Croatia holds military parade as it marks 30 years since a key war victory
A flyover in Zagreb by French-made Rafale jets was a highlight of the show that included 3,400 army personnel along with police units, emergency service teams and war veterans. Navy battle ships sailed simultaneously by the Adriatic Sea port of Split.
Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic said that 'we have passed a big process of transition from eastern to western technology in order to be compatible with the capabilities of those armies who are our partners and allies.'
Croatia joined the EU in 2013, four years after becoming a member of NATO.
Back in August 1995, Croatia recaptured lands that had been held by minority Serbs since their rebellion in 1991 against the country's independence from the former Communist-run Yugoslavia. The Operation Storm offensive presented a turning point in the war and also triggered a mass exodus of ethnic Serbs from Croatia.
Tensions persist in relations with Balkan rival Serbia, which backed the ethnic Serb rebellion in the 1990s'. Serbia plans to hold a commemoration ceremony for the Serb victims of the offensive, and Belgrade has cautioned Serbian citizens against traveling to Croatia in early August.
A military parade in Belgrade is planned for September.
Political analyst Zarko Puhovski said he believed the military parade was designed both to garner popular support for further defense spending amid security concerns in Europe fueled by Russia 's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and as a message of strength in the region.
'It's just putting on a show, to put military equipment on display," Puhovski told The Associated Press. "This will be presented as Croatia's effort to join the overall trend of increased militarization in Europe.'
Croatia is among eighteen EU countries that have applied for billions of euros from the bloc's program of cheap loans aimed at helping Europe provide for its own security. Plenkovic has said that Croatia could seek 1.8 billion euros ($2 billion) from the fund.
The 150-billion-euro ($173 billion) Security Action for Europe (SAFE) program was launched after the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump signalled that Europe is no longer a U.S. security priority.
Some U.S. allies in Europe worry that President Vladimir Putin could target one of them if Russia wins its war on Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Is Putin calling Trump's bluff on Ukraine?
US special envoy Steve Witkoff was back in Moscow today to meet with Vladimir Putin, ahead of Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to make peace with Ukraine. This was Witkoff's fifth meeting with Putin this year. Similar to his previous audiences with the Russian president, today's one-on-one lasted for three hours. While broadly we know that the two will have been meeting to discuss the Ukraine war, the details or results of the meeting so far remain unknown: according to Russian presidential aides, the Kremlin will hold off from issuing public comments on what transpired until Witkoff has had a chance to brief Trump. True to its word, the Kremlin has, so far, given little away. Foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, who was in the room, called it 'a very useful and constructive conversation'. And yet, before the US special envoy has even had the chance to touch down on home soil, the first signs of how constructive the discussions really were may already be emerging. As part of Trump's ultimatum to Putin, the US president had suggested that should the Kremlin fail to halt its invasion of Ukraine by Friday he would consider imposing further sanctions on Russia, including so-called 'secondary sanctions' on countries still buying Russian oil. Now, mere hours after Putin and Wiktoff's meeting ended, Trump has signed an executive order slapping India – the world's second-largest buyer of Russian oil after China – with additional 25 per cent tariffs for 'directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil'. The new duties will kick in 21 days from now. The President's increasing frustration and anger with Russia's attacks on Ukraine has been notable in the last month or so, with Trump most recently calling the Kremlin's missile attacks 'disgusting'. And yet there are few signs that Putin is ready to end his 'special military operation'. Anonymous sources from within the Kremlin have suggested that, with Russian troops slowly advancing across Russian territory, Putin doesn't currently feel the need, or desire, to bend to Trump's demands to stop – despite his army's heavy troop losses. The Russian army currently controls approximately a fifth of Ukrainian territory. Putin has staked his political life – and, given Moscow's descent into mafiocracy under his rule, potentially his actual life – on winning this war. He reportedly thinks that, were the conflict to stop now, it would be a difficult sell to the Russian public, and more importantly to the nationalist military hawks in his inner circle. As such, it is unlikely that Putin will move from his maximalist conditions for ending the war any time soon. We have heard the Russian president repeat these plenty of times over the past three and a half years: among them are a promise for Nato not to expand eastwards into Ukraine and the recognition of the four illegally annexed regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson as Russian. Kremlin sources have suggested that only once Russian forces have captured those four regions in their entirety will Putin be willing to seriously engage in peace negotiations. Nevertheless, the Kremlin recognises that it has an unpredictable sparring partner in Trump. Putin has reportedly considered proposing an aerial ceasefire in Ukraine as a means of throwing the US President a bone. A pause in aerial bombardments would undoubtedly be welcomed in Ukraine, which came under a record number of drone and missile attacks from Russia last month: more than 6,000 drones were directed at Ukrainian territory by Russian troops, an increase of 16 per cent on June. Any such proposal by Putin should, however, be taken with a pinch of salt – not least because Russia has agreed to several ceasefires, including a three-day pause in May, which it subsequently went on to break. The question now is whether Trump has the stomach to make good on his threats to sanction Russia and those still buying its oil. Will he reignite his tariff war with China by slapping it with the same Russian oil-related sanctions he has inflicted on India? The fact it was Trump who blinked first in the trade dispute that flared up between the US and China earlier this year doesn't instill a huge amount of confidence that the American president will hold his nerve – not least when this time there is the accompanying risk of a global spike in oil prices as a result. Trump is expected to call his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky imminently to discuss Witkoff and Putin's meeting. The ball is now firmly in the US President's court: will he follow through with his ultimatum to crush Russia's war machine or will he allow Putin to call his bluff?
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Putin defies US threats in 'cruel' Ukraine bombing hours before 'peace' talks
Russian President defies US sanctions threats by bombing Ukraine just hours before a crucial face-to-face with US President Donald Trump's 'special envoy' in latest sign of contempt Kremlin forces dropped aerial bombs on Ukraine hours before key talks in Moscow with US President Donald Trump 's peace envoy. The bombs on a recreational base in Ukraine 's Zaporizhzhia region, killed at least two people and injured 12 others, including two children. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said: 'My condolences to the families and loved ones. There was zero military sense in this strike. Just cruelty – to intimidate.' Russian President Vladimir Putin held talks with US President Donald Trump's representative Steve Witkoff in Moscow, the Kremlin confirmed. It was days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. It comes after NATO scrambled warplanes as Russia shoots down West's F-16 fighter jet in Ukraine onslaught. The meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff lasted about three hours. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said the Russian president and Mr Witkoff had a "useful and constructive conversation" that focused on the Ukrainian crisis. The talks came after Putin recently warned of nuclear war after unleashing several nights of hell on Ukraine In a hint towards improving relations between Washington and Moscow he added that there were "prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation between the US and Russia". Earlier, Mr Witkoff took an early morning walk through Zaryadye Park, a stone's throw from the Kremlin, with Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's envoy for investment and economic co-operation. Mr Dmitriev said later that "dialogue will prevail". The envoy played a key role in three rounds of direct talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul in recent months. The negotiations made no progress on ending the three-year war following Russia's invasion of its neighbour. US President Donald Trump's deadline for Mr Putin ends on Friday. Washington has threatened "severe tariffs" and other economic penalties if the killing does not stop. Mr Trump claims he is increasingly angry with Mr Putin over Russia's escalating strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine, intended to erode morale and public appetite for the war. The intensified attacks have occurred even as Mr Trump has urged the Russian leader in recent months to relent. Russian forces launched at least four strikes on the Zaporozhzhia area and initially attacked with powerful glide bombs. Russia also struck the Ukrainian power grid and heating gas facilities as Ukraine makes preparations for winter. Western analysts and Ukrainian officials say Mr Putin is stalling for time and avoiding serious negotiations while Russian forces push to capture more Ukraine land. A Russian offensive that started in the spring and is expected to continue through the autumn is advancing faster than last year's push but is making only slow and costly gains and has been unable to take any major cities. The situation on the front line is critical for Ukrainian forces but defences are not about to collapse, analysts say. On Tuesday, Mr Trump said "we'll see what happens" regarding his threat to slap tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, which could increase import taxes dramatically on China and India. "We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow," the US president said. "We're going to see what happens. We'll make that determination at that time." Mr Putin has strengthened Russia's military ties with China, North Korea and Iran. Nato, meanwhile, said on Tuesday it has started co-ordinating regular deliveries of large Western weapons packages to Ukraine. European allies and Canada are buying most of the equipment they plan to transport from the United States. The Trump administration is not donating any arms to Ukraine. Mr Putin has given no hint that he might be ready to make concessions. Instead, the Russian leader and senior Kremlin officials have talked up the country's military strength. Mr Putin announced last week that Russia's new hypersonic missile, which he says cannot be intercepted by current Nato air defence systems, has entered service. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has warned that the Ukraine war could bring Russia and the US into armed conflict. Mr Trump responded to that by ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Monday welcomed Mr Witkoff's visit.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
World awaits Trump's next move as Russia ceasefire deadline approaches
After needing six months to conclude that Vladimir Putin may not be a kindred transactional authoritarian leader, but an ideological nationalist seeking the return of what 'belongs to Russia', the deadline Donald Trump set for the Russian president to agree a Ukraine ceasefire or face US sanctions on oil exports arrives on Friday. What Trump – who some had claimed was a Russian asset – does next to punish Putin could define his presidency. It is a remarkable turnaround, and one that seasoned Trump watchers such as Michael McFaul, the former US ambassador to Russia, admitted they had never expected. Only months ago, the debate was exclusively about what further inducements and sanction relief Trump would offer Putin to end the fighting. The Trump administration has not executed a new rollout of Russia sanctions in six months, a drop to zero from a minimum of 16 sets of actions in every prior six-month period, a report by top Democrats submitted to the Senate banking committee found this week. Instead Trump first set Putin a 50-day deadline then cut weeks off it. 'Secondary sanctions and tariffs against China, India, and Brazil, which buy Russian oil, are the obvious next step in an attempt to stop the conflict,' the US ambassador to Nato, Matthew Whitaker, predicted on Tuesday. Yet as the deadline approaches, there is a lingering scepticism about how far Trump will go. He has dispatched his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to Moscow for the fifth time for last-minute talks, and on Friday Trump admitted he did not think sanctions would have much impact since Russians are 'wily characters and they're pretty good at avoiding sanctions'. He has also given himself maximum room for political manoeuvre by ensuring the US Senate did not pass legislation before its summer recess that would have empowered him to slap bone-crushing 500% tariffs on exports from countries that import Russian oil, principally India, China, Brazil and Turkey. Trump had argued that the congressional legislation was unnecessary since he can act through executive orders, mentioning instead 100% tariffs on economies that import Russian oil – a whopping number, even if lower than the 500% floated by the Republican senator Lindsey Graham. It is striking that in the run-up to Witkoff's talks in Moscow that Trump, normally keen to tout his leverage before a negotiation, has given only sketchy detail of the punishments the importers of Russian energy may face, either in terms of US sanctions on foreign refineries importing Russian oil or US tariffs on countries importing Russian oil. Some of his warnings this week to the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, saying he would raise tariffs on India because its government did not care 'how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine' do not yet seem to fit into a wider strategy. The tensions appears as much about Trump's previous complaints with India's trade practices as its purchases of cheap Russian oil. Rachel Ziemba, an adjunct senior fellow at the Centre for a New American Century, pointed out that if India was to receive a penalty, but China – the largest buyer of most Russian crude – did not, the Russian oil trade may just go further underground. Some of Trump's advisers, notably the Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, last week warned China of tariff hikes related to Russia energy purchases, but it is hard to see such threats as credible given Trump's eagerness for a trade deal with China this month and the risks associated with a sudden stop to trade between China and the US. In 2024 China accounted for 32% of Russian petroleum and oil exports. McFaul told Foreign Policy magazine about a possible boomerang effect if generalised increases in tariffs turn into a full trade war. Trump has wavered about the impact of economic pressure on Putin's thinking. Many academics claim that sanctions on oil, rather than inducing changes in state behaviour, instead change markets and reshape economic relationships. Three years of sanctions on Russia have so far been – at best – a slow burn. Russia chalked up economic growth of 4% in 2023 and 2024, kept unemployment to an astonishing 2%, and even reduced social inequality by sustaining real wage growth that has disproportionately benefited Russians at the lower end of the economic ladder, a recent report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based thinktank, found. The authors predicted that Russia's economy can withstand the current level of sanctions for at least three more years. But it also pointed to developing vulnerabilities. Interest rates are at 18%, inflation stubbornly high, and growth is stalling. Russia has had to rework its 2025 budget as oil revenues slipped, largely because of a worldwide fall in prices and the discounts importers such as India could demand. As a result, government revenues from Russian oil and gas in May-June were 35% lower than the same period in 2024, the Kyiv School of Economics pointed out in its July review. Russian oil export revenue is projected to drop 16% from $189bn (£142bn) in 2024 to $163bn in 2025 and $151bn in 2026. The federal budget deficit reached 3.7tn rubles ($40.4bn) in the first half of 2025 – 97% of the full-year target of 3.8tn rubles. This is more than five times larger than the deficit in the first half of 2024 and 57% higher than the largest first six-month deficit in recent years (2023). Oil prices are unlikely to recover significantly, meaning Russia will miss its budget target by a wide margin, increasing reliance on its national welfare fund (NWF) and domestic debt issuance. But the NWF's liquid assets are also under pressure, with Russia expected to draw heavily on these reserves by year-end. In a report this week Oxford Economics even predicted that Russia 'may tip into recession'. The overall reason is simple: the level of military spending, including the cost of voluntary recruitment is distorting the economy. The economist Janis Kluge, who conducts research on Russia at the Berlin thinktank SWP, reckons overall Russian military spending is 8 to 10% of GDP once all expenditure including regional recruitment is included. The pressure could now grow. The most recent EU sanctions package included a ban from next January on purchasing oil products made from Russian crude. The package for the first time put sanctions on a major Indian refinery, Nayara Energy, leading Microsoft this week to suspend software services. Other refineries could be placed under sanction – with the UK likely following suit – but the question then arises as to how the supply gap created by the loss of Russian oil can be filled. Moreover, if Trump is joining sanctions, the US and Europe will have to come to a joint view about the continuing value of the elaborate oil price cap, a Biden-era device designed to squeeze Russian oil profits while keeping the global price of oil low. The cap – introduced G7-wide in December 2022 – operates by withdrawing insurance from any shipping company that has not obtained a certificate that it is selling Russian oil below a $60 per barrel price cap, but a multitude of widely acknowledged problems have arisen. In recent months, as the price of oil fell, the $60 cap was self-evidently set too high. The cap also led to the birth of a shadow fleet of oil tankers operating without formal insurance that are now themselves being sanctioned by the EU, the US and the UK. Still worse, the UK and the EU have agreed to lower the price cap from 2 September to $47.60 a barrel, but Trump is keeping the US cap at $60 a barrel, a recipe for circumvention. The one requirement McFaul said, is that Trump must not back off. 'Making threats and not carrying through with them is one of the biggest mistakes you can make in diplomacy.' He recalled that George Shultz, the great Reagan-era US secretary of state used to say 'never point a gun at anyone unless you are prepared to shoot'.
