logo
Donald Trump's deadly Bunker Busters fail to damage Iran's underground nuclear sites because..., bad news for Israel due to...

Donald Trump's deadly Bunker Busters fail to damage Iran's underground nuclear sites because..., bad news for Israel due to...

India.com22-06-2025
Donald Trump's deadly Bunker Busters fail to damage Iran's underground nuclear sites because…, bad news for Israel due to...
Tehran: America has now also joined the ongoing war between Israel and Iran. US President Donald Trump said that the US military has carried out 'very successful' attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Earlier, Iran had launched dozens of drones towards Israel. After the US attacks, a statement has been issued by Iran's nuclear agency.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump escapes $454M fraud penalty: What the ruling means and what happens next
Trump escapes $454M fraud penalty: What the ruling means and what happens next

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump escapes $454M fraud penalty: What the ruling means and what happens next

Donald Trump civil fraud penalty overturned — In a major legal twist, a New York appeals court has thrown out the $454 million civil fraud judgment against President Donald Trump, a penalty that had threatened his business empire. The case, brought by Attorney General Letitia James, accused Trump of inflating property values to secure loans and insurance deals. Donald Trump civil fraud penalty overturned — A New York appeals court has struck down the $454 million judgment against Donald Trump, giving the former president a major legal reprieve. The case, filed by Attorney General Letitia James, accused Trump of inflating property values to secure better loans and insurance. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the case was really about Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why the appeals court overturned the penalty What happens next Why this matters beyond Trump Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The political stakes FAQs: A New York appeals court has thrown out the nearly half-billion-dollar civil fraud penalty that Donald Trump was ordered to pay earlier this year, reshaping one of the most consequential legal battles facing the U.S. decision, handed down Thursday by a divided five-judge panel in Manhattan, not only spares Trump an immediate financial blow but also raises fundamental questions about how aggressively state officials can police corporate civil fraud case was launched in 2022 by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused Trump of inflating his net worth for years to obtain favorable loans and insurance Arthur Engoron, who presided over a three-month bench trial, sided with James last year. In February 2024, he imposed a staggering $454.2 million penalty, plus interest, and barred Trump and his family business from seeking loans from New York banks for three argued that Trump's exaggerations were deliberate, widespread, and showed 'a complete lack of contrition.' He also curtailed the business roles of Trump's adult sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, while placing the Trump Organization under a court-appointed James, the verdict was a marquee win — proof, in her words, that no one, not even a former president, was above the law. But for Trump, it was another in a long series of courtroom battles defining his Appellate Division's ruling was far from unanimous. Two judges agreed that Trump had committed fraud but ruled the penalty excessive under the Constitution's ban on disproportionate two said the trial judge should not have pre-judged Trump's liability before the trial even began, requiring a retrial. A fifth judge dissented entirely, saying the lawsuit should have been split highlights how legally complex the case has become. The majority agreed that James had the authority to sue, but they could not settle on whether Trump's liability had been properly established or whether the punishment was lawful. The result: the $454 million penalty has been wiped away, at least for ruling is not the end of the road. James could appeal to New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, to try to reinstate the penalty. If she does, the fight could stretch well into 2026, keeping Trump's finances under the microscope during an election cycle where his legal exposure is already a major political the court-appointed monitor overseeing the Trump Organization remains in place. That means Trump's business dealings will still be scrutinized, even though the financial penalty and loan restrictions have been its core, the case goes beyond one businessman. It touches on the broader question of how much leeway prosecutors and regulators should have in policing financial misstatements, particularly when those misstatements don't clearly lead to direct losses for banks or James cannot ultimately reinstate the penalty, it could embolden other executives accused of manipulating valuations, reinforcing the idea that such exaggerations are a routine part of real estate and finance rather than punishable fraud. On the other hand, if higher courts side with her, it could expand the power of state attorneys general to impose sweeping penalties even in the absence of clear victim has consistently denied wrongdoing, calling the lawsuit a political witch hunt. The reversal now gives him a powerful talking point: that even New York's appellate judges saw the penalty as overreach. That narrative could resonate with voters who already view his legal troubles as politically the story is not finished. James can still appeal, and Trump is far from free of legal peril, with multiple criminal and civil cases ongoing. For now, though, he has won breathing room in a case that threatened to strip hundreds of millions from his centers on claims Trump inflated property values to get better loans and insurance case could move to New York's highest court if Attorney General Letitia James appeals.

Bad news for IT professionals as Donald Trump may ban H-1B visa for Indians due to....
Bad news for IT professionals as Donald Trump may ban H-1B visa for Indians due to....

India.com

time24 minutes ago

  • India.com

Bad news for IT professionals as Donald Trump may ban H-1B visa for Indians due to....

Bad news for Indians as H-1B visa holders in US are being asked to reveal home address and... H-1B visa system: In a environment where the United States, led by President Donald Trump is taking every step possible to negatively impact the India-US relations, reports have it that the next target of the US President could be the H-1B visa system through which Indian IT engineers make a career in the US. For those unversed, the Donald Trump led US government has imposed a massive 50% tariff on its exports to the United States in a matter of punishment for India due to the import of Russian crude oil. Here are all the details you need to know about the H-1B visa system and why they could be the next target of the US government. Why US may take action on the H-1B visa system next? Media reports suggest that H-1B visas could be the next target, which may be cause of concern for the over 2 lakh Indians who secured such visas in FY 2024. Reports also say that the Make America Great Again Supporters (MAGA) supporters of Donald Trump are driving an online campaign against Indian tech workers, arguing that they take away American jobs amid mass layoffs. 'End Indian H-1B visas to replace American jobs and stop sending money and weapons to the Obama/Biden/Neocon Ukraine Russia war.' politician Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the most prominent voices to have re-started the online campaign against the H-1B visa said on X (formerly Twitter). Story highlights: 1. After Trump imposed massive tariffs on India, there are reports that H-1B visa system can be the next target. Add as a Preferred Source 2. Trump's MAGA supporters are calling for a ban on the visa system. 3. The VISA system is critical as it's used by Indian IT professionals. 4. Donald Trump has imposed 50 % tariff on India. What does Donald Trump think on H-1B visa system? 'We want competent people coming into our country. And H-1B, I know the programme very well. I use the programme. Maître d', wine experts, even waiters, high-quality waiters — you've got to get the best people. People like Larry, he needs engineers, Masa also needs… they need engineers like nobody's ever needed them,' US President Trump had said on the H-1B visa system.

Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty
Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty

A US court threw out Thursday a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum "excessive" but upholding the judgment against him. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions that the Republican slammed as "lawfare." "It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before," Trump said on his Truth Social platform Thursday, adding that "everything I did was absolutely CORRECT and, even, PERFECT." When Engoron originally ruled against Trump, he ordered the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favorable bank loans or insurance terms. Live Events Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a "corporate death penalty." On Thursday, five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was "excessive" and that it "violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution." The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive or cruel punishments and penalties. - 'Massive win! - State Attorney General Letitia James , who brought the initial case, vowed to take Thursday's ruling to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals . Thursday's appeals court ruling "affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud," James added. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a "massive win!!!" " New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice... and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!" he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it "weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls." As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. Trump's economic advisor Peter Navarro said at the White House Thursday that "James is another one that belongs in jail," referring to the New York attorney general. "The Democrats really overplayed their hand on this because they thought they could take Donald Trump out," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store