Lawyers for Returned Deportee Seek Sanctions Against Trump Officials
For the better part of two months, lawyers for Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Maryland immigrant who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March, have been complaining loudly about the Trump administration's persistent efforts to dodge court orders instructing it to work toward freeing him from Salvadoran custody.
Their search for accountability continued even after the White House brought Mr. Abrego Garcia back to the United States last week — albeit to face an indictment that was investigated and filed while he was overseas.
But late on Wednesday night, the lawyers sent the federal judge handling the case their most detailed inventory yet of what they described as the administration's 'sustained and flagrant' violations. The lawyers also asked the judge, Paula Xinis, to do something about it. They said that they wanted her to appoint a special master to investigate the failure by Trump officials to comply with her instructions and to impose financial penalties, if warranted, as a punishment for contempt.
The 33-page filing by the lawyers contained a litany of purported wrongdoing by the Trump administration and accused officials in the Homeland Security and Justice Departments of throwing up evasions at every turn, harboring a disdain for the judicial process and, in one instance, potentially lying under oath.
It gave a strong flavor of the lawyers' frustration after almost two months of failing to get answers to the question of what the White House had been doing to secure Mr. Abrego Garcia's release before it suddenly changed course last Friday by bringing him back to face indictment.
'Nearly 60 days, 10 orders, three depositions, three discovery disputes, three motions for stay, two hearings, a weeklong stay and a failed appeal later,' the lawyers wrote, 'the plaintiffs still have seen no evidence to suggest that the defendants took any steps, much less 'all available steps,' to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the United States 'as soon as possible' so that his case could be handled as it would have been had he not been unlawfully deported.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
10 minutes ago
- Fast Company
For public sector projects, it's about value—not just the product
Across the United States, governments are making record investments in infrastructure, healthcare, and IT systems—yet too often, these efforts fall short of delivering the promised impact. Compared to global peers, our public projects cost more and take longer, as they are often bogged down by bureaucratic red tape and a tendency toward short-term thinking. The question we must ask is: Are we spending wisely, or just spending? A recent study from the Brookings Institution found that 'the U.S. spends three times as much as other upper- and middle-income countries on certain transportation infrastructure.' Similarly, a report from the Commonwealth Fund highlighted that the U.S. spends nearly twice as much per capita on healthcare than the average OEDC nation, yet outcomes often lag. This pattern extends to IT procurement, where public agencies frequently invest in redundant, non-integrated systems that fail to deliver meaningful efficiencies. The problem isn't a lack of funding. It's a lack of strategic allocation. THE PITFALL OF 'PRODUCTS OVER PURPOSE' Government agencies often prioritize buying products over solving problems. IT procurement is a prime example: Chief information officers (CIOs) are often overwhelmed with vendors offering new cybersecurity and management tools. But adding more tools doesn't always make systems better. Instead of asking, 'What can we buy?' decision-makers should ask, 'What problem are we solving?' Successful CIOs create a structured discipline for vendor management. By setting clear roles, ensuring contract alignment, and preparing for potential crises, they shift from chasing quick fixes to building sustainable solutions. This is the mindset governments need to embrace. THE HIDDEN COSTS OF THE 'USE IT OR LOSE IT' MENTALITY A major roadblock in public sector spending is the 'use it or lose it' budgeting mentality. Agencies rush to spend their budgets before the fiscal year ends, often leading to wasteful purchases that don't align with long-term goals. This squanders public funds. The issues we face are not a lack of resources or technology, but a failure to think long-term and prioritize impact over transactions. The prevalence of short-term decision-making in the public sector is rooted in systemic challenges. As mentioned above, the 'use it or lose it' budget framework pressures agencies to exhaust funds within fixed cycles, often prioritizing immediate expenditures over investments in sustainable, long-term outcomes. Reforming budget policies to encourage multi-year planning and flexibility could enable more impactful resource allocation. For vendors and service providers working with the public sector, it's easy to slip into a cycle of mutual dependency that stifles innovation and progress. True disruptors recognize this trap and seize the opportunity to deliver meaningful value by confronting complex public-sector challenges with bold, inventive solutions. The leaders who dominate the next era won't cling to comfort or familiarity; they'll relentlessly focus on measurable outcomes, agility, and the courage to consistently present decision-makers with thoughtfully designed solutions that clearly address unmet needs. SHIFTING THE MINDSET Policymakers and companies working on public sector projects need to redefine success—not as the completion of a contract but as the delivery of real, measurable improvements for the public. As such, public agencies must then move beyond simply 'spending budgets' and instead focus on creating lasting, scalable investments. If we want meaningful change, we must stop treating 'projects' as a short-term transaction and start treating them as a long-term opportunity to shape a more sustainable and forward-thinking governance model. The time for short-term fixes is over. It's time to put value first.
CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Grand Rapids man wanted for carjacking and kidnapping killed in shootout with Arkansas State Police
Woman accused of firing on repo man; Michigan man accused of threats to president; other top stories Woman accused of firing on repo man; Michigan man accused of threats to president; other top stories Woman accused of firing on repo man; Michigan man accused of threats to president; other top stories A Michigan man was fatally shot Wednesday during a confrontation with Arkansas State Police after a multi-state manhunt. Felipe Millan-Gomez, 33, of Grand Rapids, was wanted in connection with an armed carjacking and kidnapping Monday in Manistee County, Michigan, according to Arkansas and Michigan authorities. During that incident in the village of Okenama, he was accused of threatening a woman with a handgun and forcing her to drive. She was able to jump out of her sport utility vehicle and flagged a passerby while the suspect slid over to the driver's seat and took control of the vehicle. Several hours later, Manistee County deputies found the abandoned stolen vehicle in Benzie County, where they believe an accomplice picked up the suspect. "Law enforcement considered Millan-Gomez armed and dangerous," the Arkansas report said. At about 1:30 p.m. Wednesday, Arkansas State Police troopers, along with U.S. Marshals Service officer,s stopped Millan-Gomez on Interstate 40, near the city of Carlisle, Ark. "Millan-Gomez exited his vehicle and brandished a weapon. Troopers fired on the suspect, striking him," the report said. "Millan-Gomez died at the scene." His body was transported to the Arkansas State Crime Laboratory. ASP's Criminal Investigation Division is investigating the shooting and will submit a case file to the Lonoke County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, which will determine if the use of lethal force was consistent with Arkansas law. In the meantime, the Manistee County Sheriff's Office in Michigan says it will continue to investigate the case in hopes of identifying an accomplice. Michigan agencies involved in the case also included the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Michigan State Police, Manistee City Police and Manistee Central Dispatch.
CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' trial coverage
Update: Date: 13 min ago Title: The judge is on the bench Content: Judge Arun Subramanian is on the bench. Testimony is expected to resume around 9 a.m. ET. Update: Date: 15 min ago Title: Special agent expected to take the stand next Content: Testimony in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial is set to resume today around 9 a.m. ET. Prosecutors said they plan to call a special agent as their next witness. Judge Arun Subramanian said yesterday he needs some time to decide whether the prosecution can show jurors a text from 2015 that Sean 'Diddy' Combs' security guard sent him. The text recounts a violent incident between Combs and Gina that the security guard says would get him arrested, 'even if she begged' the police not to do it. Prosecutor Christy Slavik confirmed that Gina is identified as the third victim in the indictment tied to alleged violent acts. Slavik also said there are records putting Combs, Gina and the security guard in Atlanta at the time to corroborate the messages. Defense attorney Jason Driscoll accused the prosecution of trying to get 'two bites at the apple' because Gina isn't expected to testify. Update: Date: 31 min ago Title: What Jane said on her final day of testimony yesterday Content: 'Jane,' one of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' accusers testifying under a pseudonym, concluded her testimony yesterday after undergoing cross-examination and redirect questioning. Here's a look at what she said on her last day on the stand: 'Breaking point': Jane testified again about the physical altercation she and Combs had in 2024 over a woman she believed Combs was spending time with on a trip. 'At this point, I had just reached my breaking point in the relationship,' she said. Jane testified that after things escalated, she called the woman from Combs' phone and the two traded insults. She said Combs also FaceTimed his assistant, Jonathan, who told Jane that the other woman did not go on the trip. Confusing cycle: Jane testified that the reason she sent Combs affectionate text messages after the 2023 Turks and Caicos trip, which she had previously described as disappointing, was because of a confusing cycle in which Combs would 'shower' her with 'love and affection,' with 'sexual exploitation in between.' She said she was able to 'compartmentalize all the bad stuff' and focus on 'the good parts.' Other women: When asked why she brought up 'hotel nights' to Combs during discussions about other women in his life, Jane testified that she was trying to express, 'Why do I have to be degraded in order to be with you?' Becoming emotional, she added that she was trying to say, 'Why do I have to break all my boundaries and compromise on myself … but they can still experience you in the way I want to?' Rent threats: Jane testified that she began telling Combs she didn't want to participate in 'hotel nights' in 2021 but became more vocal about it in 2023. She said that by 2023, Combs had been paying her rent for several months and would often mention her rent in connection with 'hotel nights.' Jane added that Combs threatened to stop paying her rent 'in all different types of ways.'
