Karnataka HC orders BBMP, govt. to clear ₹10.41 crore COVID dues to private health centres pending since 2022
Two petitions
Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar issued the directions while allowing the separate petitions filed by BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences, Kengeri and Vijayalakshmi Diagnostics Pvt Ltd (VDPL), Nagarbhavi.
BGS had sought directions for release of ₹4.53 crore and VDPL had sought release of ₹5.88 crore while pointing out that the authorities, though have admitted payment due to the petitioners, had said that they were unable to release the remaining amount due to pendency of enquiry before a One-Man Commission of Inquiry into the irregularities occurred during COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2023. The petitioners have said that the payment of the remaining amount is pending since 2022.
The BBMP had told the court that it had sought permission from the commission of inquiry to release around ₹44 crore to various establishments towards the balance amount due for providing various health services during COVID-19, but the commission had rejected their request pending inquiry.
Not under inquiry
However, the court said that non-payment of dues in relation to RT-PCR tests conducted by the petitioners was not the subject matter of the inquiry before the commission.
'It is clear that in the light of the undisputed/admitted fact that the BBMP had not paid the legitimate dues payable to the petitioners, in the absence of any material to show any kind of nexus or connection whatsoever between the liability of the BBMP and the inquiry commission, it cannot be said that the BBMP was not liable to pay/clear the legitimate dues payable to the petitioners,' the court said while directing release of the amount to the petitioners within six weeks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Anganwadi workers mark Black Day, protest against Poshan app
Anganwadi workers and helpers across Punjab marked 'Black Day' on Thursday under the banner of Anganwadi Mulazim Union Punjab (CITU). Wearing black dupattas and raising slogans, they staged protests in various districts to demand their rights and highlight the problems faced by both workers and beneficiaries. The protest was held as part of a nationwide call given by the All India Federation. Anganwadi workers union protesting against the government at DPO office in Ludhiana on Thursday. (Manish/HT) Addressing the gathering, union leaders in Ludhiana accused the Centre of continuously cutting funds meant for welfare schemes. They pointed out that despite alarming figures of child malnutrition in the country, the government was weakening the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS). Quoting national survey data, they said children were increasingly suffering from stunted growth, while Supreme Court directions clearly mandate that freshly cooked supplementary nutrition must be provided at anganwadi centres. They argued that earlier, before the Covid pandemic, freshly cooked food at centres had helped reduce malnutrition by nearly 90 per cent. However, with the introduction of digitisation, beneficiaries are now given take-home rations only after completing e-KYC and facial recognition, which often fails due to technical glitches. As a result, many poor children and mothers are deprived of their rightful share. Union leaders also highlighted India's worsening ranking on the Global Hunger Index, slipping from 96 to 105, calling it a matter of shame. They said despite ICDS completing 50 years since its launch on October 2, 1975, workers and helpers are still denied fair wages. Even the meagre honorarium has not been paid for five months, and the Centre's budget share is repeatedly delayed. The protesters demanded that ICDS be recognised as a separate department, anganwadi workers be given Class III status, and helpers Class IV status. They also demanded nursery and LKG classes be attached to anganwadis, leaving certificates be issued, gratuity benefits be implemented as directed by the Supreme Court, and proper facilities like Wi-Fi and tabs be provided. Warning both the Centre and the Punjab government, the union leaders said if their long-pending demands were not met, they would be forced to intensify their agitation in the coming days. 'A demand letter was handed over to the senior superintendent at the programme office in Ludhiana,' said Anju Mehta, one of the union members.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 hours ago
- Business Standard
Senior citizens double down on super top-ups, drive 61% rise in portability
As medical costs rise, senior citizens are changing how they buy health insurance. More such citizens are purchasing policies earlier in their lives; they are adding top-ups, and even switching insurers for better value, according to data provided by Policybazaar. Almost six of 10 health insurance policies are bought by people aged 60 to 65, making it the most active bracket. The 66-70 segment is also seeing steady growth. About 65 per cent of policies bought by senior citizens were renewed in FY5 and one in three purchases were fresh, pointing to expanding coverage among families. Cost-saving strategies To manage premiums, senior citizens use tools like: 15-20 per cent opt for deductibles of Rs 2-3 lakh. Top-up purchases have almost doubled in three years, with one in three senior citizens choosing such offers to expand insurance cover Around 12 per cent shift to co-pay options at renewal, paying a small share of bills while insurers bear the bulk. Seniors seek flexible cover and add-ons Senior citizens prefer features that offer immediate and relevant insurance protection: Over 40 per cent now want cover for pre-existing conditions without waiting. Women lean towards OPD and wellness riders, while men prefer critical illness add-ons. Demand for domiciliary treatment has risen, especially after Covid-19. Portability rising As many as 61 per cent senior citizens have changed their insurers in two years for cheaper premiums or better service, according to Policybazaar. This shows growing financial awareness in evaluating long-term value, not just price. Urban-rural divide Insurance penetration is better in cities like Delhi, Bengaluru and Hyderabad, where seniors buy higher covers of Rs 10-25 lakh. Coverage in villages and towns is largely driven by government schemes, though Tier-II cities are slowly bridging the gap. Premium payment Nearly three in four premiums are funded by children or family members of senior citizens. Of these, 11 per cent come from children living abroad, highlighting the role of overseas support in ageing parents' healthcare. About 27 per cent of seniors, however, still pay premiums on their own. 'We're witnessing a significant shift in how India's senior citizens approach health insurance. Seniors are insuring earlier, buying larger covers and making smarter choices, whether through super top-ups, portability or Day-1 coverage,' said Siddharth Singhal, business head, health insurance, at Policybazaar.
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Delhi's stray dog crisis demands a One Health response
Delhi is once again at war with its dogs. The Supreme Court's recent order to remove stray dogs has reignited a long-running debate. The fear driving it is, of course, real. The city is home to nearly a million strays, dog bite cases surged almost 277% between 2022 and 2024, and January 2025 alone saw a 52 percent spike over the previous year's monthly average. Yet the Court's response is less a cure than a reflex, aimed at symptoms rather than causes. This is where the One Health framework becomes critical – as it recognises human, animal and ecological health are deeply interconnected and that only integrated solutions can deliver real safety. The Covid-19 pandemic should have made that lesson unmissable. Also Read: Dogs and laws: On street dogs and the Supreme Court order Understanding the crisis Rabies is a zoonotic disease that passes between animals and humans, and it thrives in urban systems like Delhi. The city generates more than 11,000 tonnes of solid waste every day, nearly half of which is mismanaged. These open garbage heaps are permanent food sources for dogs, allowing their numbers to persist regardless of how many are caught or removed. The 'catch and kill' method, introduced by the British in the 19th century and heavily used after Independence, proved disastrous. A Municipal Corporation of Delhi study from 1980 to 1990 found that despite slaughtering 8 lakh dogs over the decade, the city's stray population remained at 1.5 lakh. By 1993, authorities admitted the approach had failed, as rabies deaths had risen and the dog population continued to grow. The problem lies in the city's disrupted urban ecology, where unmanaged waste sustains multiple disease-carrying scavengers and the sudden removal of dogs destabilises the system further. When dogs are displaced, other scavengers like rodents, pigs or monkeys, move in to occupy the same ecological niche. Rodent populations in particular thrive on unmanaged waste and are reservoirs of diseases such as leptospirosis. Any strategy that ignores these connections risks replacing one public health crisis with another. These ecological vulnerabilities are compounded by gaps in human health systems. Post-exposure treatment can prevent almost all deaths, yet access remains patchy. Clinics often lack vaccines and immunoglobulin, epidemiological and laboratory surveillance is limited, healthcare professionals receive inadequate training, community awareness is low, and coordination across sectors is weak. Therefore, the issue moves far beyond dogs. India's own Animal Birth Control Rules, updated in 2023, require sterilisation, vaccination and release precisely to avoid these outcomes. The Supreme Court's directive cuts against this, undermines years of legal reform, and risks exposing India again to the charge of cruelty. One Health approach Viewed through the One Health lens, Delhi's challenge is not a choice between humans or dogs, but how the city manages the interconnected systems that affect both. Waste management shapes the conditions in which rabies spreads, dog vaccination protects both animals and humans, and post-bite treatment saves lives. None of these measures can succeed in isolation, and climate change intensifies the stakes. Rising temperatures and erratic rainfall alter waste decomposition, influence rodent populations, and affect dog behaviour, making fragile urban ecosystems even more unstable. Treating dog removal as a technical fix ignores the reality that the most serious health risks in the coming decades will emerge where human, animal, and environmental health intersect, and a One Health approach emerges as the pathway to tackle them effectively. There is also mounting evidence from India itself that large scale vaccinations can rapidly lower exposure even before sterilisation programmes achieve scale. Goa became India's first state to eliminate human dog-mediated rabies through a programme that combined mass dog vaccination, public education, and surveillance. Vaccinating each dog in India costs a mean of U.S. $3.45, slightly above the global average of U.S. $2.18 due to labour-intensive methods like hand-catching strays - yet, over 10 years, the programme prevented 121 human deaths and 3,427 DALYs (disability-adjusted life years, which measure years of healthy life lost due to illness or premature death) at just U.S. $567 per DALY, making it a highly cost-effective public health intervention. Jaipur's two-decade programme of sterilising and vaccinating stray dogs cost about U.S. $658,744 and saved more than 36,000 years of healthy life from rabies and dog bites at just U.S. $26–40 per year of life preserved, far below the World Health Organization's benchmark of U.S.$2,000 for cost-effectiveness in India. The city saved U.S. $5.6 million, nearly nine times its investment, when the value of lives saved is included, making it one of the most cost-effective public health strategies documented in India. Similarly, modelling in Tamil Nadu shows that vaccinating just 7% of stray dogs annually could reduce human rabies deaths by 70% within five years, while expanding coverage to 13% could reduce deaths by nearly 90%. Both cases highlight that targeted canine vaccination under a One Health framework is feasible, affordable, and highly effective at preventing human rabies deaths while maintaining animal welfare. Delhi's reliance on mass removals is short-sighted, and does not offer solutions to tackle the root cause, which is rabies rather than dogs. It offers only temporary relief, undermines animal welfare, and risks disrupting the urban ecosystem. Evidence from Goa, Jaipur, and Tamil Nadu shows that targeted canine vaccination, combined with sterilisation, public education, and effective waste management - is both feasible and highly cost-effective. By embracing a One Health strategy, Delhi can protect human lives, uphold animal health and welfare, while restoring ecological balance - providing a sustainable path to eliminate rabies. (Sharon Sarah Thawaney works with the Observer Research Foundation, Kolkata. sharonthawaney04@
