Portugal far-right party becomes second biggest in parliament
Chega, which means "Enough", and the left-wing Socialists had been level on 58 seats after the provisional results from the May 18 poll, but the far-right party won two of the previously unannounced four overseas constituencies, taking its tally to 60.
The results make Chega the official opposition just six years after its creation.
The centre-right Democratic Alliance claimed the other two overseas seats taking its total to 91, still far from the 116 seats needed to form a majority government. The Social Democratic Party of outgoing prime minister Luis Montenegro is the main part of the alliance.
"It is a big victory," said Chega founder and leader Andre Ventura, claiming that it "marks a profound change in the Portuguese political system".
The anti-immigration party had 50 seats in the last parliament.
Montenegro is expected to try to form a minority government after the latest election and he has said he will not deal with Chega. But Ventura called on Montenegro to "break" with the Socialists.
President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa was to hold new talks with the leaders of the three main parties on Thursday and could name a new prime minister during the day.
"Portugal is moving in line with the European trend" for a "protest vote", said Paula Espirito Santo at Lisbon University's Higher Institute of Social and Political Sciences.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Most NATO members endorse Trump demand to up defence spending
Most US allies at NATO have endorsed US President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of GDP on defence and are ready to ramp up security spending, the alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Thursday. "There's broad support," Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. "We are really close," he said, adding that he has "total confidence that we will get there" by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5% of GDP on defence; 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defence budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others are still struggling to meet the target. Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on 24-25 June. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5% so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and on its own borders. He has gained important leverage over other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the United States would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5% increase over the current 2% goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19% of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68% a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. While the two new figures do add up to 5%, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2% target, set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014, was meant to be reached over a decade. According to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump has done nothing less than save NATO. He told reporters that European allies around the table on Thursday had said: "We hear you. We all need increased capabilities. We all need to spend more. Thank you, President Trump, for reviving this alliance. It was an alliance that was sleepwalking to irrelevance." The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. Asked what the Pentagon's plans are, Hegseth did not explain but he said: "It would only be responsible for the United States to continually assess our force posture, which is precisely what we've done." "America can't be everywhere all the time, nor should we be and so there are reasons why we have troops in certain places," he said, offering the assurance that any review would be done "alongside our allies and partners to make sure it's the right size." During the meeting, Hegseth and his defence counterparts also approved purchasing targets for stocking up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic. The "capability targets" lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment like air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and "strategic enablers" such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023, the alliance's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War, to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
NATO to propose upping members' defence spending to 5%, chief indicates broad support'
Most US allies at NATO endorse President Donald Trump 's demand that they invest 5 percent of GDP on their defence needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Thursday. 'There's broad support,' Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. 'We are really close,' he said, and added that he has 'total confidence that we will get there' by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5 percent of GDP on defense — 3.5 percent on core military spending and 1.5 percent on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's full-scale war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2 percent of GDP on national defense budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others still struggle to do so. Pressured by Trump Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on June 24-25. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5 percent so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and its own borders. He has gained important leverage over the other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the US would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5 percent increase over the current 2 percent goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19 percent of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68 percent a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. Seven-year time frame While the two new figures do add up to 5 percent, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2 percent target – set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 – was meant to be reached over a decade. The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War – to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. NATO planners believe that the targets must be met within 5-10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Did Merz achieve everything he wanted from meeting with Trump?
Friedrich Merz has held talks with US President Donald Trump in the White House, his first visit to Washington since becoming Germany's chancellor. The three topics that were most important during the meeting were defence spending, tariffs and Ukraine and according to a press statement released by Merz shortly before the meeting, the German side was well prepared for the meeting. German Council of Foreign Relations senior research fellow Rachel Tausenfreund said the meeting "could not have gone better for Merz." Tausenfreund says Merz's answers were "well crafted" and that "specifics over the tough trade negotiations were avoided." Trump said the White House was in good shape, that the new administration had "fixed it up, and having it tippy toppy" like "they have in Germany." Trump said both leaders feel it is "very sad" what is going on in Ukraine and added that between five and six thousand soldiers a week are being killed there. The US president mentioned the 75-minute phone conversation he had had with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, where Putin reportedly promised to retaliate to Ukraine's audacious drone strikes deep inside Russia on Sunday that that took out a third of the country's bombers. Trump said that he didn't think Putin was "playing games," and blamed former President Joe Biden for the full scale invasion starting. Trump also said he thinks Putin wants "the whole thing," referring to all of Ukraine. Merz suggested he wanted Germany and the US to play a joint role in ending the war. Merz also underlined the good relationship between Germany and US and said he was looking forward to "good cooperation" between both nations. Merz highlighted Germany's commitment to NATO after the government locked in billions of euros of additional defence spending. Relations between Germany and the US had grown frosty, particularly after the Trump administration accused Europe of "freeloading," regarding NATO and defence spending. The US administration is frustrated over what it views as insufficient European contributions. "We want to have the strongest conventional army in Europe," Merz said in the press release ahead of the conference. Trump welcomed the increase in Germany's spending on defence, although suggested he would eventually cap Germany's efforts to rearm. Merz said that Europe still needs US support and friendship ahead of Friday's D-Day anniversary. Trump claimed that under the Biden administration, the numbers for US recruitment for the army were the lowest ever, but now they have broken records. Merz asked how as Germany is having a tough time filling reserves, to which Trump replied: "spirit. They love our country again and you're going to do the same thing." Trump called Merz "difficult" but a good man and said he could imagine US troops would remain in Germany. Director of the Aspen Institute, Dr Stormy-Annika Mildner, says that whilst confrontational with tariff threats and talk of troop withdrawals, "this partnership requires more active management than ever. All the more important, then, that Chancellor Merz sought an early dialogue in Washington." "It seems good work was done ahead of time to let Trump know that Merz had different positions from Merkel on issues which are important to Trump. Trump seemed eager to position himself as a friend to Merz," Tausenfreund added. On the topic of Trump's recent US travel ban on citizens from 12 countries, the US president said: "I even hate to say this in front of the chancellor, but you have a little problem too with some of the people you let in. It's not your fault," and suggested he had warned former chancellor Angela Merkel not to open the borders in 2015 to allow over a million Syrian refugees in. Regarding tariffs, Europe is in danger of becoming flooded by steel after Trump increased tariffs on aluminium and steel to 50%. Asides from that the EU is also facing a 25% tariff on cars and a 10% levy on all other imports. The US has also launched several investigations into pharma, semiconductors and aircrafts that could lead to further tariffs. Trump has further threatened to impose a 50% tariff on all EU goods as of 9 July if negotiations fail to meet his expectations. Dr Stormy-Annika Mildner told Euronews that the relationship with the United States remains central to Germany "both economically and politically." On the subject of China and Trump's phone call with leader Xi Jinping, Trump said they struck a deal, but they needed to make sure "everyone understands what the deal is." He also said Jinping will be visiting the US and he'll be visiting China with US First Lady Melania Trump.
