logo
For millions of voters nothing has changed since Labour won – here's how Starmer can turn things around

For millions of voters nothing has changed since Labour won – here's how Starmer can turn things around

The Sun5 hours ago

IF I wrote here that everything had gone well in the last year in politics, you would stop reading.
So this is an honest appraisal of how I think the Government, which I support, has fared since winning the election on July 4.
6
6
The first big decision, which was intended to secure the confidence of the international bond markets, created a major political hit.
Namely, the now-reversed decision on Winter Fuel Allowance, affecting up to 10million people in retirement.
The intention was to offer economic rectitude and stability, but the consequence was an immediate collapse in popularity.
This was matched by the 'miserabilist' messages that they were picking up the pieces from years of chaos.
It was true that there were major gaps in public finances, which somehow had to be filled if services weren't to fall apart.
But the electorate had already got that message.
That's why, across the whole of the country, the Conservatives lost so badly.
What people wanted was hope, and what they got was downbeat at best, doom and gloom at worst.
Steadying the ship and balancing the books is worthy, but in a world of political turmoil, of populists and chancers, the electorate were looking for precisely what Keir Starmer had promised — 'change'.
The truth is, there has been genuine action to put things right.
Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs
Enormous cash for the NHS; a commitment to a dramatic housebuilding target; and investment in transport, clean energy and education to bring success in the long term.
The problem is that they are 'long term' at a moment when so many people are looking for dramatic improvement in the here and now.
That is why the opinion polls are so devastating for the two traditional mainstream political parties.
As with American President Donald Trump, the audacious, bizarre, sometimes off-the-wall and completely incredible catch people's attention.
The 'same old' of tinkering and ticking along feels like business as usual.
Learning curve
But it is 'business as usual' that many people just do not want.
So, if the first 12 months have been a learning curve, what are the lessons for the years ahead?
Quite simply, build on what you've done best.
'The best' includes Britain's standing on the world stage.
Dealing with world security and defence; alliances to tackle conflict across the world; reaching trade deals and even managing to square the circle of relationships with the US President.
All of this in the last six months has been both impressive and vitally necessary.
More of this decisiveness, and grasping of nettles here at home, would make all the difference.
For instance, stop using phrases like 'working at pace' and actually get on with the job.
One of the features of the last year, and long before that, is a kind of inertia.
I'm sure that civil servants genuinely believe they're working hard. I'm sure that ministers believe they have joined up policies and that, when they pull a lever, something is happening on the ground.
For millions of voters, however, nothing has changed.
That is why action in the pipeline now needs to be accelerated.
6
6
That is why relentless focus on delivery at local level is so vital, and tangible change in the lives of men and women who can only watch on as global conflict and turmoil unfold.
However — and it has to be said — not everything is down to government.
The lousy service you receive (public or private), gross incompetence and indifference to the wellbeing of others is as likely to be the fault of someone living down your street as it is elected politicians.
This government has three years to demonstrate that they can really make a difference.
Three years in which to stop Reform UK leader Nigel Farage deluding the nation into believing there are simple and easy answers to the greatest questions of our time.
Failure to live up to those expectations or get it wrong, the consequences will be felt for generations to come.
Self-evidently, I didn't get everything right in my time in government.
So, learning from mistakes and shifting up a gear is the way forward for Keir Starmer and his ministerial team.
There is still time to turn this around.
6
A clueless, cowardly windsock of a PM whose politics of deceit has taken him from loveless landslide…to landfill
By Trevor Kavanagh
FOR what it is worth, I am neither surprised nor disappointed by Sir Keir Starmer's calamitous first year as Prime Minister.
Sir Shifty was always going to be a dud in Downing Street just as he was in opposition.
What has really shocked me — along with millions of Sun readers — is his swift and spiteful attack on the social fabric which binds our nation and our trust in democracy.
On July 4 last year, Britain carelessly elected an activist regime, whose sole but unstated objective is to unravel everything that makes us British.
6
In the blink of an eye we have been divided by a narrow socialist cult against an overwhelming majority of decent, fair-minded law-abiding citizens.
We are being routinely lied to, ordered to believe the unbelievable and threatened with jail if we refuse.
For all his fine words to Nato and to Parliament, Starmer and his socialist rabble are intent on attacking the foundations of our democracy — the rule of law and the defence of the nation.
Left-wing zealots
Thin-skinned Starmer is not just clueless as a political leader. He is a coward who runs like a yellow streak from every tough decision that crosses his desk.
Indeed, our windsock PM has just surrendered even the pretence of leadership. This week, he became the publicly humiliated hostage of the Corbynite left he once boasted of defeating.
Close to collapse, Downing Street has abjectly surrendered over a piffling £5billion cut in the bloated welfare bill. This places Starmer at the mercy of Jeremy's loony left.
Two-Tier Keir might continue to strut the world stage as an international statesman. But this emperor has no clothes.
If he cannot cut a few quid off the handouts to nine million people on employment-related benefits, how can he persuade left-wing zealots to cough up billions for defence? Or to cut illegal immigration and 'smash the gangs'?
The people smugglers backed by the Kremlin's Vladimir Putin — as The Sun revealed this week — will keep sending us tens of thousands of bearded young men of fighting age.
Corbynites do not believe in borders. Nor do they believe in crime and punishment — unless there is a Tory in the dock.
Sir Shifty stubbornly defied calls for a proper inquiry into the rape of thousands of white teenage girls by mainly Pakistani gangs in mainly Labour-controlled authorities.
Cabinet ministers were licensed to smear protesters as 'far right dog-whistlers'. A backlash was inevitable.
Thousands of angry voters fled from Labour. Along with Tory defectors, they swelled the ranks of Reform UK and turned insurgent Nigel Farage into the man most likely to be our next PM.
Now, in a screeching U-turn, there will be a national grooming gang inquiry after all. So, landslide to landfill in a single year.
Farage is entitled to celebrate. He has reaped the whirlwind from the collapse of two-party politics.
Still, Reform has only five MPs and virtually nobody in the House of Lords.
Nor is it any consolation that Labour's Pyrrhic victory last July was entirely due to 14 years of dismal Tory failure. David Cameron, George Osborne, Theresa May, Liz Truss and — not least — Boris Johnson have much to answer for.
Along with Rishi Sunak, Boris hammered the final nails into the Tory coffin with Covid lockdowns and one million new migrants in a single year.
The result was a great Fourth of July belch of anti-Tory revulsion, which handed Labour class warriors their 'loveless landslide' and absolute power for five years.
We know now that it was a victory based on lies.
Deceit runs through Starmer's brand of politics like 'Brighton' through a stick of rock.
Deceit is more than telling blatant porkies, such as promising not to raise tax or National Insurance.
It means concealing the truth, like Labour's plan to axe the Winter Fuel Allowance.
It involves gaslighting — coercing people to believe in fairytales, such as green energy, bending the knee to Black Lives Matter or claiming women can have a penis.
And there are petty deceits, such as the gifts to our multi-millionaire PM of free suits and specs, and designer frocks for Lady Starmer, from an ambitious party donor.
Starmer's Labour was deep in such tacky mire before last year's election, and it has continued in that style since.
We were told porkies about £20billion 'black holes' in Britain's genuinely improving economy.
We were promised the 'adults were back in charge', only to see Chancellor Rachel Reeves send borrowing into orbit while trashing our reputation as a magnet for foreign investment.
We were told lies about gifting the strategically vital Chagos islands to China's military ally, Mauritius, with the true cost to the taxpayer being in excess of £30BILLION over 99 years.
Starmer promised Labour would repair the sacred NHS, only for Health Secretary Wes Streeting to admit it is getting worse.
But if there is one single issue that sums up the cant, hypocrisy and contempt for voters by both major parties, it is the flood of uncontrolled mass immigration.
Labour's traditional working class supporters, many in Red Wall seats, were shamed and silenced after Gordon Brown opened the floodgates to cheap imported labour.
Those daring to protest are slandered as 'racist' or 'Islamophobic'.
Yet the UK population has boomed by millions since, with a dire impact on the wages and living standards of voters Labour took for granted.
Rightly or wrongly — rightly in my view — voters believe this inevitable clash of cultures has led to dangerous divisions in cities and major towns.
It remains shocking that police failed to act against Pakistani grooming gangs for fear of stoking 'community tensions'.
Growing anger
Last year's Southport riots, stridently denounced by Starmer, were blamed on police silence over the racial background of the man who fatally stabbed three schoolgirls at a Taylor Swift dance class.
There is growing anger over Labour's plans to create new blasphemy laws, meaning criticism of Islam would be a criminal offence, while police turn a blind eye to intimidation by pro-Palestinian protesters.
Keir Starmer is a lifelong pro-Palestinian. His party and his government are beholden to Muslims who vote Labour.
Labour lives in fear of moves by Muslim hardliners to set up their own party in Parliament with enough MPs to dictate coalition terms.
The question now is whether Starmer can cling on for four more years as Prime Minister.
Can his Labour government survive in power?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Crisafulli found to be ‘careless' in not declaring $200,000 in payments related to company he ran
David Crisafulli found to be ‘careless' in not declaring $200,000 in payments related to company he ran

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

David Crisafulli found to be ‘careless' in not declaring $200,000 in payments related to company he ran

The Queensland premier, David Crisafulli, was 'careless' in not declaring $200,000 in payments he made after a company he had run became insolvent, the state's parliamentary ethics committee has found. Crisafulli became sole director and chief executive of Southern Edge Training Solutions after losing his north Queensland seat at the 2015 election. The company had been financially stressed before he took over on 1 December 2015 and went into liquidation months after he left on 1 April 2016. After being re-elected in 2017, Crisafulli made three payments as a result of a claim of insolvent trading by liquidators: $80,000 on 12 March 2020, $60,000 on 30 July 2020 and $60,000 on 19 July 2021. He did not declare them on parliament's register of interests, though parliamentary rules required MPs to declare any liability worth over a threshold of $19,000 at the time. From October 2020 onwards, the threshold for declaration was $19,399. A report by the parliament's ethics committee, which is made up of three Labor and three Liberal National party MPs, was tabled on Friday. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The committee ruled the premier was 'careless in the discharge of his obligations as a member by not including the liability on the register of interests'. But it found that 'on balance, it did not have evidence to meet the threshold required to prove that the premier knowingly did not disclose the liability'. As a result, it found his non-disclosure was not a contempt of parliament. Crisafulli argued to the committee that he did not have a liability because no claim had been litigated, and asked for the complaint to be dismissed. But the committee determined that there was a liability as a result of an agreement 'which created a legally binding obligation to settle a debt'. It noted that he had not approached the clerk of the parliament for clarification of the rules. 'While I did receive legal counsel, in hindsight, it is clear to me I should have consulted with the clerk on this matter,' Crisafulli told the committee. 'If the committee decides I should have declared a liability, I can only apologise and assure the committee it was an honest mistake and by no means deliberate or knowing.' On Friday, the premier said he had 'acted in good faith'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The report is very definitive. It has cleared me. There was no further actions,' he said. Crisafulli did not answer a series of questions about how he made the $200,000 payments and whether anyone had assisted him. 'This was subject to this analysis, and I have met my obligations. And a bipartisan committee has shown that,' he said. The deputy Labor leader, Cameron Dick, referred Crisafulli to the ethics committee on 22 October last year, four days before the state election. On Friday, Dick said: 'David Crisafulli has been saying over and over that he has complied with his obligations. Well, he did not, and that is in black and white in this report today.' The report says that the payments did not create any conflict of interest or the perception of any on the part of the premier, and that assessing the matter was a 'novel issue' involving 'ambiguity in the definition of liability'. Crisafulli was the subject of an earlier ethics inquiry, in April 2020, between the first and second payments. He was late to disclose interests as director and secretary of Revalot Pty Ltd. The committee 'determined these failures were not undertaken knowingly'. Southern Edge Training Solutions, which traded as SET Solutions, taught a range of training courses. Based in Melbourne, it went into voluntary liquidation on 30 June 2016. Crisafulli has repeatedly said he only joined the company after being assured that there would be an imminent capital injection to keep it afloat. The committee recommended that no further action be taken.

Critics warn Sir Keir's screeching welfare U-turn will now result in a 'two-tier' benefits system and a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it
Critics warn Sir Keir's screeching welfare U-turn will now result in a 'two-tier' benefits system and a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Critics warn Sir Keir's screeching welfare U-turn will now result in a 'two-tier' benefits system and a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it

Sir Keir Starmer 's benefits climbdown will create a 'two-tier' benefits system with families facing a £3billion tax bombshell to pay for it, critics warned last night. And that will be on top of the £1.25billion bill caused by the Prime Minister's screeching U-turn over winter fuel payments for pensioners. Experts warned the £4.25billion black hole in the public finances caused by the backsliding will probably force Chancellor Rachel Reeves to plug it with more tax rises in her autumn Budget. The Prime Minister was humiliatingly forced to hand Labour 's welfare rebels the concessions in a bid to avoid defeat in a crunch vote on benefits cuts on Tuesday. The compromise deal last night looked like it had peeled off enough of the 126 rebels to pass the vote. However, as many as 50 were still threatening to rebel unless the vote was pulled. The reforms had originally been forecast to save the Government £5billion a year by the end of the Parliament. Charity bosses and Labour MPs still planning to rebel also warned the new proposals would create a 'two-tier' benefits system because existing Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants will keep their current level of disability payments. But new claimants after November 2026, when the changes are scheduled to kick in, would be entitled to as much as £4,000 a year less on average, even if they suffered from the same condition which meant they couldn't work. Before the U-turn, both existing and future claimants were facing stricter eligibility conditions for the daily living component of PIP, a working-age benefit for those whose health condition increases their living costs. The concessions on PIP alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. Meanwhile, existing claimants of the universal credit (UC) health element, paid to those with a condition which stops them working, will have their payments protected in real terms. However, new claimants will see it halved and frozen. According to calculations by the Resolution Foundation think tank, the PIP and UC reforms will cost £1.5billion each. Sir Keir yesterday branded his own climbdown 'common sense' and refused to rule out tax increases to pay for it in an interview. During a visit to RAF Valley in Wales, he said how the Government intended to pay for it would be revealed in the autumn Budget, adding: 'The changes still mean we can deliver the reforms that we need and that's very important because the system needs to be a system that is fit for the future. 'All colleagues are signed up to that, but having listened, we've made the adjustments. The funding will be set out in the Budget in the usual way.' Yesterday's climbdown is hugely embarrassing for Sir Keir as it highlights the scale to which he failed to read his MPs' mood over the proposed cuts, with rebels having spoken out for months. Care minister Stephen Kinnock dismissed criticism that the Government was in chaos and that Sir Keir was not 'competent', insisting that the process had been 'positive and constructive' and that the PM was someone who 'gets stuck into fixing problems'. Care minister Stephen Kinnock (pictured) dismissed criticism that the Government was in chaos and that Sir Keir was not 'competent', insisting that the process had been 'positive and constructive' and that the PM was someone who 'gets stuck into fixing problems' But Kemi Badenoch said the debacle left benefits claimants facing 'the worst of all worlds'. Speaking to reporters on a visit to North West Essex, the Tory leader said: 'I think we're seeing a government that is floundering, a government that is no longer in control despite having a huge majority. I don't see how they're going to be able to deliver any of the things they promised if they can't do something as basic as reducing an increase in spending. 'It's a real shame because what they're doing now with this U-turn is creating a two-tier system... this is the worst of all worlds.' Arch rebel Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, said: 'These revised proposals are nowhere near good enough, and frankly, are just not well thought through. It would create a two-tier system in both PIP and the Universal Credit health element based on when somebody became disabled.' Sir Mel Stride, the Shadow Chancellor, said: 'Labour promised not to raise taxes on working people, and their Jobs Tax has led to rising unemployment and growth being halved. Now the Government has been unable to rule out that taxes will go up this autumn in order to pay for Keir Starmer's latest U-turns.'

Justin Welby fails to surprise with no hope for Pope
Justin Welby fails to surprise with no hope for Pope

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Justin Welby fails to surprise with no hope for Pope

Justin Welby may have said that his ousting as Archbishop of Canterbury was based on a flawed report, but he is courting less controversy by asserting that he is unlikely to become Pope. Asked what his papal name would be, he opted for either Hadrian or Francis, but was keen to stress that a Welby papacy would be unlikely. 'I have had six children, therefore there is some evidence that I've not been entirely celibate,' he said, adding that he was also a 'lousy theologian'. Still, this needn't rule him out as a Pope, if the Borgias were anything to go by. Welby remarked: 'It was a Borgia who said, 'Since God has given us the papacy, we may as well enjoy it'. ' Glastonbury brings together the revolutionaries and the posh, and this year is throwing together particularly strange bedfellows. The other night, the same backstage VIP bar was frequented by the controversial band Kneecap and the uncontroversial Samantha Cameron. It's not like they have nothing in common, though. For instance, as she was a PM's wife, both have benefited from government money. Jeffrey Archer's success is not as impressive as it sounds. The former Tory MP's first novel, Not a Penny More, Not a Penny Less, is still topping bestsellers' lists after racking up 25,000 sales last month, but he points out that this is worldwide and it's not all that impressive when you divide it by 151 countries. 'I got a call from Iceland saying your latest book is number one in the bestsellers' list,' he tells the Rosebud podcast. Archer, right, was filled with pride, until he asked how many copies had taken him to this giddy height. The answer was 83. Much excitement on the left this week about the potential for a new Jeremy Corbyn-led party. Many are saying that polls have shown it would get 10 per cent of the vote, but the pollster Joe Twyman offers a note of caution. 'May I gently suggest that 'would' is doing a lot of heavy lifting here,' he said. 'I say that as the official pollster for Change UK.' It is official — politicians don't talk like humans. A study to be published in Comparative Political Studies has found that politicians' speeches become more interminable as soon as they are elected. The study looked at 1.5 million extracts from speeches by Danish parliamentarians across a quarter of a century from 1997. It found that the speeches became less readable after the speaker was elected but this reverted as soon as their career ended. It's cited by the political scientist Philip Cowley in his latest for The House. 'You campaign in poetry, govern in prose,' he says, 'but even the prose suffers when in office.' With books like his new history of St Petersburg, the author Sinclair McKay has become an adept copy editor, but he learnt the craft the hard way. He used to be a diarist and tells me he got into terrible trouble when he wrote a piece about the political salon host Lady Carla Powell. She was furious about one word. He admits it was probably an error to call her 'fawnlike' in the first place, but what was worse was that he also got the third letter wrong and had to explain to Powell that he hadn't meant to suggest she was half-man, half-goat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store