Pakistan suspends train services after railway bombing in insurgency-hit Balochistan
No one was harmed in the attack Sunday in Mastung, a district in Balochistan, said railways spokesman Ikram Ullah. Engineers were repairing the damaged track, he said.
The Jaffer Express was traveling from Quetta, the provincial capital, to the northern city of Peshawar when assailants targeted it with a bomb, Ullah said.
The banned Baloch Liberation Army, in a statement, claimed responsibility for the attack, which comes months after BLA fighters hijacked a train in the same district, killing 21 hostages before security forces were able to kill 33 assailants.
The attack came as Pakistan prepares to mark its 78th Independence Day on Aug. 14.
Balochistan has long been the scene of insurgency by separatists seeking independence from the central government. The province is also home to militants linked to the Pakistani Taliban.
Local administrator Shahid Khan said the government imposed curfews in some areas of the district of Bajaur along the Afghan border in the troubled northwest and advised residents to stay indoors, prompting many to flee to safer places in preparation for a possible security operation against the Pakistani Taliban.
Bajaur was once a stronghold of the Pakistani Taliban, who are known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, and the group has resurfaced there. TTP is a separate group but closely allied to the Afghan Taliban.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
5 minutes ago
- Arab News
Pakistan denies nuclear threat claims, says India misrepresenting army chief's US remarks
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's defense minister on Monday dismissed Indian accusations of 'sabre-rattling,' saying New Delhi's claims about alleged nuclear threats by the Pakistani army chief were baseless and reflected domestic political pressures on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The comments followed a statement by India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) accusing Pakistan of 'sabre-rattling' and 'irresponsibility' after media reports claimed Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir had hinted at the possible use of nuclear weapons during a speech in Florida, framing it as a warning to New Delhi in light of recent military tensions. Indian officials argued that such comments, if accurate, amounted to 'nuclear sabre-rattling' — a term used to describe provocative or threatening language about deploying nuclear arms — and said it was particularly irresponsible to make them while abroad in a 'friendly third country.' Munir was said to have spoken at a black-tie dinner hosted by a Pakistani-origin businessman in Florida on Saturday, attended by more than 100 guests. An excerpt of his speech shared by Pakistani security officials did not contain any such remarks, while Pakistan's foreign office said the Indian MEA's statement was 'yet another demonstration of their chronic tendency to distorting facts and twisting statements out of context.' 'This is a totally baseless thing, [they] are trying to make an issue [out of Munir's remarks],' Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said in an interview to a private news channel. 'These things reflect one thing… internally, Modi has been devastated, with no reputation left.' Asif said Modi was under intense pressure following the outcome of a four-day military standoff between India and Pakistan in May, as well as an increase in US tariffs linked to New Delhi's purchase of Russian crude oil. India and Pakistan, both nuclear-armed neighbors with a history of wars and border clashes, fought their deadliest battle in decades in May after an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir killed 26 civilians. The skirmish quickly escalated into aerial combat. Pakistan claimed its air force used Chinese-built J-10C fighter jets to shoot down six Indian aircraft, including three French-made Rafales. Last week, Indian Air Chief A.P. Singh said his country had also downed six Pakistani jets, which Islamabad denies. In the interview on Monday, Asif warned that Modi's political troubles could prompt risky military moves: 'He could resort to something which is, which could, you know, amount to a war, amount to something desperate in this region.' In its statement, the Indian MEA described 'nuclear sabre-rattling' as Pakistan's 'stock-in-trade,' and said it was 'regrettable that the reported remarks have been made while in a friendly third country.' The version of Munir's speech released by Pakistani officials read: 'The (Indian) aggression has brought the region to the brink of a dangerously escalating war, where a bilateral conflict due to any miscalculation will be a grave mistake.' Pakistan's foreign office rejected India's allegations as 'a misleading and self-serving construct,' saying: 'Pakistan remains firmly opposed to the use or threat of use of force. India's sabre-rattling and war mongering, whenever confronted, invite unfounded allegations bereft of rationality.'
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
US designates Balochistan Liberation Army, active in Pakistan, as ‘foreign terrorist organization'
KARACHI: The United States (US) is designating the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), a separatist militant group active in Pakistan's southwestern Balochistan province, as a 'foreign terrorist organization,' the State Department said on Monday. Balochistan, Pakistan's largest but most impoverished province, has been the site of a long-running insurgency that has intensified in recent months, with separatist militants attacking security forces, government officials and installations and people from other provinces. The BLA, which also uses the alias of 'The Majeed Brigade,' is the most prominent of separatist groups in Balochistan, which borders Iran and Afghanistan and is home to key China-led infrastructure projects, including a port and a gold-copper mine. In March, the group claimed responsibility for the hijacking of the Jaffar Express train traveling from Quetta to Peshawar, killing 31 civilians and security personnel and holding hostage over 300 train passengers. In 2024, it claimed suicide attacks on Chinese nationals in Karachi and Gwadar. 'Today's action taken by the Department of State demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to countering terrorism,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio was quoted as saying by the State Department. 'Terrorist designations play a critical role in our fight against this scourge and are an effective way to curtail support for terrorist activities.' The foreign terrorist organization designation by the US triggers restrictions on providing financial support and other aid to the group. The US designation of the BLA comes amid a spike in militant violence in Pakistan's Balochistan, which Islamabad has blamed on India and Afghanistan. New Delhi and Kabul deny the allegation. On Monday, Pakistan Railways suspended all train services to and from the insurgency-hit southwestern province for four days after separatists blew up a railway track, derailing six cars of the Jaffar Express train, officials said. The BLA claimed responsibility for the attack, which came as Pakistan prepares to mark its 79th Independence Day on Aug. 14. Separatist groups operating in the mineral-rich region accuse the central government of stealing their resources to fund development elsewhere in the country. The federal government denies the allegations and says it is working for the uplift of local communities in Balochistan.
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan's humanitarian crisis
DUBAI: Afghan refugees are returning in their thousands — few of them by choice or with a destination in mind. Many of the youngest have never set foot in Afghanistan before. Others are returning to find their homes and livelihoods no longer exist. What were once considered places of refuge from the unrelenting turmoil back home, neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink. According to Babar Baloch, global spokesperson for the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone, including 1.6 million from Iran and more than 352,000 from Pakistan. Sami Fakhouri, head of delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, witnessed the impact first-hand. 'We are anticipating that an additional 1 million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year,' he told a briefing in Geneva. 'The majority didn't have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border.' Fakhouri said he had seen busloads of families being dropped off at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days, many with no idea where to go. He also sounded the alarm over a critical funding shortfall. The IFRC's $31.4 million appeal to support returnees is only 10 percent funded. 'Whether we can maintain support at this pace is a real concern,' he said. At the same time, Afghanistan is in no position to absorb the influx of people after four decades of war, occupation, civil unrest and economic crisis have left the country extremely fragile. The US military withdrawal and the return of the Taliban government in 2021 led to Afghanistan's global isolation, a freeze on foreign aid and assets, and the near-collapse of public services. Compounding these challenges is one of the worst droughts Afghanistan has seen in decades, which has devastated crops, depleted water sources, and crippled rural livelihoods. With more than half the population reliant on agriculture, many returnees have little to go back to in their home villages — forcing them to remain in transit areas or drift toward overcrowded cities. Aid agencies warn that without climate-resilient recovery plans, the drought will deepen food insecurity and drive even more internal displacement. These overlapping crises have already pushed more than two-thirds of the population into poverty. Baloch described the expulsions as 'a broader, worrying regional trend,' adding that 'refugee-hosting countries have issued return orders with deadlines for Afghans to depart, or face deportation.' Since those announcements, the situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly. These mass returns follow a shift in regional policy, beginning in March when Iran issued a deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave or face arrest. In June, Pakistan launched its second phase of deportations targeting unregistered Afghans. Both countries cited national security concerns and internal pressure to expel large refugee populations. Pakistan has defended its forced expulsions, with Talal Chaudhry, an adviser to Islamabad's Interior Ministry, stating in April that the policy targets only 'illegal foreigners.' In February, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan rejected claims that Afghan nationals were being mistreated during the repatriation process. 'In this connection, we also extensively engaged the Afghan side to ensure the smooth repatriation of Afghan nationals,' he told Voice of America. Iran, meanwhile, has justified its expulsions as a response to national security and economic pressures, particularly following its recent conflict with Israel. Rhetoric on social media has increasingly blamed Afghans for shortages and social issues. Abdul Rahman Rashid, the Taliban government's deputy minister for refugees and repatriation, has rebuked host countries for the mass expulsions. And described the removal of Afghans as a 'serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.' 'The scale and manner in which Afghan refugees have been forced to return to their homeland is something Afghanistan has never before experienced in its history,' Rashid said in Kabul on July 31. For the hundreds of thousands now crossing back into Afghanistan each month, the journey does not end at the border. Many are stepping into a future marked by uncertainty, deprivation and loss, without hope, safety or dignity. Even so, the pace of returns has surged in recent weeks. On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June. From July 10 to 16, the average was more than 29,000 per day. Inevitably, the scale of arrivals has overwhelmed aid operations at border crossings. 'Our teams are at the borders, receiving and assisting streams of exhausted, hungry, and scared people every day,' Baloch told Arab News. 'Staff and structures are absolutely inundated,' he said, adding that the UN agency has deployed additional personnel and is distributing essential relief items, hot meals, and emergency financial assistance to meet immediate needs. 'But amid funding constraints, and given the scale and pace of returns, we will not be able to sustain support for more than a few weeks,' said Baloch. In addition to the operational burden, the nature of these returns has raised serious concerns. Many of those arriving say they had little choice. Baloch described the situation as 'a complex protection crisis,' noting that returns are taking place under difficult and often involuntary conditions. He said many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, and 'returnees who arrived in the country in recent months have been sharing concerning stories of increased restrictions, harassment and discrimination.' Once back, many find themselves in provinces that lack even the most basic services, forcing thousands into temporary transit sites, informal settlements, or already strained households. Many arrive without identity papers, making access to support even more difficult. 'Immense challenges lie ahead for returnees — from accessing documentation, housing, healthcare and education, to rebuilding their lives in a country they do not know,' said Baloch. Those challenges are already visible. Shelter is scarce, and schools and clinics are either closed or inaccessible to women and girls. Meanwhile, job opportunities are limited — especially for those who have spent years or decades abroad. 'For women and girls in particular, life in Afghanistan brings extreme restrictions,' said Baloch. Under the Taliban government, most secondary schools and universities remain closed to girls. Women are banned from most forms of employment, including in the nongovernmental organization sector. For many returnee women, it means a life of near-total invisibility. Even female aid workers have been forced into the shadows. One Afghan humanitarian worker, speaking anonymously to a UN publication, described living in fear while continuing to serve her community. 'I feel depressed,' she said. 'As an aid worker, I don't feel safe, and I am afraid for my life… I am worried that I might be targeted because of my job.' She described being stopped at checkpoints, harassed for not having a male guardian, and being unable to access work or support systems freely. 'It is so unfair to be deprived of your rights because of your gender. Working is not only my dream or a human right, it is also the way I support my family. Women are half of a country … Let us work, let us learn, let us live.' Aid workers have also reported a growing number of unaccompanied or separated children among recent returnees — some born abroad and unable to navigate legal systems or school enrolment. Data for June published by UNICEF, the UN children's fund, indicates that more than 5,000 unaccompanied or separated Afghan children returned from Iran, many arriving without guardians or legal identity. The lack of functioning child protection mechanisms places these vulnerable children at risk of exploitation, statelessness, and abuse at a critical stage in their lives. Human rights experts have also warned of broader risks facing returnees. Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, has said the nation 'is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control.' Rights groups have documented cases in which returnees — particularly those with foreign residency or links to international organizations — have faced interrogation or detention upon arrival, fueling fears of surveillance and reprisals. Despite urgent warnings from aid agencies, the international response has fallen short. The UNHCR has appealed for $71 million to support returnees in the region over a nine-month period. The IFRC and other aid actors have made separate appeals for immediate assistance at border crossings and for longer-term reintegration support. But donor interest remains weak, with many countries reducing their funding to Afghanistan over governance concerns and competing global crises. Roza Otunbayeva, the UN secretary-general's special representative for Afghanistan, called the mass returns 'a test of our collective humanity,' warning of further displacement, famine, and instability without urgent action. She called for an 'integrated approach' that combines emergency aid with long-term support for return areas, and stressed that regional dialogue with Iran, Pakistan, and Central Asian states is essential to ensure returns remain voluntary, safe, and dignified. Baloch echoed those concerns. 'We are in touch with the authorities in Iran and Pakistan. UNHCR urges countries in the region to ensure protection for Afghans and that returns to Afghanistan are voluntary, safe, and dignified.' 'We are also calling on the international community to urgently and substantially increase funding — to meet both critical needs at the border upon arrival, and provide longer-term assistance to help returnees settle in Afghanistan,' he said.
