
Black US farmers brace for impact amid tariffs turmoil
Summary
Black farmers face historical challenges in accessing capital and land ownership
Trump's tariffs criticized by farm groups, threaten farmers' competitiveness
Race-neutral program passed after lawsuits against Biden's debt relief initiative
Black farmers' share of U.S. farms has drastically declined over the past century
BOYDTON, Virginia, April 30 (Reuters) - As a fourth generation farmer, Virginia resident John Boyd Jr typically spends the busy spring season prepping his land to plant sweet corn seeds and soybeans.
But Boyd, the president and founder of the National Black Farmers Association, has also been busy fielding inquiries from Black farmers anxious about the impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs.
here.
'The farmers are calling and saying,'Hey, Boyd, should I plant my crop, man? This ain't looking good for us. Have you heard anything from anybody where we can get some emergency loans?' Boyd recounted in an interview, as he worked on his farm. 'And it's frustrating because the answer is no. We don't have the resources to help them.'
In several interviews, agricultural sociologists, public health and government and governance experts and advocates said the impact of Trump's tariffs could be more acute for Black farmers, given their historical challenges in accessing capital, retaining ownership of their land and the enduring legacy of decades of discrimination and racism.
Groups representing U.S. farmers and food processors have been mostly critical of Trump's tariffs on imports, which analysts say will hike prices for consumers. The American Farm Bureau Federation, the leading farm lobby, said the tariffs threaten farmers' competitiveness and could cause long-term damage.
'Everything about trade and tariffs over the past few months has just been so erratic that it is tough for businesses, for farmers, for analysts to know what's gonna happen, not only in the long term, but even from day to day or even hour to hour,' said Bill Winters, a Georgia Tech University sociology professor.
Black farmers today account for less than 2% of all U.S. farmers, a share that has significantly dropped over the past century, according to a 2024 report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service. In 1920, 41.4 million acres were operated by Black farmers. By contrast, a USDA Census of Agriculture data report found Black producers operated 32,700 farms and ranches, covering about 5.3 million acres in 2022.
In a March 2021 website post affirming the agency's commitment to civil rights, former USDA secretary Tom Vilsack said the government needed to acknowledge the "USDA's history of systemic discrimination via policies and programs designed to benefit those with access, education, assets, privilege rather than for those without." He pledged to root out systemic racism and barriers experienced by Black farmers, socially disadvantaged farmers, and poor areas in rural America.
The post appears to have since been removed, opens new tab from the USDA's site. Since returning to the White House, Trump has spent the past 100 days aggressively dismantling diversity -- and civil rights -- initiatives across the federal government.
'We spend most of our time just trying to survive on what's thrown at us,' Boyd said, noting that unequal access has existed regardless of who occupies the Oval Office. But he said farmers are concerned about the ripple effects of dismantling programs aimed at remedying discrimination.
'ACTION TO SUPPORT FARMERS'
Farming accounts for more than a third of U.S. land. While the number of farms is dwindling and their average size growing, family-owned and operated farms still account for the vast majority of land farmed, according to USDA.
A USDA spokesperson said that over the last four years, the Biden administration left the USDA "in complete disarray and dysfunction."
"President Trump is taking strong action to support farmers by quickly rolling out programs like the Emergency Commodity Assistance Program that provides $10 Billion in direct assistance to producers," the USDA said in a statement. "USDA does not discriminate and single out individual farmers based on race, gender, or political orientation."
The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act signed by former president Joe Biden in 2021, in part set aside billions in debt relief to help socially disadvantaged farmers -- and to address the USDA's history of discrimination.
But, the program was repealed following lawsuits filed by white farmers. A subsequent race-neutral program was passed through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
'With tariffs right now, from a Black farmer's perspective, it really doesn't affect us because we have been shut out for 100 years,' said Corey Lea, a Tennessee farmer and advocate.
Keon Gilbert, a Brookings Institution governance studies fellow and Saint Louis University public health professor, said Black farmers fear they won't receive payments awarded as part of the legislation. The tariffs, he said, could compound an already fragile situation.
'What could possibly happen is we may see a continued decline in Black farms. Many of those farmers have smaller properties, smaller land, and that may all just go away," Gilbert said.
Meanwhile, Boyd will continue to fight to preserve his family's multi-generational farming legacy.
"By the grace of God, I'm going to plant my crops," Boyd said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Democrats respond to Trump's ‘reckless' and ‘discriminatory' travel ban
Democrats have criticized Donald Trump's travel ban on 12 countries as 'reckless' and 'discriminatory', with some warning the policy may be an effort to distract Americans from Trump's much-criticized tax bill. Trump signed a sweeping order banning travel from countries including Afghanistan, Equatorial Guinea and Haiti on Wednesday night, claiming he had considered multiple factors, including 'foreign policy, national security and counterterrorism goals' in deciding on the ban. Adam Schiff, the Democratic senator from California, disagreed, calling the move 'Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again'. 'Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the US from the rest of world [sic]. Bigotry is not a national security strategy.' Pramila Jayapal, a Democratic congresswoman from Washington, said in a statement: 'This ban, expanded from Trump's Muslim ban in his first term, will only further isolate us on the world stage. This discriminatory policy, which limits legal immigration, not only flies in the face of what our country is supposed to stand for, it will be harmful to our economy and our communities that rely on the contributions of people who come to America from this wide range of countries. 'Banning a whole group of people because you disagree with the structure or function of their government not only lays blame in the wrong place, it creates a dangerous precedent.' Trump announced the ban as Republicans in the Senate weigh his tax and spending bill. On Wednesday, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the legislation, which would extend tax cuts and increase military spending, would add $2.4tn to the national deficit over the next decade and leave millions more people without health insurance. 'Not a coincidence Trump announced his travel ban tonight,' Chris Murphy, the Democratic senator from Connecticut, said on social media. 'He's trying to distract us from the core story. And the core story is their bill to throw 15 million people off their health care in order to give a $270,000 tax cut to the richest Americans.' Don Beyer, a Democratic congressman from Virginia, said on social media: 'From his first Muslim Ban, Trump's travel bans have always betrayed of [sic] the ideals and values that inspired America's Founders. Trump's use of prejudice and bigotry to bar people from entering the U.S. does not make us safer, it just divides us and weakens our global leadership.' Beyer added: 'This policy will separate families, including many I represent. And with Trump's assault on asylum and refugees, it will intentionally put people at deadly risk. The true rationale isn't security, it's racism.'


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
ECB's Lagarde says she's determined to complete her term
FRANKFURT, June 5 (Reuters) - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on Thursday she was determined to complete her term at the ECB, following speculation she might leave early to take up a role leading the World Economic Forum (WEF). "I can very firmly tell you that I have always been, and I am, fully determined to deliver on my mission, and I'm determined to complete my term," Lagarde told her regular news conference following the ECB's interest rate decision. Former WEF head Klaus Schwab was recently quoted by the Financial Times as saying he had met Lagarde to discuss the prospect of her leaving the ECB early to lead the Swiss-based organisation, best-known for its winter conference in Davos. An ECB spokesperson said at the time that Lagarde was determined to complete her eight-year presidential term, which runs out at the end of October 2027. Founder Schwab resigned with immediate effect in April and the WEF said it had launched an investigation into his affairs following a whistleblower letter alleging misconduct. Schwab denies the allegations.


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
France's Dassault and India's Tata to produce Rafale fuselage in Hyderabad
NEW DELHI, June 5 (Reuters) - France's Dassault Aviation ( opens new tab and India's Tata Advanced Systems have agreed to manufacture the fuselage of the Rafale fighter aircraft in India, the companies said on Thursday, the first time it will be produced outside France. India, the world's biggest arms importer, has been looking to step up domestic production and boost defence exports, which jumped 12% in the fiscal year to end-March, to $2.76 billion. Tata will set up a production facility in the southern city of Hyderabad to manufacture key structural sections of the Rafale as part of the agreement, the companies said in a statement. The first fuselage sections are expected to roll off the assembly line in the 2028 financial year, with the facility expected to deliver up to two complete fuselages per month, they said. The statement did not say how much the deal was worth nor whether the finish products would be for domestic use or export, but Tata Advanced Systems said on X that the fuselage would be "for India and other global markets". The Indian Air Force currently operates 36 Rafale fighters. India also signed a deal in April with France - its second-largest arms supplier - to buy 26 naval versions of the jets for $7 billion, which are expected to be delivered by 2030. The South Asian nation is looking to modernise its military and boost domestic weapons' production, particularly to strengthen its defences against neighbours Pakistan and China. India used fighter jets in four-days of fierce clashes with Pakistan last month, after a deadly attack by Islamist assailants that killed 26 men in Indian Kashmir. Pakistan's defence minister had said three of India's Rafale fighter jets had been shot down during the fighting but did not share any evidence. One U.S. official told Reuters that at least one downed Indian aircraft was a Rafale. Dassault Aviation had declined to comment. India's chief of defence staff told Reuters in an interview last week that India suffered losses in the air, but declined to give details. ($1 = 85.7970 Indian rupees)