she said: 'To the people who did this to me: I hope you can sleep well at night, because I most certainly can't.' In text messages read out in court, one of the men boasted to a friend during the incident that they had a 'hostage' and had 'cut her up', to which this unidentified man replied: 'quality'. Phone video footage taken inside the flat that day was also played in court, which showed the woman bloodied and distressed and a hammer being heated up on a hob.
