U.S. stocks close mixed as Iran-Israel conflict continues
NEW YORK, June 20 (Xinhua) -- U.S. stocks finished mixed on Friday over the deepening Iran-Israel conflict and speculation about whether the United States will become directly involved.
Markets were volatile throughout the session, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average inching up 35.16 points, or 0.08 percent, to 42,206.82. In contrast, the S&P 500 declined 13.03 points, or 0.22 percent, to 5,967.84, while the Nasdaq Composite Index lost 98.86 points, or 0.51 percent, closing at 19,447.41.
Sector performance was divided, with six of the S&P 500's 11 primary sectors finishing in red. Communication services and materials led the declines, down 1.83 percent and 0.66 percent respectively. Energy stocks benefited from the geopolitical uncertainty, rising 1.05 percent, while consumer staples gained 0.62 percent.
Tensions in the Middle East continued to loom large over market sentiment. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reaffirmed Tehran's willingness to continue diplomatic talks with Germany, France, Britain, and the European Union, following discussions in Geneva. However, the White House said Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide within two weeks whether to involve the U.S. militarily in the conflict, intensifying pressure on Iran to return to the negotiating table.
"Investors are a little bit nervous about buying stocks right in front of this situation and, more specifically, right in front of this weekend," said Rick Meckler, a partner at Cherry Lane Investments in New Vernon, New Jersey.
The escalating conflict has raised fears of a broader regional war and sent safe-haven assets like U.S. government bonds higher. The two-year Treasury yield fell 3.8 basis points to 3.907 percent, while the 10-year yield dropped 2.2 basis points to 4.374 percent. The 30-year yield slipped just under 1 basis point to 4.889 percent, all reaching their lowest levels since June 12.
On the monetary policy front, investors digested comments from Federal Reserve officials following the central bank's decision to keep interest rates steady. Fed Chair Jerome Powell warned that inflation could accelerate in the coming months. However, views within the Fed remain split. Fed Governor Christopher Waller indicated support for a rate cut as early as the next meeting, while Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin suggested a more cautious approach, citing no immediate need for action.
In corporate news, Kroger emerged as the top performer in the S&P 500. The supermarket giant reported stronger-than-expected profits and raised its same-store sales forecast, citing robust performance in pharmacy, fresh food, and e-commerce. Shares of CarMax also advanced after the used-car retailer posted better-than-anticipated earnings, buoyed by higher retail vehicle sales.
Despite growing geopolitical risks, Wall Street has shown resilience in recent weeks. However, with inflation pressures, tariff uncertainties, and the specter of a widening conflict in the Middle East, markets remain on edge heading into the second half of the year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysian Reserve
24 minutes ago
- Malaysian Reserve
US falls into Israel's trap
Israel presses forward with what many observers describe as a campaign of ethnic cleansing WHAT happened to President Donald Trump's promise of 'no war'? As this piece goes to print, the US stands perilously close to being dragged into a potentially catastrophic conflict with Iran — prodded by none other than the increasingly belligerent Israeli government. This looming confrontation threatens to send shockwaves through the global economy. Disruption to oil flows would only be the beginning. For a global economy already reeling from inflation and economic uncertainty — amplified by Trump's earlier tariff battles — this new crisis could deepen the struggles faced by Americans and others round the world. It is deeply ironic that such a potential war looms under a president who campaigned as an anti-war figure. During his 721-day run-up to the 2024 election, Trump repeatedly vowed to put 'America First' and steer clear of costly foreign entanglements. That message resonated strongly with a public exhausted by decades of endless wars and rising living costs. Many Americans saw no reason why the US should be involved in conflicts far away from their shores. Trump also promised swift solutions to some of the world's most intractable crises. At a March 2023 rally in Texas, he declared: 'Before I even arrive at the Oval Office, shortly after I win the presidency, I will have the disastrous war between Russia and Ukraine settled. I will have that settlement done within 24 hours.' Five months into his term, Ukraine remains a battlefield and Gaza continues to be a killing field. Israel — a small illegal nation with outsized influence — presses forward with what many observers describe as a campaign of ethnic cleansing. There is no peace in sight — only deepening tragedy. So, what does this say about Trump? About politicians in general? Well, that's politicians for us. They make promises to win elections, promises they cannot keep or never intended to keep in the first place. In the meantime, Israel's unrelenting bombardment of Gaza found a brief distraction when it launched missile strikes against Iran. But this temporary shift in focus could become a long-term quagmire — especially if the US becomes directly involved. To critics, this potential policy misstep over Iran appears to be yet another reckless idea from a leader who has shown little regard for nuance or diplomacy. Like his controversial tariffs, Trump's approach to international relations seems driven more by bravado than by strategy. In truth, Trump and his administration have demonstrated a troubling lack of understanding of global affairs. He spoke of ending the Russia-Ukraine war and resolving the Gaza crisis as if they were simple business deals. The reality, however, has proven far more complex. They don't happen at the snap of a fingers. The same can be said for his dangerous posturing toward Iran. The US has failed before — in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Why should anyone believe that Iran — a country nearly five times the size of Malaysia, with a population of over 90 million — will be any easier to subdue? Iran has weathered decades of US sanctions and military threats. It is not a foe to be underestimated. Military experts have warned against such adventurism. Retired US Army Colonel Douglas Abbott Macgregor recently reminded listeners during a podcast discussion, of the 1983 Beirut bombing, in which a suicide truck attack killed 241 American servicemen. The explosion marked one of the deadliest single-day losses for the Marine Corps since World War II (WWII). Macgregor urged Trump to learn from history — to heed the that lesson former President Ronald Reagan learned too late. 'We fell into a trap, the usual Israel's trap,' Macgregor said. 'Drag us into the Middle East, make us targets.' This warning comes from a commander who led one of the early tank battles in the Gulf War. Trump's claim that the US won't put boots on the ground is naive. Relying solely on air and naval power does not eliminate risk — it merely changes the form it takes. History has shown that technological superiority alone cannot guarantee victory — or survival. After half a century of failed interventions, one might expect the US to have learned better. Some have. But not the military-industrial complex: The powerful alliance of government officials, military brass and defence contractors that profits handsomely from perpetual conflict. For them, war is not a tragedy; it's an opportunity. A new front means new weapons to test, new contracts to sign and a fresh narrative to justify ever-growing budgets. It's almost a jolly good business to wage wars as a profitable enterprise! As the retired colonel sums it up: 'Arrogance and self-delusion are trumping reason.' Habhajan Singh is the corporate editor of The Malaysian Reserve. This article first appeared in The Malaysian Reserve weekly print edition
Malay Mail
28 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Trump teases ‘mindboggling' deal after US judge backs Harvard's foreign student fight
NEW YORK, June 21 — A federal judge yesterday indefinitely paused Donald Trump's bid to block Harvard from enrolling foreign students as the US president said a 'deal' with the Ivy League school was in the works. The order by District Judge Allison Burroughs will allow international students to continue to attend the elite university while a lawsuit filed by Harvard plays out in the courts. Trump, who has cut federal grants for Harvard and tried a host of different tactics to block the institution from hosting international students, said that his administration has been holding negotiations with Harvard. 'Many people have been asking what is going on with Harvard University and their largescale improprieties that we have been addressing, looking for a solution,' Trump said in a post yesterday on Truth Social. 'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so,' he said. 'If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country.' Trump did not provide any details about the purported 'deal.' The Trump administration has sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed embassies to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing that they were illegal and unconstitutional. Harvard previously secured two temporary restraining orders from Burroughs against the government's move to bar international students, and the judge extended it with a preliminary injunction yesterday. International students accounted for 27 per cent of total enrolment at Harvard in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In court filings, Harvard argued that Trump's actions were 'retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students.' Alongside the campaign against foreign students, the Trump administration has also cut around US$3.2 billion (RM13.6 billion) of federal grants and contracts benefiting the university and pledged to exclude it from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Trump and his allies claim that Harvard and other prestigious universities are unaccountable bastions of liberal, anti-conservative bias and anti-Semitism. — AFP
New Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump disputes own spy chief's take on Iran nuclear programme
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday that his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was wrong in suggesting there is no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not working on a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. "She's wrong," Trump said. Gabbard testified to Congress in March that the US intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead. Trump's comments came as the president has said he would weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Gabbard's office has previously pointed to quotes from the spy chief saying that she and Trump were "on the same page" regarding the status of Iran's nuclear programme. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment programme was only for peaceful purposes. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard had not changed. They said US spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. Some experts, however, believe it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee it would work. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a "deep state" cabal of US officials opposed to his presidency. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with US spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favour and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials.
