Officials in Biden admin worked to undermine Netanyahu after ceasefire talks collapsed, former aide says
A new bombshell report on an Israeli TV news show revealed Biden officials discussed the idea of working to trigger an election with the hope of defeating Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu so they could push the president's ceasefire deal.
The plan was ultimately blocked by the president.
One of the president's advisors on the region said that after the first ceasefire deal in the Israel-Hamas war collapsed, the idea of working against Netanyahu started to circulate in President Joe Biden's administration, according to former White House officials interviewed on Israel's Channel 13 show "HaMakor."
The idea floated was that Biden would give a speech directly to the Israeli public, presenting two options, according to his Middle East advisor Ilan Goldenberg. "A lot of people were talking about, including in the Oval Office at times, the idea of, like, the President going out and giving a speech. Benny Gantz (the opposition leader) was at 37 [seats] and Bibi was like at 15, right? Like, he was very weak. Joe Biden was still incredibly popular in Israel," he claimed.
Biden Criticizes Netanyahu Over Israel-hamas War, Says Israeli Leader Making A 'Mistake'
Goldenberg said, "The idea was that Biden would say you can end the war, get all the hostages out, get a deal that includes even, you know, maybe trying to have elements of Hamas leave — or you can keep doing what you're doing, and Israel will be in a Forever War. Your sons and daughters are going to keep fighting. Most of the hostages are going to come home dead. The idea would be either to force Netanyahu to come on board with that or scramble Israeli politics and see if you could trigger elections. That's what people were saying, like, 'let's just break this up because it's not going anywhere good.'"
Read On The Fox News App
However, Goldenberg said Biden blocked the move. "I think at the end of the day, he [Biden] was uncomfortable with the idea of going out that directly against Netanyahu."
At a moment when U.S.-Israeli cooperation was vital, the deep mistrust and personal tensions between former President Biden and Prime Minister Netanyahu threatened to derail key diplomatic opportunities. The recent report featured insights from nine senior Biden administration officials and sheds light on the complexities that defined their interactions.
Tom Nides, former U.S. ambassador to Israel, recalled how the president frequently clashed with Netanyahu's leadership.
"Biden didn't really trust Netanyahu," Nides said. "Netanyahu, I mean, come on everybody, he's a survivor, a manipulator, you know, a magician when it comes to relationships. Biden saw all of that."
Kamala Harris' Pick For Jewish Liaison Draws Criticism Over Israel, Iran Views: 'Red Flag'
Before Oct. 7, tensions focused on Netanyahu's push for judicial reform, which sparked massive demonstrations and clashes among the Israeli public. "I was in the middle of all this… I had many a screaming match with Ron Dermer (Israel's Minister of Strategic Affairs) about this," Nides said. Biden repeatedly urged Netanyahu to slow down and seek consensus, while anxieties rose over figures like far-right nationalist Minister Ben Gvir.
"There were lots of anxieties over the issues around judicial reform, which I thought was insane," Nides said.
The personal tension sometimes erupted publicly. When asked if Biden ever used harsh language for Netanyahu, Nides said, "President Biden likes to use colorful language, and on occasion, the prime minister was able to extract that colorful language from the president." He said Netanyahu questioning Biden's commitment to Israel particularly infuriated him.
After Oct. 7, when Biden became the first sitting president to visit Israel during wartime, tensions deepened as Netanyahu rejected U.S. plans for Gaza's future. According to Michael Herzog, Israel's then-ambassador to Washington, Biden believed Netanyahu was aiding Trump politically, while Netanyahu suspected Biden of deliberately "walking on his head."
The tension extended to hostage negotiations. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said Hamas was reluctant to talk seriously for months. When asked if Netanyahu added conditions, he said, "I'm not saying that."
Unlike their public statements, Arab leaders were quietly supporting Israel's efforts to defeat Hamas, Dan Shapiro, former deputy assistant secretary of Defense, revealed in the interview. "They said very clearly, please tell the Israelis they have our support to wipe out Hamas," he said.
At the same time, while tensions with Netanyahu were growing, a major opportunity was slipping away. Amos Hochstein, former U.S. special envoy for International Energy Affairs, called Saudi Arabia "the most important Muslim country in the world," describing Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as a historic figure capable of reshaping the region.
Herzog, Israel's former ambassador to Washington, confirmed that serious discussions had taken place about advancing normalization during the transition period before Trump could return to office. "Biden would bring Democrats, and Trump would bring Republicans," Herzog explained, but said that Trump preferred to wait, not wanting to share the achievement. "I believe it will happen, I just don't know when," Herzog said.
Fox News Digital sent questions to former President Biden's spokesperson for comment.Original article source: Officials in Biden admin worked to undermine Netanyahu after ceasefire talks collapsed, former aide says
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP approves ‘technical changes' to Trump agenda bill
House Republicans on Wednesday greenlit a series of 'technical changes' to the party's tax cut and spending package, removing language that would have thrown their effort off course in the Senate. The chamber approved the tweaks — which were tucked inside a procedural rule for a separate measure — in a 213-207 vote, weeks after Republicans passed the sprawling package full of President Trump's legislative priorities. The adopted rule also tees up a final vote on the White House's bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending. House GOP leaders moved to make the changes after the Senate parliamentarian scrubbed through the legislation — a procedure known as the 'Byrd bath' — and identified provisions and language that do not comply with the strict rules for the budget reconciliation process, which the GOP trifecta is using to circumvent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate and approve the bill by a simple majority. Leaving the legislation as it was risked the parliamentarian ruling that it was not compliant, which would have resulted in the threshold for passage in the Senate increasing from a simple majority to 60 votes — allowing Democratic opposition to block it. The changes to the Trump agenda bill — officially titled the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act — pertain to defense funding, energy policy and changes to Medicaid. For defense, Republicans nixed $2 billion for the enhancement of military intelligence programs; $500 million for the development, procurement and integration of maritime mines; and $62 million to convert Ohio-class submarine tubes to accept additional missiles. On the energy front, meanwhile, the changes removed a provision that would have reinstated leases for a proposed copper and nickel mine that had been renewed under the first Trump administration but revoked under Biden. The mine would have been located near an area known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, a nature preserve that contains canoe routes and species including black bears, moose and foxes. While leaders moved to strike some portions of the bill, they still plan to fight for those provisions when the package hits the Senate floor. 'We disagree; ultimately we're going to try it again on the Senate floor,' House Majority Leadere Steve Scalise (R-La.) said Tuesday. ' We disagree with the parliamentarian. … But you can't take the risk on any of them. You cannot take the risk because if any one of them is ruled on the Senate floor to be fatal, it's a 60-vote bill. The whole bill is a 60-vote bill — you can't take that risk.' With the changes made, the House is now expected to formally send the package to the Senate, where Republicans are mapping out their own changes to the behemoth bill. Some GOP senators want to decrease the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, others are pushing to increase the spending cuts in the bill, and a subset are pressing for a smaller rollback of the green energy tax credits that Democrats approved in 2022. Any changes to the House bill in the Senate, however, risks party leadership losing support in the lower chamber, which will have to approve the Senate's tweaks before the bill can head to Trump's desk for signature. Party leaders are still hoping to enact the package by July 4, but that timeline is coming into serious question as Republicans remain at odds over a series of high-stakes issues. Rachel Frazin contributed.
Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
EPA to Repeal Air-Pollution Standards on Power Plants
WASHINGTON—The Environmental Protection Agency proposed Wednesday weakening air-pollution standards for mercury and eliminating carbon dioxide rules on power plants, reversing Biden-era policies as part of an overall effort to curtail the agency's role in regulating climate change. The easing of the environmental regulations is in line with executive orders issued by President Trump in April to expand coal mining, leasing and exports, and push for greater use of coal-fired power generation.
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's EPA Scraps Air Protections in Effort to Revive Coal Power
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced Wednesday that it will seek to scrap two rules on power plant pollution as part of the Trump administration's effort to encourage more use of fossil fuels such as coal, a major source of greenhouse gases and toxic emissions that contribute to disease and premature deaths. "Since President Trump was sworn in, we have been working to end this agency's war on so much of our U.S. domestic energy supply," EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said at a ceremony at EPA headquarters. The EPA is proposing to repeal two Biden-era rules that would make new and existing power plants cut pollution. The 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards would limit greenhouse gases from power plants, and the 2024 changes to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards would have reduced emissions of harmful metals in emissions, primarily from coal. The power plant rules are among more than 30 regulations that Zeldin pledged to undo in March in what he called the biggest deregulation action in U.S. history. President Donald Trump speaks alongside coal and energy workers during an April executive order signing ceremony in the White House. The Trump administration has elected to roll back Biden-era environmental policies with the intention to... President Donald Trump speaks alongside coal and energy workers during an April executive order signing ceremony in the White House. The Trump administration has elected to roll back Biden-era environmental policies with the intention to help revive coal-fired plants. MoreThe changes will not immediately take effect, Zeldin said—the announcement Wednesday will trigger a public comment and rule-making period. Zeldin claimed the final repeal of the rules would save ratepayers more than $1 billion a year. "These rules have saddled our power sector with expensive, unnecessary and burdensome regulations," Zeldin said. In its proposal, the EPA argued that U.S. power plants do not contribute a significant amount to global greenhouse gas emissions. However, the U.S. power sector is responsible for about one-quarter of the country's total emissions, second only to the transportation sector. Zeldin's claims of cost savings are also undermined by the health costs associated with the rollbacks. "No power plant will be allowed to emit more than they do today," Zeldin said. However, repealing the rules means Americans would continue to be exposed to the current levels of harmful pollutants. Data from Zeldin's own agency shows that the 2024 carbon pollution standards would save lives by also reducing the other pollutants such as soot that lead to heart and lung disease. EPA estimates that the standards would prevent about 1,200 premature deaths in 2035. Environmental and public health groups pledged to fight the proposed rollback. "It's an extraordinary and reckless action by the head of the Environmental Protection Agency," Vickie Patton, general counsel for the Environmental Defense Fund, told Newsweek. "The fleet of power plant smokestacks in our country are the single largest industrial source of carbon pollution in the nation, it's just a staggering amount of pollution." Republican members of Congress from coal and gas-producing states joined Zeldin at the announcement in support. They said the changes would allow their states to keep in place fossil-fueled plants that might otherwise be shuttered. Ohio Representative Troy Balderson said the Biden-era rules "would have forced our most reliable sources into early retirement," threatening the reliability of the electric grid. West Virginia Representative Carol Miller, a co-chair of the Congressional Coal Caucus, said the country needs the dependable baseload power that coal provides. "We must unleash American coal, not bury it under red tape," Miller said. Miller lamented the decline of the coal industry in her state. Twenty years ago, coal was the nation's top fuel source and provided a little more than half of the country's electricity. By 2023, it had fallen to the fourth-highest energy source, providing only about 16 percent of U.S. electricity generation, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). A chart from the Energy Information Administration showing changes in the makeup of U.S. electricity generation over time. The brown section at the bottom shows the decline of coal as a fuel over the past... A chart from the Energy Information Administration showing changes in the makeup of U.S. electricity generation over time. The brown section at the bottom shows the decline of coal as a fuel over the past 20 years. More Energy Information Administration Coal mining employment has also sharply declined over the decades. Department of Labor statistics show about 45,000 people were employed in coal mining in 2023, roughly 60 percent of the number employed a decade earlier. In West Virginia, the state with the highest number of coal miners, coal employment dropped from about 21,000 in 2010 to 14,000 in 2023. Trump's high-profile effort to bring back coal in his first term in office did little to slow the decline. West Virginia and the nation had fewer miners when he left office in 2021 than when he entered it. The coal industry and its allies in Congress frequently blame the industry's woes on environmental regulations, a so-called "war on coal." But energy market analysis shows that the main reason behind coal's demise is simply that other cheaper and cleaner energy sources have become more available. The boom in natural gas supplies led many power companies to switch fuels, and gas is now the country's top source of electricity generation. Natural gas demand is projected to rise, but analysts also point to cost concerns with gas as both domestic use and exports of liquified natural gas climb. More recently, renewable energy has become the go-to source for new power. Last year, the EIA reported wind, solar and battery storage together accounted for more than 90 percent of new electricity capacity added to the U.S. grid. Electricity demand is projected to surge in the coming years, and many power companies find that renewable energy and battery storage is the fastest, cheapest way to add power supply. Globally, investments in clean and low-carbon energy are expected to be twice those in fossil fuel, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). The IEA's recent report on energy investment found about $2.2 trillion dollars flowing to solar, wind, nuclear power, battery storage, energy efficiency measures and low-emissions fuels. Coal, meanwhile, has become pricier. A 2023 analysis by the non-partisan think tank Energy Innovation found that 99 percent of U.S. coal plants were more expensive to run compared to replacement by renewable energy and battery storage. Even before the clean energy incentives offered by the Biden administration, about 77 percent of coal plants were more expensive than solar and wind. The extra cost to operate coal plants often gets passed along to ratepayers, as happened when the Trump administration used its emergency powers to order local utility regulators in Michigan to prolong the use of an old coal-fired power plant slated for closure. Michigan's Public Service Commission estimated that the order could cost ratepayers millions of dollars. The cost of air pollution is also a burden on the public in the form of additional premature deaths, illnesses, hospitalizations and lost work days due to asthma and other lung diseases linked to dirty air. One of Zeldin's predecessors at the EPA, Gina McCarthy, said the health effects of eliminating the rules would fall disproportionately on the most vulnerable people. "By giving a green light to more pollution, his legacy will forever be someone who does the bidding of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our health," McCarthy, who served as the 13th EPA administrator under President Barack Obama, said in a statement. "It's a purely political play that goes against decades of science and policy review."
