Opponents of Amazon distribution facility in Essex to rally ahead of development board meeting
The owners of an independent bookstore in Essex are asking residents opposed to an Amazon distribution center to rally Thursday ahead of a meeting of the town's development review board.
The Board's review of the proposed 107,00-square-foot distribution center in the Saxon Hill Industrial Park began last month. But after a four-hour public hearing marked by near-unanimous opposition, board members opted not to put Amazon's plans to a vote.
Tonight's Board meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m.
In a Facebook post Thursday morning, Michael DeSanto and Renee Reiner, owners of Phoenix Books Essex, said the rally will begin at 4:30 p.m. outside Essex Town Offices.
At March's meeting of the Board, a spokesperson for the development appeared via Zoom to defend the proposal, saying Amazon is already a part of the community.
'We're already here, we already have customers, we already have businesses selling on amazon. com,' the spokesperson said. 'This is kind of the final piece of that plywood to make sure that we can deliver the best service.'
Amazon is eyeing a roughly 23 acres of woodland and meadow, bordered by undeveloped land on three sides and a solar array to the south. The review board approved a 5-lot subdivision of the land, which was once mined for sand and used as a tree farm, on March 6.
The developer's site plan for the facility calls for parking for 211 cars and 271 delivery vans, as well as spaces for five trailers and five box trucks. The warehouse will have 11 loading docks. Amazon delivery drivers are expected to make a total of 90 trips in and out in the morning and another 82 in the afternoon.
The social media post noted that the site plan has not yet undergone an Act 250 review. But, DeSanto and Reiner said, the Board 'is unable to reject any proposal which passes all the regulations, regardless of who the end user happens to be.'
'We believe that Amazon will not give up without a fight,' they said. 'We intend to resist and disrupt that fight.
DeSanto and Reiner say they will be handing out free copies of 'How to Resist Amazon and Why,' an e-zine by an independent bookstore owner who argues that Amazon's 'business model relies on preying on local businesses.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Residents warned about the appearance of counterfeit bills
MERCER COUNTY, WV (WVNS) — Members of the community were advised to stay alert due to the appearance of counterfeit bills in the region. According to a post on the Chamber of Commerce of the Two Virginias' Facebook page, counterfeit $100 bills are being seen in the area. Virginia DMV warns customers about a text scam The post stated that the bills appear real, even when marked with a counterfeit detection pen, but the bills are fake. The Chamber of Commerce of the Two Virginias Facebook post stated that four stores were affected by the counterfeit money in Mercer County. According to the post, people and businesses are encouraged to be alert and keep an eye out when dealing with cash transactions. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You Thought Facebook Was Toxic Already, Now It's Replacing Its Human Moderators with AI
Few companies in the history of capitalism have amassed as much wealth and influence as Meta. A global superpower in the information space, Meta — the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads — has a market cap of $1.68 trillion at the time of writing, which for a rough sense of scale is more than the gross domestic product of Spain. In spite of its immense influence, none of its internal algorithms can be scrutinized by public watchdogs. Its host country, the United States, has largely turned a blind eye to its dealings in exchange for free use of Meta's vast surveillance capabilities. That lack of oversight coupled with Meta's near-omnipresence as a social utility has had devastating consequences throughout the world, manifesting in crises like the genocide of Muslims in Myanmar, or the systemic suppression of Palestinian rights organizations. How do you uncover the harms caused by one of the most powerful companies on earth? In the case of public violence, the evidence isn't hard to trace. However, Meta's unprecedented corporate dynasty also creates less obvious harms, which scores of scholars, researchers, and journalists are devoting entire careers to uncovering. One prominent group of said investigators is GLAAD, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, which recently released its annual report on social media safety, privacy, and expression for LGBTQ people. The report notes that Meta has undergone a "particularly extreme" ideological shift over the past year, adding harmful exceptions to its content moderation policies while disproportionately suppressing LGBTQ users and their content. The tech giant has also failed to give LGBTQ users sovereignty over their own personal data, which it collects, analyzes, and wields to generate huge profits. While Meta collects all of our data — from which it draws over 95 percent of its revenue — the practice is particularly harmful to LGBTQ users, who then have to contend with algorithmic biases, non-consensual outing, harassment, and in some countries state oppression. "It's a dangerous time, certainly for trans people, who as a minority have been so ridiculously maligned, but also a dangerous time for gay people, openly bi[sexual] people, people who are different in any way," says Sarah Roberts, a UCLA professor and Director of the Center for Critical Internet Inquiry. To address these shortcomings and the dangers they introduce, GLAAD made a number of recommendations. One key suggestion was to improve moderation "by providing training for all content moderators focused on LGBTQ safety, privacy and expression." The media advocacy group doesn't mince words, adding that "AI systems should be used to flag for human review, not for automated removals." However, it doesn't look like Meta got the message. Weeks after GLAAD issued its findings, internal Meta documents leaked to NPR revealed the company's plan to hand 90 percent of its privacy and integrity reviews over to "artificial intelligence." This will impact nearly every new feature introduced to its platforms, where human moderators would typically evaluate new features for risks to privacy and safety, and the wellbeing of user groups like minors, immigrants, and LGBTQ people. Meta's internal risk assessment is an already opaque process, and Roberts notes that government attempts at risk oversight, like the EU's Digital Services Act, are likewise a labyrinth of filings which are largely dictated by the social media companies themselves. AI, chock full of biases and prone to errors — as admitted by Meta's own AI chief — is certain to make the situation even worse. Earlier this week, meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal revealed Meta's plans to fully automate advertising via the company's generative AI software, which will allow advertisers to "fully create and target ads" directly, with no human in the loop. This includes hyper-personalized ads, writes the WSJ, "so that users see different versions of the same ad in real time, based on factors such as geolocation." Data hoarders like Meta — which track you even when you're not using its platforms — have long been able to profile LGBTQ users based on gender identify and sexual orientation, including those who aren't publicly out. Removing any human from these already sinister practices serves to streamline operations and distance Meta from its own actions — "we didn't out gay users living under an oppressive government," the company can say, "even if our AI did." It's no coincidence that Meta had already disbanded its "Responsible AI" team as early as 2023. At the root of these decisions — Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's right wing turn notwithstanding — is the calculated drive to maximize revenue. "If there's no reason to rigorously moderate harmful content, then why pay so many content moderators? Why engage researchers to look into the circulation of this kind of content?" observes Roberts. "There ends up being a real cost savings there." "One of the things I've always said is that content moderation of social media is not primarily about protecting people, it's about brand management," she told Futurism. "It's about the platform managing its brand in order to make the most hospitable environment for advertisers." Sometimes these corporate priorities line up with progressive causes, like LGBTQ user safety or voter registration. But when they don't, Roberts notes, "dollars are dollars." "We are looking at multibillion-dollar companies, the most capitalized companies in the world, who have operated with impunity for many, many years," she said. "How do you convince them that they should care, when other powerful sectors are telling them the opposite?" More on Meta: Meta's Platforms Have Become a Cesspool of Hatred Against Queer People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
D-BOX Technologies Announces CEO Change
MONTREAL, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- D-BOX Technologies Inc. ('D-BOX' or the 'Corporation') (TSX: DBO), a corporation with more than 25 years of experience delivering immersive motion experiences in movie theatres, sim racing, gaming, simulation training and more, today announced a mutual agreement with Sébastien Mailhot, its Chief Executive Officer, under which Mr. Mailhot will be stepping down, and Naveen Prasad will assume the role of interim Chief Executive Officer effective as of the close of business on June 10, 2025. D-BOX extends its gratitude to Sébastien Mailhot for his dedicated service and invaluable contributions. During his tenure, Mr. Mailhot achieved significant and critical financial milestones, helping the Corporation deliver both revenue growth and improved profitability. 'On behalf of the entire Board of Directors and management team, I want to extend our sincere thanks and appreciation to Sébastien Mailhot for his dedication and the positive impact he had on D-BOX,' said Brigitte Bourque, Chair of the Board of Directors. 'This mutual decision allows for a smooth transition and positions the Corporation to build on the financial progress achieved under Sébastien's leadership, as we look to further unlock D-BOX's potential. We wish Sébastien all the best,' stated Mrs. Bourque. With Naveen Prasad's appointment, the Board is reinforcing its commitment to focused execution. A seasoned media and technology executive, Mr. Prasad brings over 25 years of experience driving growth, innovation, and organizational change. He is the Co-Founder of SoundIMAGE, an AI-powered localization company, and Founder of the media consultancy firm Impossible Objects. As President of VICE Media Canada, he led a comprehensive restructuring across all divisions. He was also a key architect in building Elevation Pictures into Canada's leading independent film distributor and held senior executive roles at Entertainment One and Alliance Films. A current D-BOX Board member, Mr. Prasad steps into the CEO role with deep operational insight and a proven record of leadership and change. 'D-BOX is at an important inflection point, and I'm stepping into this role with a sharp focus on disciplined execution,' said Naveen Prasad. 'As a current independent Board member, I've seen the progress firsthand and understand the opportunities ahead. I look forward to working closely with the team to build on that momentum and ensure we're aligned around clear priorities and strategic outcomes.' Brigitte Bourque added, 'Naveen's deep understanding of the business and the industry, combined with a track record of leadership and transformation, makes him well positioned to lead D-BOX forward with focus and clarity. The Board has full confidence in his ability to strengthen operational effectiveness, support the team, and guide the next phase of the Corporation's evolution. His appointment reflects our shared commitment to delivering results and advancing the Corporation's priorities.' In addition, D-BOX is pleased to announce the appointment of Lori Vaudry Tersigni as an independent director. Mrs. Vaudry Tersigni brings extensive operational and leadership experience, having served as Senior Vice-President of Strategic Planning & Operational Effectiveness at Morneau Shepell (now Telus Health), and previously holding multiple executive roles at CIBC across strategy, governance, HR, and technology. She currently serves as a board member and Chair of the Human Resources Compensation Committee at the Canadian Securities Exchange. Mrs. Vaudry Tersigni holds a BA in Industrial Relations from McGill, an MBA from McMaster and holds both the Institute of Corporate Directors and Global Competent Boards designations, with the latter focused on ESG leadership. The Corporation further announced that it expects to release its financial results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. ABOUT D-BOX TECHNOLOGIES INC.D-BOX Technologies Inc. (TSX: DBO) is a global leader in haptic technology, delivering immersive motion experiences that engage the body and spark the imagination. Our patented systems synchronize motion, vibration, and texture with on-screen content, enhancing storytelling across various platforms. With over 25 years of innovation, D-BOX's solutions are utilized in movie theaters, sim racing, and simulation & training. Headquartered in Montreal, Canada, with offices in Los Angeles, USA, D-BOX continues to redefine how audiences experience media worldwide. Visit FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: D-BOX TECHNOLOGIES Le BlancVice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate SecretaryD-BOX Technologies DISCLAIMER REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information included in this press release may constitute 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information may include, among others, statements regarding the future plans, activities, objectives, operations, strategy, business outlook, and financial performance and condition of the Corporation, or the assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In this document, words such as 'may', 'would', 'could', 'will', 'likely', 'believe', 'expect', 'anticipate', 'intend', 'plan', 'estimate' and similar words and the negative form thereof are used to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether, or the times at or by which, such future performance will be achieved. Forward-looking information, by its very nature, is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and is based on several assumptions which give rise to the possibility that actual results could differ materially from the Corporation's expectations expressed in or implied by such forward-looking information and no assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking information will transpire or occur, including but not limited to the future plans, activities, objectives, operations, strategy, business outlook and financial performance and condition of the Corporation. Forward-looking information is provided in this press release for the purpose of giving information about Management's current expectations and plans and allowing investors and others to get a better understanding of the Corporation's operating environment. However, readers are cautioned that it may not be appropriate to use such forward-looking information for any other purpose. Forward-looking information provided in this document is based on information available at the date hereof and/or management's good-faith belief with respect to future events and are subject to known or unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond the Corporation's control. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Corporation's expectations expressed in or implied by the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to, the ability to complete a successful CEO transition and build on the current momentum and alignment around clear priorities and strategic outcomes. These and other risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations expressed in or implied by the forward-looking information are discussed under 'Risk Factors' in the Corporation's annual information form for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at Except as may be required by Canadian securities laws, the Corporation does not intend nor does it undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information contained in this press release to reflect subsequent information, events, circumstances or otherwise. The Corporation cautions readers that the risks described above are not the only ones that could have an impact on it. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Corporation or that the Corporation currently deems to be immaterial may also have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's business, financial condition or results of in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
