logo
Tory Party's handling of Shrewsbury bypass criticised by Labour

Tory Party's handling of Shrewsbury bypass criticised by Labour

BBC News11-03-2025

The handling of Shrewsbury's controversial North West Relief Road (NWRR) by the council's ruling Conservative group has been "scandalous", the opposition Labour party says.The project, estimated to cost £215m, has not been formally discussed by full council.Liberal Democrat, Labour and Green groups have said they want the four-mile (6.4km) bypass scrapped due to cost and because it would not solve traffic problems.Councillor Rosemary Dartnall, Labour group leader, said the project had been "mired in opaque and substandard governance" for years.
Although it could be cancelled by the authority or the government, whoever decided that would become liable for £39m already spent.Council leader Lezley Picton, who announced last week she would not be seeking re-election, wrote an open letter to Future of Roads Minister Lilian Greenwood on Friday asking the government to reaffirm its support for the road, which is yet to receive planning permission."The NWRR is a shovel-ready project... that offers significant benefits for economic growth and new housing delivery, reductions in congestion and air pollution, improvements to public transport and the delivery of our sustainable travel strategy," she wrote.
With the council in a pre-election period ahead of polls in May, Picton said she regretted not seeing the matter come before the council but hoped the minister and Shropshire Council's next leader, would "endeavour to deliver this scheme in full."But Dartnall said she was shocked at the letter and added the Labour group believed public spending should be "justified openly and transparently"."We find the Conservatives' approach scandalous, particularly so considering the enormous sums of tax-payers money involved," she said.She described the bypass as of "dubious benefit" and said a Labour-run council would cancel the NWRR application for funding and ask the government to help cover the lost costs.Councillor Roger Evans, co-leader of the Liberal Democrats, said Picton acted against local democracy by "requesting something of the minister that elected members have been unable to scrutinise, discuss or decide".
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer warned against creating 'two tier' benefit system after U-turn
Keir Starmer warned against creating 'two tier' benefit system after U-turn

Daily Mirror

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Keir Starmer warned against creating 'two tier' benefit system after U-turn

Keir Starmer said the Government's welfare reforms 'strike the right balance' after he made major concessions to Labour rebels to avoid a potential Commons defeat Keir Starmer is battling to push through watered down cuts to disability benefits as he faced warnings it would create a "two tier" system. In a dramatic climbdown, the Prime Minister offered a series of concessions to Labour rebels opposed to moves that would see hundreds of thousands of disabled people lose lifeline benefits. ‌ But campaigners said it risked "betraying the next generation of disabled people" - and some Labour MPs remain opposed ahead of a Commons vote next week. ‌ After fraught negotiations on Thursday, the Government agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Plans to tighten eligibility will now only apply to new claimants from November 2026, in a reprieve to around 370,000 people who were due to lose around £4,150-a-year. And existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The original plans to reform the welfare system were designed to save around £5billion from the benefits bill by 2030. But economists said the changes will cost around £3billion, on top of around £1.5billion for the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance, leaving Chancellor Rachel Reeves to make up the shortfall. No10 failed to rule out such raising taxes to foot the bill, saying 'tax decisions are set out at fiscal events'. ‌ Today, Mr Starmer said the reforms now "strike the right balance". "It's very important that we reform the welfare system, because it doesn't work and it traps people, and therefore we're going to press ahead with the reforms," he said. "We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward." Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government had listened to concerns. ‌ She told broadcasters: "I think we're in a good place now, alongside the huge investments we are putting in to create the jobs that people need in every part of the country, to get waiting lists down in the NHS, to ensure stronger rights at work, but also to make sure there's employment support for those who can work and protections for those who can't." She insisted it was "very common in the welfare system that there are protections for existing claimants". Leading rebel Meg Hillier said she would now support the bill and is expected to drop her amendment, which had been signed by 126 Labour MPs. ‌ Ms Hillier, who chairs the Commons Treasury Committee, said it was "a good deal" involving "massive changes" to protect vulnerable people - and said disabled people would be involved in designing future reforms. She said: "It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed." But Labour MP Nadia Whittome said "Even these revised proposals are nowhere near good enough and frankly are just not well thought through. It would create a two-tier system in both PIP and the UC system when somebody became disabled.' ‌ Andy McDonald, the Labour MP for Middlesbrough, said: "I'll be voting against it because it hasn't dealt with the totality of the is bringing about the change, it's just poverty delayed, or poverty postponed for millions of people in the future." Charles Gillies, Senior Policy Officer at the MS Society and Policy Co-Chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: 'These supposed 'concessions' to the cuts bill are just a desperate attempt to rush through a disastrous piece of legislation. By pushing the cuts onto future claimants, the government are betraying the next generation of disabled people." He urged MPs to "stop this impending disaster" when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill comes to the Commons on Tuesday. ‌ Mikey Erhardt, Policy Lead, Disability Rights UK said: 'We completely reject the imposition of the two-tier system on offer. It is not a massive concession to have a benefit system where future generations of Disabled people receive less support than Disabled people today." He added: "By attempting to push through cruel cuts to the benefits of Disabled people, the Government prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of Disabled citizens... the Government needs to stop playing politics with our lives." ‌ James Taylor, director of strategy at disability equality charity Scope, said: "It is encouraging that the government is starting to listen to disabled people and MPs who have been campaigning for change for months. "But these plans will still rip billions from the welfare system. The proposed concessions will create a two-tier benefits system and an unequal future for disabled people. "Life costs more if you are disabled. And these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work. "We urge the government to properly engage with disabled people and MPs on how best to reform welfare and create an equal future."

BBC will broadcast Kneecap at Glastonbury despite calls for ban
BBC will broadcast Kneecap at Glastonbury despite calls for ban

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

BBC will broadcast Kneecap at Glastonbury despite calls for ban

The BBC has refused to deplatform controversial rap group Kneecap ahead of the trio's Glastonbury set. Amid mounting political pressure to not air the group's performance on Saturday, the BBC insisted that it did not 'ban artists' but would make sure that the broadcast 'meets our editorial guidelines'. The Telegraph understands that one option under consideration will be to broadcast Kneecap's gig on iPlayer after the live performance, as the BBC has done in the past. This allows the broadcaster to scrutinise the set for any language or imagery that might breach BBC guidelines. But the Conservatives said that allowing Kneecap's set to be broadcast either live or on iPayer would be 'simply not acceptable'. It comes after a member of the trio was charged with a terror offence for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, at a gig in November 2024. Liam O'Hanna, 27, appeared in court earlier this month and was released on unconditional bail until his next court appearance on August 20. The group's involvement at Worthy Farm has provoked a backlash from both sides of the political spectrum after footage emerged from Kneecap's previous concerts showing members shouting 'kill your local MP' and 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'. Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, urged the festival to kick the trio off its schedule, while Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, said the BBC should not broadcast footage of their show. Stuart Andrew, the Tory shadow culture secretary, said: 'It is deeply troubling that the BBC, a publicly funded institution with a responsibility to uphold ethical broadcasting standards, would choose to platform a band that has a leading member facing a terror charge. 'Giving Kneecap visibility, whether live or on iPlayer, is simply not acceptable, and directly betrays the BBC's mandate. They must urgently think again.' In a statement ahead of Kneecap's set, the BBC said: 'As the broadcast partner, the BBC will be bringing audiences extensive music coverage from Glastonbury, with artists booked by the festival organisers. 'Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists, our plans will ensure that our programming will meet our editorial guidelines. Decisions about our output will be made in the lead up to the festival.' BBC Radio 2 DJ Jo Whiley described the rap group as 'very passionate about their music' ahead of their performance on Saturday. Speaking on the Today Programme, she urged people to watch their set and 'make up their own minds'. 'So if the performance goes out [on the BBC] – and I'm not sure exactly what is happening at the moment but I believe it is – then people should watch and make up their own minds,' she said. 'It's satirical, it's a f—ing joke' Meanwhile, O'Hanna – who appears under the stage name Mo Chara – defended waving the Hezbollah flag, which had been passed to him by a fan, on stage. In a new interview with The Guardian ahead of the gig, he said: 'S–t is thrown on stage all the time.' He told the newspaper: 'If I'm supposed to know every f—ing thing that's thrown on stage... I don't know every proscribed organisation – I've got enough s–t to worry about up there.' Addressing the comments about targeting Tory MPs elsewhere, he said: 'Why should I regret it? It was a joke – we're playing characters, it's satirical, it's a f—ing joke.' O'Hanna added of the critiques against the band: 'If you believe that what a satirical band who play characters on stage do is more outrageous than the murdering of innocent Palestinians, then you need to give your head a f—ing wobble.' He also said it was not Kneecap's 'job to tell people what's a joke and what's not', insisting that they will continue to have 'political messaging in our songs'. 'It's not for us to dissect it for other people,' he concluded. 'Take what you want from it, but we're not going to change in that way.' A BBC insider recently told The i newspaper that the corporation is 'likely' to show Kneecap's performance 'in some form', explaining that the broadcaster cannot be seen 'to bow to political pressure'. Elsewhere at the festival, Bono's son Elijah Hewson dedicated a performance with his band Inhaler to 'the people of Palestine'. During a show on the Other Stage, the frontman said: 'I'd like to dedicate this next song to the people of Palestine, to any innocent people being starved or bombed, or genocide for the sake of some lunatics. 'I feel like we have to say that because our greatest strength is freedom of expression, and there's no better place for it than right here at Glastonbury. So, be kind to each other, and have a great time.' Glastonbury's founder, meanwhile, has told people to 'go somewhere else' if they do not like the politics of the event. Sir Michael Eavis insisted his festival 'stands for something' amid the mounting controversy. Elsewhere at the Worthy Farm event, a Palestine Action activist is set to appear as a speaker. Francesca Nadin, who contributes to the Revolutionary Communist Party website, is part of the group that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has recently said she will proscribe under anti-terror law following a break-in at the RAF base at Brize Norton. It was also revealed on Friday that Reform's Richard Tice had turned down an invitation to debate at Glastonbury after his team concluded that 'it would not be safe' for him to attend, he said. The party's deputy leader was invited to debate Zack Polanski, deputy leader of the Green Party.

Inheritance tax poses difficult decisions for Northern Ireland farmers
Inheritance tax poses difficult decisions for Northern Ireland farmers

ITV News

time32 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Inheritance tax poses difficult decisions for Northern Ireland farmers

Getting your head around numbers can sometimes be a difficult task. Even more so when it comes to exactly what Northern Ireland's farming community has had to do though, in just a few the end of 2024, the Labour government said it was going to remove relief on inheritance tax for farmers. From April 2026, agricultural assets which total over £1m will be taxed at a rate of 20%.That includes animals, buildings and land - with change now looming for many farms in Northern have been exempt from Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief for many years but that could now be was a decision not welcomed by many farmers then, and even now, including dairy farmer Keith runs a large operation just outside of Newry, Co Down.'The simple fact is that the sector isn't profitable enough whenever you count the valuation of property, to be able to sustain this for one generation, never mind two.'Keith spoke to UTV at Markethill Livestock Sales in Co Armagh. Dairy and beef cattle were being sold on the day of filming and interest was still strong, but under it all, lay concern for what the future Hewitt is the man behind the microphone and the man who coordinates the sales. 'They (the government) have brought these proposals in, genuinely without thinking about it and not realising the knock-on effect,' he added that he was worried about the 'long-term' effects on farmers and other way farms can be exempt from the new proposals is if the family farm is gifted, but the donor must live on it for seven years Kinnear was forced into adapting, not by his own father John died in 2017, leaving the family farm in Derrynoose to his mother Shirley before she passed it on to Timothy.'Something so simple can absolutely obliterate farming,' he told UTV.'If they (the government) don't watch themselves, they will do away with Irish produce.'If inheritance tax hit me today, I would have to sell a third of the place and if I was to sell a third of the place there wouldn't be enough income to support me or if I was to have a future family.'The Ulster Farmers' Union is urging the government to take on the concerns of farmers in Northern Ireland.'It is gut-wrenching and really does pull on the heartstrings, some of the things which farmers are actually considering,' said James McCluggage from the union.'We need to see some sort of morality clause in there for the elderly, for the disabled, for those who are incapacitated, that [sic] can't make a decision or cannot get plans in place at the moment.'The government says the changes won't affect every farmer and that they are necessary to better fund public a statement, a spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: 'Our commitment to farming and food security is steadfast, which is why we've allocated a record £11.8billion to sustainable farming and food production over this parliament. 'We are also slashing costs and red tape for food producers to export to the EU, have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to recommend reforms to boost farmers' profits, and we're ensuring farmers get a bigger share of food contracts across our schools, hospitals, and prisons.'For now, the industry looks determined to continue speaking up as farmers prepare to count the cost of change, whatever it may be. On Friday UTV were joined by Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir to address the central issues within the farming community.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store