McIver heads to court as watchdog group files complaint against Alina Habba
Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) is expected to appear in federal court for the first time Wednesday morning on a trio of charges following a May scuffle outside a federal immigration facility.
At her arraignment in Newark, McIver will plead not guilty, spokesperson Hanna Rumsey said. McIver is accused in a three-count indictment of slamming a federal agent with her forearm, 'forcibly' grabbing him and using her forearms to strike another agent.
Allegations of physical violence by a sitting member of Congress are rare, with a handful of incidents including the pre-Civil War caning of a senator by a member of the House.
McIver's allies, including two other Democrats who were with her during the incident, have decried the charges as political and have said she was roughed up by federal agents. Her allies are also trying to turn the tables on the federal prosecutor bringing the case, the interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, Alina Habba.
The Campaign for Accountability, a liberal watchdog group, filed a complaint this week against Habba with the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics.
The complaint alleges Habba has acted improperly since becoming a prosecutor and cites her actions in the McIver case, along with comments about turning 'New Jersey red' and announcing investigations into its Democratic governor and attorney general over immigration.
A spokesperson for Habba did not respond to a request for comment.
'In an atmosphere where other oversight bodies are caving to political influence, the bar's duty to independently enforce these rules is ever more important,' the group's executive director, Michelle Kuppersmith, said.
Habba, who represented Donald Trump in court between his presidencies, is already facing a lawsuit brought against her by Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was arrested for trespassing at the detention facility before the charges were dropped and a judge questioned Habba's judgment.
When she first announced charges against McIver, Habba said she had 'made efforts to address these issues without bringing criminal charges and have given Rep. McIver every opportunity to come to a resolution, but she has unfortunately declined.' The watchdog group's complaint alleges it was improper to say the charges were contingent on McIver taking actions ordered and approved by Habba.
Campaign for Accountability filed a similar complaint in New York against another federal prosecutor, Emil Bove, after he moved to drop charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The New York attorney grievance committee declined to act and instead transferred the complaint to the Department of Justice.
The charges against McIver are an extraordinary stress-test for the separation of powers at a time in which Trump is seeking to maximize executive branch dominance. In recent weeks, New York City mayoral candidate Brad Lander was handcuffed and arrested by federal agents while escorting migrants from immigration hearings and Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security press conference.
Neither Lender nor Padilla have been charged with anything. The two Democrats who were with McIver outside the immigration facility — Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez — have also not been charged.
The three New Jersey Democrats have said they were at the immigration detention facility exercising their oversight duties and were roughed up by federal agents. Since their oversight visit, several detainees escaped and there were reports of poor conditions inside the facility, which the private company that runs the facility has denied.
McIver appeared virtually at a previous hearing in May, after charges were filed but before a grand jury returned an indictment. She was allowed to appear remotely from Washington because Congress was in session. Since then, the indictment has put her case in front of U.S. District Court Judge Jamel Semper.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
37 minutes ago
- Politico
Housing fight blows up budget talks
Presented by California Resources Corporation BUDGET BLUES: California's last-minute budget negotiations are all coming down to housing and labor. Many rank-and-file Democrats and their powerful union allies are fuming about wage requirements tucked into a budget bill to fast-track housing construction, arguing they are far too low. Gov. Gavin Newsom has made his approval of the entire budget contingent on legislation that would ease environmental reviews for housing developments. A separate housing streamlining bill, which drew the ire of trades unions, would set minimum pay standards for certain construction projects. (The fate of the budget package does not rest on that second proposal.) The governor applied public pressure to lawmakers this afternoon in response to the resistance, calling the bills 'the most significant housing and infrastructure reforms in decades.' 'This is our moment to build the California Dream for a new generation,' Newsom said in a social media post. 'We're done with the roadblocks and delays — let's get this done.' The bills are reopening a longtime Sacramento housing labor battle. The Trades — whose members filled Senate and Assembly Budget Committee hearing rooms today to register their objections — contend the new standards would undercut higher wages they've achieved through bargaining and past legislation. 'It is frankly insulting that I'm addressing this committee about a budget trailer bill that has a residential minimum wage,' said Chris Hannan, Trades president, during the Assembly hearing. A letter the Trades sent to Newsom and legislative leaders says a fire sprinkler fitter working on residential projects in Los Angeles County earns almost $66 per hour under prevailing wage, comparing that to the $20-$40 minimum wage in the bill. Lawmakers are running out the budget clock. They must pass the spending agreement negotiated by Newsom, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire by Monday. The eleventh-hour wrangling has injected drama into final budget hearings, usually pro forma affairs filled with self-congratulatory rhetoric. Instead, lawmakers openly expressed their outright disagreement with the housing bill, while Trades supporters unleashed on committee members. 'Make no mistake, this bill was amended this late and connected to the budget with a poison pill to force every member of this Legislature to vote for things that their conscience would never allow them to do otherwise,' Scott Wetch, a Trades lobbyist, told Assembly committee members. 'It's shameful, and it will leave a black mark on this Legislature and anybody who votes for it for the rest of your career.' Democrats complained the wage language is confusing and rushed — the kind of criticism about budget negotiations that usually comes from Republicans, who are almost entirely shut out of talks. 'Don't try to put members in a position where we have to decide between people who can't afford housing and people who can't afford groceries,' said Assemblymember Chris Rogers, a North Coast Democrat. 'And let's actually have real conversations about this, not hide it in the budget.' Los Angeles state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez called the bill 'incredibly hurtful and inappropriate.' 'The lack of conversation, the lack of transparency is completely inappropriate,' Pérez said. 'And I hope we have larger discussions about huge, huge policies with implications that have so many impacts for so many workers all across the state.' IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY THE OTHER BUDGET PROBLEM: Meanwhile, Washington lawmakers are also facing pushback on the federal megabill, which leaders are trying to push through Congress by July 4, our Jordain Carney reports. North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis warned his colleagues during a closed-door meeting today that he would not vote to take up the party's sweeping domestic policy bill without further clarity on Medicaid changes, a person granted anonymity to disclose private discussions said. 'He said he wouldn't vote for a motion to proceed until he got some clarity on what's going to happen with the provider tax,' the person said, referring to a funding mechanism Senate GOP leaders are hoping to curtail that has sent billions of dollars to the Medicaid program in California alone. Tillis wasn't alone. Multiple other Republican senators warned Majority Leader John Thune during the lunch that they were not ready to vote to launch floor debate on the megabill, according to three attendees. But it's Tillis, who is up for reelection next year, who has emerged as a key vote to watch as Thune moves to try and meet the target for final passage of the bill. Thune isn't just facing pushback over health care provisions; a clutch of deficit hawks also still aren't on board with the bill. IN OTHER NEWS MAMDANI IN THE GOLDEN STATE: California leaders weighed in on Zohran Mamdani's victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, with former Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg saying 'voters are looking for hope and inspiration.' 'Experience still matters, but voters are willing to invest in younger candidates who may see our most difficult challenges with fresh eyes,' he told POLITICO. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, a well-known moderate, said his policy differences with Mamdani 'will be tested by reality.' 'I believe that to deliver these outcomes, we don't need bigger government — we need better government,' he said. 'We need practical policies that work.' Mahan also took the opportunity to invite 'any entrepreneur or company looking to leave New York' to come to San Jose, where they would 'find a warm welcome.' FINEME: California financial regulators fined a cryptocurrency company for the first time today, accusing the firm Coinme of failing to comply with a landmark 2023 state law regulating digital asset markets, our Tyler Katzenberger reports for POLITICO Pro subscribers. Seattle-based crypto exchange firm Coinme agreed in a draft court order to pay the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation a $300,000 penalty after regulators said the company violated the state's Digital Financial Assets Law, which imposes regulations on cryptocurrency kiosks. The penalty includes a $51,700 restitution payment to an elderly Californian. WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — The U.S. Department of Justice has sued the Orange County Registrar of Voters, accusing the agency of refusing to provide full records of non-citizens on its voter registration rolls and not keeping accurate registration lists. (Orange County Register) — A Los Angeles judge ruled that the California FAIR Plan's smoke-damage policy violates state law. (Los Angeles Times) — The vice mayor of a Southern California city is facing backlash from the Department of Homeland Security after a video in which she appears to call on gang members to organize against recent immigration sweeps. (CNN) AROUND THE STATE — Sacramento Mayor Kevin McCarty wants to prohibit homeless people from sitting or laying down outside City Hall except under specific circumstances. (Sacramento Bee) — The Los Angeles Police Commission said it would allow LAPD to use drones on routine emergency calls instead of restricting their use to only situations deemed dangerous. (Los Angeles Times) — The San Diego Board of Supervisors voted to explore a plan to step up mitigation of cross-border pollution in the Tijuana River. (San Diego Union-Tribune) — compiled by Juliann Ventura
Fox News
41 minutes ago
- Fox News
Poll: Majority of Republicans back Trump's strikes on Iran; most Americans fear getting dragged into war
The country is, once again, divided along partisan lines, this time over the U.S. joining Israel in military strikes against Iran's nuclear sites, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. Such was the case on Capitol Hill this week as congressional Democrats railed against the "unconstitutionality" of President Donald Trump ordering attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran, while most Republican lawmakers celebrated his bold move to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear capability. Forty-two percent of voters support the U.S. strikes against Iran, while 51% oppose them, according to the Quinnipiac University poll, conducted between June 22-24 in the days after the U.S. strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in Iran. The results were split along party lines, with 81% of Republicans supporting the strikes compared to 75% of Democrats opposing them. Sixty percent of independents opposed the strikes, while 35% supported them. "No ambivalence from Republicans on the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear sites. By a large margin, GOP voters give full-throated support to the mission," Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said in a statement. Half of voters, at 50%, think the strikes would make Americans less safe, while 42% said they would make Americans safer. Results were once again split along party lines. Seventy-six percent of Democrats said striking Iran's nuclear program would make Americans less safe, while 80% of Republicans said it would make Americans safer. According to the poll, nearly 8 in 10 voters are either very concerned, 44%, or somewhat concerned, 34%, about the U.S. getting dragged into war with Iran. Only 22% of voters are not concerned. "American voters, most of whom are not supportive of the country joining in the Israel-Iran conflict, are extremely troubled by the possibility that involvement could metastasize and draw the U.S. into a direct war with Iran," pollster Malloy said. Forty-two percent of voters think the U.S. is too supportive of Israel, while 45% say support for Israel is about right. Only 5% say the U.S. is not supportive enough. The percentage of voters calling the U.S. too supportive of Israel is at an all-time high since Quinnipiac University first posed the question to registered voters in January 2017. The percentage of voters calling the U.S. not supportive enough is an all-time low since then, the poll reveals. Half of voters, 50%, support Israel's military strikes against nuclear and military sites inside Iran, while 40% oppose them. Eighty percent of Republicans support them, while 60% of Democrats do not. The Quinnipiac University Poll included 979 self-identified registered voters nationwide who were surveyed from June 22-24, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. Trump announced the U.S. successfully struck Iran's nuclear sites Saturday night. Israel had launched a series of coordinated attacks on Iran the previous week, which Iran had retaliated against, prompting the countries to exchange strikes. After the U.S. struck Iran, the Islamist country launched retaliatory attacks on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The president indicated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran earlier this week, touting a successful mission to hinder Iran's nuclear sites without engaging the U.S. in an escalatory Middle East conflict.
Boston Globe
41 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Scott Brown is back with a fourth Senate campaign, the latest in his circuitous career
And the famous truck's tailgate has been transformed Now, maybe it's time for a Tesla Cybertruck. On Tuesday, the 65-year-old Republican launched his fourth bid for the US Senate, and his second in New Hampshire, vying for the seat being vacated by three-term Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen. If he were to win the nomination, he'd likely face Representative Chris Pappas, 45, who appears to have a clear path to the Democratic nomination. And Brown didn't waste any time signaling how he would attack him. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Chris Pappas wants a better title,' Brown said in Advertisement Brown, of course, knows a thing or two about titles. He was 'Downtown Scottie Brown,' a high school basketball standout. He was a Cosmopolitan centerfold. He became a lawyer, a colonel in the National Guard, a Massachusetts state representative, and then a state senator before pulling off that Senate win in 2010. He Advertisement After he lost reelection to Democrat Elizabeth Warren in 2012, Brown's resume grew even more eclectic. He became a Fox News commentator, a His career has been driven as much by ambition as by a willingness to embrace whatever challenge comes next and a healthy attitude that he wasn't too good for any role. Politically, Brown has evolved with the times — and the terrain. In Massachusetts, he positioned himself as a moderate, independent-minded Republican, a posture that resonated in the state's deep-blue political culture. But when he moved to New Hampshire and ran in the 2014 Republican Senate primary, he found himself pressured to tack to the right. He won a multicandidate GOP primary but lost the general election to Shaheen. Since then, Brown has embraced his party's populist turn. He was an early endorser of Trump's first run for president and has remained a staunch supporter ever since. When his wife, former television reporter Gail Huff Brown, ran for Congress in New Hampshire in 2022, she ran praising Trump. (She lost the nomination to Karoline Leavitt, the current White House press secretary.) Advertisement Heading into this contest, it is less clear whether Trump will return the favor for Brown, who is not exactly beloved among the New Hampshire MAGA base. While Pappas has basically cleared the primary, other Republicans, including state Senator Dan Innis, tell the Globe they are seriously considering getting in. The biggest challenge that Brown, Innis, or any Republican may have is getting national donors to simply pay attention. The New Hampshire contest is currently listed as a 'lean Democrat' contest by the Cook Political Report, and historically, the party in the White House, currently the Republicans, face challenges in the midterm elections. Add to that that Trump has never won a general election in the state. There hasn't been any recent public polling for the contest. The path for Brown to return to the Senate is indeed hard. But Brown has been open to changing his stripes and his path. Should Brown win, he would be only the third person ever to represent two different states in the Senate, both in the immediate post-Civil War era as the nation was expanding. And if it doesn't work out in 2026, he will be the first person since Allen Keyes to run and lose three US Senate races as a majority party nominee. Like Brown, he also lost in two different states, Maryland and Illinois. Both would be other titles to add to his list. James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.
