
New Superman movie is forced to CUT two scenes after they were deemed too risque for Indian audiences
While cinemagoers in the rest of the world saw the blockbuster in its entirety, Indian fans noticed a jarring skip.
On two occasions, as the superhero leaned in for a kiss, the film suddenly lurched forward, cutting to the aftermath of an embrace.
The film, directed by James Gunn, originally featured a 33-second scene between Superman and Lois Lane in which they are seen passionately smooching.
However, India's notoriously prudish film board, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), deemed this inappropriate for Indian audiences and subsequently cut it from the movie.
The organization said the moment was 'too sensual' to be branded with the U/A film certification, which roughly translates to a 12A or Parental Guidance in other countries around the world.
The cuts have sparked furore from some viewers, who have accused the CBFC of regressive and hypocritical censorship.
Many highlighted that the same board which removed a consensual kiss regularly permitted films that glorified violence, promoted regressive gender roles, or peddled misinformation about minority religious communities.
Fans have taken to social media to express their frustration over the cuts.
One viewer said: 'CBFC would allow horrific scenes of violence and sexual assault in a U-certified film that kids are freely allowed to watch, but won't allow consensual kissing in a U/A comic book movie that kids should watch under adult supervision.'
Another added: 'Dear Board Members of CBFC, you are a disgrace to the film industry.
'Emoji censoring was your lowest point, & today, it was kissing (not making out, just passionate/sensual kissing) in Superman that was cut.
'If movies are already made to be in ICU, you are the kill switch.'
A third wrote: 'Now watching and boy howdy the Indian censor board has embarrassed itself with the abrupt cuts they've made to the film.
'The "morality" aside, the way they've managed to mangle the flow is atrocious. Awful editing job all around by the CBFC.'
This is not the first time the CBFC has been the subject of controversy.
In 2015 it sparked fury after ordering that kissing scenes in James Bond movie, Spectre, be shortened by 50 per cent ahead of its release in India
The organization demanded that four scenes be trimmed, including at least two kisses between the lead actors Daniel Craig and Monica Bellucci.
The decision to reduce the length of the scenes triggered a social media storm as Indians mocked the prudishness of film certification authorities.
Ashoke Pandit, a member of the censor board, confirmed to BBC Hindi that the scenes had been heavily edited, but claimed the decision had been made in 'personal capacity' by the board's controversial head, Pahlaj Nihalani.
'He does these kind of things,' Pandit said. 'Other shots have also been cut along with the kissing scene. This seems like a joke. If you do this to a James Bond film, then it's shameful.'
Kissing scenes are regularly censored in films and TV shows in India as public displays of affection are still widely looked down upon in the largely conservative country.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
Puppy power: canine in new Superman movie spurs pet adoption interest
Superman's dog Krypto is not the best-mannered canine in the new James Gunn-helmed blockbuster about the Man of Steel – but he does prove himself to be a capable sidekick and he has driven a real-world surge in pet adoption interest, if online search trends are any indication. Searches by Google users for 'adopt a dog near me' increased by 513% after Gunn's Superman was released in US theaters during the weekend of 11 July, according to the Woofz dog training app, which cited its own analysis of the trends on the search engine. Searches for 'rescue dog adoption near me' and 'adopt a puppy', meanwhile, respectively jumped by 163% and 31%. Furthermore, Google searches for 'adopt a schnauzer' rose by 299%, Woofz said on its website. That is revealing because – as the app noted – the CGI-created, red-caped Krypto which stars alongside David Corenswet's Superman in Gunn's flick evidently is a Schnauzer and terrier mutt mix. Pet lovers in the US, where nearly 6 million dogs and cats were placed into shelters and rescue centers nationwide in 2024 alone, generally met Woofz's findings alongside Krypto's scene-stealing turn with enthusiasm. More than 450 pets were adopted across the US during the first 10 days of July, when Warner Bros – the studio which released Superman – collaborated with Best Friends Animal Society to cover animal adoption fees. Nonetheless, in a statement first reported by the Wrap, Woofz chief executive officer, Natalia Shahmetova, made it a point to tell those seeking out their own Krypto that 'adoption is a real commitment'. 'The hype will fade, but your dog will stay, so make sure you're ready to give them the time, care, and training they need and deserve,' Shahmetova's statement said. Gunn has spoken publicly about how he based Krypto's likeness and behavior off his own rescue dog, Ozu, whom the Superman director called 'the world's worst dog'. When rescued from an owner who had hoarded about 60 dogs, Ozu wouldn't let Gunn and his wife 'pet him because he had never known human beings', Gunn had said. 'And he was biting my feet until they bled, ate my new $10,000 laptop, chewed up all my shoes and our furniture – and I was like, 'Thank God he doesn't have superpowers.'' That gratitude over his dog's lack of superpowers then gave the film-maker the idea to have Ozu '3D scanned and then digitally altered to resemble' Krypto – who is overly excitable, easily distracted and benevolently disobedient, but fearlessly goes into battle alongside Gunn's version of Superman, according to the Internet Movie Database (IMDb). During one particularly poignant scene, Corenswet's Superman laments how Krypto is 'not even a very good' dog at a time when the pair are apart. 'But he's out there alone, and he's probably scared,' the Last Son of Krypton says, before leaving to try to reunite with him and grapple with various enemies.


The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
A real wag: Superman gets the bleak realities of dog ownership spot on
Superman might be one of the most confusing blockbuster films to hit the big screen this year. The tone, as you might expect from a goofball superhero movie that is plainly about the invasion of Gaza, is all over the shop. Too many characters contribute too little to the plot. There are moments when it feels like it was written specifically to provide work for the silly-glasses and ironic-haircut industries. It is a bit of a mess. But that said, one thing is demonstrably true: the dog is cool. As shown in the trailer, Krypto the superdog is Superman's secret weapon. A mile away from his last screen outing, where he was muscular and proud and voiced by Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson, Superman's Krypto is scrappy and wild. He doesn't obey commands. He destroys whatever equipment is put in front of him. Whenever he may or may not save the day, it seems like he does it out of accident rather than design. And now everybody wants one. Research by the dog training app Woofz has shown that Google searches for 'adopt a dog near me' jumped 513% during Superman's opening weekend. What's more, searches for 'rescue dog adoption near me' rose by 163%, while 'adopt a puppy' rose by 31%. And these searches are specific, too. Krypto is apparently a schnauzer-terrier mix, and 'adopt a schnauzer' searches have risen by almost 300% since Superman's release. There are many potential reasons for this. Perhaps viewers who found themselves confused by Superman's swampy storytelling latched on to Krypto as a guidepoint. Perhaps they have short attention spans and fail to think things through, as with the boom of dalmatian sales (and subsequent boom in dalmatian abandonments) after 101 Dalmatians was released in 1996. Or perhaps it's because Superman is one of the rare films to get dog ownership exactly right. So often in Hollywood, dogs are either loyal companions or would-be therapists who teach their owners about the meaning of love. Think of Marley and Me, in which a dog helps Owen Wilson to love and then dies. Or Turner and Hooch, in which a dog helps Tom Hanks to love and then gets murdered. Or Old Yeller, in which a dog helps a boy to love and then the boy shoots it with a shotgun. Some mix the formula up a little – in The Call of the Wild a dog teaches Harrison Ford to love, and then Harrison Ford dies – but you get the gist. Meanwhile, Krypto is a bit of a dick. The first time we meet him, Superman has been beaten for the very first time. Bleeding and broken, as a last resort he calls on his faithful pup to help him to safety. In any other film, this is exactly what Krypto would have done. But here he leaps all over Superman instead, doing little but compounding his injuries. He's excited. He wants to help. But he's also a dog, so he's sort of useless. Winningly, there's no sentimental ending to his story, either. He doesn't ever really bond with Superman, and he definitely doesn't die. In the end (and this probably counts as a spoiler), Supergirl comes and picks him up, and Superman barely even notices. There's no growth. Nobody learns anything. It's sort of great. It's telling that Krypto was only written into the script after James Gunn adopted a dog of his own, named Ozu. Last year on Twitter, Gunn wrote that 'Ozu, who came from a hoarding situation in a backyard with 60 other dogs and never knew human beings, was problematic to say the least. He immediately came in and destroyed our home, our shoes, our furniture – he even ate my laptop. It took a long time before he would even let us touch him. I remember thinking, 'Gosh, how difficult would life be if Ozu had superpowers?' – and thus Krypto came into the script.' And maybe that's the key here. There were no misty-eyed Marley and Me-style reminiscences about Ozu. Gunn was living through the incredibly annoying part of dog ownership where neither party fully trusts the other, and just lifted it wholesale into the script. And this realistic depiction has apparently translated to the hearts of Superman's audience, as we will soon see when thousands of schnauzers are definitely not abandoned at shelters four months from now.


Daily Mirror
14 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Superman director speaks out about debate over whether film is about the war in Palestine
Superman director James Gunn has now weighed in on the debate on social media, which sees fan drawing parallels between the blockbuster and the Israel war on Palestine James Gunn's Superman has sparked a raft of online discourse about the Hollywood blockbuster's storyline. Fans are taking to social media to debate specifically whether the film is actually a metaphor for the current Israeli conflict in Palestine. The crux of the film is this: villain Lex Luthor (played by Nicholas Hoult) has started a foreign war between two fictional countries, and Superman (played by David Corenswet) steps in to prevent war. Fans have seen similarities between the film and reality in depiction of the fictional Bovaria, the aggressor nation, which attacks its neighbouring country Jarhanpur. READ MORE: Superman review: DC's messy yet triumphant reboot makes you believe this franchise can fly Fans have taken to social media to draw parallels between the film and the Israeli war on Palestine. One TikTok user wrote: "Without a doubt that is genuinely the most pro-Palestine I have seen a mainstream film ever be." While another said: "It's probably as pro anti-Israel as a movie produced by Hollywood can be." Another commenter adds: "The entire thing that starts the plot is a country that is backed by the US, like the US sends them money and guns." For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and viral lifestyle picks from The Mirror's Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox. Director James Gunn, before the movie was released in theatres, in an interview with The Times said: "When I wrote this the Middle Eastern conflict wasn't happening. So I tried to do little things to move it away from that, but it doesn't have anything to do with the Middle East." He added: "It's an invasion of a much more powerful country that's problematic in terms of its political history, but has totally no defence against the other country. It really is fictional." This comes after Gunn sparked controversy by calling Superman an "immigrant", which led to accusations by Fox News that the movie was "Super-Woke". Gunn's brother, actor Sean Gunn, defended him at the LA premiere when he told Variety: "Yes, Superman is an immigrant, and yes, the people that we support in this country are immigrants and if you don't like that, you're not American. People who say no to immigrants are against the American way." Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you!