Singapore's Ninja Van said to halve valuation in latest funding round
Ninja Van, backed by Alibaba Group, is set to raise US$80 million in a round that will slash its valuation by about half to around US$1 billion.
SINGAPORE - Logistics start-up Ninja Van is in talks to raise an internal round which will slash its valuation by about half, the latest sign of tech companies struggling to navigate the funding winter plaguing South-east Asia.
Singapore-based Ninja Van, backed by Alibaba Group Holding, is set to raise US$80 million (S$102.8 million) in a round that will reduce its valuation to about US$1 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.
Existing investors B Capital Group – the venture capital firm set up by Meta Platforms co-founder Eduardo Saverin and Raj Ganguly – as well as Monk's Hill Ventures will be leading the round, said the people.
Investors in this round secured favourable or preferential terms for a future exit, according to the people. A spokesperson for Ninja Van declined to comment. B Capital and Monk's Hill did not respond to requests for comment.
Ninja Van is raising capital during one of the hardest possible times for fledgling firms. The South-east Asia technology industry has been plagued by job cuts, CEO resignations and falling start-up valuations amid prolonged global macroeconomic uncertainties, making it difficult for companies to secure funding or debut on public markets.
Shares of regional tech peers Grab Holdings and Gojek parent GoTo Group have underperformed compared to Big Tech in the US as they work to balance growth and profitability in a region that's losing its lustre. While e-commerce is gaining popularity in the region of more than 650 million people, stiff competition and deep-pocketed players like J&T Global Express and Sea's SPX Express have kept profit margins slim in the logistics industry.
Founded in 2014, Ninja Van operates in six markets in South-east Asia and delivers two million parcels a day, according to its website.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Keppel to sell M1's telco business to Simba for $1.43b, says deal expected to benefit consumers
Business Singtel, StarHub shares fall after announcement of Keppel's M1 sale
Singapore Healthy lifestyle changes could save Singapore $650 million in healthcare costs by 2050: Study
Opinion Anwar's government: Full house but plenty of empty offices
Singapore 79 arrested, over 3kg of heroin seized in 5-day drug blitz
Singapore Man's claim amid divorce that his mother is true owner of 3 properties cuts no ice with judge
Asia Tourist spots in South Korea face complaints over rude service, price gouging during peak season
Business Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenues to US, official says
It raised US$578 million in a Series E round in 2021 from participants including Alibaba and B Capital Group. The round lifted the company's valuation to well beyond US$1 billion, turning the start-up into a unicorn. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
23 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Do Kwon may plead guilty in US case over $51 billion collapse of Singapore-based Terraform
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Police officers escort South Korean cryptocurrency entrepreneur Do Kwon (centre) at the exit of a court in Podgorica, Montenegro, on March 23, 2024. NEW YORK – Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a US criminal fraud case tied to the US$40 billion (S$51 billion) collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin in 2022. US District Judge Paul Engelmayer in New York scheduled a change of plea hearing for Aug 12. The judge said in an order on Aug 11 that Kwon should be ready to explain how he violated the law if he pleads guilty. Kwon, 33, pleaded not guilty in January following a two-year extradition battle over whether he would first face prosecution in the United States or his native South Korea. A call to Kwon's lawyer was not immediately returned. Kwon was charged in both countries in connection with the implosion of Singapore-based Terraform's TerraUSD, which shook the crypto world in the spring of 2022. The downturn that followed played a role in the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Kwon had been a fugitive from the South Korean charges for months when he and Terraform's former chief financial officer were caught trying to board a Dubai-bound private jet at the airport in Montenegro's capital, Podgorica, with fake passports in March 2023. Kwon, who owned 92 per cent of Terraform, was held in Montenegro for months as officials in the Balkan nation spent most of two years battling over whether he should be extradited to the US or South Korea. Meanwhile, Terraform and Kwon were found liable for civil fraud in a 2024 suit by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A jury in New York, at the end of a two-week trial, determined that Kwon and Terraform misled investors. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump signs order extending China tariff truce by 90 days, White House says World Trump seizes control of Washington police, deploys National Guard Opinion For Singapore, the AI revolution is coming just in time Asia Death of student in Sabah raises hurdle for Malaysian PM Anwar as he faces tough state polls soon Opinion Sumiko at 61: Hearing loss is linked to dementia risk. Here's what you risk by ignoring it Business S'pore start-up among 5 global picks for Japan construction group Kajima's mentorship and funding Business Lower-wage retail workers to receive up to 6% pay bump from Sept 1 Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1? Jurors found that Terraform and Kwon falsely claimed that Chai, a popular Korean payment application, was using Terraform's blockchain technology to make transactions. The jurors also found investors were misled about the stability of the UST stablecoin, which Kwon and Terraform claimed was algorithmically pegged to the US dollar. Terraform and Kwon later agreed to pay the US US$4.47 billion to resolve the case. The deal required Kwon to wind down the business and use any remaining assets to pay off the company's creditors. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US-India relations at a crossroads
THE relationship between the US and India, once hailed as one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century, is now under its most significant strain in decades. What began as a promising strategic alliance built on shared democratic values and mutual economic interests has devolved into a transactional relationship marked by escalating trade disputes, divergent geopolitical priorities, and fundamental disagreements over India's foreign policy autonomy. This deterioration manifested on Aug 6, when US President Donald Trump imposed a punitive 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods , doubling the previously announced rate. Justified as a penalty for India's continued Russian oil imports, the move is more than a trade dispute – it signals a breakdown in the strategic understanding that has underpinned US-India relations for two decades. The move surprised many, given the historically warm rapport between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, once seen as a stabilising force in the bilateral relationship. Yet, current tensions suggest that even strong personal ties cannot overcome fundamental policy disagreements in an increasingly polarised global environment. Core disagreements At the heart of the crisis lies India's refusal to abandon its relationship with Russia, despite sustained pressure from Washington. India's continued purchase of Russian oil and military equipment has become a litmus test of its commitment to the Western alliance system, at least from the US perspective. For India, however, these ties represent core elements of its strategic autonomy, a principle that has guided Indian foreign policy since independence and remains non-negotiable for New Delhi. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up This disagreement exposes a fundamental disconnect: The US has increasingly viewed India as a junior partner in its broader strategy to contain China and challenge the Russia-China axis, while New Delhi has consistently maintained that its alignment with Washington is based on mutual benefit, not subordination to American priorities. ' Unrealistic expectations on both sides compound the situation. American demands for greater access to India's agricultural markets run counter to India's domestic political imperatives, while Indian hopes for preferential treatment in trade talks clash with the US' growing protectionism. ' Perhaps more troubling for the relationship's long-term trajectory is the apparent return to what Indian strategists call 'hyphenation' – the Cold War-era practice of treating India and Pakistan as equals in US foreign policy. Trump's recent diplomatic interventions in Indo-Pakistani disputes have revived Indian concerns about America's reliability as a strategic partner. This represents a significant reversal of the 'de-hyphenation' policy initiated during the George W Bush administration, and undermines a key achievement of the last two decades of bilateral engagement. Economic and geopolitical friction The economic dimension of US-India relations faces equally serious challenges. India supplies nearly half of all generic drugs consumed in the US, saving American consumers billions of dollars annually in healthcare costs. The pharmaceutical sector, along with information technology services, has been a cornerstone of the bilateral economic relationship. However, the new tariff regime threatens to disrupt these established supply chains and could force both countries to seek alternative arrangements. Unrealistic expectations on both sides compound the situation. American demands for greater access to India's agricultural markets run counter to India's domestic political imperatives, while Indian hopes for preferential treatment in trade talks clash with the US' growing protectionism. The deterioration in US-India relations is set against the backdrop of global geopolitical realignment. India's participation in multilateral forums such as Brics and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, and continued engagement with the Quad (alongside the US, Japan and Australia), reflects New Delhi's commitment to a multipolar world order. ' The era of grand strategic partnerships based on shared values and long-term vision may be giving way to more pragmatic, issue-specific cooperation between countries with different worldviews. ' This approach increasingly conflicts with Washington's binary worldview, where countries are expected to choose sides in the emerging 'Great Power' competition. The implications of this divergence extend beyond bilateral relations to the broader Indo-Pacific strategy that has been central to US foreign policy in recent years. If India continues to drift away from close alignment with the US, it could alter the strategic balance in the Indo-Pacific region and complicate US efforts to counter Chinese influence. Crucial next steps Despite these tensions, the US-India partnership remains too important for both countries to allow it to deteriorate completely. Common challenges, from the rise of China to climate change and terrorism, necessitate cooperation. But any path forward will require a fundamental recalibration of mutual expectations. The US must accept India's strategic autonomy, while India must recognise that continued access to American markets and technology comes with certain obligations. The current crisis may ultimately serve as a necessary correction to an overly optimistic assessment of US-India convergence that has dominated policy thinking in both countries. A more transactional relationship, while less emotionally satisfying, may prove more realistic and durable, given the constraints faced by both democratic governments. The tensions currently shaking US-India relations reflect deeper questions about the nature of international partnerships in an increasingly multipolar world. The era of grand strategic partnerships based on shared values and long-term vision may be giving way to more pragmatic, issue-specific cooperation between countries with different worldviews. Whether this represents a temporary setback or a permanent reorientation of one of the world's most important bilateral relationships will depend largely on the two leaders' ability to find common ground while respecting each other's core interests and constraints. The coming months will be crucial. The choices made in Washington and New Delhi will determine whether this partnership weathers the storm or unravels, with far-reaching implications for the geopolitical landscape of the Indo-Pacific region and beyond.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump bid for cut of Nvidia, AMD chip revenue risks ‘dangerous world'
The Nvidia and AMD revenue-sharing deals could prompt the Trump administration to target other industries and goods. Hong Kong - The revenue-for-exports deal between the US government and two of the world's biggest chipmakers opens a new front in a trading regime turned upside down by Presdient Donald Trump. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) agreed to pay the US government 15 per cent of revenue from some chip sales to China. The chips – Nvidia's H20 AI accelerator and AMD's MI308 chips – were earlier banned by the Trump administration and require export licences to sell. 'To call this unusual or unprecedented would be a staggering understatement,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the Singapore-based ISEA – Yusof Ishak Institute. 'What we are seeing is in effect the monetisation of US trade policy in which US companies must pay the US government for permission to export. If that's the case, we've entered into a new and dangerous world.' The chip-payment arrangement may face legal challenges because it could be construed as an export tax, something that's not allowed under the constitution, trade experts said. The proposal is the latest direct government intervention into business and finance since Mr Trump returned to the Oval Office in January. As well as a chaotic tariff campaign and persistent criticism of a sitting Federal Reserve chairman, Mr Trump has used his Truth Social platform for everything from calling on CEOs to resign to offering commentary on corporate advertising campaigns. Mr Trump's transactional policy approach saw him approve the sale of United States Steel Corp. to Japan's Nippon Steel in a US$14.1 billion (S$18 billion) deal that included caveats such as agreeing to US national security rules and a 'golden share' for the US government. Japan, South Korea and the European Union all pledged to invest billions in the United States, helping secure tariff rates of 15 per cent, while companies such as Apple have also skirted levies by promising to invest hundreds of billions of dollars. The Nvidia and AMD revenue-sharing deals may now prompt the White House to target other industries and goods, according to Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump signs order extending China tariff truce by 90 days, White House says World Trump seizes control of Washington police, deploys National Guard Opinion For Singapore, the AI revolution is coming just in time Asia Death of student in Sabah raises hurdle for Malaysian PM Anwar as he faces tough state polls soon Opinion Sumiko at 61: Hearing loss is linked to dementia risk. Here's what you risk by ignoring it Business S'pore start-up among 5 global picks for Japan construction group Kajima's mentorship and funding Business Lower-wage retail workers to receive up to 6% pay bump from Sept 1 Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1? 'The sky is the limit,' she said. 'You could come up with all sorts of company-specific, country-specific combinations that would say, 'No one else can trade, but if you pay us directly, then you get the ability to trade.'' The Trump administration is already in the midst of a lawsuit related to his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to levy what he called 'reciprocal' tariffs on the world. On Aug 8, Trump warned of a 'GREAT DEPRESSION' if US courts ruled that his tariffs were illegal. Chips are at the heart of the US-China battle to dominate industries of the future such as AI and automation. The Biden administration restricted the sale of advanced chips to China, prompting Nvidia to develop the H20, which skirted such restrictions. Trump administration officials tightened export controls in April by barring Nvidia from selling the chips without a permit. In July, however, the White House decided to allow Nvidia and AMD to resume sales of chips designed specifically for the Chinese market, which are several rungs below the most advanced artificial intelligence accelerators. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the administration wanted Chinese developers 'addicted' to American technology. China has grown increasingly hostile to the idea of Chinese firms deploying the H20, particularly after the US called for the chips to be installed with tracking technology to better enforce export controls. Yuyuantantian, a social media account affiliated with state-run China Central Television that regularly signals Beijing's thinking about trade, on Sunday slammed the chip's supposed security vulnerabilities and inefficiency. Still, Chinese companies could use the H20s because domestic firms can't produce enough AI chips to meet demand. That potentially provides an opportunity for Nvidia and AMD to sell more – and now for the US government to earn additional revenue as well. Mr Trump on Aug 11 signed an order extending a 90-day tariff truce between the US and China, which was set to expire on Aug 12, by another 90 days. This staves off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods as US retailers prepared for the critical end-of-year holiday season. 'There's clearly a shift by the administration to take a lighter national security stance as these negotiations are ongoing,' said Drew DeLong, lead in geopolitical dynamics practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm. While the US has intervened before, including by taking stakes in private companies after the 2008 financial crisis, a similar deal like the one struck with Nvidia and AMD is hard to remember and – without proper oversight – could lead to a 'crony capitalism state,' according to Scott Kennedy, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. 'It represents a huge shift in the way the American economy is supposed to operate,' Mr Kennedy said. 'It won't make anyone happy except maybe the Chinese, who will get their chips and watch the US political system go through gyration and domestic tensions.' REUTERS
