Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology
A row broke out on Tuesday morning after Peter Kyle said the Reform UK leader is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile' over the party's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act.
Mr Farage labelled Technology Secretary Mr Kyle's remarks as 'below the belt' and 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief', and urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed.
Former Reform chair Zia Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into Government.
'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws,' Mr Kyle told Sky News.
'So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side.
'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.'
Responding to Mr Kyle on a live stream on Tuesday morning, Mr Farage said: 'Just how low can the Labour Government sink in its desperation?
'Yes, of course they're in trouble. They're well behind us in the opinion polls. But frankly, to say that I would do anything that would in any way aid and abet people like Jimmy Savile, it's so below the belt it's almost not true.'
He also reiterated his demand for an apology and added: 'We're not going to get one. I think perhaps the best thing we can do is to sign the petition to repeal the Online Safety Act. That's what I'm going to do today. I think it makes sense. I'm deeply worried about the implications for free speech.'
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
Mr Yusuf has said that the laws work to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-Government speech'.
After being asked by Mr Farage to apologise on social media, Mr Kyle doubled down on his comments, claiming that wanting to 'overturn' the Act puts somebody 'on the side of predators'.
Mr Yusuf has claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the Government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.'
He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.'
Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone.
'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.'
The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Essex politicians call for meeting with Home Secretary over asylum-seeker hotel
Five local political leaders have urged the Home Secretary to make a hotel housing asylum seekers in Essex a 'priority for urgent closure', citing community tensions that have put a strain on policing. The signatories have requested a meeting with Yvette Cooper to discuss the continued use of The Bell Hotel in Epping to house migrants. Essex Police said 14 people have been charged in connection with protests at the site and there have been 23 arrests. Multiple demonstrations have been held outside The Bell Hotel since July 13 after an asylum-seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, who was charged with sexual assault, denies the charges. He is due to stand trial in August. Concerns about the use of The Bell Hotel to house asylum-seekers have been expressed in an open letter sent to the Home Secretary on Wednesday. The signatories are: Roger Hirst, Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner for Essex; Dr Neil Hudson, MP for Epping Forest; Alex Burghart, MP for Brentwood and Ongar; Cllr Christopher Whitbread, Leader of Epping Forest District Council and Cllr Kevin Bentley, Leader of Essex County Council. In the letter, the politicians argue that housing migrants at the site is 'proving to be entirely unsuitable and… placing an unsustainable strain on police resources'. They added that this is 'creating significant community tension, and leading to public disorder that is unacceptable to our residents and deeply concerning for the safety of all involved'. The letter continued that 'large-scale protests and counter-protests' on several days saw 'more than 2,000 people attending across all dates'. 'During these events, eight Essex Police officers have been injured — one requiring hospitalisation after being struck in the face with a bottle,' the letter said. 'Officers from neighbouring forces have been brought in to support our local resources. 'This simply cannot continue. 'While we respect the public's right to peaceful protest, the level of violence now seen on Epping's streets is alarming.' They say that the police deployments at the hotel are 'putting our ability to maintain public safety at risk'. 'We support the Home Office's wider objective of reducing reliance on hotels and are keen to work with you,' the letter said. 'However, we urge you to accelerate this process and make The Bell Hotel in Epping a priority for urgent closure. 'It is vital that this location be reconsidered considering the operational realities on the ground. 'We urge that The Bell Hotel be made a priority for urgent decommissioning.'


CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Palestine Action's co-founder wins bid to challenge UK terror group ban
The Middle East UK National security TerrorismFacebookTweetLink Follow The co-founder of a pro-Palestinian campaign group on Wednesday won her bid to bring a legal challenge against the British government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Huda Ammori, who helped found Palestine Action in 2020, asked London's High Court to give the go-ahead for a full challenge to the group's proscription, which was made on the grounds it committed or participated in acts of terrorism. Earlier this month, the High Court refused Ammori's application to pause the ban and, following an unsuccessful last-ditch appeal, Palestine Action's proscription came into effect just after midnight on July 5. Proscription makes it a crime to be a member of the group, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Judge Martin Chamberlain granted permission for Ammori to bring a judicial review, saying her case that proscription amounted to a disproportionate interference with her and others' right to freedom of expression was 'reasonably arguable.' This is a developing story and will be updated.


CNN
36 minutes ago
- CNN
Palestine Action's co-founder wins bid to challenge UK terror group ban
The co-founder of a pro-Palestinian campaign group on Wednesday won her bid to bring a legal challenge against the British government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Huda Ammori, who helped found Palestine Action in 2020, asked London's High Court to give the go-ahead for a full challenge to the group's proscription, which was made on the grounds it committed or participated in acts of terrorism. Earlier this month, the High Court refused Ammori's application to pause the ban and, following an unsuccessful last-ditch appeal, Palestine Action's proscription came into effect just after midnight on July 5. Proscription makes it a crime to be a member of the group, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Judge Martin Chamberlain granted permission for Ammori to bring a judicial review, saying her case that proscription amounted to a disproportionate interference with her and others' right to freedom of expression was 'reasonably arguable.' This is a developing story and will be updated.