New Northants MPs reflect on 'amazing' and 'challenging' year
'The British public are really watching'
Bool has previously stood in Vauxhall in the 2019 election before succeeding Dame Andrea Leadsom in South Northamptonshire.Looking back on the last 12 months, she says: "The very first time I actually sat in the chamber was a real pinch me moment."You touch the green leather and think of everything and everyone who has spoken there. "For me, that was quite a magical moment, after years and years of being interested and wanting to get into politics, to finally be there was absolutely incredible."Bool is the Private Parliamentary Secretary (PPS) for the shadow Home Office and shadow Attorney General, as well as being on a select committee and the vice chair of another parliamentary group.She says being in opposition brings plenty of challenges, including time management, and there is "all the national legislation and all the constituency things that are the most important" to consider. However, she says she gets interesting experiences as part of her job, such as when she did "a loop-the-loop in an aeroplane" as part of an armed forces parliamentary scheme.
Bool got to ask her first Prime Minister's Question (PMQ) last month about the need for early detection.Describing the experience, she says: "[It was] Nerve-wracking, it's the one moment where you know the British public are really watching and the chamber is full."Bool says it was "quite intimidating, but what was lovely is you can get the support from your colleagues, so you hear the 'here, here's' as you're standing there".
'The other side of parliament'
Reader joined the Labour Party in 2015 and was selected for the party's future candidate programme in 2022, before being elected to Parliament.Reflecting on his first day in Westminster, he says: "Going into parliament that day was the first time I'd ever been into the chamber, so it was a real experience that will live with me forever."He says he works six days a week and thinks it's more than just a job, adding: "It's more of a calling because you are always on call, people scrutinise everything you do, and the rewards are amazing, but also the stress and the experiences are quite challenging sometimes."
Reader's office is in Richmond House, and the building previously housed the Department for Health. He shares the space with another MP. In his half of the room, he's got a desk area for his staff, and plenty of trinkets that he has collected over the past 12 months from his travels."The commando comic I got when I visited the commandos in Plymouth," he explains, going through his shelf. "Some little logistics trucks because one in five people in Northampton South work in the logistics sector, and then little trinkets I've collected when I've been to different events and other things, including my boarding passes from when I went to the Falklands."In the corner of the room is a pop-up banner from the All Party Parliamentary Group on Wrestling, which Reader chairs.Over the summer recess, his office offers two tours every Tuesday and Wednesday for community groups in Northampton."I thought it was a nice way to use this privilege of having full access to a UNESCO World Heritage site, a beautiful building, to demystify it for people and show them the other side of parliament that they would maybe never see."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Aggressive insults, grabbing all the headlines – Gavin Newsom is trying to be a Democratic version of Trump. Will voters buy it?
On Thursday, Gavin Newsom announced that he would ask the California legislature to vote to put an initiative to redraw the state's congressional districts on the ballot in November. This, of course, came in response to Texas Republicans, acting on behalf of Donald Trump, attempting to redraw their maps to give additional seats to the GOP in the House of Representatives. All the while, Newsom has roundly mocked Trump and, on social media, mimicked the president's all-caps style of posting. Newsom is clearly eyeing a run for president. But he's also offering something unique: between his bombastic tone and his ability to grab headlines, he's offering Democrats their own version of Trumpism. When Trump first ran for president and then later stepped into the Oval Office, Republicans regularly would say, 'At least he fights.' That refrain allowed them to accept Trump calling Mexicans rapists, impugning prisoners of war and his bragging about grabbing women without their consent. 'The guy's a generational talent,' Mike Madrid, a Hispanic political consultant from California who worked for Republicans, told The Independent. 'Most people rely on their own skillset. He's able to adjust, see the political terrain and fight on that terrain and win.' And Madrid saw Newsom's skill up close in person when he worked on the campaign for Newsom's 2018 opponent, former Los Angeles Democratic mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. That was the case in 2004, when Newsom presided over same-sex marriages during his time as mayor of San Francisco. In 2008, he famously said, 'This door's wide open now. It's going to happen, whether you like it or not.' 'He is best in times of tension and conflict,' Madrid said. It's a major change of fortune for Newsom. After Trump's victory in 2024, he faced severe criticism for his handling of the wildfires in Southern California. When he launched his podcast at the beginning of 2025, he took heat from other Democrats when he agreed with conservative activist Charlie Kirk about transgender athletes in women's sports. To this day, many Democrats and LGBT+ activists remain salty. But many Democrats still find themselves pleased with his actions against Trump. In June, he sued the Trump administration for sending the National Guard into Los Angeles to quell protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Now, he's taking Trump on directly, and it seems to have appeal. Earlier this year, Shannon Watts, a Democratic activist who raised $11 million last year for Kamala Harris, had largely refrained from giving money to Democrats in disappointment at the party's inability to stand up to Trump. But this week, she contributed to Newsom's campaign. 'I have been waiting for Democrats to meet the moment and to show some fight and to stand up to this administration that is so clearly wanting to be authoritarian,' she told The Independent. 'And this is less of me saying with my money, oh, this is the person that I think will be president. It's more of a vote of a thank you so much for doing what is expected of elected officials and politicians in this moment.' Newsom still has his weaknesses, of course. He famously faced a recall in 2021 after facing backlash for dining indoors at the French Laundry restaurant without a mask during the pandemic. And his policies of banning homeless encampments have also angered progressives. This is to say nothing of the fact that if he runs, he will have the 'Liberal San Francisco mayor' label that might put off swing voters. But Watts said her contribution was not an endorsement of him as the Democratic nominee in 2028. 'I had people in my thread say when I tweeted that I was donating, 'You know, he's not the one,'' Watts said. 'That's not the point. This is not about in 2025 who is going to be the Democratic nominee. This is about who is leading the pack in fighting in ways that are new and different, inventive and effective.' Polling consistently shows that Democratic voters increasingly do not like their leaders and see them as rolling over for Trump. That has, in turn, led to Democrats yearning for someone to fill the gap, Lakshya Jain, a co-founder of the politics website Split Ticket, told The Independent. 'There's not really any way for Democrats to fight against Trump right now,' he said. 'Because what letters do they have? They don't control any branch of government. They don't control the Supreme Court, but what is true is they do control the state of California, and the state of California has nine Republicans and a lot of blue turf that's kind of wasted on certain incumbents.' That allows Newsom to step out in front and say he is the first one to stand against Texas's actions. Specifically, the Texas Democrats who decamped to blue states said they would return to Texas because California would respond in kind if Texas passed their new maps. 2028 is a long way off and plenty could change. Other candidates might be able to prove Newsom is a paper tiger. But then again, plenty of Republicans waited for Trump to implode and he laid waste to them. On Friday, as Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, Newsom's office fired off another Trumpian all-caps tweet. 'MANY PEOPLE ARE SAYING THAT DONALD J. WOULD CONSIDER 'GIVING AWAY' THE FREE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO HIS 'BEST FRIEND' VLADIMIR PUTIN — ALL BECAUSE I, GAVIN C. NEWSOM, STOLE THE CAMERAS THIS WEEK WITH 'THE MAPS,' he posted.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
The tax change Starmer is being urged to do to improve UK finances
Sir Keir Starmer is facing growing pressure to introduce a wealth tax to address a significant shortfall in public finances. New polling indicates that 91 per cent of Labour members support taxing the rich more, with 84 per cent also advocating for an end to the two-child benefit cap. Senior Labour figures, including Angela Rayner and Anneliese Dodds, have previously urged consideration of wealth taxes as an alternative to departmental cuts. The survey also highlights widespread concern among Labour members regarding party discipline, with 74 per cent believing challenging controversial legislation should not result in suspension. Critics within the party warn that the leadership is out of step with its membership and risks losing support if it does not adopt a more progressive policy direction.
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Afghans resettled in UK affected by new MoD data breach
Thousands of Afghans brought to safety in the UK have had their personal data exposed, after a Ministry of Defence (MoD) sub-contractor suffered a data breach. The names, passport information and Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) details of up to 3,700 Afghans have potentially been affected after Inflite The Jet Centre, which provides ground-handling services for flights at London Stansted airport, suffered a cyber-security comes just a month after it was a revealed another major data breach in 2022 leaked the details of almost 19,000 people who had asked to come to the UK in order to flee the Taliban. The government said the incident "has not posed any threat to individuals' safety, nor compromised any government systems." There is currently no evidence to suggest that any data has been released Afghans affected are believed to have travelled to the UK between January and March 2024, under a resettlement scheme for those who worked with British troops. An email sent out by the Afghan resettlement team on Friday afternoon warned their families that personal information may have been exposed."This may include passport details (including name, date of birth, and passport number) and Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) reference numbers," it affected also include British military personnel and former Conservative government ministers, the BBC understands.A government spokesperson said: "We were recently notified that a third party sub-contractor to a supplier experienced a cyber security incident involving unauthorised access to a small number of its emails that contained basic personal information."We take data security extremely seriously and are going above and beyond our legal duties in informing all potentially affected individuals." Inflite The Jet Centre said in a statement it believes "the scope of the incident was limited to email accounts only" and has reported it to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). The BBC has contacted the ICO for comment. The incident follows a February 2022 incident in which the personal data of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to move to the UK under the Arap scheme was mistakenly leaked by a British official, leading to thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK. The leaked spreadsheet contained the names, contact details and some family information of the people potentially at risk of harm from the Taliban. That incident was made public for the first time in July of this year.
