High court rescinds permit for Shell, TotalEnergies to explore for oil off west coast
However, the court said TotalEnergies should be given a chance to rectify deficiencies identified, including a failure to properly assess the potential socioeconomic impacts of oil spills or take climate change into consideration.
'TotalEnergies must be afforded the opportunity to submit new or amended assessments to cure the deficiencies identified,' judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said in her August 13 ruling.
A TotalEnergies spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The French company said last year it intended to exit the concession, Block 5/6/7 between Cape Town and Cape Agulhas, leaving the operatorship to Shell, with PetroSA holding a minority share.
The order is the latest in a series of court challenges between environmentalists and oil companies looking to explore along South Africa's coast.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South
Cole Jackson and Dr Iqbal Survé | Published 2 days ago The G20 (Group of 20) was established in 1999 in the wake of the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis as an informal platform bringing together Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors from the world's leading developed and emerging economies to address global economic and financial stability. While its early discussions centred primarily on broad macroeconomic concerns, the G20 has since broadened its scope to cover a wider range of global priorities, including trade, climate action, sustainable development, health, agriculture, energy, environmental protection, and anti-corruption efforts. BRICS was established in a similar fashion, as quoted by Cole Jackson: ' The BRICS grouping has, to a large extent, grown naturally considering the global climate during its formation and in today's context. BRICS was formed in 2009. Its formation follows the 2007/08 financial crisis, caused by a period of dramatic economic downturn in the United States (US)--due to the housing market collapse and a subprime mortgage crisis–leading to a global recession. Many countries, the world over, bore the brunt of this recession, especially those countries in the Global South already battling economic difficulties.' The G20 comprises BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia) and other countries in the Global South (Argentina & Mexico). These presidencies and officials often overlap between countries in the Global South, G20, BRICS (and its associated institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB)). This in essence, means more than a quarter of members are BRICS or Global South affiliated. However, due to the United States (US) & Canada, for example, being part of the G7 they need to collaborate and deliberate with many of these countries having BRICS/Global South agendas to fulfill. Reforming Global Governance G20: Includes both developed and emerging economies and increasingly acknowledges the need for reform in global financial institutions (like the IMF and World Bank). BRICS: Actively pushes for a multipolar world and reform of institutions to reflect the voices of emerging powers and developing nations. Global South: Wants a fairer system where their voices are heard and interests are not sidelined by traditional Western powers. Promoting Inclusive and Sustainable Development G20: Advocates for sustainable development, climate finance, and reducing inequality, especially through multilateral cooperation. BRICS: Prioritises development-led growth, infrastructure financing (e.g., through the New Development Bank), and South-South cooperation. Global South: Seeks development financing and capacity building on their terms, focusing on health, education, and infrastructure. G20: While not centered on the Global South, it increasingly includes dialogues on cooperation between developing countries. BRICS: Champions South-South cooperation as a means to share resources, technology, and strategies among developing nations. Global South: Sees South-South partnerships as more equitable alternatives to Western aid or conditional loans. Multipolarity and Economic Sovereignty G20: Includes rising powers like India, China, Brazil, and South Africa, reflecting a shift away from unipolar dominance. BRICS: Promotes a multipolar world order with diversified centers of power. Global South: Seeks to reduce dependency on the West and build regional blocs and alternative financial institutions. Climate Justice and Energy Transitions G20: Has focused on climate change mitigation and adaptation, though progress varies. BRICS: Supports climate action but emphasizes common but differentiated responsibilities. Global South: Advocates for climate finance, technology transfer, and the right to develop. The growing alignment between the G20, BRICS, and the Global South reflects a strategic shift towards a more inclusive and multipolar global order. With overlapping memberships and shared priorities—ranging from global governance reform and sustainable development to climate justice and economic sovereignty—these groupings increasingly influence one another. BRICS and the Global South have injected fresh urgency and purpose into G20 deliberations, pushing for a system that better represents emerging economies and developing nations. As this alignment deepens, it strengthens efforts to reshape international institutions, promote equitable growth, and ensure that the voices of the Global South are not only heard but also acted upon. Written By: Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Cole Jackson Lead Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Chinese & South American Specialist * MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
TimesLIVE
17 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump-Putin summit ends with no ceasefire in Ukraine war
A highly anticipated summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine, though both leaders described the talks as productive before heading home. During a brief appearance before the media after Friday's nearly three-hour meeting in Alaska, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions, with the normally loquacious Trump ignoring shouted questions from reporters. 'We've made some headway,' Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, 'Pursuing Peace'. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' he added. The talks did not initially appear to have produced meaningful steps towards a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine, the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years, a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit. But simply sitting down face-to-face with the US president represented a victory for Putin, who had been ostracised by Western leaders since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. After the summit, Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he would hold off on imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil after making progress with Putin. He did not mention India, another major buyer of Russian crude, which has been slapped with a total 50% tariff on US imports that includes a 25% penalty for the imports from Russia. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now,' Trump said of Chinese tariffs. 'I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now.'
The Herald
21 hours ago
- The Herald
Sassa flags 'unlawful' grant deductions by insurance companies
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has raised concern about the surge in 'unlawful' deductions by financial services providers, such as insurance companies and funeral schemes, targeting grant beneficiaries. The agency said it has been receiving complaints from beneficiaries who have had money deducted using Sassa's name without permission. Sassa CEO Themba Matlou said the agency does not work with financial service providers and has no authority to make deductions without the consent of the beneficiaries. 'We have respect for our beneficiaries and the act governing social assistance and we will never do anything to short change our clients,' he said. 'Your money is your money, If you qualify for a grant the money belongs to you and as Sassa we have no right, nor authority, to dictate how you use it.' He urged beneficiaries who have fallen victim to visit the Sassa local office to report the matter for investigation. 'Alternatively, clients who dispute signing a funeral policy with the financial services provider are advised to dispute the deduction by sending an SMS to 34548 with their identity number and the financial services provider's name. They should also visit the insurer or the services provider to cancel the policy.' According to the Social Assistance Act, the agency only allows one deduction per month of no more than 10% of the grant for a funeral policy issued by an insurer registered under the Long-term Insurance Act to be made directly from a social grant. Funeral deductions are not permitted from child-related grants such as the child support grant, care dependency grant or foster child grant. Temporary grants are also excluded, the agency said. 'The regulation says the beneficiary of the social grant must consent to such deduction by electronic communication or any other means of communication and has submitted such consent by electronic communication or any other means of communication to the agency.' TimesLIVE
