Bethan had a brilliant and full life ahead of her but it was taken away. It could so easily have been avoided
Bethan had a brilliant and full life ahead of her but it was taken away. It could so easily have been avoided
'It is heartbreaking for us to know that with appropriate treatment, Bethan would not have died... We now hope to receive an apology from the health board'
The family of 21-year-old Bethan James, whose death could have been avoided, have slammed a health board for failing to take accountability. The daughter of cricket star Steve James was admitted to hospital on February 8, 2020 and died on February 9.
An inquest into her death heard that she died of sepsis and pneumonia, which was complicated by the immune suppressing effects of Crohn's disease. However during the inquest's conclusion on Tuesday coroner Patricia Morgan said that Bethan likely 'would not have died' if medics acted appropriately sooner.
The conclusion at Pontypridd Coroner's Court followed three days of evidence earlier this month. It included a statement from Bethan's mother, Jane, who detailed how she believed her daughter had been dismissed multiple times by hospital medics before her death. An expert witness had also shared that he believed Bethan's life could have been saved.
Following the conclusion Steve and Jane delivered an emotional and scathing statement, which was read out to the press by their advocate Richard Booth KC.
Bethan James was just 21 when she died. She hoped to teach others about Crohn's
The speech outlined the family's "indescribable" grief, before going on to reveal how an inquest into Bethan's death was refused three times before it was finally permitted.
Article continues below
The family, who live in St Mellons in Cardiff, shared that they are "glad" that the Welsh Ambulance Service Trust (WAST) accepted "some of their failings", but said they are "deeply disappointed" that Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (CVUHB) "has not done the same".
The called for the health board to apologise and for healthcare professionals to "admit their mistakes" so that "lessons can be learnt".
The family pleaded with the Welsh Government to implement Martha's Rule across the NHS in Wales.
This is a patient safety initiative in English NHS hospitals, granting patients and their families the right to request an urgent review by a critical care outreach team if they are concerned about a patient's deteriorating condition.
WalesOnline has asked WAST, CVUHB and the Welsh Government to comment.
The statement was read out by the family's advocate
(Image: John Myers )
Here is the family's full statement:
"It is over five years since Bethan died, but the pain and grief are still indescribable and will always be so. Our hearts are broken forever and we miss her dreadfully.
"We know that Bethan should not have died and we have always felt that she was let down by the healthcare professionals who should have been there to help and support her.
"Bethan was just too kind and caring; never one to make a fuss or complain about anything. And even when we tried to advocate on her behalf we were dismissed and we were not listened to by the doctors and nurses.
"Although it has taken over five years - and they (the family) threatened judicial review to secure an inquest for Bethan after three refusals to hold an inquest - we are pleased His Majesty's area coroner Mrs Patricia Morgan permitted a comprehensive investigation of the circumstances leading up to Bethan's death, involving three days of evidence.
"We note the coroner's conclusion this morning that there were a number of delays which contributed to Bethan's death. It is heartbreaking for us to know that with appropriate treatment, Bethan would not have died.
"At 21 and just finishing her journalism degree our beautiful Bethan had a brilliant and full life ahead of her, but it was taken away by a catalogue of errors that could so easily have been avoided by etter listening, understanding, recognition and actions by healthcare staff.
"Sepsis is still not spotted quickly enough and this was a tragic example.
"We are glad that the Welsh Ambulance Service NHS Trust has at least admitted some of their failings, but we are deeply disappointed and distressed that the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board has not done the same.
"It has become a cliche that the NHS is broken, but this was a case in point because the care given to Bethan was simply unacceptable.
"We now hope to receive an apology from the health board."
You can read more from the inquest here:
Parents Steve and Jane James outside Pontypridd coroner's court
(Image: John Myers )
The statement continued: "Suffering from pneumonia - not that we were told this - and against her background of Crohn's disease, unable to tolerate oral antibiotics without being sick.
"Bethan should have been admitted to hospital long before the day she died, but on each of the five occasions when she attended hospital in the last two weeks of her life, we felt the general plan was to send her home as quickly as possible simply because there was not space for her.
"In her sixth and last hospital attendance on the evening of Saturday, February 8, 2020, this culminated in Bethan not being admitted to the resuscitation unit swiftly enough and therefore not receiving the critical care she so desperately required
"As a family we hope that this never happens to another family in the future.
"But for that to be the case sepsis training and recognition of symptoms need to improve dramatically. Equally as importantly, healthcare staff need to admit their mistakes so that lessons can be learnt.
"We have observed with interest the imposition of Martha's Rule in England named after Martha Mills who also died of sepsis when her family's concerns were not listened to.
"Martha's Rule is a major patient safety initiative providing patients and families with a way to seek an urgent review if they or their loved one's condition deteriorates and they are concerned they are not being responded to.
"This now provides parents in England with a route to a critical outreach second opinion.
"We urge the Welsh Government to implement Martha's rule across the NHS in Wales so that needless and tragic deaths like Bethans might be avoided."
Article continues below
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
37 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
MP claims assisted dying could be ‘trojan horse that breaks the NHS'
It is expected MPs will have a vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. It will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since November's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. While supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date, opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is now weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacing of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have also been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists. Disability campaigners have voiced worries about coercion and how vulnerable people could be caught up in any new law, although the proposed legislation is supported by MP and disability rights advocate Marie Tidball as well as former director of public prosecutions Sir Max Hill. On Tuesday, Mr Streeting confirmed no money has yet been allocated for the setting up of an assisted dying service and reiterated the Government is neutral on the Bill. Mr Streeting voted no last year and has since indicated he remains opposed to the Bill. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. He was asked by Labour MP Katrina Murray, who also voted no in November, whether the NHS has the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. 'Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral (on assisted dying). It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' Mr Streeting said last year that there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, fellow Labour MP who is also opposed to the Bill, claimed an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources'. She said: 'When asked today in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for Health made clear to MPs that there is no money allocated to the NHS to fund the assisted dying Bill. 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources and could become the trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder. 'I urge Labour MPs not to vote for the assisted dying Bill to protect the vulnerable and our NHS.' An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and the three-member expert panels would cost an average of between £10.9 million and £13.6 million per year, although overall implementation costs of a service were not possible to work out yet. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Commons Leader Lucy Powell for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. But a Government spokesperson pointed out that it is a Private Members' Bill and 'the amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House'.
Leader Live
38 minutes ago
- Leader Live
MP claims assisted dying could be ‘trojan horse that breaks the NHS'
It is expected MPs will have a vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. It will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since November's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. While supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date, opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is now weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacing of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have also been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists. Disability campaigners have voiced worries about coercion and how vulnerable people could be caught up in any new law, although the proposed legislation is supported by MP and disability rights advocate Marie Tidball as well as former director of public prosecutions Sir Max Hill. On Tuesday, Mr Streeting confirmed no money has yet been allocated for the setting up of an assisted dying service and reiterated the Government is neutral on the Bill. Mr Streeting voted no last year and has since indicated he remains opposed to the Bill. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. He was asked by Labour MP Katrina Murray, who also voted no in November, whether the NHS has the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. 'Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral (on assisted dying). It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' Mr Streeting said last year that there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, fellow Labour MP who is also opposed to the Bill, claimed an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources'. She said: 'When asked today in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for Health made clear to MPs that there is no money allocated to the NHS to fund the assisted dying Bill. 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources and could become the trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder. 'I urge Labour MPs not to vote for the assisted dying Bill to protect the vulnerable and our NHS.' An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and the three-member expert panels would cost an average of between £10.9 million and £13.6 million per year, although overall implementation costs of a service were not possible to work out yet. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Commons Leader Lucy Powell for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. But a Government spokesperson pointed out that it is a Private Members' Bill and 'the amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
NHS guilty of ‘culture of cover-up', admits Streeting
The NHS is guilty of a 'culture of cover-up' over safety, the Health Secretary has admitted. Wes Streeting said patients were being forced to endure situations that were 'totally intolerable', with concerns being dismissed when they attempted to find out the truth. Mr Streeting said a 10-year health plan, due to be published within weeks, would have safety at its heart. He made the comments after being tackled in the Commons about a case in which repeated NHS failings left a woman permanently disabled. Perran Moon, a Labour MP, told him about the experience of his constituent, saying: 'A couple of weeks ago at my constituency surgery, through the tears, my constituent Amy explained how, following a hip operation in 2008, she suffered progressive nerve damage due to repeated failures in diagnosis, referral and treatment. 'Despite raising concerns for years, she was told her pain was common.' The MP for Camborne and Redruth added: 'A nerve test in 2015 confirmed damage, and further tests last year showed a significant deterioration. After 17 years, she's only now been offered surgery. 'All Amy wants to know is what steps are being taken to ensure that no other patient is left permanently disabled due to such long and systemic failures.' Responding, Mr Streeting said: 'Can I first of all, on behalf of the NHS, apologise to his constituent. That is a totally intolerable situation, but sadly not rare or exceptional. 'There's too much of that happening, and a culture of cover-up and covering reputations rather than being honest with patients about failures. We are changing the culture – safety is at the heart of the 10-year plan – and I'd be delighted to talk to him further about his constituent's case.' The 10-year health plan follows promises for three major shifts in the way services are delivered – from hospital to community, from analogue to digital, and from treating sickness to prevention. It comes after a record-breaking £29 billion annual cash injection for the health service in the spending review. The plan will detail Mr Streeting's ambitions to turn the NHS into a 'neighbourhood health service' and to shift far more resources from hospitals into GP and community services. He has also promised NHS league tables so there is no more 'turning a blind eye to failure', saying patients deserved 'far more transparency' about failings in the service. Last month, the Government set out plans to hand out bonuses of up to £30,000 to health chiefs who deliver 'exceptional results' as part of efforts to turn NHS performance around.
