Minnesota jury convicts alleged ringleader of massive pandemic food fraud scheme on all counts
Aimee Bock — the founder of Feeding our Future, the group that prosecutors say was at the heart of the plot — was one of 70 defendants charged in the overall case, said to be one of the country's largest frauds against COVID-19 relief programs.
The Minnesota case has also drawn attention for an attempt to bribe a juror in an earlier trial and witness tampering in Bock's trial, which began last month. Thirty-seven defendants have already pleaded guilty, while five were convicted in a group of defendants who were tried last year.
The jury also convicted a co-defendant, Salim Ahmed Said, the owner of the now-defunct Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis.
Bock and Said were charged with multiple counts involving conspiracy, wire fraud and bribery. Said was also charged with money laundering. Bock allegedly pocketed nearly $2 million, while Said was accused of taking around $5 million. They both maintained their innocence and testified on their own behalf.
In closing arguments, prosecutors said the evidence showed that Bock and Said exploited the chaos of the early days of the the pandemic by submitting falsified paperwork to enrich themselves and failed to provide anywhere near as many meals to needy children as they claimed.
Defense attorneys did not dispute that there was massive fraud but insisted that their clients were not responsible for it.
Bock's attorney said she was deceived by dishonest people and tried cut them off whenever she suspected fraud. Said's attorney blamed his client's business partner.
Federal prosecutors alleged that the conspiracy revolved around Feeding Our Future and another small nonprofit that were approved as sponsors of the Federal Child Nutrition Program before the pandemic. They dramatically grew as the pandemic took hold. Feeding Our Future went from receiving and disbursing $3.4 million in federal funds in 2019 to nearly $200 million in 2021. Food sites sponsored by Feeding Our Future falsely claimed to be serving thousands of children daily, prosecutors allege.
Besides fraudulently obtaining and disbursing more than $240 million in federal funds, prosecutors say, Bock and other Feeding Our Future employees also solicited and received bribes and kickbacks from other participants connected with the alleged pay-to-play scheme.
The defendants are being tried in several groups. The first trial was marred by an alleged attempt by some defendants and people linked with them to bribe a juror with a bag of $120,000 in cash. That juror went straight to police. That led to tighter security for Bock's trial, and additional precautions ordered by U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel.
Despite all that, an allegation of witness tampering surfaced midway through Bock's trial. A defendant slated for trial in August approached a government witness who was due to testify against Bock and Said and asked to speak with him in a courthouse bathroom. That witness declined and instead told his lawyer, who informed prosecutors. Abshir soon agreed to plead guilty to a wire fraud charge and to have his tampering attempt factored into a longer sentencing recommendation, which isn't binding on the judge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
11 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trolls who tried to ruin young Skye's big football break make me sick
And if I'm being honest here, no matter how much I might fancy myself to be a feminist ally, I proceed at a glacial pace of two steps forward and one a half steps back. It's not that I don't fully support organisations like For Women Scotland and Sex Matters; it's just that, well … like Eric Morecambe playing Grieg's Piano Concerto, I don't say everything in the right order (or use the appropriate language). I come with attitudes shaped by upbringing, faith, environment and historic social mores that can be difficult to unpack. Read more Yet, for all that Scotland might believe itself to have reached the gold standard in women's equality, we never have to wait long between incidents that render such claims premature. Last week, a young teenage footballer called Skye Stout, won her first contract with Kilmarnock FC. This should have been a joyous moment for Ms Stout and a source of great pride for her family. I'd have gladly swapped whatever I've achieved in my career just to have played football with any senior club. Kilmarnock shared a picture of Ms Stout in their famous blue and white colours. It was a lovely photo of an attractive young woman looking both joyful and proud. And if you looked at it closely you'd also have sensed a wee glint of cheeky defiance in her eyes. Some men though, chose only to notice that Ms Stout had a skin condition not uncommon among girls and boys who are still negotiating the terrain that lies between childhood and adulthood. The abuse was such that Killie felt compelled to remove her picture from its social media accounts. Ms Stout though, seems possessed of a strong character and no little resilience. A few days later, she made her full debut for her new club and marked it with a delightful goal – direct from a free kick – in a 4-0 win. When I was her age, my attempts at executing something like that usually ended in a search party being organised to fetch the ball. It was heartening to see several high-profile former professional footballers, including Ally McCoist and John Hartson express support and sympathy for Ms Stout. Yet, I couldn't help thinking how crushed and mortified this young woman might have felt when she was told why her picture was being taken down. The story moved me to tears and I fervently prayed that she would be surrounded by the love and support of a strong family and her new employers. Ally McCoist expressed support and sympathy for Skye (Image: PA) Some there are who will claim that such treatment isn't confined to girls and women. You don't need to be a strong feminist ally though, to know that such a belief is, at best, mistaken and probably delusional. During the Covid lockdown, I gave a few online seminars on behalf of the NUJ about aspects of writing for a newspaper. Among those who had signed up for these were several young women and this compelled me to change my introduction slightly. I had to tell them that they would encounter online abuse, merely for the fact that they were women. And that although my columns will often attract criticism, most of it will be legitimate comment about my writing style or the case I'm attempting to make. Women who venture to express a sincerely-held belief will also have to deal with mockery for even having an opinion. Very quickly, this can descend into vitriol about their appearance followed by something darker in the realm of sexual harassment. Over the last two years, I've been appalled at the abuse Nicola Sturgeon has had to endure while being questioned by police in Operation Branchform, before she was told she had no case to answer. The slurs intensified following news of her marital breakdown. Predictably – and depressingly so – it moved onto homophobic speculation about her sexuality. Much of this came from deeply poisoned minds. And I'm not having any infantile nonsense about Ms Sturgeon having brought this on herself owing to her advocacy of self-ID. Is it not reasonable to disagree profoundly with the former First Minister's beliefs in this area while also being appalled at the poison attaching to some of the criticism of her? Read more Kevin Mckenna Last month, I interviewed newspaper columnist Sarah Vine about her memoir How Not to be a Political Wife. Among the most startling revelations in an excellent book, were about the casual sexism and misogyny she'd had to overcome since childhood. These included a vile joke aimed at her recently by a celebrity columnist on a left-leaning London broadsheet. Ms Vine is also a striking and attractive woman, yet – by her own admission – is plagued by self-doubt about her appearance. In Scotland right now when groups of women gather to discuss their legitimate concerns about single-sex spaces they know that they must first run a gauntlet of hate and threats of physical violence by young male activists. They also know that Police Scotland will rarely intervene to prevent this. Skye Stout is just embarking on a promising career as a footballer. That young women like her are now being recognised for their skills and paid for them signposts one of the most important pathways ever to have emerged for women and young girls in this generation. This has coincided with a period in Scotland's history where some of the most important and compelling voices in politics belong to smart, brave, eloquent women. How tragic that in Scotland male trolls still want to silence them. Kevin McKenna is a Herald writer and columnist. He is Features Writer of the Year and writes regularly about the working-class people and communities of Scotland.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP confirms when it will start taking payments straight from bank accounts
The new Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill will be introduced from April 2026 and will give the Government power to recover money straight from bank accounts The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed when a major crackdown on benefit cheats will come into force. The new Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill will be introduced from April 2026 and will give the Government power to recover money straight from bank accounts of those who have committed benefit fraud. The DWP will be able to request bank statements of those who are under investigation, but it will not have direct access to bank accounts. There will be new requirements for banks and building societies to flag where there is a potential breach of eligibility rules for benefits. The DWP will also be able to apply to the court to ban people from driving for up to two years. It is hoped the new powers will save taxpayers £1.5billion over five years. The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill forms part of wider government plans to save a total of £8.6billion. An estimated £7.4billion was lost to benefit fraud last year. Other measures include DWP organised crime investigators being allowed to apply to for search warrants to seize evidence against fraudsters, including computers and smartphones. The time limit for civil claims against Covid fraud will also be doubled from six to twelve years. DWP minister Liz Kendall said back in March: "The social security system that we inherited from the Conservatives is failing the very people that it is supposed to help and is holding our country back. "The facts speak for themselves. One in 10 people of working age are now claiming a sickness or disability benefit. Almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training - one in eight of all our young people." In more DWP news, pensioners have been told they have until September 15 to opt out of the Winter Fuel Payment worth up to £300. Winter Fuel Payments are being paid this year to pensioners who were born before September 22, 1959 - but if you earn over £35,000 a year, then your Winter Fuel Payment will be automatically recovered by HMRC. This will be done through PAYE, or through self-assessment return. If you earn over £35,000, then there is an option to opt out of getting your Winter Fuel Payment. You can do this by filling out a form on or by contacting the Winter Fuel Payment Centre by post or telephone. The income eligibility is based per person. You can check if your Winter Fuel Payment will be clawed back by HMRC on this page.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Qantas fined over £43 million for illegally sacking 1,800 workers during Covid pandemic
A judge on Monday fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59m or £43m) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AU$120m ($78m) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labour laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AU$120m ($78m) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney -based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AU$121,212,000 ($78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AU$90m ($59m), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AU$125m ($81m) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas 's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. "I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families," she said. 'Over the past 18 months, we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AU$50m ($33m) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AU$40m ($26m) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling, which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history, and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless, and we won,' Kaine added. Qantas has admitted to illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AU$120m ($78m) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court, alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been cancelled.
