logo
As it attacks Iran's nuclear program, Israel maintains ambiguity about its own

As it attacks Iran's nuclear program, Israel maintains ambiguity about its own

Boston Globe23-06-2025
Israel is one of just five countries that aren't party to a global nuclear nonproliferation treaty. That relieves it of international pressure to disarm, or even to allow inspectors to scrutinize its facilities.
Critics in Iran and elsewhere have accused Western countries of hypocrisy for keeping strict tabs on Iran's nuclear program — which its leaders insist is only for peaceful purposes — while effectively giving Israel's suspected arsenal a free pass.
On Sunday, the U.S. military struck three nuclear sites in Iran, inserting itself into Israel's effort to destroy Iran's program.
Advertisement
Here's a closer look at Israel's nuclear program:
A history of nuclear ambiguity
Israel opened its Negev Nuclear Research Center in the remote desert city of Dimona in 1958, under the country's first leader, Prime Minister David Ben Gurion. He believed the tiny fledgling country surrounded by hostile neighbors needed nuclear deterrence as an extra measure of security. Some historians say they were meant to be used only in case of emergency, as a last resort.
After it opened, Israel kept the work at Dimona hidden for a decade, telling United States' officials it was a textile factory, according to a 2022 article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, an academic journal.
Advertisement
Relying on plutonium produced at Dimona, Israel has had the ability to fire nuclear warheads since the early 1970s, according to that article, co-authored by Hans M. Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project with the Federation of American Scientists, and Matt Korda, a researcher at the same organization.
Israel's policy of ambiguity suffered a major setback in 1986, when Dimona's activities were exposed by a former technician at the site, Mordechai Vanunu. He provided photographs and descriptions of the reactor to The Sunday Times of London.
Vanunu served 18 years in prison for treason, and is not allowed to meet with foreigners or leave the country.
Israel possesses dozens of nuclear warheads, experts say
Experts estimate Israel has between 80 and 200 nuclear warheads, although they say the lower end of that range is more likely.
Israel also has stockpiled as much as 1,110 kilograms (2,425 pounds) of plutonium, potentially enough to make 277 nuclear weapons, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a global security organization. It has six submarines believed to be capable of launching nuclear cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles believed to be capable of launching a nuclear warhead up to 6,500 kilometers (4,000 miles), the organization says.
Germany has supplied all of the submarines to Israel, which are docked in the northern city of Haifa, according to the article by Kristensen and Korda.
Nuclear weapons in the Middle East pose risks
In the Middle East, where conflicts abound, governments are often unstable, and regional alliances are often shifting, nuclear proliferation is particularly dangerous, said Or Rabinowitz, a scholar at Jerusalem's Hebrew University and a visiting associate professor at Stanford University.
Advertisement
'When nuclear armed states are at war, the world always takes notice because we don't like it when nuclear arsenals ... are available for decision makers,' she said.
Rabinowitz says Israel's military leaders could consider deploying a nuclear weapon if they found themselves facing an extreme threat, such as a weapon of mass destruction being used against them.
Three countries other than Israel have refused to sign the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: India, Pakistan and South Sudan. North Korea has withdrawn. Iran has signed the treaty, but it was censured earlier this month, shortly before Israel launched its operation, by the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog — a day before Israel attacked — for violating its obligations.
Israel's policy of ambiguity has helped it evade greater scrutiny, said Susie Snyder at the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, a group that works to promote adherence to the U.N. treaty.
Its policy has also shined a light on the failure of Western countries to rein in nuclear proliferation in the Middle East, she said.
They 'prefer not to be reminded of their own complicity,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live updates: Trump set for Alaska summit with Putin in push to end the war in Ukraine
Live updates: Trump set for Alaska summit with Putin in push to end the war in Ukraine

NBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Live updates: Trump set for Alaska summit with Putin in push to end the war in Ukraine

Russia will come to the Alaska summit as it makes steady but costly gains on the Ukrainian battlefield. Putin believes he has the momentum in this war, throwing tens of thousands of soldiers each month into his 'meat grinder' war machine. Some Ukraine-supporting military analysts were alarmed this week after it appeared advanced Russian units had punched a hole through Ukraine's defenses near the town of Dobropillya. Ukrainian reinforcements rushed to the area, launching a counterattack that was able to stabilize the situation, according to Ukrainian military officials and Russian military bloggers. But the fight there and elsewhere remains desperate for Kyiv's forces. Compounding the situation is an infantry crisis that has seen Ukraine's once superior troop numbers dwindle, now outnumbered by Russia's conscription of prison inmates and hiring of mercenaries and soldiers from North Korea. 'The entire front has turned into a 'hodgepodge,'' Bohdan Krotevych, the former head of Ukraine's Azov Brigade, posted on X last week. 'This chaos has been growing for a long time, worsening with each passing day.' Nevertheless, some Western analysts believe that if Ukraine can hold out into next year, then Russia will begin struggling to resupply its losses of personnel and equipment. Though American aid to Ukraine has stalled under Trump, that gap has been largely plugged by European powers, according to Germany's Kiel Institute think tank.

Label the Muslim Brotherhood's branches as terrorist organizations
Label the Muslim Brotherhood's branches as terrorist organizations

Los Angeles Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Label the Muslim Brotherhood's branches as terrorist organizations

On Tuesday, New York City radio host Sid Rosenberg asked Secretary of State Marco Rubio about whether the State Department intends to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and Council on American-Islamic Relations as terrorist organizations. Rubio responded that 'all of that is in the works,' although 'obviously there are different branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, so you'd have to designate each one of them.' Logistics and bureaucracy aside: It's about time. For far too long, the United States has treated the Muslim Brotherhood with a dangerous combination of naiveté and willful blindness. The Brotherhood is not a random innocuous political movement with a religious bent. It is, and has been since its founding about a century ago, the ideological wellspring of modern Sunni Islamism. The Brotherhood's fingerprints are on jihadist groups as wide-ranging as Al Qaeda and Hamas, yet successive American administrations — Republican and Democratic alike — have failed to designate its various offshoots for what they are: terrorist organizations. That failure is not merely academic. It has real-world consequences. By refusing to label the Muslim Brotherhood accurately, we tie our own hands in the fight against Islamism — both at home and abroad. We allow subversive actors to exploit our political system and bankroll extremism under the guise of 'cultural' or 'charitable' outreach. Enough is enough. Founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the Muslim Brotherhood's stated mission has never wavered: the establishment of a global caliphate governed by sharia law. The Brotherhood has always attempted to position itself as a 'political' organization, but it is 'political' in the way Lenin was political. Think subversion through infiltration — or revolution through stealth. Consider Hamas. Hamas is not merely inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood — it is the Muslim Brotherhood's Palestinian-Arab branch. The link is unambiguous; as Article Two of Hamas' founding charter states, 'The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine.' And Hamas' charter also makes clear its penchant for explicit violence: 'Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.' This is not the rhetoric of nuance or moderation. This is the ideological foundation of contemporary jihadism. Yet, while Hamas is rightly designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department, other branches of the Muslim Brotherhood remain off the list. Why? Because Western elites have allowed themselves to be duped by the Brotherhood's two-faced strategy. Abroad, they openly sow the seeds of jihad, cheer for a global caliphate and preach for the destruction of Israel and Western civilization more broadly. But in the corridors of power in the U.S. and Europe, they and their Qatari paymasters don suits and ties, rebrand as 'moderates' and leverage media credulity and overly generous legal protections to plant ideological roots. What's more, CAIR — an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history — has extremely well-documented ties to the Brotherhood. And yet CAIR agents continue to operate freely in the United States, masquerading as civil rights advocates while pushing Islamist narratives that undermine the core constitutional principles of equality that they purport to champion. Today, almost two years after CAIR-linked Hamas executed the Oct. 7 pogrom in Israel, CAIR remains in good standing with many elected Democrats. It shouldn't be so. In November 2014, the United Arab Emirates designated CAIR as a terrorist organization, citing its links to the Brotherhood and Hamas. And the Brotherhood itself is recognized as a terrorist organization by at least Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Bahrain and Russia. Jordan also banned the Brotherhood earlier this year. Put bluntly: There is absolutely no reason the United States should have a warmer approach toward CAIR than the UAE or a warmer approach toward the Brotherhood than Saudi Arabia. The first Trump administration flirted with the idea of designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. It was the right impulse. But the effort was ultimately bogged down by internal bureaucracy and international pressure — most notably from Qatar and Turkey, both sometime U.S. partners that harbor strong Brotherhood sympathies and bankroll Islamist causes. And the second Trump administration's troubling embrace of Qatar may well nip any designation in the bud before it even takes off. Critics argue that such a designation would complicate relations with countries where Brotherhood affiliates participate in local politics. But since when did the U.S. place a premium on building alliances with the ideological cousins of Al Qaeda and ISIS? Moreover, designating the Muslim Brotherhood would empower domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies to go after its networks and financial infrastructure. It would send a clear signal that the U.S. government no longer accepts a claim of 'nonviolent Islamism' as a pass when designating terrorist groups. In a time when the threat from Islamic extremism remains global and decentralized, we can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to the architects of the movement. The Muslim Brotherhood is not, as 'Arab Spring' boosters risibly claimed a decade and a half ago, a Western partner in 'democracy.' It is the mother's milk of modern Sunni jihadism. The question is not whether we can afford to designate Muslim Brotherhood offshoots as terrorist organizations. It is: How much longer can we afford not to? Josh Hammer's latest book is 'Israel and Civilization: The Fate of the Jewish Nation and the Destiny of the West.' This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate. @josh_hammer

Ukraine says its forces bombed a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammo as it ramps up deep-strike operations
Ukraine says its forces bombed a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammo as it ramps up deep-strike operations

Business Insider

time36 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Ukraine says its forces bombed a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammo as it ramps up deep-strike operations

The Ukrainian military said on Friday that it carried out an attack against a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammunition, marking one of the latest deep strikes far behind the front lines. Separately, Ukraine said that it struck an oil refinery that supplies fuel to the Russian military. The two attacks are the latest in a string of long-range strikes deep into Russian territory and come as Ukraine continues to target critical military and energy facilities. Kyiv hopes this campaign will put additional strains on Moscow's war machine. Ukraine's Special Operations Forces said they struck the vessel Port Olya 4 in Russia's Astrakhan region, which borders the Caspian Sea, during an operation on Thursday. It said the ship was loaded with parts for one-way attack drones and ammunition from Iran, adding that the results of the attack are still under investigation. SOF said Russia uses the port as a logistics hub to transport military supplies from Iran. They said in a statement that "hitting this vessel disrupts a critical supply chain." The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces said SOF was behind another long-range attack on Friday, this time striking an oil refinery in Russia's Samara region, which borders Kazakhstan. It said in a statement that the Syzran refinery produces various fuels, including some for aircraft, and supplies the Russian military. It added that the attack caused fires and explosions. It's unclear what weapons Ukrainian forces used in the attacks. Business Insider was unable to independently verify all the details of the two deep-strike operations. Ukraine previously faced restrictions on using its limited arsenal of Western-provided cruise and ballistic missiles for strikes inside Russia, restrictions that hamstrung the Ukrainian military until they were lifted last year. The main problem now appears to be munition availability. As a workaround, Kyiv began to invest heavily in locally produced long-range drones and missiles. Over the past year, it has used these weapons to carry out a range of strikes on Russian airfields, ammunition storage facilities, energy sites, and other high-profile targets. In recent weeks, Ukraine has kept up its long-range attacks. Megan Ewert, a geospatial researcher at the Institute for the Study of War, a US think tank that closely tracks the grinding conflict, found that Kyiv carried out 40 drone strikes in Russian territory between July 15 and August 10. Ewert explained to Business Insider that the number of strikes correlates with the number of sites attacked and said the number of days each week with strikes seems to have an upward trend over the timeframe. She attributed this shift to a possible increase in the intensity of drone use, though ISW does not track the exact number of drones that Ukraine launches in each attack. The number of Ukrainian drones often varies with each attack. On Monday, for instance, a source in Ukraine's internal security agency, the SBU, said at least four long-range drones struck a facility that makes parts for cruise missiles in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region. Other attacks may use a different number of munitions. The SBU told Business Insider that facilities within Russia's military-industrial complex, which contribute to Moscow's war machine, "are absolutely legitimate military targets." "The SBU continues to work on the demilitarization of facilities that produce weapons for the terror of peaceful Ukrainian cities," the source said in translated remarks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store