
Trump says he is not seeking summit with Xi, but may visit China, World News
"I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest!," Trump said on Truth Social.
Aides to Trump and Xi have discussed a potential meeting between the leaders during a trip by the US president to Asia later this year, sources previously told Reuters.
A trip would be the first face-to-face encounter between the men since Trump's second term in office, at a time when trade and security tensions between the two superpower rivals remain elevated.
While plans for a meeting have not been finalised, discussions on both sides of the Pacific have included a possible Trump stopover around the time of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea or talks on the sidelines of the October 30-November 1 event, the people said.
The third round of US-China trade talks taking place in Stockholm this week may lay the groundwork ahead of a leaders' summit in the autumn, analysts say.
A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely impact any plans for a meeting with Xi.
[[nid:720500]]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US: S&P 500, Nasdaq open at record highs with earnings, Fed meeting in focus
[NEW YORK] The S&P 500 and Nasdaq opened at fresh record highs on Tuesday (Jul 29), as investors assessed a slew of earnings reports from major US companies and looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's upcoming two-day policy meeting. The Dow Jones Industrial Average down 3.8 points, or 0.01 per cent, at the open to 44,833.74. The S&P 500 rose 15.8 points, or 0.25 per cent, at the open to 6,405.62, while the Nasdaq Composite rose 108.1 points, or 0.51 per cent, to 21,286.725 at the opening bell. REUTERS

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds. SINGAPORE - The liquidators for three companies of Ng Yu Zhi, the alleged nickel-trading fraudster at the centre of a $1.5 billion nickel trading scam, scored a legal victory on July 29 to recover more than $900 million from nine former directors and employees for their role in Singapore's biggest Ponzi scheme. In 2021, the liquidators of Envy Asset Management (EAM), Envy Global Trading (EGT) and Envy Management Holdings (EMH) sued Ng, former directors Lee Si Ye and Ju Xiao, and former employee Cheong Ming Feng. Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds, supposedly for nickel trading. Of those sums, $593 million, US$192.2 million and €880,000 remain outstanding to investors. In a 180-page judgment issued July 29, the liquidators, who are represented by lawyers Daryl Fong and Lin Ruizi of Shook Lin & Bok, were awarded damages after Ms Lee, Mr Ju and Mr Cheong were found to have breached their duties as directors. They also received damages for fraudulent trading by Mr Ju. The trio were also ordered to pay back about $27 million in commission payments, profit sharing, bonuses, CPF payments, directors' fees and dividends. The High Court, however, ruled that the July 29 judgment is 'not binding' on Ng, who was made bankrupt in December 2022. Civil proceedings against the former managing director of EGT and EAM stopped as a result. Ng's criminal trial on 42 charges ended on July 7 after he opted not to take the stand. He had faced a total of 108 charges over offences including cheating, forgery, fraudulent trading, money laundering and criminal breach of trust. In awarding damages to the liquidators, High Court Judicial Commissioner Mohamed Faizal found that the nickel trading scheme did not exist and none of the investors' monies were used to buy nickel from Poseidon Nickel. This is the Australian firm that Ng claimed to have bought nickel from. Instead the funds were transferred to Ng through Envy Asset Management Trading (EAMT), paid as directors' fees to Ng and Ms Lee, and as commission payments, profit sharing fees to the defendants and other employees. The funds were also used to pay referral fees or 'profits' in excess of the invested principal to investors; and transferred or paid to other companies owned by Ng or his Envy companies, the judicial commissioner found. The High Court also found that the Envy companies were 'hopelessly insolvent and unable to pay their debts. Neither EGT nor EMH had any legitimate, revenue-generating business and there was no other meaningful business undertaken by the Envy companies.' There was also 'compelling evidence of the shocking level of ineptitude and nonchalance' on the part of Ms Lee, who allegedly helped Ng cover up details of fraudulent transfers of $416.5 million and US$17.7 million to his own bank accounts under false pretences, according to the ruling. She was found to be 'grossly negligent' but 'did not have actual knowledge' of the Ponzi scheme as she herself was being duped by Ng, with her own family members and loved ones also invested in the scheme, the judicial commissioner pointed out. As for Mr Ju, the High Court found that he was in breach of his directors' duties and liable for fraudulent trading, among other things. 'That he was willing to forge documents, fraudulently change the paid-up capital sums for EGT and mislead investors ... spoke to his entire approach to his role as a director and employee of the company. These actions also reflect his willingness to be complicit in whatever he was asked to do. This made a mockery of his duties as a director of EGT,' the judicial commissioner said. Mr Cheong, the ex-employee, knew that he was creating forgeries, and also became aware that these were being circulated to both internal employees and external investors, but the High Court found that he did not know that such actions were being done to prop up a sham scheme. For one thing , Mr Cheong was 'not particularly sophisticated and possessed a rather rudimentary understanding of the business'. His own investments 'started even before he joined the Envy companies and he had assisted some of his friends to do the same, which suggests that he himself bought into the logic of the purported nickel trading,' the judicial commissioner said. Regardless of whether Ms Lee, Mr Ju or Mr Cheong had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme, they were still ordered to return most of the monies they had received from the Envy companies. In a separate 62-page judgment released July 29, the High Court ordered six other former employees of the Envy companies to cough up more than $42 million in fictitious profits, commission payments, profit sharing and referral fees paid to them. This award is subject to a deduction of income tax payments made by these six employees. Former employees Lau Lee Sheng, Benjamin Teo Wei Wen, Ms Shen Xuhuai, Koh Hong Jie (Xu Hongjie), Guo Yujia and Jordan Chua Wei Jian were named defendants in this suit brought by the liquidators. The High Court allowed the liquidators to claw back monies paid to them after finding that the Envy companies 'were never under any obligation to pay the commission payments and profit sharing payments to the defendants because the (companies) never made any actual profit.'

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump eyes Aug 1 trade deals as EU, China talks continue, US Commerce chief says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox U.S. President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, walk on the tarmac at Morristown Airport, in Morristown, New Jersey, U.S., July 6, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump will make his trade deal decisions this week even as separate negotiations with China and the European Union continue, U.S. Commerce chief Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday ahead of Trump's self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline. U.S. and EU officials were still discussing steel and aluminum tariffs as well as digital services regulations following their framework announced on Sunday, Lutnick told CNBC in an interview, adding that talks with China were also "their own thing". "But for the rest of the world, we're going to have things done by Friday," he said in the interview. Asked about remaining uncertainties surrounding the U.S.-EU agreement, Lutnick said Trump was working "to get things done now." He said pharmaceuticals were a key part of the EU deal so that medicines made in European countries—home to several major drugmakers—would see their products included in the 15% tariff. "It was important for them to have pharmaceuticals be part of the deal at 15% because President Trump is going to come out in the next two weeks with his pharmaceutical policy, and it is going to be higher," he said. REUTERS