UK should not follow down Biden's ‘dark path' on free speech, says Vance
The Republican met with Foreign Secretary David Lammy at Chevening House in Kent, where the pair went carp fishing.
Asked whether Mr Vance had a 'message' for Mr Lammy on free speech, the vice president replied: 'I've raised concerns about free speech in the United States of America.
'I think the entire collective West, the transatlantic relationship, our Nato allies, certainly the United States under the Biden administration, got a little too comfortable with censoring rather than engaging with a diverse array of opinions.
'So, that's been my view.
'Obviously, I've raised some criticism and concerns about our friends on this side of the Atlantic, but the thing that I say to the people of England, or anybody else, to David, is many of the things that I worry most about were happening in the United States from 2020 to 2024.
'I just don't want other countries to follow us down what I think is a very dark path under the Biden administration.'
Mr Vance has previously attacked what he described as a 'backslide in conscience rights' in the UK.
At the Munich Security Conference in February, he referred to buffer zones near abortion clinics, where certain acts of protest are not allowed within defined boundaries.
'In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat,' the vice president said at the time.
In the White House earlier this year, Mr Vance said he knew of 'infringements on free speech that actually affect not just the British' but also US technology firms, 'and, by extension, American citizens'.
Sir Keir Starmer, who was sat with him, responded by saying London 'wouldn't want to reach across US citizens'.
The Prime Minister said: 'We've had free speech for a very, very long time in the United Kingdom and it will last for a very, very long time.'
During their exchange in Kent, Mr Lammy said he had 'commonalities' with Mr Vance.
'The cut and thrust of politics is what excites me, and the truth is, I was blessed to go to Harvard, and I think the vice president went to a university not quite as good, Yale,' the Foreign Secretary said.
'So we enjoy that political debate and discussion particularly.
'But, you know, there are areas where there are actually joint concern, we both have a joint concern about outcomes for working people, that is the truth of it.'
Mr Lammy later added: 'There are commonalities and there are differences and that is the joy of living in democracies like ours.'
Mr Vance visited the Foreign Secretary's Chevening retreat while on holiday in the UK.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
10 minutes ago
- Metro
'Panama Playlists' leak exposes JD Vance's love for boy bands
Ever wonder what tune US Vice President JD Vance is listening to when he's coming up with brilliant ideas for governing? 'Right now I'm looking at you and I can't believe, You don't know oh-oh, You don't know you're beautiful oh-oh, That's what makes you beautiful…' That's right, Vance is apparently a big fan of One Direction and other boy bands. Eight years after the Panama Papers leaked 11.5million financial documents of offshore bank accounts, the Panama Playlists have surfaced. The Panama Playlists, claiming to expose the favourite music of politicians, celebrities and other public figures on Spotify, may not be too damaging to the individuals. But it could be embarrassing – that is, only if loving boy bands is something to be ashamed of. Featured on Vance's playlists are 'What Makes You Beautiful' by the 2010s pop band One Direction, 'I Want It That Way' by the 1990s band Backstreet Boys, and 'One Time' by Canadian singer-songwriter Justin Bieber, according to the Panama Playlists. Vance also really seems to really like 'Get Lucky' by the electronic music duo Daft Punk, 'You Are a Tourist' by '90s rock band Death Cab for Cutie, and 'San Francisco' by alternative rock band The Mowgli's, and has them in two of his playlists named 'Making Dinner' and 'Gold On The Ceiling'. The anonymous person behind the playlists claims to have been scraping the public figures' accounts since summer 2024, and know what songs they've played and how many times as well as their live listening feed. 'I found the real Spotify accounts of celebrities, politicians, and journalists. Many use their real names. With a little sleuthing, I could say with near-certainty: yep, this is them,' states the Panama Playlists website. 'Heard of the Panama Papers? That exposed offshore bank accounts. This is about onshore vibes.' The site, which quietly went live on July 30, is not affiliated with Spotify or any of the individuals analysed. Spotify playlists in their default setting are public, for those who did not know, and only public information was gleaned for the Panama Playlists. Its eagle-eared researcher is convinced that the figures listed on the site are who they are, due to 'lots of signals', and provided the US attorney general and White House press secretary as cases in point. 'An example is Pam Bondi. Her longtime partner is John Wakefield, and her profile has an old playlist called 'john' and an old shared playlist with a user named 'John Wakefield,' so that gives me a lot of confidence it is her account,' the researcher told the New York Post. 'Karoline Leavitt's profile has a playlist called 'Baby Shower,' and she had a baby a month after the playlist was made.' Below are the Panama Playlists of a handful of individuals highlighted on the site – ranked somewhat in order of how interesting they are. US Attorney General Pam Bondi, who leads the Justice Department, has a self-titled playlist filled with Top 40 hits including Nelly's 'Hot In Herre', Adele's 'Hello', Selena Gomez's 'Kill Em With Kindness', 'Hands To Myself', Black Eyed Peas' 'I Gotta Feeling', Mike Posner's 'Cooler Than Me', and USHER, Lil Jon and Ludacris' 'YEAH!' Trump's White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has a 'Baby Shower' poppy playlist that includes Beyoncé's 'Run the World (Girls)', Shaboozey's 'A Bar Song (Tipsy)', Lee Ann Womack's 'I Hope You Dance', Meghan Trainor's 'Mom' and Aretha Franklin's 'Respect'. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's 'My Shazam Tracks' playlist is a mixed bag including Dixon Dallas' 'Good Lookin', RÜFÜS DU SOL's 'Until the Sun Needs To Rise', David Guetta and OneRepublic's 'I Don't Wanna Wait', and Missy Elliot's 'Get Ur Freak On'. Disgraced FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried has a mix of R&B, electronic and indie music in his 'loud' and 'soft' playlists including The Weeknd's 'Save Your Tears', Sia's 'Unstoppable', Bon Iver's 'Blindsided' and Frank Ocean's 'Bad Religion'. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in his 'Hodge-podge mix' playlist has some classics including Johnny Cash's 'Ring of Fire', Billy Joel's 'Piano Man', and a-ha's 'Take On Me', and a curveball – Miley Cyrus' 'Party In the U.S.A.' New York Times privacy and technology reporter Kashmir Hill's 'writing music' playlist features a handful of respected European artists including Mogwai ('Wake Up and Go Berserk' and 'I Do Have Weapons'), Aphex Twin ('Avril 14th'), and Nils Frahm ('Some'). Comedian and TV host Seth Meyers' 'Porch Jams' playlist suggest he's partial to soft rock with Benji Hughes' 'Vibe so Hot', Jackson Browne's 'The Fuse', and Lucinda Williams' 'Can't Let Go'. Meta's chief AI officer Alexandr Wang is a fan of country and folk, with his top songs being Tyler Childers' 'Feathered Indians', Jack Van Cleaf and Zach Bryan's 'Rattlesnake', and Zach Bryan's 'Blue Jean Baby'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: 'Bodies on the ground' after teenager opens fire in New York's Times Square shooting MORE: Army veteran suspected of shooting four dead at Montana bar arrested MORE: Moment thieves snatch $30,000 worth of Labubu dolls in shop break-in
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump 'considering' inviting Zelenskyy to peace summit meeting, sources say
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are set to meet for a summit in Alaska next Friday to discuss the war in Ukraine - but it has not yet been officially confirmed if Volodymyr Zelenskyy will be invited Donald Trump is reportedly "considering" inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the summit meeting with Vladimr Putin in Alaska next Friday. Trump and Putin are set to meet to discuss the war in Ukraine and an invitation for the Ukrainian leader is 'being discussed,' according to NBC News, citing three people briefed on internal conversations about the meeting. A senior U.S. official reportedly told NBC News that Zelensky's attendance is 'absolutely' possible, but it is believed that no official invite has been talked about with Kyiv as of yet. It comes after NATO scrambled warplanes as Russia shoots down West's F-16 fighter jet in Ukraine onslaught. When quizzed over an official invite, a senior White House official told NBC: 'The President remains open to a trilateral summit with both leaders. Right now, the White House is focusing on planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has cast doubt over the upcoming summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, cautioning that any peace agreement which sidelines Kyiv is doomed to fail. The meeting, set for Friday in Alaska, is being seen as a potentially pivotal moment. Zelenskyy, who voiced his concerns via a Telegram post on Saturday, warned that shutting Ukraine out of peace talks would only result in "dead solutions." Zelenskyy's remarks highlight fears that direct dialogue between Trump and Putin could undermine both Kyiv's and Europe's interests, emphasising that "Any solutions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time, solutions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead solutions, they will never work." This meeting could be a turning point in a conflict that started over three years ago when Russia invaded its western neighbour, leading to tens of thousands of casualties. However, there is no guarantee it will end the violence as Moscow and Kyiv are still at odds over their peace terms. In a joint statement last night, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said Ukraine's future cannot be decided without Kyiv. It said: "Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations."
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Why is it still acceptable to abuse men with long hair?
It was a hairy situation. At a drab corporate dinner in a posh hotel basement, one of my fellow diners grew increasingly prickly. My publication had committed some slight against him – perhaps passing him over for one of our phoney awards, more likely misspelling his name. Unassuaged by my non-apologies, the fur was beginning to fly, though with as much ferocity as Bagpuss might muster. As my assailant stared at my luscious locks cascading onto my chest, he decided things must get personal. He leant across the table and yelled: 'And get your hair cut!' The advice wasn't without merit; I'm perennially in need of a trim. But the incident spoke to something darker in the soul of British men, borne of frustration, drink, and perhaps subconscious lust. It is one of the last acceptable prejudices in modern Britain: barnets. The topic is an unlikely point of agreement between white contrarian hipsters and racial justice activists. Earlier this year, a group of the latter launched a petition to end 'hair discrimination' against people sporting afros, braids or dreadlocks, a phenomenon that has 'destroyed' some of those affected, as social entrepreneur Salha Kaitesi recently told the BBC. Whether facing unwanted contact, comments or professional chastisement, those with traditional black hairstyles argue they should be left alone. 'By discriminating against us, you're literally just saying we shouldn't belong or we shouldn't be who we are,' Kaitesi said. It's a new spin on a fashionable cause, at least. And as befits the vogue for legal boilerplating, her campaign calls for the Equality Act to be rewritten to make explicit mention of hair discrimination. This is despite the fact that the legislation already covers hairstyles worn because of cultural, family and social customs. The politics of hair is nothing new. Even two decades ago, my own all-boys secondary school carved out generous exemptions for bewhiskered pupils. While the official policy was not far off short back and sides with a clean shave, South Asian classmates were sufficiently numerous to make a mockery of having any standard at all. Such liberalism has crept into working life, as a stroll around any office would show you. Even the City of London, that bastion of stuffy privilege, now hosts a vivid array of barnets. The easing of dress codes has coincided with laxer rules about hair, perhaps encouraged by growing diversity in the workplace. Keep it kempt and you can often get away with anything. Or at least you can most of the time. For while the socially-astute conformists will know to avoid a brush with race relations law, white men with long hair are still fair game for follicular abuse. To paraphrase famous baldy Gregg Wallace, 'men of a certain age' are frequently forthright in expressing their distaste, as if traditional British mores haven't been suffering an unbroken series of catastrophic defeats since the 1960s. In that decade, lengthier styles on men were indicative of everything from mere idleness to the worst seditions: communism, anarchism and sexual deviancy. Long-haired men at the time report being refused service at pubs, subjected to a non-consensual trim, or in grimmer cases even beaten up. The correlation between barber abstinence and disobedience is true, of course. As Graham Nash once put it, long hair 'was a flag, it was a symbol of rebellion, of a new way of thinking, of a tantalising of your parents, a finger in the face of convention'. As well as symbolising good music taste and access to decent drugs, it was most of all a threat to the establishment. Perhaps then the man who heckled my flowing locks outside a Redhill pub some years ago was continuing in that tradition of defending the beliefs of every right-thinking person. Something similar may well be true of the Millwall fans who called out to their Lord and Saviour on seeing a friend of mine the other side of a security barrier – though in fairness, he does rather look like Jesus. But I suspect at its heart the verbal attacks on the long-hairs owe most to sexual jealousy from the baldies. Certainly many women cannot resist a floppy fringe after a few drinks, if only for the shampoo recommendations. It is hardly nit-picking to argue that men and women of all colours and creeds should be allowed to wear their hair how they like, if only to prop up one of the few AI-proof industries Britain has left and maintain a steady supply of hirsute tribute acts as rock pioneers die off. The government must act to end this disgraceful prejudice – at least once it's fixed the economy.
