Opinion - Meet the House un-American activities caucus
Last week, four members of the House Republican Conference asked Bondi to target three small civil society organizations for informing the human beings in their communities about their legal rights when it comes to dealing with — or not dealing with — Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
These are tactics straight out of the darkest period of the Cold War. This is the playbook of the Eisenhower administration, the House Un-American Activities Committee, and its Senate counterpart, the Internal Security Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee. I know because I've spent the last 10 years working on a book about domestic surveillance and political repression that includes that very period. It's a key reason why I titled the book 'The Triumph of Fear' (coming in April).
Going after politically disfavored individuals (Owen Lattimore and J. Robert Oppenheimer) or groups (Emergency Civil Liberties Committee, Methodist Federation for Social Action) was a sick, unconstitutional political game, played on a bipartisan, bicameral basis by the likes of Reps. Martin Dies (D-Texas), Richard Nixon (R-Calif.), and Sens. Pat McCarran (D-Nev.) and of course Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis.), among many others. Their witch-hunts for alleged communists or homosexuals in government and civil society terrorized not only those targeted but the entire country.
Now, a new generation of like-minded Republican zealots has arisen to claim their mantle.
In their Feb. 18, 2025, letter to Bondi, Reps. Andy Harris (R-Md.), Josh Breechen (R-Okla.), Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), and Pete Sessions (R-Texas) implored the attorney general to 'continue prosecuting individuals, organizations, and elected officials who aid and abet illegal aliens in evading Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. We are a nation of laws. Without enforcement of those laws, we will cease to be a nation.'
Their full letter is worth the read, not only because it demonstrates complete contempt for the First Amendment rights of the three groups and their members, but because of the precedent they clearly seek to set — encouraging the criminalization of anyone or any group opposed to Trump's dubious mass deportation plan. They make that clear when they call out state and local elected officials in Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts — states that voted against Trump for president in 2024 — for allegedly assisting 'illegal aliens in their invasion of our country.'
The First Amendment allows Code Pink, the Washington Immigrant Solidarity Network and the Immigration Defense Project — the groups these House Republicans want Bondi to go after — to inform people about their legal rights.
It's no surprise that Harris, Breechen, Burlison and Sessions want Bondi to target three relatively small and largely politically powerless groups — their ability to fight back, politically and legally (in terms of legal defense fees) is inherently limited.
Code Pink's politically ineffectual theatrical demonstrations have been a Washington staple for more than two decades. I still remember the group disrupting a 2007 House hearing with then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Group member Desiree Fairooz approached Rice, with fake blood on her hands while screaming 'war criminal.' The stunt got lots of press coverage but did absolutely nothing to change Bush administration policy in Iraq. That's pretty much par for the course for Code Pink.
If Code Pink and the other targeted groups are out there informing their fellow humans about their legal rights, it means they're actually doing socially useful, necessary work protected by the First Amendment.
Four House GOP members are pushing Trump's Justice Department to waste taxpayer time and money pursuing those groups with politically motivated, constitutionally violative witch-hunts. That they are not instead demanding the intensification of investigations of Communist Chinese hackers laying waste to our telecommunications security underscores how far off the rails things are in America's capital.
Former CIA analyst and House senior policy advisor Patrick Eddington is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's route to Kennedy Center cleared of homeless camps amid DC crackdown
The number of homeless in D.C. is down from pandemic levels. The White House said those who remain in encampments will be jailed if they refuse to move. WASHINGTON ‒ Blocks away from where President Donald Trump announced the latest slate of Kennedy Center honorees, workers began to sweep away homeless encampments along his route to the White House as part of his broader crackdown in the capital city. The Aug. 13 move comes days after Trump seized control of Washington, D.C.'s local law enforcement, deployed National Guard troops, and ordered people living outside to "immediately" move, suggesting, as the president put it, that they be relocated "FAR from the Capital." Amber Harding, executive director of the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, said officials cleared at least two tents on a patch of green space near the Kennedy Center as Trump spoke at the performing arts center. Members of the city's Department of Human Services pinned notices to at least nine other tents in the area, notifying residents that the camps would be broken down and closed if not removed by the following morning. George Morgan, a lifelong D.C. resident who has lived in the encampment for two months, said he's not sure where he will go. He won't go to a shelter because they wouldn't allow him to bring his American pit bull terrier. "I'm very concerned," said Morgan, a Trump supporter, about the president's takeover of the city's police force and his mobilization of the National Guard. "I try not to take offense." He said while he doesn't know where he will go, he's "hopeful God will make a way." Where are they being taken? Advocates for the city's homeless population say they're still unclear where the Trump administration expects people living outside to move. At an Aug. 12 news conference, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters homeless people would be "given the option to leave their encampment, to be taken to a homeless shelter, to be offered addiction or mental-health services, and if they refuse, they will be susceptible to fines or to jail time." She said U.S. Park Police have removed 70 homeless encampments from federal parks since March and are set to clear the remaining two encampments in the city later this week. Andrew Wassenich, director of policy at Miriam's Kitchen, a local nonprofit that assists the homeless, said Trump's rhetoric and the notices being put on tents appear targeted at scaring homeless people to leave. "The more people who do that on their own, the easier for them," he said. So far, Wassenich said the clearing of encampments mirrors past efforts by city officials to move people away from high-traffic areas of the city. In 2023, officials removed a large site of tents at a park near the White House despite pushback from some local officials and homeless advocacy groups. "They're not solving the homeless problem. It's not going away," Wassenich added. "They're just moving it." 'Minimize the disruption' Over the weekend, the city's human services department added about 70 beds to homeless shelters to make room for an expected influx of residents, said Rachel Pierre, the agency's acting director. She said that the city's shelters were at capacity when the order took effect, but that additional room could be made. Wayne Turnage, the deputy mayor of the DC Department of Health and Human Services, said the number of homeless encampments in the city is way down from their pandemic levels. Turnage said about 100 people are living in encampments today – down from around 300 in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. But advocates said those numbers likely do not include all of the people living outside in D.C. The city counted 900 people living on the streets during a one-night survey in January. When the city conducts a cleanup or shuts down an encampment, they typically provide residents with a week's notice, Turnage said. But with the new federal order in place, they're telling residents that they should pack up now. "Our objective is to see that the encampments are closed in an orderly fashion and to extend homeless services to those who are impacted," Turnage said. 'These people are human beings, they're not chess pieces. Their lives are being disrupted, so we have to make sure that we do as much as we can to minimize the disruption."
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Failed New Mexico GOP candidate sentenced to 80 years for organizing drive-by shootings at Democrats' homes
A wannabe Republican representative in New Mexico was sentenced to 80 years in prison for organizing shootings at Democrats' homes after he was easily crushed in an election for a state House seat. Solomon Peña, 42, originally ran for the Albuquerque-based house district in 2022, but was swiftly defeated by incumbent Democrat Miguel Garcia after securing a mere 26% of the vote. 4 Solomon Peña was sentenced to eight decades in prison for organizing targeted shootings at Democratic officials' homes. Solomon Pena/X Still, Peña asserted the election was 'rigged.' 'I didn't lose nada,' he posted on his X account on Jan. 2. The sore loser quickly formed a 'sophisticated scheme' targeting elected officials in the state, US District Court Judge Kea Riggs said during his sentencing. 4 Peña previously attempted to run for a state House seat, but was defeated. AP He was arrested in January 2023 after a tense standoff with a SWAT team and accused of hiring four men to shoot at the homes of Bernalillo County Commissioners Adriann Barboa and Debbie O'Malley and state Sens. Linda Lopez and Moe Maestas, who are all registered Democrats. Peña was found guilty in March for recruiting a man and his son to target the Democratic officials. He was additionally convicted of trying to convince fellow inmates he was in jail with while awaiting trial to kill his codefendants. As the 'ringleader' of the operation, Peña tagged along on the final drive-by to Lopez's, less than a day before he was nabbed by the SWAT team. 4 Peña was arrested in January 2023 after a standoff with SWAT officials. AP The heavily armed men opened fire on the senator's house, sending multiple bullets flying through Lopez's 10-year-old daughter's bedroom window. No injuries were reported, but Lopez testified Wednesday that her children still suffer from mental health issues spurred by the shooting, including anxiety and depression, the Source New Mexico reported. 'The shooting of our home shattered what I was trying to form for my children,' Lopez said. 4 Peña plans to appeal the conviction, his attorneys said. AP Peña's attorneys spoke on his behalf and asserted that he would be appealing the conviction. Riggs, a Trump appointee, said that Peña would have likely continued on his violent rampage if he hadn't been captured by authorities — all because of his 'ego' and inability to 'believe that [he] lost an election.' Peña, an ex-con, previously served seven years in prison for theft. He was also ordered to pay a $250,000 fine. Over the last year, acts of political violence have spiked countrywide. In June, Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were assassinated at her home by deranged madman Vance Boelter, who dressed up as a police officer to trick the couple into opening their door. In April, an unemployed mechanic set Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's home on fire while his family was asleep inside. The arsonist later told police that he despised the governor and would've beaten him with a hammer himself if given the opportunity.
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House puts a low bar for Trump-Putin summit
Trump and other administration officials have indicated Friday's summit in Alaska is not meant to be one that will bring an end to the fighting in Ukraine, using terms like 'listening session' and 'feel-out meeting' to describe the planned discussion about the war in Ukraine. The president and his team have also largely avoided predicting any deliverables that might come out of the meeting and noted that it will likely take a follow-up summit involving both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for any concrete progress to be made on a ceasefire. 'There's a very good chance that we're going to have a second meeting that will be more productive than the first,' Trump said Wednesday. 'Because the first is I'm going to find out where we are and what we're doing.' The White House has steered clear of making any firm commitments about what will come out of Friday's gathering in Anchorage, and details have been scarce as officials work to rapidly pull the event together on one week's notice. The president himself has offered mixed signals about what will happen. Trump is expected to meet one-on-one with Putin, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, and the event will take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. But other logistics were still being sorted out as the summit approached. 'This is a listening exercise for this president,' Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday. 'Look, only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present. And so this is for the president to go and to get, again, a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end.' Trump is a wild card in Friday's meeting. He has avoided setting expectations for the event, telling reporters earlier this week that the conversation with Putin 'will be good, but it might be bad.' Trump on Wednesday threatened 'severe consequences' if Russia did not stop the fighting after this week's summit, then minutes later acknowledged that he is unlikely to be able to get Putin to stop targeting Ukrainian civilians. And he said he hoped to arrange a second meeting quickly involving Putin and Zelensky, or that perhaps a second meeting would not happen at all. 'If the first one goes OK, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately,' Trump said. 'I think the second meeting – if the second meeting takes place. Now there may be no second meeting, because if I feel it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we're not going to have a second meeting.' Some critics have bemoaned that Trump is giving Putin a win simply by holding the meeting on U.S. soil without Zelensky or leadership from Ukraine present. And European allies have approached Friday's meeting with caution, expressing appreciation for Trump's efforts while bracing for the possibility that he may go off script. Trump has in recent days suggested Ukraine may have to give up land to Russia as part of a peace agreement, something Ukrainian leaders have said is a non-starter.
