
Rethinking Leadership Development For The Social Sector
Being a leader of an organization propelling social and environmental change means engaging in difficult, often isolating work. Problems such as poverty, systemic racism, public health inequities and climate justice are entrenched, volatile and complex. They involve tangled stakeholder networks, ever-evolving constraints, labyrinthine funding journeys and the constant balancing act between mission impact and organizational sustainability.
These thorny issues generally lack clear, straightforward technical solutions. Instead, they require adaptive problem-solving skills. Where can leaders of nonprofits, social enterprises and other impact-first organizations turn for answers and help? We're finding that one of the best sources is each other.
Why Peer-To-Peer Networks Work
Impact leaders face challenges that don't exist in traditional businesses, where so many experts and consultants have gained their experience. Too often, outside consultants, speaker-driven conferences and rigid, pre-packaged training programs fail to address the reality of impact-first organizations.
Peer settings offer a welcome alternative, making room for more candor and less posturing. Fellow leaders can provide advice and examples grounded in lived experience, not generic theory. Individuals are more likely to share what didn't work, the pivots they made and the emotional realities behind their decisions with others in similar situations.
Within the space of peer networks, leaders can solve problems collaboratively. They can test ideas, get feedback and work through possible solutions together rather than struggling in isolation to find answers.
For nonprofits and social enterprises working in rural or isolated areas, or in regions lacking a strong support infrastructure, access to experts of any kind can be limited or nonexistent. Leaders might participate in accelerator or incubator programs at the outset of their ventures, but finding sustained support and training can be difficult.
Community lies at the heart of every successful peer network. As the Stanford Social Innovation Review has said, 'What distinguishes peer-driven change ... is that it emphasizes people's mutuality, where peers share information, connections, and funding to achieve their goals.' Building community is crucial for creating the mutual support and trust that allow peers to truly listen to and learn from one another.
A Peer Network In Action
I had the privilege of witnessing a powerful example of peer-driven change last March at our organization's inaugural Entrepreneur Summit in Nairobi.
The summit brought together a group of distinguished entrepreneurs from 15 countries around the world who are building successful, impactful organizations. Peer-led sessions focused on leadership, scaling and navigating current funding challenges. Participants built valuable connections with like-minded individuals who shared a passion for innovation, entrepreneurship and mission-driven impact.
One of the most unexpectedly fun and powerful sessions at the summit was on 'Biggest Failings Stories.' Three seasoned social entrepreneurs, all considered success stories, each shared one of their most painful recent failures—not an early-career failure, but something that happened within the past year. Following this brave demonstration of vulnerability, they invited others in the room to share their stories and even offered a small prize for 'the most impressive failure.'
At least 15 entrepreneurs stood up to describe their 'best' failures, with the 'winner' telling a harrowing story of how relying on a verbal funding agreement with a high-net-worth investor went disastrously wrong.
In another peer-led session, based on the Brain Trust concept originated by Pixar, breakout group members presented a business challenge, then voted on which issue to focus on more deeply. One entrepreneur, who had been experiencing serious setbacks and was considering giving up, talked in depth about the challenge.
Others in the group listened attentively, then asked questions, intended to inspire further exploration rather than offer specific advice. The entrepreneur was able to think about the problem from different angles. Her peers' perspectives helped her approach investors with renewed focus and confidence, which helped her secure funding soon after the summit.
What made this event different from typical conferences for entrepreneurs?
• It was co-created by and for entrepreneurs of impact-first organizations.
• It focused on personal leadership, shared challenges and collective wisdom.
• It used peer-led sessions and deep listening to surface insights and forge connections.
Rethinking Leadership Development
The Entrepreneur Summit wasn't a one-off event. It reflects a broader movement toward decentralized, leader-driven learning and action. And it points the way toward an ongoing support system—a vibrant, multifaceted community—able to drive changemaking leaders' social and environmental impact at scale.
Every player in the nonprofit and social enterprise ecosystem has a role to play in making peer-driven leadership a core feature of our mutual efforts. Here are some concrete steps to consider:
• Reframe leadership from the lone hero archetype to a model of community-based support.
• Integrate peer coaching or reciprocal mentoring programs into existing fellowships, accelerators and incubators.
• Convene regular gatherings of leaders who are working on similar issues, and include structured peer learning protocols.
• Fund relationship-building as a strategy, not a side effect, by allocating funding for cohort formation, peer retreats and travel stipends that allow leaders to meet together in person.
• Leverage digital platforms (secure chat groups, video calls, dashboards) alongside in-person activities to maintain consistent communication, especially for geographically dispersed organizations. Investigate the development of digital tools specifically designed for impact sector peer learning.
I invite all nonprofits, impact funders and other ecosystem participants to rethink how we approach leadership development and support for leaders of impact organizations. We need to create more opportunities for those closest to the work to learn from each other—not as a nice-to-have extra or left to the whims of serendipity, but as a strategic imperative.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Target's CEO is stepping down as customers turn away
Target CEO Brian Cornell is stepping down after 11 years at the retailer, as the company faces slumping sales and backlash to its retreat on DEI. Cornell's departure was widely expected. Some industry analysts believed Target should bring in an outside voice to lead the company, but it opted for an internal candidate: Cornell will be replaced on February 1, 2026, by Michael Fiddelke, Target's current chief operating officer. Fiddelke started as an intern at Target and has been at the company for 20 years. Fiddelke was chosen from a 'strong list of external and internal candidates,' Cornell said on a call with analysts Wednesday, adding that he is the 'right candidate to lead our business back to growth.' Cornell will stay on as executive chairman. He took over in 2014 and revitalized Target, overseeing a strategy to remodel stores and strengthen the chain's online business to compete with Amazon. But Target has been in a deep slump for years, a result largely of its own strategic missteps. The company has struggled as customers have purchased less of its home goods and clothing. Target has also faced intense competition from Walmart, Amazon and Costco. Target on Wednesday reported sales fell for the third-straight quarter. Shares fell 10% in premarket trading. Target's (TGT) stock is among the worst performing companies in the S&P 500 this year. Target's stock drop reflects many investors' belief that the chain needed to go in a new direction with its choice of CEO. Some analysts criticized Target's board for choosing an insider who has helped develop Target's current strategy. 'This an internal appointment that does not necessarily remedy the problems of entrenched groupthink and the inward-looking mindset that have plagued Target for years,' Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail, said in a note to clients Wednesday. 'Target, which used to be very attuned to consumer demand, has lost its grip on delivering for the American shopper.' DEI retreat and shopper slowdown The last three years have been unkind to target, but 2025 has been particularly tumultuous. Earlier this year, the company ended some of its DEI programs. The decision angered supporters of diversity and inclusion policies, who felt blindsided by Target. Customers online protested Target's decision, and Anne and Lucy Dayton, the daughters of one of Target's co-founders, called the company's actions 'a betrayal.' Target acknowledged its move hurt its sales. 'People re-evaluated and started driving extra miles to go to other places,' Rev. Jamal Bryant, who led a boycott against Target, told CNN. 'We felt like it was a stark betrayal.' Target wasn't the only company to roll back DEI policies, but came under more pressure because it had more deeply ingrained diversity and inclusion programs into the core of its business. Target also has a more progressive base of customers than many competitors. Tariffs and a consumer slowdown have put even more pressure on Target. Target is known for its trendier items, and the chain stocks more nonessential merchandise than its competitors. More than half of Target's merchandise is discretionary. But that merchandise has slumped as shoppers spend more on essentials such as food and household basics. Around half of Walmart's business, for example, comes from groceries. Target also imports about half of its merchandise, compared to roughly 33% at Walmart, so it needs to raise prices at almost double the rate of Walmart to mitigate the tariff impact, Bank of America analyst Robert Ohmes said in a report this week. Rocky tenure Target's recent struggles are a reversal of Cornell's early years at the retailer. In 2018, Target reported its best results in a decade. The following year, Cornell was named CNN Business' CEO of the Year for leading a turnaround at Target. The company thrived at a time when many brick-and-mortar stores were closing. 'Target has earned a place in the retail winners' circle by investing in our business and staying true to our guests and our purpose,' Cornell told CNN in 2019. Target also boomed during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 as shoppers rushed to stores to purchase essentials, home goods, office supplies and other merchandise. The company's home goods also proved popular as stuck-at-home Americans looked to improve their living spaces when they couldn't venture outside. But Target began to falter in 2022. The chain bought too much merchandise, so it had to deal with a glut of unsold inventory just as decades-high inflation pressured the wallets of many of its shoppers. Post-pandemic, shoppers stopped buying up treadmills, TVs and home goods – especially as inflation started to bite. A year later, activists and customers on the right attacked Target on social media for its LGBTQ-themed merchandise during Pride Month. Target employees faced threats over items such as bathing suits designed for transgender people, and the company removed them from stores. Misinformation spread on social media that the swimsuits were marketed to children, which they were not. The backlash led to a drop in sales and lawsuits from Republican-aligned legal groups. 'We must improve' Fiddelke said Target 'must improve' and the company is 'not realizing our full potential right now' on a call with analysts Wednesday. He outlined a plan to bring trendier merchandise to Target, make its stores more appealing to visit and to invest in technology. This includes an initiative called 'Fun 101,' which seeks to capitalize on the latest trends for electronics and home goods. The company has been able to navigate tariffs so far, he said, and will raise prices as a last resort. Target has changed some of its merchandise selection to mitigate the impact of tariffs. Analysts are mixed as to whether Target's issues are easily solvable or if drastic changes are necessary to revive to the business. 'Target's long-term outlook is deteriorating,' Ohmes said. 'Target is falling behind peers and has tougher challenges.' CNN's Ryan Young contributed to this article. This story has been updated with additional developments and context.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Italian Restaurant Group Just Filed For Bankruptcy, Threatening All Of Its Locations Across 20 States
On Monday, popular Italian restaurant group Bravo Brio filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the state of Florida, joining the slew of other popular Italian restaurant chains like Buca di Beppo, which have also filed for court protection in recent years due to rising economic pressures and changing consumer spending habits. And this is not the first bankruptcy go-around for Bravo Brio. The restaurant group behind Bravo! Italian Kitchen and Brio Italian Grille, known for their authentic yet accessible Italian classics like creamy seafood risotto and hearty pasta dishes, has changed hands multiple times, most recently in 2020, when the restaurant group last filed for bankruptcy and was bought by Earl Enterprises. At the time, over 50 of the restaurant group's locations were closed. Now, this week's filing news threatens to shut down more of the still-standing 31 Brio and 25 Bravo locations. It's highly likely that this will mean more restaurant shutdowns, specifically locations that are underperforming financially. This will add to several restaurant spots already closed this year, such as mall locations in Virginia and other states. In a press release regarding the filing via Restaurant Dive, Bravo Brio stated that like other dining groups, it plans to use the "bankruptcy as a tool for restructuring," referencing reasons for recent financial struggles including but not limited to pandemic-related restaurant shifts (such as the rise in fast-casual eateries), inflation, rising debt, and operational expenses. Read more: 15 Failed Restaurant Chains We Actually Miss The Restaurant Group Has Struggled To Stay Afloat Bravo! Italian Kitchen and Brio Italian Grille, which were first opened in Columbus, Ohio, in 1992, have beloved locations in cities from Cincinnati, Ohio, to Albuquerque, New Mexico. However, in addition to significant sales drops (we're talking just short of a 50% decline in the years since 2019) across their locations, the restaurant group has long struggled with paying down its debt. In 2020, when the group formerly owned by FoodFirst Global Holdings Inc. first filed for bankruptcy, it was reportedly carrying approximately $27 million in debt. Though current debts don't appear to be included in the recent press release, there have been several attempts to continue to improve the Italian restaurant group since Earl Enterprises came into the picture. The most recent attempts likely include bringing on Craig Miller as CEO just this past March. Robert Earl of Earl Enterprises noted (via Restaurant Business News) that Miller, the former CEO of big-time restaurant chains including Ruth's Chris Steakhouse and Uno, was brought on due to his "unparalleled expertise and strategic vision." It is not clear how else the bankruptcy filing will impact the business -- or if it will fix years of shaky business -- but it's likely that Bravo! Italian Kitchen and Brio Italian Grille locations across the country could very well close their doors in the months ahead. Read the original article on Tasting Table. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Just Exited Its Stake in T-Mobile and Loaded Up on an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Infrastructure Stock That's Risen 7,850% Since Its IPO
Key Points Berkshire exited the large mobile carrier T-Mobile, despite the fact the company has been executing well. Berkshire also disclosed a few mystery stocks that it purchased in the first quarter but chose to keep confidential until recently. One stock Berkshire bought is a traditional commodity company positioned as an artificial intelligence infrastructure play. 10 stocks we like better than Nucor › Warren Buffett's company Berkshire Hathaway recently filed its 13F form with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), disclosing what stocks the large conglomerate held at the end of the second quarter. Using these filings, investors can see what stocks Berkshire bought and sold in a three-month window and get a rare glimpse into the minds of some of the smartest investors in the world. Berkshire has been a bit muted in recent quarters, choosing to pile into cash. But the company did make some notable moves in the second quarter, selling one decent-sized position and loading up on an artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure stock. After a strong year, Berkshire calls it quits on T-Mobile The one position that Berkshire completely exited in the quarter was in the large mobile carrier T-Mobile (NASDAQ: TMUS). The company sold its entire position that had been valued at over $1 billion. Based on filings, Berkshire initiated its position in T-Mobile toward the end of 2020, and appears to have done well on the stock, which is up over 120% in the past five years. T-Mobile has also had a strong 2025, with the stock up about 16.5% (as of Aug. 15), and it recently reported strong second-quarter earnings. Diluted earnings per share of $2.84 rose about 14% year over year, while revenue jumped nearly 7%. Meanwhile, the company achieved some of its best-ever customer growth in the quarter, including 12% growth in its 5G broadband customer base, which is among the best in the industry. In 2023, T-Mobile initiated a dividend, which it has already grown significantly, and management's goal is to grow the quarterly dividend 10% annually. The team at Berkshire may simply be choosing to sell T-Mobile high. The stock is not far off from all-time highs and is now trading at a fairly high forward price-to-earnings ratio above 23. That's toward the higher end of where it has historically traded in recent years, and well above peers. The company has earned the valuation but Berkshire may see it as fairly priced right now. Berkshire has been secretly buying this AI infrastructure stock Many investors came into this 13F season excited about Berkshire once they realized that it would unveil some mystery stocks. Funds can request permission from the SEC to keep certain positions confidential for a certain amount of time. So Berkshire actually purchased Nucor (NYSE: NUE) in the first quarter, but the market only just found out about it in the company's second-quarter 13F. Berkshire's position in Nucor amounted to over $850 million at the end of the second quarter. Nucor is a steel company at its core. However, AI investors have gotten very interested because Nucor makes steel parts for data centers, which are in high demand to power and store all of the necessary data for large language models and AI applications. As a result of this and the way Nucor is positioned to support other burgeoning sectors, the stock has ripped close to 215% over the past five years and is up about 27% this year. Nucor's earnings through the first six months of the year are down significantly compared to last year, as the costs to make its steel products have risen. Investors were also disappointed by management's third-quarter guidance calling for "nominally lower" earnings, mainly due to margin compression in some of its segments. But the market expects President Donald Trump's 50% steel tariffs to benefit U.S. steel companies like Nucor, which will have an easier time raising prices because steel manufactured in other countries will be less competitive and more expensive. However, it could take time for higher prices to roll through. Nucor trades at about 17.5 times forward earnings, which I wouldn't necessarily call cheap in the steel sector. However, we have seen Buffett and his team get interested in U.S.-based commodity companies like oil and gas, perhaps due to a belief in increasing demand over time and a finite supply. Nucor could fit into this theme. Do the experts think Nucor is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Nucor make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends T-Mobile US. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Just Exited Its Stake in T-Mobile and Loaded Up on an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Infrastructure Stock That's Risen 7,850% Since Its IPO was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data