
France to ban common object in public places from July 1 with hefty fines
France to ban common object in public places from July 1 with hefty fines
The new rule could catch people out if they're not aware before heading to the country this summer
Tourists visiting France this summer will need to be aware of the new rules - or risk fines
(Image: Getty )
People taking summer holidays in France must be aware of a new rule starting in July. Failure to follow the new law could result in a serious fine from the local police.
According to a BBC report, France will enforce a major smoking ban in public places from July 1, including beaches, parks, public gardens, outside schools, bus stops and at sports venues. The measure has been approved in order to help limit the damage that smoking has on young children.
Smoking cigarettes is common in France. An estimated 16.4 million people aged 15 and older use tobacco products, according to Global Action to End Smoking.
It comes as part of a mission by the country's minister for children, health and family, Catherine Vautrin. In an interview published by Ouest-France daily, she said: "Tobacco must disappear where there are children".
Anyone caught breaking the ban will be fined €135 (which works out to £113 or $153). Ms Vautrin said the police would enforce the ban, but added that the public would be given the chance to "self-regulate."
French authorities plan to actively enforce the new rules, with signage and public awareness campaigns to support compliance. This is an extension of the smoking rules already in place across France, which has banned smoking in restaurants and nightclubs since 2008.
France's minister for children, health and family Catherine Vautrin
(Image: Thierry NECTOUX/GAMMA RAPHO via Getty )
People in Britain might struggle to remember the rule, as the UK's own smoking rules currently only apply indoors. Since July 2007, it has been illegal to smoke in enclosed public places and workplaces in the UK.
It was reported in 2024 by the BBC that the UK Government is considering similar action by extending legislation in England to outdoor areas like playgrounds and hospital grounds to "protect children and the most vulnerable from the harms of second-hand smoke".
People can still smoke in the outdoor areas of cafes and bar terraces. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes or vapes) are not included in this ban, though France is working on tightening vaping regulations soon.
The ban will take effect from July 1, 2025
(Image: Dazeley via Getty )
Hotels usually set aside a few rooms for smokers. If you don't specify, you will be placed in a non-smoking room, the French Rivera Traveller claimed.
Article continues below
The BBC claimed that, according to the French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, almost a quarter (23.1%) of the French population smokes on a daily basis. France's National Committee Against Smoking adds that more than 75,000 smokers die each year of tobacco-related illnesses - 13% of all deaths.
A recent report by the French cancer association La Ligue Contre le Cancer shows that almost 80% of French people are in favour of a ban on smoking in public places like woodlands, beaches, parks, and terraces.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Why Israeli PM is wrong about UK. We just want Gaza's children to be fed
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... When the invitation arrived, my first thought surprised and frightened me, more than a little. 'Would I be safe if I accepted the invitation to the event at the Israeli Embassy.' It is not something that has ever crossed my mind about any of the events I have been invited to as an MP in the eight years since I was elected. But it was there, and very real. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I felt the same anxiety a few days ago when I heard of the murder of Israeli Embassy staff in Washington DC. Is anyone now safe? It is not that this outrage was any worse or any more deplorable than what we are seeing in Gaza, or the Israeli people experienced on October 7. A girl holds a container at a food distribution point in the Nuseirat camp for refugees in central Gaza Strip (Picture: Eyad Baba) | AFP via Getty Images Retribution upon restribution It has long passed the point where sufficient adjectives are available to encapsulate the horror. But this latest murder somehow felt like a harbinger of even worse to come, that the conflict is now way beyond the control or even influence of the international community. And in the Middle East, it seems that retribution upon retribution is being sought with ever worsening tactics. Food is now a weapon of war. Humanitarian aid is being used as some sort of means of controlling people who have been left with nothing else but to fight for life. For 12 weeks, Israel blocked aid to Gaza and while our government, and indeed all political parties, recognise that country's right to defend itself against Hamas, the situation has now gone far beyond that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last week the UK Government, together with France and Canada, warned that they were not prepared to 'stand by while the Netanyahu government pursues these egregious actions'. And that if the renewed military action and further expansion in the West Bank did not stop, they would 'not hesitate to take further action including targeted sanctions'. No place for Hamas There will be those who will say that it is too little, too late and that too many people have died, both Israelis and Palestinians. I know that I have felt that the pursuit of peace and the two-state solution which so many of us crave has been increasingly hopeless. And my frustrations that the Israeli government is not prepared to listen even to its own citizens who want an end to this war reached new heights with Netanyahu's reaction to that joint UK, French and Canadian statement. They had, he claimed, 'effectively said that they want Hamas to remain in power'. That is so far from the truth as to be nonsense. Every political party in this country, my own Liberal Democrats included, have made it abundantly clear that there can be no place for Hamas in the future of Gaza. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We do want peace, for both the Palestinians and Israel. We also want an end to both the resultant Islamophobia and antisemitism which has reached previously unknown levels in this country. Perhaps more than anything else, I want to see the children of Gaza fed and the families of the hostages enjoy shabbat with their loved ones again.


Daily Record
3 hours ago
- Daily Record
Zack Hudson to become a dad again? EastEnders fans predict new twist after Lauren Branning fling
EastEnders fans are convinced that Zack Hudson and Lauren Branning will fall pregnant after they shared a passionate night together in the BBC soap EastEnders has unveiled another unexpected turn of events for Zack Hudson (James Farrar) as he spent the night with Lauren Branning (Jacqueline Jossa), betraying her fiancé Peter Beale (Thomas Law). Just last week, Zack narrowly escaped a horrifying car crash after threatening to abduct Barney Mitchell (Lewis Bridgeman) upon discovering that he is the teenager's biological father. After Teddy's (Roland Manookian) car plunged into a lake, Zack was feared dead but had actually managed to evade the Mitchell family as he feared for his life. Barney was also informed about his true parentage after Zack persuaded him to leave the Square. Zack is also the father to baby Peach, who was tragically stillborn, and his young daughter Dolly, but viewers speculate that he might be on the verge of becoming a father for the fourth time. Elsewhere in the Square, Lauren Branning (Jacqueline Jossa) was harshly confronted by her fiancé Peter Beale's (Thomas Law) anger over their son Jimmy Beale's severe sight impairment diagnosis, blaming Lauren's drug use during pregnancy. After a distressing confrontation with Peter, Lauren decided to break her sobriety by having a drink at the Queen Vic - but was turned away by fellow alcoholic Linda Carter (Kellie Bright), reports Belfast Live. Instead, she headed to Harry's Barn where she demanded a drink but was denied by Gina Knight (Francesca Henry). She then became irate before Zack arrived and convinced her to leave. Lauren, still intent on drinking, was at Zack's flat when he encouraged her to put the bottle down and engage in conversation instead. As she opened up about her troubles with Peter, Zack disclosed his own challenges with Barney, both feeling they hadn't lived up to their parental aspirations. The atmosphere shifted when Zack remarked on how fortunate Lauren's family was to have her, leading them to seek solace in each other's arms and culminating in a fervent kiss. On the following Tuesday (June 3), Lauren left Zack's residence and made her way to the café to confront Peter and Jimmy. Peter, however, hesitated to involve Lauren with their child after she had been out for the entire night. Towards the episode's conclusion, after attending an appointment at a private hospital, Peter ended things with Lauren, pointing the finger at her for Jimmy's ailment and threatening to take their two sons from her. Yet, there may be more drama unfolding as aficionados of EastEnders are now speculating that Lauren and Zack's heated encounter might lead to an unexpected pregnancy. A viewer speculated on X, posting: "And it was set up so that Lauren and Zack would sleep together baby no I've lost count #EastEnders." Another tersely commented: "Baby no 4 or something #EastEnders", while someone else added: "Pregnant by the end of the week #EastEnders." One fan ventured a guess, saying: "Lauren is gonna get pregnant by accident again with Zack #EastEnders".


North Wales Live
3 hours ago
- North Wales Live
UK workers skipping lunch as 'too much work to do' costing them £1,000 per year
Hardworking Britons are, in effect, 'giving away' as much as £29 billion in labour every year simply by not taking full advantage of their lunchtime breaks. A study of 2,000 employees holding either full-time or part-time positions has shown that those who do take a break for lunch generally use just 70 per cent of the time they're given, and those who don't take the entire break often skip it altogether twice a week. For someone working full-time, with an average of 233 workdays in a year and the average full-time salary taken into account, this tallies up to an astonishing £1,012 worth of time each person annually misses out on. Almost 50 per cent confess that it's usually too much work that prevents them from stepping away, whilst others feel pressured to get back to work or see no point when there's barely enough time to go anywhere during their break. More than one-third consider their lunchtime pauses 'too brief', reporting an average length of only 39 minutes per day to refresh themselves. In an effort to restore the sanctity of lunch hours for the British public, St Pierre has established a 'respect zone' in London's Potter's Field Park – an ode to the preciousness of the midday interlude, calling upon Londoners to engage in dining 'avec respect'. The special area intended to transport office workers to Paris, inviting them to follow the French example of enjoying unhurried and relaxed mealtimes. A spokesperson from St Pierre remarked: "Lunchbreaks shouldn't be a luxury." They added: "Even though life is busy and work is important, we need to remember to take time out for ourselves to really get that break we need – and go back to work energised, refreshed, and satisfied by a delicious meal we were able to properly savour." A fifth of Brits feel that lunchtime rituals are not given the respect they deserve, particularly when compared to European neighbours such as Spain, Italy, and France who are seen as more appreciative of their midday meals. Yet, even those who manage to set aside time for lunch often end up multitasking with work-related activities like checking emails or answering calls. For those accustomed to working through their lunch hour, over 20 per cent admit it would be difficult to alter this routine even if they had the chance. This admission comes despite 37 per cent acknowledging that regularly skipping lunch breaks can lead to burnout and negatively impact work performance. St. Pierre's spokesperson added: "It's a sad state of affairs that our main break during a long day of work isn't really being treated as one – and that we can't seem to switch off even when given permission. "There's something to be learned from the French here – taking that moment to really unwind and enjoy a delicious meal, without thinking about other things. We're also missing a prime opportunity in our everyday lives to connect with other people over good food and conversation."