Trump urged to review UN immunity, lax visa rules amid national security concerns
At a time of increased national security fears and immigration enforcement by the Trump administration, experts are urging a re-examination of the host nation agreement with an eye to the functional immunity granted to U.N. staff and the limited vetting given to those with U.N. visas.
"The United States appears to have taken a relaxed view of the individuals entering the country associated with the U.N., either as employees or as representatives of various country missions. And yet we know that U.N. employees have had, and continue to have, close, direct relationships with terrorist organizations, like UNRWA and Hamas," Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, told Fox News Digital.
Un Watchdog Project Calls On Doge Caucus To 'Audit' The International Org
Bayefsky said there is "a disconnect between the welcome routine and the significant harm to American interests. Hosting the U.N. does not require the host country to facilitate or endure threats to its national security."
The federal government grants G visas to employees, spouses and children of international organizations, including the U.N., who reside in, or are visiting, the U.S. According to the State Department's website, "if you are entitled to a G visa, under U.S. visa law, you must receive a G visa. The exceptions to this rule are extremely limited." The Department of State also explains that "Embassies and consulates generally do not require an interview for those applying for G-1 - 4 and NATO-1 - 6 visas, although a consular officer can request an interview."
Read On The Fox News App
Hugh Dugan, a senior advisor to 11 U.S. former ambassadors to the U.N., told Fox News Digital that it "appears to me that the issuance of the G visas for [U.N. employees] is a relatively rubber stamp exercise." While not requiring interviews of personnel has "become a matter of convenience, frankly, we should always be able to assess a threat to our country."'
Dugan, a former National Security Council special assistant to the president and senior director for international organization affairs, said nations like Russia and China are only allowed to travel a certain distance from U.N. headquarters. "We are mindful of our adversaries' activities and presence here, but the door is open to participate in the U.N. and the host country agreement makes that possible so that no country would be barred because of a certain political atmosphere or issue that might be brewing between us and them."
Fox News Digital asked the State Department whether it requires interviews for staff from adversarial member states, including Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, North Korea, Iran and China, but received no response. A State Department spokesperson reiterated that consular officers "have full authority to require an in-person interview for any reason."
Peter Gallo, formerly an investigator with the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), told Fox News Digital that he is particularly concerned about the functional immunity granted to U.N. staff participating in activities related to their employment. Gallo explained that "U.S. legal system has come to accept that pretty much it's a blanket coverage." He added that "immunity breeds impunity."
Republicans Seek To Block The Reappointment Of Un Official Accused Of Antisemitism
Gallo claimed that there is an epidemic of sexual offenses and misconduct among U.N. staff. He cited an incident in which a U.N. employee outside the U.S. sexually harassed "a young female in his department." Gallo said it took two years after receipt of the investigation report for an investigation to be completed, which resulted in the demotion of the offending employee. Gallo said the employee who was harassed, and her harasser remained in the same organization.
Gallo said that if employees take part in misconduct while based at U.N. headquarters, the U.S. government should be able to examine cases and determine whether staff should retain their G visas.
Dugan said that if U.N. personnel "knew that [immunity] could be lifted at any time by us… they might start behaving a lot differently."
In response to questions about whether U.N. staff have been accused of sexual misconduct in the U.S., or whether U.N. staff who engaged in misconduct have had their G visas revoked, a State Department spokesperson explained the department "generally does not provide" revocation statistics. They also said that "all visa applicants, no matter the visa type and where they are located, are continuously vetted. Security vetting runs from the time of each application, through adjudication of the visa, and afterwards during the validity period of every issued visa, to ensure the individual remains eligible to travel to the United States."
The spokesperson said officials of the U.N. "are expected to respect applicable laws of the United States, including criminal laws. Failure to do so may constitute an abuse of privileges of residence." They added that this "applies for those who hold diplomatic immunity for their positions as well."
Among staff who have raised internal alarm bells is U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories Francesca Albanese, who traveled to the U.S. in 2024 to deliver a report before the Third Committee of the General Assembly. Albanese, whose antisemitism has been condemned widely by senior U.S. diplomats and the State Department, was allowed to tour multiple U.S. college campuses while in the U.S.
In addition to qualifying for "rubber stamp" G visas, staff of international organizations like the United Nations can qualify for green cards if they have spent half of at least seven years of employment inside the U.S., or have been in the U.S. for a combined total of 15 years prior to retirement.Original article source: Trump urged to review UN immunity, lax visa rules amid national security concerns
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising
Another day, another confused Trump voter! On today's edition, we've got a MAGA supporter who supposedly understands tariffs but can't imagine why costs are rising. In a social media screenshot posted to r/LeopardsAteMyFace, this person wrote, "Trump i voted for him,now that being said I understand the tarrifs,but what good are they doing to help us? Everything is going up i thought one reason to elect him as president was for things to be cheaper I haven't seen it,Everything is going up i know the government is making more money but its us I'm worried PLEASE!" The Trump voter seemingly edited the post with an update, writing, "OK I understand now just last time he was in office it seemed like right a way fuel was cheaper. Thanks all of you!" Related: Economists widely agree that Donald Trump's tariffs will likely result in rising costs, with many companies such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble already confirming the reasons behind their recent price hikes. Sooo I'm not sure if this Trump supporter really does understand now! Naturally, people had a lot to say in the comments: "Here let me explain using cookies: You voted for a fascist because you thought he would give other people's cookies to you, but now he's taking your cookies and telling you to go fuck yourself. Hope this helps." —u/Apple-Dust Related: "These fools will never get that tariffs are just a type of tax." —u/Gadshill "It's a sales tax with extra steps." —u/GoodDog_GoodBook123 "Why is water wet? Trump said water was dry, but every time I take a shower, I get wet? Is this something the transgender Democrats are doing? Can we arrest them? Is this from the Deep State?" —u/rwblue4u "Any Trumper who tells you they 'get' or 'understand' tariffs is lying." —u/Glenn-Sturgis Related: "This reads like a satirical cartoon. 'I understand exactly how an extra tax works, but why am I suddenly paying more?? And I could've sworn prices were cheaper last time he was in power and was working with Obama's economy… explain please??'" —u/Revolutionary-Ad5695 "The bizarre disconnect we're all going to continue to see from Trump voters on the tariffs issue is so frustrating. These bozos believed that foreign governments pay our tariffs because Trump told them this. They argued with Kamala Harris supporters at the time, despite the fact that this is Econ 101. They never believe they have ANY responsibility at all. They don't believe they're expected to research the issues, learn anything new, or verify any of the information they're being given, before they adopt it as their new mantra." "The biggest frustration is the fact that they're being continually misled and never, ever learn from it. There'll be a new lie tomorrow to cover up yesterday's lie, and they'll regurgitate it perfectly, without ever feeling any embarrassment or personal responsibility." —u/Longstroke_Machine "'Last time he was in office seemed like right away fuel was cheaper.' There was a pandemic, everything was closed, and demand for fuel cratered. I'm not sure why they all have amnesia about that part while remembering the cheap gas. They sure made enough noise about it at the time." —u/WintersChild79 Related: "'I understand now.' Lord knows what Rumpelstiltskin gold was spun on that thread with those geniuses." —u/ThatsRobToYou And finally, "Yeah. We tried to explain this beforehand, but he didn't understand since he only speaks Republican." —u/Jocelyn-1973 What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Note: Some responses have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
US and EU frame the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidify some commitments
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States and the European Union on Thursday issued a joint statement that frames the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidifies some trade commitments. 'This Framework Agreement will put our trade and investment relationship — one of the largest in the world — on a solid footing and will reinvigorate our economies' reindustrialization,' the document reads. Together, the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. Key points in the letter include a 15% U.S. tariff rate on most European goods, with specifics on auto tariffs tied to EU legislative actions. In addition, the EU agrees to eliminate tariffs on industrial goods and many agricultural products, while the U.S. will reduce tariffs accordingly. The agreement also covers $750 billion in energy purchases and $600 billion in EU investments by 2028. The agreement also addresses non-tariff barriers, digital trade and environmental regulations. In July, President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met briefly at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland and announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. Before the Republican U.S. president returned to office for his second term, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with about $2 trillion, around 1.7 trillion euros, in annual trade.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
The Millennium Challenge Corporation advances US interests — don't kill it
The future is unclear for a key, 20-year-old U.S. government initiative advancing American interests around the world and blunting Chinese and Russian influence. The Millennium Challenge Corporation changed the way development assistance was done. It has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty since its launch by President George W. Bush in 2004. It was a year after he created the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which has saved more than 26 million people over the past two decades, especially on the African continent. Both are perfect examples of American soft power at its best. But whereas the AIDS relief program has largely been spared recent budget cutting after some hiccups, the Millennium Challenge Corporation's future is less clear. Its board meets this week to decide whether to terminate more than half of its portfolio of compacts and smaller threshold programs in various stages of development or implementation. These programs are in Africa and Asia, strategically important regions of the world in which China and Russia would be happy to take our place. The board should consider the impact of possible cuts to our country's reputation as a reliable partner and whether such a reduction would actually benefit U.S. economic, national security and diplomatic interests. Although all government programs should be regularly reviewed for efficiency and effectiveness, it seems shortsighted to drastically reduce the footprint of an agency that has been successfully implementing its mandate to the benefit of U.S. interests. Congress has historically supported the Millennium Challenge Corporation as a model for development and a safeguard for our national security, and its funding level in the House fiscal 2026 appropriations bill demonstrates that support. The Millennium Challenge Corporation aims to reduce poverty through economic growth and exemplifies how the generosity of the American people can really make a difference overseas in ways that advance U.S. national interests while driving development. The program has expanded access to electricity in Benin and Georgia so that children can study after dark and hospitals can properly store vaccines. It has created the infrastructure to deliver clean water to homes and businesses in Cape Verde and Mongolia. And it has built or improved roads, airports, ports and bridges in many countries so that people can get to school or work — and efficiently deliver their goods to markets. In Africa, the program has educated more than 255,500 students, contributed more than 26 million megawatt-hours of electricity, guaranteed over 305,000 households and businesses have legal rights and protections over their land, and improved production for over 70,600 farmers. The Millennium Challenge Corporation has funded 82 agreements in 49 countries since 2004, benefiting nearly 400 million people. Twenty-five of these countries are in Africa, and these investments have benefited an estimated 154 million Africans. And it has done all this in financially sound ways. Moreover, this kind of assistance opens doors for the United States, including for American companies seeking to do business in and with these countries. The Millennium Challenge Corporation took a groundbreaking approach to foreign assistance, requiring that countries qualify based on rigorous third-party indicators measuring democratic governance, investment in health and education, and economic freedom. Countries that don't meet these criteria aren't eligible for compacts, which are binding agreements developed in partnership with qualifying countries with rigorous monitoring. As with the Bush-era AIDS program, the Millennium Challenge Corporation's focus on Africa is well placed. By 2050, more than 25 percent of the world's population will live there. By 2030, more than 40 percent of the world's young people will be African. Already, more than half of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies are in Africa, along with 65 percent of the world's arable land and about 30 percent of the world's mineral reserves. The Millennium Challenge Corporation engenders tremendous goodwill among the populations of recipient countries and helps counter efforts by Russia and China to insert themselves at the expense of U.S. interests. Whether through cultural engagement programs and educational opportunities, infrastructure investments or military interference, Beijing and Moscow seek to expand their influence in the region while at the same time spreading anti-Western propaganda and taking advantage of disenfranchised or struggling populations to export their authoritarian brand of governance. This is a risk for the African population, global security and American interests. Without this program, the picture would look much worse. It empowers its partners, championing country ownership of its development projects rather than holding them hostage to burdensome loan terms, like China does. It creates jobs, rather than taking them from the local population. Ut requires transparency and accountability for every dollar spent, as opposed to the shady, corrupt deals China and Russia seek. There must be accountability both from partner countries and the Millennium Challenge Corporation. The compact countries must maintain their performance on the indicators and implement the compact transparently. Meanwhile, they Millennium Challenge Corporation measures economic rates of return on its investments and rigorously evaluates every program for effectiveness and results. The Millennium Challenge Corporation demands democratic governance, investment in people, and policies supporting economic freedom from its partners so they can escape poverty and build strong economies, rather than undercutting democracy and saddling its partners with debt. At the same time, it creates opportunities for private investment and develops trade and economic partners. A drastic reduction in its work could leave unfinished projects that China would sweep in and complete — and claim credit for. The Millennium Challenge Corporation uses foreign assistance dollars responsibly to lift people out of poverty while strengthening U.S. diplomatic ties and economic partnerships — all while fostering a positive view of America among both citizens and governments. Its board should keep this in mind this week. Monica Vegas Kladakis is senior advisor for Outreach and Strategic Partnerships at the George W. Bush Institute and previously served as managing director for Threshold Programs at MCC. David J. Kramer is executive director the George W. Bush Institute.
