How to Spot Weather Misinformation
Misinformation and conspiracy theories tend to thrive in the wake of natural disasters, as people search for updates amid a changing landscape. 'It creates this fruitful ground for spreading misinformation, because people are so attentive, trying to find more information, trying to find more context, and that opens the way for malicious actors, or just people that are maybe not as educated on this topic, to knowingly or unknowingly share falsehoods,' says Nathan Walter, associate professor in the department of communication studies at Northwestern University.
False information can impact individuals' ability to receive the help they need in the event of a disaster. In the aftermath of Hurricane Helene last fall, false information about FEMA aid payments and assistance was widespread sowing confusion over what assistance victims were entitled to. Misinformation can also create confusion or risk sensationalizing tragedy. Following the wildfires in Los Angeles in January, fake images showed the Hollywood sign on fire—though the area was not in the path of the fire. Acting on conspiracy theories, meanwhile, can put people in harm's way. Currently, false claims that cloud seeding somehow triggered the Texas floods is leading to violence.
How to spot a conspiracy theory
In the wake of natural disasters, it's important to be on the lookout for misinformation—and experts say there are tips you can use to better spot and prevent the spread of false information.
First, it's important to think critically about the information you're seeing and who is posting it before you amplify it, says Walter, 'Slow down. Take your time. Really try to read and engage with information.' Research shows that most people share links on social media without reading them first.
Build up a list of sources you trust, and see if the information you're finding online has been confirmed by those vetted sources.
'I encourage people to, over time, cultivate a relationship with specific news outlets that they trust, and rely on them, as opposed to just picking up the something that someone tweeted,' says Walter.
If you're looking for up-to-date information, turn to experts before relying on individuals posting to social media—be it local news or officials in the area. 'Look to what actual experts are saying, rather than relying upon dubious social media posts,' says Michael Mann, director of the Penn Center for Science, Sustainability and the Media and co-author of Science Under Siege.
Ask yourself a few simple questions before sharing information you see on the internet. 'Is it really likely to happen? Can you…see who is the original source of this information, or is it just commentary?' says Walter. 'Because often, especially as news breaks, you will see that there's no actual source [on many social media posts]. They're not referencing something in the real world. It's just completely made up.' And remember, if it seems way too good—or bad—to be true, it likely is.
As content generated by artificial intelligence becomes more common, experts warn that tactics for spreading misinformation are only going to get more sophisticated—and harder to catch. 'This is all very preliminary,' says Walter. 'It's like we're trying to capture a moving target that, frankly, just gets a little bit more sophisticated in escaping us all the time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
‘Sweet' pup survived hurricane. Now she's ‘living a cattle dog's dream' on farm
A 'sweet' pup survived a hurricane — then she got 'the ultimate happy ending.' 'She's living a cattle dog's dream now on a farm with lots of animals and lots of room to run, swim, and play to her heart's content,' Malinda Massey, marketing manager for a North Carolina animal shelter, told McClatchy News in a July 24 email. 'Seeing her not only heal but thrive in such a perfect environment is exactly why we do what we do.' The Forsyth Humane Society celebrated the heartwarming adoption after Lucy experienced a rough patch. The shelter said she had been living at another facility when it was 'devastated by Hurricane Helene,' which left parts of the Southeast with catastrophic storm damage in September. When Lucy landed at the Winston-Salem humane society, she was limping due to a broken bone. A team at Bedrock Veterinary Specialists was able to save her leg and help with the healing process. 'Lucy's injured leg definitely took a toll on her,' Massey wrote. 'She was on strict exercise restriction due to her leg injury. Cattle dogs like Lucy need jobs to do and lots of enrichment, so our team worked around the clock to ensure she was mentally stimulated.' At one point, someone tied to the veterinarian's office felt drawn to Lucy's 'sweet, adorable, and happy' personality. Though the woman was hesitant to take the dog home at first, the two soon kicked off their next chapter together. 'It was a big adjustment for her to walk around the farm with me and see all of the new things and animals,' said the woman, identified only as Brittany in a Facebook post from the shelter. 'You could tell by her face and eyes that she loved it instantly! It did take Lucy some time to adjust to my current pack of pups and to learn that the chickens were not to be chased and caught with our mouths!!!' The woman said Lucy became even more affectionate after she adopted her. Now, the pup loves being close to her new owner — unless she's trying to herd animals like geese or horses. 'It's the ultimate happy ending that fills our team with joy,' Massey wrote.
E&E News
2 days ago
- E&E News
Critics blast damage inflicted by Hurricane Helene cleanup
A $1.6 billion cleanup effort in communities hit by Hurricane Helene has spawned fears that the aggressive operation damaged rivers and hurt endangered species, raising bigger questions about the federal response to ever-frequent disasters. Federal contractors are wrapping up a FEMA-funded effort to clear staggering amounts of storm debris from the mountains of North Carolina. But some survivors say that the cleanup has stripped streams, wetlands and streambanks of plants and wood key to the ecosystem's recovery. 'We're scratching our heads and thinking the recovery activities were actually more damaging than the storm itself to these animals and some of their habitats,' said one state official, granted anonymity to speak freely. 'Of course, we're always going to prioritize reducing danger to people, but we need to do that in a way that's responsible to our natural environment.' Advertisement Local fishing guides, biologists and environmentalists are calling for changes to the federal cleanup process, which they say lacks sufficient oversight.
The Hill
4 days ago
- The Hill
Northwestern study reveals a culture abandoning NPR
In Fall 2024, a media engagement study at Northwestern University revealed a stunning generational break: Only 2 percent of students reported listening to NPR at all, and of those, just 17 percent listened regularly. That's right: Fewer than one-half of one percent of students at one of America's most intellectually engaged universities still consider NPR a relevant part of their cultural experience. You might surmise that college students just don't go in for this sort of thing, but you would be wrong. In the 1990s and early 2000s, more than 40 percent of college students reported tuning in to NPR during a given semester, with nearly half of those listening regularly. The collapse in engagement is not the product of shifting dashboard technology or the rise of podcasts. NPR's decline, particularly in classical music programming, reflects something deeper: the breakdown of aesthetic trust in institutions that have exchanged excellence for ideology. For decades, NPR served as a gateway to the Western classical canon. It offered emotionally rich, intellectually accessible programming that invited listeners into music that transcended cultural boundaries. A Mahler symphony or a Debussy prelude didn't require a conservatory background — only the desire to feel something profound. What distinguished NPR wasn't just the music it played, but the curatorial intelligence behind it. That intelligence has since been compromised. Over the last decade, NPR's classical segments have become laboratories for performative inclusion, where programming is governed not by aesthetic judgment but by demographic optics. DEI ideology now functions as a selection criterion. Composers are elevated for what they represent — not for what they compose. The result is music introduced not through its structure, innovation, or affective power, but through the race, gender, or social positioning of its creators. This is not progress. It is reduction. No serious critic argues against expanding the canon. Marginalized composers have produced masterworks that deserve broader recognition. But NPR's current posture doesn't correct history — it merely flattens it. By featuring underrepresented composers primarily to satisfy institutional symbolism, it strips the music of its autonomy. The pieces become vehicles for moral instruction, not aesthetic encounter. And the listener — sensing the shift from invitation to indoctrination — quietly steps away. The Northwestern study makes this clear. Today's students, raised amid saturation-level virtue signaling, are no longer persuaded by it. They do not protest NPR — they simply ignore its existence. This is the most potent form of cultural judgment: not outrage, but indifference. Indeed, NPR's own data mirrors the trend. In 2023, the network reported a $30 million budget shortfall and laid off 10 percent of its staff. Digital music engagement is in steady decline, even as classical music consumption increases among young listeners on commercial platforms. The genre is thriving — it's just not thriving on NPR. Why? Because people don't turn to classical music for affirmation. They turn to it for transcendence. The canon was not constructed through quotas. It emerged across centuries through refinement, repetition, and resonance. Works by Bach, Brahms, and Tchaikovsky endure not because of who the composers were, but because their music continues to arrest the human spirit. The suggestion — increasingly implied by NPR — that love of the canon is itself suspicious, or in need of correction, is not only historically illiterate, but aesthetically toxic. And yet this is now the ambient message embedded in much of NPR's music programming: that to prefer Brahms over an obscure activist-composer from a recent MFA program may reflect some quiet prejudice. This is the logical endpoint of identity-first curation: the collapse of musical trust between broadcaster and audience. Listeners can feel this. They don't complain, they just tune out. That is the quiet tragedy of NPR's collapse — not scandal, but entropy. Not rebellion, but silence. To recover, NPR must recognize that artistic legitimacy cannot be conferred through ideology. It must be earned through beauty, complexity, and affective depth — qualities that exist independently of identity. Diversity matters. But without excellence, it becomes mere optics. And listeners know the difference. NPR is not the first institution to discover that DEI cannot sustain cultural relevance. It is merely the latest. And like many, it remains unwilling to admit what the evidence makes undeniable: the public is not rejecting inclusion. It is rejecting the substitution of ideology for merit. The Fall 2024 Northwestern study was not just a dataset. It was a verdict. A generation raised on curated empathy, language policing, and moral performance has turned away — not because they are closed-minded, but because they recognize when an institution has stopped respecting their intelligence. And the current silence — empirical, generational, and final — is not the result of reactionary resistance. Northwestern is not a reactionary place. Rather, it is the sound of trust lost, music misused, and a cultural authority that now exists largely in name. If NPR hopes to survive, it must return to what made it great: the unyielding belief that excellence, not messaging, is the highest form of inclusion. Until then, it will remain a case study in how great institutions disappear — not with the bang of a scandal, but with the whimper of disillusionment.
