
Calgary daycare chain hits parents with 'optional' $330 meal fee while prohibiting outside food
Parents with kids in a Calgary daycare chain say they feel taken advantage of after new provincial rules took effect on April 1 that set a flat monthly rate of $326 for basic care but also allow operators to charge any amount on top of that for "optional" services.
In practice, the parents say, the new $330-per-month "meal service fee" at Clever Daycare hasn't actually been optional.
"There's no outside food allowed in the facility, and therefore we're not able to opt out of the meal fee," said one parent, who didn't want to be identified because she worries speaking out might get her kid kicked out of the facility.
Another parent said her child used to be allowed to bring some light snacks in the morning but was told this week that was no longer allowed.
"They didn't let him eat his snack and they said no outside food," she said. "It was never an issue before. We used to do potlucks."
CBC News has agreed not to identify the parents, in order to avoid potential repercussions for their kids.
The parents recently received a new "Clever Daycare Parent Handbook," which includes a non-disparagement clause and warns that the operator "reserves the right to immediately terminate a child's enrolment" if parents violate the policy.
Daycare says rules 'unclear,' possibly contradictory
A spokesperson with Clever Daycare said the province's new regulations have "areas that still remain unclear" and noted meal services are also governed by other "health and safety protocols" under Alberta's Public Health Act.
"At Clever Daycare, our policy is to mitigate serious allergy risks, prevent cross-contamination, and uphold consistent food safety standards," Ahad Daneshvar said in an email to CBC News.
"This policy has been key to protecting children with life-threatening allergies, and changing it would significantly increase risk and liability. The E. coli outbreak in Calgary daycares in September 2023 highlighted how lapses in food handling can lead to severe health risks for children."
He noted the final report from the review panel that investigated that incident recommended all child-care providers be required to develop an "outside food" policy but that the province "should allow for flexibility across individual facilities."
"It is not recommended that such policies are strictly prescribed in government legislation," the report reads.
"As such, we are actively engaging in conversations with government stakeholders to advocate that allowing optional parent-provided meals undermines both the intent of current regulations and the review panel's clear direction for risk mitigation and proactive food safety management," Daneshvar said.
Clever Daycare operates three facilities in the city: in Glamorgan, Aspen Woods and the University District.
Daneshvar also said the company was awaiting "clarification" from the government on the new rules and informed parents on Wednesday that, in the meantime, it will cover the cost of the optional fees for the first week of April if they wish to opt out of them.
The province told CBC News, however, there is no grey area when it comes to this.
"Under the new regulations, providers may offer additional, optional services such as meals or diapers, but parents must be able to opt in or provide their own," Matt Jones, Alberta's minister of jobs, economy and trade, said in an email.
"Charging a meal fee while prohibiting outside food is not permitted, nor is charging a materials fee for diapers while requiring parents to use only the provider's supply."
Why Alberta changed its rules
Prior to April 1, in order to qualify for funding under the federal-provincial child-care agreement, daycares were limited in how much they could raise fees and were restricted from introducing additional fees beyond what they were already charging.
In addition to setting a flat base fee of $326 per month, the new regulations also allow for new fees to be charged for "optional services" such as field trips, food, transportation and certain goods like diapers and sunscreen.
"Parents must have the choice whether to participate in and pay for an optional service," the province said in a "What's Changing" fact sheet for operators.
The guidelines also specifically prohibit charging for operational or administrative services such as technology fees, toy fees or nap fees.
The province has said the new rules are aimed at making parents' costs more consistent and predictable, while also giving operators more flexibility.
Clever Daycare previously charged a $185 monthly meal fee, and parents say they have received no explanation for the nearly 80 per cent increase to $330.
'You're really kind of stuck'
Prektsha Tam took her kid out of Clever Daycare after she grew frustrated by its fee policies. She still worries about how Alberta's new rules will affect other families at daycares across the province.
"Lower income families now have to pay more than what they were paying before," she said, referring not just to the introduction of optional fees but also the loss of the income-based child-care subsidy, which ended April 1.
Tam says she was lucky to snag a spot in a brand-new daycare that just opened this week — and doesn't charge a meal fee — but she recognizes not all parents have a readily available alternative if they want to switch operators.
"There are super full waitlists everywhere," she said.
One of the parents whom CBC News agreed not to name said she's been looking around for other daycare providers but hasn't been able to find any with available space.
"So you're really kind of stuck where you are," she said.
Tam said the federal-provincial child-care agreement has brought daycare costs way down for parents, but she wonders if these latest changes have been effectively communicated.
"I think what the government is doing is good," she said. "But I think there needs to be more clear-cut instructions."
Opt in or opt out?
In its email to parents on Wednesday, Clever Daycare said it was awaiting a new document from the government with more specific guidelines "that should help child-care providers and parents better assess how optional services should be managed."
In the same email, it opened the door to allowing outside meals but put the onus on parents to not only opt out but actively explain how they would do so.
"If you do not wish to receive these services moving forward, we kindly ask that you officially email your centre director by the end of this week [and] … clearly outline how you will be managing the services yourself (e.g., providing meals daily)."
The government document with the additional guidelines, however, is now posted online and it specifically prohibits this approach.
"Participation in optional services must be voluntary, and parents must actively opt in," the guidelines say. "Automatic enrolment approaches that require a parent to opt out are not permitted."
The new rules are part of the final phase of the federal-provincial child-care agreement, which ends March 31, 2026.
Eight provinces and three territories have signed on to a new federal child-care agreement that will see them receive nearly $37 billion in funding from Ottawa from 2026 through to 2031. Alberta and Saskatchewan have not.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
2 days ago
- CBC
Have you ever wanted to contribute to medical research? These women can show you how to do that
You don't have to be a health-care professional to take part in medical research. You can be a patient partner, like Amanda Doherty-Kirby. She and Kate Kelly, with the Centre for Health and Community Research at UPEI, talk to Louise Martin of CBC News: Compass about a workshop on the topic, happening at the Charlottetown Library on June 10.


Toronto Star
2 days ago
- Toronto Star
Stay out of the water at two Niagara public beaches
According to public health guidelines from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, water is considered unsafe for swimming when one sample contains 400 or more E. coli bacteria per 100 millilitres, or the geometric mean of five samples is 200 or more. Collecting, transporting and testing beach water for E. coli can take a day or more, so the latest available data may not reflect current conditions at the beach. Swimming is not recommended when it's raining, the water is wavy or cloudy, there are lots of birds, or for two days after a big storm. Consuming E. coli can cause serious illness, including stomach cramps, diarrhea and vomiting. When high levels of the bacteria are detected it's more likely that other harmful organisms are present as well, including those that cause skin rashes and eye, ear, nose and throat infections. A beach may also be considered unsafe for swimming due to weather conditions, runoff, pollution, spills, smells, garbage, sharp debris and dead fish. In addition, public beaches are monitored for blue-green algae, which can be highly toxic to humans, dogs and other animals.


CBC
3 days ago
- CBC
Nova Scotia recoups $3.7M in health-transfer clawbacks from Ottawa
Ottawa has paid Nova Scotia several million dollars in health transfers that were previously withheld because of people paying out of pocket for private MRIs and ultrasounds. According to the federal government, no one in Canada should pay for medically necessary diagnostic imaging services, and it's been clawing back money from Nova Scotia and other provinces for allowing it to happen. However, Nova Scotia and Ottawa have come to an agreement that recently resulted in a reimbursement of $3.79 million — the total amount clawed back over the past three years. The payment was finalized in March. "It's been a long time coming," said Katherine Fierlbeck, a professor of political science at Dalhousie University who studies health policy. She noted many other provinces have already made arrangements to reduce or eliminate privately funded medical imaging to have their health transfers reimbursed. Fierlbeck said she has a long list of questions about the details of the agreement, some of which she's hoping will be answered in Health Canada's annual report on transfer payments. The report is typically tabled in Parliament each March, but the House wasn't sitting from the start of January to the end of May — the result of a prorogation and then the federal election. The report has yet to be tabled since the new session began last week. Health Canada released the reimbursement numbers to CBC News on request, along with a brief explanation. Contract with private clinic A spokesperson for Health Canada said the key reason for the reimbursement is "efforts taken by Nova Scotia to eliminate patient charges at the private clinic." The private clinic they refer to is Healthview, which offers MRIs and ultrasounds. Nova Scotia Health (NSH) signed a contract with the Halifax imaging clinic last May to send some patients there at the public expense. A spokesperson for NSH said 2,278 MRIs and 585 ultrasounds were publicly funded at Healthview in the first year of the five-year, $7.6-million agreement. Patients who NSH sends to Healthview are triaged in the same way as patients who go to public clinics. Privately funded imaging continues But the contract with Healthview does not entirely eliminate cases of patients paying for medically necessary imaging. Healthview still accepts patients who want to pay to jump the queue, and at least two other private clinics in Halifax do the same. Wosler Diagnostics opened last summer, offering ultrasound only, and Why Wait Imaging opened earlier this year, offering ultrasounds and MRIs. NSH confirmed it does not have contracts with either of these clinics. Fierlbeck said this is hard to reconcile with the fact the province received a full reimbursement of health transfer clawbacks. WATCH | Why Nova Scotia was losing out on health transfer payments: Why N.S. is losing out on health transfers as private medical imaging grows 5 months ago Duration 2:18 With long waits for ultrasounds and MRIs, some Nova Scotians are paying to get care sooner at private clinics. But Ottawa says those services should be publicly funded and it's punishing Nova Scotia for allowing patients to pay. Taryn Grant has the story. "If it's only partial coverage, I would have thought that the ministry would say 'OK, partial coverage, we'll give you partial reimbursement,'" Fierlbeck said. She said covering some services at private clinics — but not all — makes for a "thinly veiled two-tier system." The Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness would not make anyone available for an interview. Health authority working on imaging backlogs The underlying issue that's pushing many Nova Scotians to seek private medical imaging is a backlog in the public health-care system, with some people waiting months or years for MRIs and ultrasounds. Dr. Tim Mailman said the problem is complex and has been years in the making, but Nova Scotia Health is "laser-focused" on improvements. Mailman, senior medical director of the diagnostics and therapeutic services network, said the main bottleneck is staffing; there's a shortage of imaging technologists. "Let's use MRI as an example," he said in an interview earlier this year. "If we were able to run our current MRIs across the province [for] extended hours, we have enough MRIs to meet the demand." Mailman said there's a "complex workforce strategy" in the works to address that issue. Additionally, Mailman said the health authority is working on a central intake system to streamline booking. He said he expects it will reduce duplication and no-shows, and ultimately shorten wait times. The health authority is expecting the system to come online this summer. Mailman said the health authority is also working on training and support for clinicians to make sure they're sending patients for the most appropriate type of imaging. "As a provider myself, I can tell you it's not always easy … I still call my phone-a-friend radiologist to say, 'With this specific situation, should I be asking for a CT? Should I be asking for an MRI?' "It's not policing the resources, it's working with providers," he said.