logo
Tennessee Senate immigrant education bill clears final committee, still conflicts with House

Tennessee Senate immigrant education bill clears final committee, still conflicts with House

Yahoo01-04-2025
A controversial education bill to require Tennessee schools to collect citizenship or legal residency documentation of all students in the state is headed for a full Senate vote, even as the legislation stands at odds with a companion House bill that would not impose requirements on local schools.
The Senate Finance committee voted 7-4 to advance Senate Bill 836, which would require all schools in Tennessee to verify children have legal immigration or visa status, or that they're U.S. citizens, before enrolling them. Schools could then deny to enroll the children who cannot prove their status or charge them tuition to attend the school.
Senate Finance Committee Chair Bo Watson, R-Hixson, has argued undocumented students are potentially a financial drain on Tennessee school resources, citing a rise in English language learners in the state.
But several advocates have testified that legal residents or U.S. citizens account for a majority of English language learners. Additionally, there's no evidence disenrolling undocumented students would save Tennessee any money in education costs.
In fact, due to a provision in the school voucher bill Republicans passed earlier this year, local schools are set to receive a base enrollment amount going forward, even if they lose students to disenrollment under this bill.
Sen. Jeff Yarbro, D-Nashville, pressed Watson on why lawmakers filed legislation directly targeting children as a vehicle for addressing undocumented immigrants in the state, rather than focusing on Tennessee employers who frequently hire undocumented workers across the state.
"If we were so concerned about this problem, we could solve it tomorrow," Yarbro said. "We could pass $1,000-a-day penalties for every employer who hires any undocumented worker. We could shut this down, but in doing so we would shut down every construction project you see outside, every construction project across the state. We'd shut down every meat packing plant, half the agriculture in this state. We could do that. That would at least be going after the people who are relying upon and, in many cases, profiting from undocumented labor. But instead, we're punishing kids."
Yarbro was also critical of the administrative burden the bill could impose on local schools, something Watson dismissed given most public schools already request a birth certificate or similar documentation to determine a student's age.
"That's a process that is already in place. There's nothing new there," Watson said, referencing registration forms from the Department of Education and Memphis city schools as an example. "Most school systems are already requesting this information. Whether they're getting it or not, we don't know, but they're requesting the information. It's already part of the process, so I would argue that any increase in spending on documentation is insignifcant."
But determining legal residency or visa status is likely much more complicated than having a U.S. birth certificate or not.
Recent emergency rules passed by the Tennessee Board of Education to govern the state's voucher program revealed the complexities of determining legal status. State officials will have to review documentation to determine if an applicant student falls under 10 different categories the state recognizes as lawful residency, ranging from asylum seekers to non-citizens granted temporary parole and trafficking victims with pending applications for certain non-immigrant status.
With the Senate bill now headed to the calendar committee, it appears likely the upper chamber could vote on the legislation without the Senate and House sponsors reconciling their versions of the bill.
More: Pledge of Allegiance protests shut down Tennessee General Assembly committees
House Majority Leader William Lamberth, R-Portland, has said in recent weeks he wants the bill to be "permissive" and not impose documentation requirements on schools.
While Watson's bill allows schools to choose whether to block enrollment or charge tuition, it does require all schools to collect status documentation.
SB 836 has emerged as one of the more controversial measures the Republican supermajority is pursuing this session.
The bill has also drawn criticism from some business groups, with the Tennessee Small Business Association this week releasing a statement
"Senator Watson and Rep. Lamberth claim their bill denying education to undocumented children is about starting a fiscal conversation — but that's not true, and they know it,"the organization said. "Undocumented immigrant families already pay into Tennessee's public schools through sales tax — just like everyone else. Tennessee immigrants contribute $4.4 billion in tax revenue every year, including over $900 million from undocumented families alone. Going after children to deny them an education when he knows it is already paid for by immigrants in our state isn't just cruel — it's unethical, fiscally irresponsible, and politically desperate."
Previous committee meetings have drawn hundreds of protestors, though the Tuesday morning finance committee was relatively quiet in comparison to previous debates. Still, the committee gaveled into a recess after a handful of protestors interjected after the vote.
Tennessee Highway Patrol troopers later arrested one protestor, Lynne McFarland, after she refused to move from her seat in the committee room. A trooper later picked up and carried McFarland outside to a patrol car, which was expected to take her downtown for booking.
McFarland's booking charges are not yet available.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Tennessee immigration education bill clears final Senate committee
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says
California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says

USA Today

time5 minutes ago

  • USA Today

California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says

Newsom has called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. WASHINGTON ― California Gov. Gavin Newsom's redistricting proposal aimed at creating five new Democratic congressional seats begins with overwhelming support ahead of a planned November referendum when voters would decide its fate, according to a survey conducted by his longtime pollster. The proposal is backed by 57% of California voters and opposed by 35%, the poll taken by Democratic pollster David Binder found, according to a report by Axios. Another 8% of voters in the heavily Democratic state said they were undecided. Newsom has portrayed his mid-term redistricting push as necessary to offset Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's pursuit to create five new Republican congressional districts in Texas. President Donald Trump has publicly lobbied for the gerrymandering in Texas to boost Republican chances in the 2026 midterm elections. Newsom last week called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. The poll found 84% of California's Democratic voters support the redistricting plan while 79% of the state's Republicans oppose it. The 57% in overall support for the redistricting plan is a jump from the 51% who said they backed redrawing California's congressional maps in a July poll. California currently has 43 congressional seats held by Democrats and nine by Republicans. The creation of five new Democratic-friendly districts could sway California's delegation to a 48-5 advantage for Democrats. Yet the move comes with risk for Democrats because it might create several competitive seats that Republicans could target. "I know they say, 'Don't mess with Texas,'" Newsom, widely considered a potential presidential candidate in 2028, quipped at a Democratic rally kicking off the redistricting campaign last week. "Well, don't mess with the great Golden State." California has an independent redistricting commission that is designed to limit partisan influence on the map-drawing process, but Newsom said the measure would allow a new process to draw maps that would go into effect for House elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030, before ceding power back to the commission to draw maps ahead of 2032. Redistricting in all states is required by federal law every 10 years following the release of new U.S. Census Bureau figures; however, Trump pushed Texas Republicans to jumpstart the process in the middle of the decade, setting off a cross-country redistricting fight. Redistricting efforts are also ongoing in Florida and Ohio that could benefit Republicans, while Republican-controlled Indiana and Missouri are also discussing redrawing their maps. Control of the U.S. House of Representatives at stake, with Republicans currently holding a 219-212 majority. Contributing: Erin Mansfield of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

Paxton's lead over Cornyn nearly cut in half: poll
Paxton's lead over Cornyn nearly cut in half: poll

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Paxton's lead over Cornyn nearly cut in half: poll

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's (R) lead over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) in the state's Senate primary is narrowing, according to a new survey from Texas Southern University's Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center survey. The poll showed Paxton holding a five-point lead among likely primary voters, 44 percent to 39 percent, in a two-way race with Cornyn. Another 17 percent said they were undecided. The last Texas Southern University poll released in May showed Paxton with a nine-point lead over Cornyn. The five-point gap between Paxton and Cornyn remains the same in a hypothetical three-way race with Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas), who has been considering a primary run. Paxton leads with 35 percent while Cornyn trails at 30 percent. Hunt comes in with 22 percent support. Another 13 percent said they were unsure. The poll released on Wednesday comes after a separate Emerson College survey released last week showed the incumbent senator and attorney general locked in a dead heat. That poll showed Cornyn leading Paxton 30 percent to 29 percent, with five percent saying they prefer another candidate and 37 percent saying they were undecided. Most polls released before last week's Emerson College poll showed Paxton with a double-digit lead over Cornyn, leading to questions about the incumbent senator's electability in a primary. Cornyn's allies have pulled out all of the stops in an effort to boost him. According to The Texas Tribune, the Senate GOP leadership-affiliated One Nation has spent more than $4 million in advertising, while Texans for a Conservative Majority, another pro-Cornyn group, has spent $3.2 million. The pro-Cornyn Conservative Majority Project has spent roughly $500,000. The latest poll from Texas Southern University's Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center was conducted from Aug. 6 to Aug. 12, 2025 among 1,500 likely Texas Republican primary voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.53 percentage points.

Ohio must redraw its congressional maps in 2025: What's next in that process
Ohio must redraw its congressional maps in 2025: What's next in that process

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio must redraw its congressional maps in 2025: What's next in that process

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — As high-stakes redistricting battles erupt nationwide, an Ohio coalition is stepping back into the spotlight to fend off partisan gerrymandering. The Equal Districts Coalition — a statewide alliance of environmental, education, civil rights and several other advocacy groups — announced last week it's relaunching to demand fair congressional maps in Ohio, just as lawmakers in Texas and California are also drawing fire for threatening to manipulate political boundaries ahead of the 2026 election. While Texas Republicans are pushing for a mid-decade redraw to expand their congressional edge, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is signaling he will abandon the state's independent redistricting commission in retaliation. Sherrod Brown's first interview on 2026 Senate run: The 'system got worse' Ohio is unique in being the only state required to redraw its congressional map in 2025, a legal consequence of the 2022 map's adoption without bipartisan support under redistricting reform laws. Such maps last only four years; the new map will govern congressional elections through 2030 and likely shape the battleground for control of the U.S. House. 'Ohio is the only state required to redraw its congressional map this year because the last one was gerrymandered so badly,' Equal Districts spokesperson Bria Bennett said. 'Without transparency and public pressure, politicians will use this process to lock in partisan power and set a national gerrymandering playbook. We're here to make sure voters, and not politicians, decide our future.' Procedural roadmap Under Ohio's constitutional redistricting process, the legislature has until roughly Sept. 30 to pass a congressional map with a three‑fifths majority, including support from both parties. If that fails, the Ohio Redistricting Commission steps in with only a month to agree. If that also fails, the legislature makes a simple‑majority map, but it then lasts only four years. The current commission is dominated by Republicans, holding five of seven seats, and the Ohio Supreme Court now leans heavily conservative, making legal challenges more uncertain than in past cycles. After Issue 1's defeat The Equal Districts' relaunch follows the defeat of 2024's Issue 1, a proposed constitutional amendment that aimed to create an independent redistricting commission in Ohio. The ballot measure, backed by several of the same groups now involved in the coalition, was pitched as a solution to end partisan gerrymandering. Supreme Court appeal reignites push to repeal Ohio's same-sex marriage ban Issue 1 was rejected at the polls after a heated and expensive campaign in which opponents framed the measure as an unnecessary overhaul of the current system. The failure of Issue 1 left the existing redistricting structure intact, but Equal Districts is betting that a more organized, informed, and vocal public can still make a decisive difference in shaping what comes next. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store