
Hegseth wins praise but Asia still has strong doubts about Trump
SINGAPORE (Bloomberg): After US military allies in Europe were torched by Vice President JD Vance in March over military spending, free speech and the war in Ukraine, America's partners in Asia warily awaited Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's arrival at a security conference in Singapore.
Turns out there was little reason to worry, apart from the perpetual anxiety over President Donald Trump's social media feed.
While Hegseth delivered Trump's demands for higher security spending on par with Europe, he couched it as necessary to prepare for a potentially "imminent' Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
The US wouldn't be pushed out the region, he said, nor let allies and partners "be subordinated and intimidated' - a commitment lauded by many in attendance.
But in the hallways of the Shangri-La Hotel, Hegseth couldn't dispel concerns about the erratic policymaking of his boss. Many of the generals, defense ministers and intelligence officers from Asia and Europe - who are key to helping the US counter China - were still reeling from the shock of Trump's sectoral levies and "reciprocal' tariffs.
Hegseth "offered a needed level of reassurance to allies and partners that the United States will remain present in the Indo-Pacific and committed to countering China's coercive threats,' said Rory Medcalf, head of the National Security College at the Australian National University. "But this message will remain discounted by the dysfunction we are seeing in Washington.'
On his second trip to Asia since March, the Pentagon chief displayed some diplomatic nuance that surprised some officials who expected more grandstanding from the former television personality. Hegseth was also able to capitalize on a huge absence at the annual gathering: China didn't send a defense minister for the first time since 2019, putting Beijing's lower-level officials on the back foot.
That void gave US officials space to set the tone and work the room, vowing greater cooperation with countries like Cambodia, Thailand and Indonesia. And it gave America's traditional partners even more room to criticize Beijing, despite their dependence on trade with China.
Yet even if Hegseth was more reassuring than Vance, it still wasn't enough to overcome the uncertainty created by Trump's trade policies. That's particularly the case in Southeast Asia, which was among the hardest hit by Trump's tariffs in April.
"Trade is not a soft power indulgence - it is part of our strategic architecture,' Malaysia Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said, referring to Southeast Asia. "It must be protected, not from competition but from the onslaught of arbitrary imposition of trade restrictions.'
Trump's barrage of tariffs and general volatility - he announced a doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs over the weekend - was the subject of much of the chatter on the sidelines of the annual conference, according to several officials who asked not to be identified, citing private discussions.
The officials said they were unsure whether the US president would stand by their side in a moment of need and that any deal reached with him could unravel moments later in a social media post.
That uncertainty appeared to be pushing Indo-Pacific nations and Europe toward each other in a stronger sense of shared security and free-trade opportunities based on longstanding global rules. It also sparked pushback against what several nations saw as efforts to establish "spheres of influence' where the US or China can dominate.
"Our shared responsibility is to ensure with others that our countries are not collateral victims of the imbalances linked to the choices made by the superpowers,' French President Emmanuel Macron said at the conference's opening on Friday.
Macron's words about "strategic autonomy' and his call for Europe and Asia to join forces to "de-risk' supply chains struck a chord with many attendees. Several countries in the region are already having similar debates in their own capitals, some of the officials said.
Many governments in the region rely on China economically and on the US for security, and are keen to not antagonize either. However, there's also a desire to be more autonomous and less dependent on either of the world's two-biggest economies, opening up new space for middle powers in Europe and Asia to join hands.
Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, made that pitch to Asian nations throughout the weekend.
"If you reject unilateralism, bullying and aggression, and instead choose cooperation, shared prosperity and common security, the European Union will always be by your side,' she said.
Amid the US-China turbulence, smaller nations sought to build ties. Japan's defense minister, Gen Nakatani, touted efforts to build closer relations with India and the Philippines. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Sunday that her country was working with partners in the region to counter Russian and Chinese cyber threats, as well as Beijing's dominance of drone manufacturing and ship building.
Even one of America's closest partners in the region, Australia, signaled some independence from its ally.
Hegseth's outreach to the region "is deeply welcome,' Australia's Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said. But he quickly added that "liberal trade has been the lifeblood of the Asian region, and the shock and disruption to trade from high tariffs has been costly and destabilizing.'
During his remarks, Hegseth was pressed on the trade concerns and whether there was a contradiction in the Trump administration's message. He sidestepped the question with a smile, saying he was "in the business of tanks, not trade.'
Last year, China's delegation surprised observers by repeatedly calling unscheduled press briefings. This year they surprised delegates by barely appearing at all. When they did engage, China's representatives pushed back at Hegseth's accusation that Beijing was destabilizing Asia and sparred with other speakers more broadly.
The Pentagon chief aimed to "provoke, divide, instigate confrontations, stir up the region,' said Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of China's National Defense University. Another official, Senior Colonel Lu Yin, decried the atmosphere at the forum, saying that "labeling China, blaming China, verbally attacking China are politically right here.'
In one of the sharpest exchanges of the weekend, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro had a testy exchange with two senior colonels in the People's Liberation Army, receiving applause after he thanked them for "propaganda spiels disguised as questions.' Referring to China, Teodoro said he couldn't trust a country that "represses its own people.'
Yet although China's presence was diminished, most countries still wanted to balance ties between Beijing and Washington.
"If we have to choose sides, may we choose the side of principles,' Singapore Defense Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday at the final panel of the weekend. "Principles that uphold a global order, where we do not descend into the law of the jungle, where the mighty do what they wish and the weak suffer what they must.'
--With assistance from Alastair Gale, Courtney McBride and Alfred Cang.
- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump and Xi will likely speak this week, says White House
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. Leavitt is the third top Trump aide to forecast an imminent call between the two leaders to iron out differences on last month's tariff agreement in Geneva, among larger trade issues. It was not immediately clear when the two leaders will speak. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday that Trump and Xi would speak "very soon" to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions on exports of certain minerals. Trump said on Friday he was sure that he would speak to Xi. China said in April that the two leaders had not had a conversation recently. On Saturday, the US Trade Representative's office announced it would continue to exclude certain solar manufacturing equipment and other products from existing tariffs on Chinese goods until August 31, offering a three-month extension while talks with Beijing continue. Bessent led negotiations with China in Geneva last month that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies, but progress since then has been slow, the US Treasury chief told Fox News last week. The US-China agreement to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model, leaving those issues for future talks. A US trade court on Wednesday ruled that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing the bulk of his tariffs on imports from China and other countries under an emergency powers act. But less than 24 hours later, a federal appeals court reinstated the tariffs, saying it was pausing the trade court ruling to consider the government's appeal. The appeals court ordered the plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the administration to respond by June 9.


The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
Experts: End monopoly in the gold market
An employee prepares a gold dragon statue inside a jewelry shop during Lunar New Year holidays in Hanoi, Vietnam, on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024. Photographer Linh Pham/Bloomberg HANOI: It is time to fundamentally change the gold market structure through eliminating monopoly and building a gold trading exchange to effectively manage the market, say experts. Many of them believe that to stabilise the domestic gold market, it is necessary to eliminate the monopoly of gold bars, as directed recently by the general secretary To Lam. Only when more businesses are allowed to participate in the production and import of gold bars legally and transparently, can the market achieve a state of healthy competition, bringing domestic gold prices closer to world prices. On the goal of narrowing the gap between domestic and world gold prices, vice-president of the Vietnam Gold Business Association Nguyen The Hung said this depends entirely on actual supply and demand in the market. In principle, when demand exceeds supply, prices will increase, and gold is no exception. If the local gold supply is supplemented, domestic gold prices will decrease. According to Hung, a major bottleneck are the activities of gold jewellery manufacturing enterprises. Although Decree 24/2012 allows the import of raw gold, gold manufacturing and trading enterprises have not been granted import quotas for more than 10 years. As a result, they have to buy gold on the market unofficially at high prices with unknown origin. It means the ultimate risk will be pushed to consumers because they will have to buy gold at prices much higher than the world price. Another bottleneck of the gold market is the 1% export tax currently applied to jewellery. Vietnamese businesses import raw gold at global prices but are taxed when exporting, making the cost even higher. Therefore, they cannot compete against their foreign rivals. They also have to bear a series of additional costs such as labour, machinery and depreciation. Hùng said if the export tax is removed and the supply of raw gold is ensured, it will create a strong driver for jewellery gold exports, attracting foreign currency revenues into the country. According to deputy Tran Anh Tuan of the National Assembly delegation of Ho Chi Minh City, if the government shifts to market-based management and create conditions for qualified enterprises to participate in the production, trading and distribution of gold as a normal commodity, the gap between domestic and global gold prices will be narrowed. 'It is necessary to open the door to qualified enterprises. If they have a licence, they should be allowed to import according to their actual capacity.' — Vietnam News/ANN


The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
Oil gains on supply concerns as wildfires disrupt Canada supply, Opec+ keeps output plans unchanged
NEW YORK: Oil prices climbed nearly 3% on Monday on supply concerns as producer group OPEC+ decided not to accelerate plans to hike output and wildfires in Canada's oil-producing province disrupted production. Brent crude futures settled $1.85, or 2.95%, higher at $64.63 a barrel. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude gained $1.73, or 2.85%, to $62.52. Wildfires burning in Canada's oil-producing province of Alberta have affected about 7% of the country's overall crude oil output as of Monday, according to Reuters calculations. At least two thermal oil sands operators south of the industry hub of Fort McMurray evacuated workers from their sites over the weekend and shut production as a precaution. "The wildfires in Alberta are now starting to seep in," said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital in New York. Also supporting prices, the U.S. dollar slipped across the board on Monday on worries that Trump's fresh tariff threats might hurt growth and stoke inflation. A weaker U.S. currency makes dollar-priced commodities such as oil less expensive for buyers using other currencies. Prices were also supported by a perception of increased geopolitical risk after Ukrainian drone strikes against Russia over the weekend, said Rystad Energy's Jorge Leon. Meanwhile, mixed signals from Iran-U.S. talks kept market participants on edge. An Iranian diplomat said on Monday Iran was poised to reject a U.S. proposal to end a decades-old nuclear dispute. Delegations from the two countries made some progress after a fifth round of talks in Rome last month. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, known collectively as OPEC+, decided on Saturday to raise output by 411,000 barrels per day in July, the third consecutive monthly increase of that amount, as it looks to wrestle back market share and punish members that have produced more than their quotas. Sources familiar with OPEC+ talks said on Friday that the group could discuss an even larger increase. Oil traders said the 411,000 bpd increase had already been priced into Brent and WTI futures. Phil Flynn, a senior analyst with Price Futures Group, said investors had expected the oil-producing group to increase production by more than it did. "I think they were caught the wrong way." Goldman Sachs analysts expect OPEC+ to implement a final 410,000 bpd production increase in August. "Relatively tight spot oil fundamentals, beats in hard global activity data and seasonal summer support to oil demand suggest that the expected demand slowdown is unlikely to be sharp enough to stop raising production when deciding on August production levels on July 6," the bank said in a note. Morgan Stanley analysts also said they expect 411,000 bpd to be added back each month up to a total of 2.2 million bpd by October. "With this latest announcement, there is little sign that the pace of quota increases is slowing," the bank's analysts said. - Reuters