Review: IMOU Doorbell 2S Kit boasts smart tracking and a chime
Video doorbells are all the rage these days and now home security specialist IMOU has again entered the fray with the launch of its Doorbell 2S Kit. It includes everything you'd expect but with a couple of features that make it stick out from the crowd.
The kit comes with two devices. First off is a video doorbell with a rotating lens that allows for a 180° field of view. It can cover the entire front of a house while tracking movements closely. The 4:3 aspect ratio is suitable for the corridor in front of the door, capturing head-to-toe images of people and objects.
I found the images to be very decent, but what really impressed me was the infrared night vision mode. This worked brilliantly and was as good as - if not even better - than some of its more expensive rivals.
The doorbell will only show and notify up about important and necessary clips thanks to some clever tech – reducing unwanted notifications and false alarms. It boasts a 0.3 seconds detection time to catch any movements when the doorbell detects someone approaching the door means that users will be informed quickly of any activity. The doorbell also has a loitering detection feature that notifies when people are staying in front of the door after a preset duration.
The second part of the kit is an indoor chime. Yes, you get a chime included. So many times this is, rather frustratingly, an added extra that you have to fork out for. The IMOU chime connects to the doorbell via 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, and also acts as a Wi-Fi extender as well as offering indoor storage of the SD card, which helps to protect the recording. There are ten different chime ringtones to choose from for event alarms and snooze schedules.
The camera offers the usual two-way talk call functionality you'd expect, but there are a few extra goodies I wasn't expecting. You can record a voice that can be used to scare away an intruder or welcome people with a personalised touch.
You can connect the doorbell to the IMOU app, which allows you to control the device and meddle with the settings. Local storage is free, but a very reasonable subscription of £3.49 a month will give you an automatic cloud back-up.
There is no solar panel but the 5,000mAh rechargeable battery can be recharged by USB-C and, when fully charged, lasts up to 120 days under normal conditions. The doorbell can be used standalone with the rechargeable battery or it can be hardwired for continuous power using the hardwired kit that is included in the box as standard.
For the price, you can't really go wrong. You get a lot for the money, and the inclusjon of the chime gives it an edge in my opinion.
What users say
"Works great so far. Robust device, charges quickly, battery lasts a good while. Chime is loud. Pan tilt is good, but field of vision is already excellent."
"In summary, a great doorbell, but not always easy to hear in all parts of the house, can't purchase an additional chime, and can't work with Google or Alexa. These are big drawbacks to an otherwise outstanding camera."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Does anyone really want AI civil servants?
Of course they've called it 'Humphrey'. The cutesy name that has been given to the AI tool the government is rolling out across the civil service with unseemly haste is a nod – as those of an age will recognise – to the immortal sitcom Yes, Minister. But it may also prove to be more appropriate than they think. The premise of that show, you'll recall, is that Sir Humphrey is the person really in charge – and that he will at every turn imperceptibly thwart and subvert the instructions given to him by the elected minister. Why is Sir Keir Starmer so absolutely hellbent on turning us into, in his wince-makingly gauche phrase, 'an AI superpower'? At least in the show, we're encouraged to believe that Sir Humphrey undermines Jim Hacker because he's cleverer and has the best interests of the nation at heart. But an AI Humphrey has no such redeeming qualities: if it undermines the elected minister, it'll be for no reason other than an algorithmic sport. Item one: generative AI hallucinates. It makes stuff up. Nobody knows exactly why, and nobody knows how to stop it doing so. Some experts in the field say that there's a good chance that the problem will get worse rather than better over time: after all, as an ever-greater proportion of the zillions of words of text on the internet comes to be AI-generated, and AI models are therefore training on the outputs of AI models, those hallucinations are going to be baked in. Garbage in, garbage out, as programmers like to say. So though ChatGPT and its cousins are a fantastic boon to people who don't want to do their work – be they lazy undergraduates, lawyers who can't be bothered to comb through case law and write their own briefs, or government ministers who imagine the savings to be made if bureaucratic emails were to start writing themselves – they come with significant risks. It's not just those notorious Google searches that encourage you to put glue on pizza. Already, we're seeing cases coming to court where lawyers have used AI to draft their arguments, and it has emerged that the LLM has invented its legal citations out of whole cloth. Academic work is being turned out with footnotes leading to works that don't exist, and imaginary bibliographies. More than one US newspaper published a syndicated 'summer reading' special in which several of the books it recommended didn't exist. Is this going to be a problem when it comes to the machinery of Whitehall? I would say so, wouldn't you? The Post Office Horizon scandal – which had at its root a lot of credulous officials believing everything that a malfunctioning computer told them – ruined lives and cost the taxpayer a small fortune in compensation and in the inquiries that had to sort out the whole mess. Embedding a large language model at the heart of government is a recipe for any number of repeat performances. It seems perfectly reasonable to suppose that the legal risk will outweigh any vaunted efficiency savings – to say nothing of the potential for human suffering if the LLM goes wonky in the tax and benefits systems. The promise to 'have meaningful human control at the right stages' sounds like an excellent principle – but it's not clear how it can be more than an aspiration. You won't know when you've got it wrong until it bites you in the bum. And people, remember, are lazy. What's the betting that they won't always bother to check the computer's homework when the homework sounds plausible enough, and it's getting towards time for a pint in the Red Lion? Item two: there is a moral case as well as a practical one against Humphrey. Not only does generative AI have serious environmental costs, but it's a plagiarism machine. ChatGPT, which is one of the models on which Humphrey has been built, is known to have scraped text to train its models from piracy websites. This is still a live legal issue. And as Ed Newton-Rex of the campaign group Fairly Trained has put it: 'The government can't effectively regulate these companies if it is simultaneously baking them into its inner workings as rapidly as possible.' Why is Sir Keir Starmer so absolutely hellbent on turning us into, in his wince-makingly gauche phrase, 'an AI superpower'; so keen to jump the gun that he hadn't even allowed the public consultation on AI and copyright to conclude before he pushed the government's recommendations – which were, basically, to let copyright holders be damned. He seems to have been seduced by the blandishments of the salespeople for this technology, whose main sales tool is FOMO. AI is a solution in search of a problem. Big tech has invested so much in it that they're trying to brute-force it into every area of life, and they are succeeding. Of course, one can see how – for instance – using AI to minute meetings or draft memos can save costly man-hours. But the way to integrate it into the machinery of Whitehall is, or should be, with extreme caution and on a case-by-case basis, not with the panicky haste of someone who's been persuaded by a lobbyist that if you don't go all-in on this exciting new technology as fast as possible you're going to be left behind. It seems something of a tell, for instance, that Principle 8 in the government's own AI Playbook is: 'You work with commercial colleagues from the start.' As Sir Humphrey would say: 'No, Prime Minister.'
Geeky Gadgets
a day ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Is Apple Delaying Smarter Siri Yet Again?
Apple has once again postponed the release of updates aimed at making Siri a more advanced and capable virtual assistant. This decision, announced without a clear timeline for rollout, has sparked questions about Apple's ability to remain competitive in the rapidly evolving virtual assistant market. As rivals like Amazon and Google continue to push the boundaries of artificial intelligence (AI), the delay raises concerns about Siri's future and Apple's position in the broader AI landscape. The video below from SaranByte gives us more information. The delay is particularly significant given the increasing reliance on virtual assistants to simplify daily tasks and enhance user experiences. With Siri's updates on hold, Apple risks falling behind competitors who are already delivering more sophisticated and user-friendly solutions. Watch this video on YouTube. What the Delay Means for Siri's Evolution The postponed updates were expected to introduce substantial advancements to Siri's AI capabilities, promising to make the assistant more intuitive, responsive, and versatile. These updates were anticipated to include: Enhanced voice recognition for improved accuracy in understanding user commands. for improved accuracy in understanding user commands. Better contextual understanding to enable more natural and fluid interactions. to enable more natural and fluid interactions. Seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem, enhancing compatibility across devices and services. By delaying these updates, Apple has left users waiting for improvements that could significantly enhance their experience with Siri. For now, Siri remains largely unchanged, which may frustrate users who expect their virtual assistant to evolve alongside their needs. This stagnation could also impact Apple's ability to retain users who might seek more advanced alternatives. Rising Competition in the Virtual Assistant Market The delay comes at a critical time when competition in the virtual assistant market is intensifying. Rivals such as Amazon's Alexa and Google Assistant are consistently raising the bar with innovative features, including: Multi-turn conversations that mimic natural, human-like dialogue. that mimic natural, human-like dialogue. Proactive suggestions based on user behavior and preferences. based on user behavior and preferences. Extensive third-party integrations that expand functionality and usability. These advancements have positioned Alexa and Google Assistant as leaders in the market, offering users a more dynamic and personalized experience. By postponing Siri's updates, Apple risks losing ground to these competitors, who are already delivering innovative solutions. This delay could make it increasingly difficult for Siri to remain a compelling choice for users seeking advanced AI-powered assistance. Why Smarter Siri Features Are Crucial For many users, the value of a virtual assistant lies in its ability to simplify tasks, provide accurate information, and integrate seamlessly with other devices. Smarter Siri features, such as improved natural language processing and advanced voice recognition, could significantly enhance its utility. These updates would: Enable Siri to handle more complex and nuanced queries effectively. to handle more complex and nuanced queries effectively. Deliver personalized responses tailored to individual user preferences and contexts. tailored to individual user preferences and contexts. Streamline interactions across Apple's ecosystem, from iPhones to smart home devices. Without these advancements, Siri risks falling short of user expectations, especially as competitors continue to innovate. Users increasingly demand virtual assistants that can anticipate their needs, adapt to their preferences, and provide seamless integration across devices. Apple's delay in delivering these features could erode user confidence in Siri's ability to meet these demands. What This Means for Apple's AI Strategy The delay in smarter Siri updates also raises broader questions about Apple's approach to artificial intelligence. While Apple has made strides in areas like privacy-focused machine learning, its progress in virtual assistant technology appears slower compared to its competitors. Several factors may be contributing to this lag, including: Apple's commitment to user privacy, which limits the data available for training AI systems. which limits the data available for training AI systems. Technical challenges in developing more advanced and capable virtual assistants. in developing more advanced and capable virtual assistants. Resource allocation, as Apple prioritizes other AI-driven projects over Siri's development. These challenges highlight the complexities of balancing innovation with Apple's core values, such as privacy and security. However, the slower pace of Siri's evolution could jeopardize Apple's competitive edge in the AI-driven virtual assistant market. To remain relevant, Apple must address these challenges and accelerate its efforts to enhance Siri's capabilities. What's Next for Siri and Apple? Apple has yet to provide a clear timeline for the release of the smarter Siri updates, leaving users uncertain about when they can expect meaningful improvements. In the meantime, competitors like Amazon and Google are likely to capitalize on this delay by further advancing their own virtual assistants and attracting users with more innovative features. For Apple, the delay underscores the urgency of staying competitive in the virtual assistant market. To maintain its position as a leader in technology, the company will need to overcome the obstacles slowing Siri's development and deliver updates that meet user expectations. This will require a strategic focus on innovation, user experience, and seamless integration across Apple's ecosystem. As the virtual assistant landscape continues to evolve, Apple's ability to adapt and innovate will determine Siri's future relevance and its role in shaping the next generation of AI-powered tools. Below are more guides on Siri updates from our extensive range of articles. Source & Image Credit: SaranByte Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
North Wales Live
a day ago
- North Wales Live
Review: iFi Go Link Max brings you hi-res audio on the move
You've picked up some high-end headphones but you're going to need some extra power to get the best out of them, often more power than your phone or laptop can deliver. This is where the iFi GO Link Max comes in. This mini DAC (Digital to Analogue Converter) unlocks the true potential of your playlist, boasting a 4.4mm headphone output and 10x the power of your typical iPhone. Your phone or laptop will have its own DAC, but usually they aren't up to much. The iFi will supercharge the sound they produce and you hear. The GO Link is a little dongle that can attach via USB-C to your device (you also get Lightning and USB-C adapters included), and then you can plug in your headphones via the 3.5mm or 4.4mm inputs. Now this is where we go into audiophile territory. The DAC allows you to enjoy hi-res audio offered by the likes of the Tidal music streaming service. The quality of audio that you're not going to get via your Bluetooth bins. It supports up to PCM 384 kHz and DSD256 natively, letting you enjoy high-fidelity playback directly from your phone or laptop. I must say it works well, being plug-and-play, and you can really tell the difference once you access some hi-res audio. A little LED light on the GO Link lets you know the bit rate of the songs you are listening to. With up to 241 mW balanced output, it can drive most in-ear monitors and some full-sized headphones - but you'll need to do some research first. However, it will improve the sound coming from your any wired headphones. It can't compete against the desktop amps but nor should it at its size and price. For the first step into the world of high-end audio, it's a manageable one. The iFi GO Link is available via Amazon for £59. What users say "Enhances sound quality nicely with corded cans. I've tried this on my Galaxy S20 and S21FE phones, using Tidal. Fine detail is easier to hear whether using my earbuds (RHA) or Grado over ear headphones. Surprisingly, it was on a 1962 live recording of a Herbie Mann concert that the detail was most easily perceived. Does consume battery of course, albeit not excessively. I've had to cover the LED indicator up as it's surprisingly bright for nocturnal listening." "Not sure how they manage to make headphone amplifier so small easy to use, plug into my laptop the sound is clear loud and detailed impressive through my AKG headphones."
